Oh oh it might be this oneIn post 1897, Annie Edison wrote:They increased effort to increase their pull in thread?
If it weren't for her being frustrated this would almost be like a fun game of charades. I bet it would be easier f2f
Oh oh it might be this oneIn post 1897, Annie Edison wrote:They increased effort to increase their pull in thread?
In post 1897, Annie Edison wrote:They increased effort to increase their pull in thread?
In post 993, Medea the Alien wrote:Reason we were holding back: RNJESUS gave us the worst possible draw given my recent string of games.
So, outright, we know for sure there is at most ONE scum demon. Why? We're a STARTING demon. Our role is extremely useless, as hopefully correctly conveyed to finches, a la Estelle the poison doc in Tales of Vesperia. My role does SOMETHING at night, not gonna say what yet since it'll be in our flip, but we self-roleblock if visited in any way shape or form. You know, the night action magnet guy, me, hi, drew this one. So completely useless. We want zero ambiguity about our role's outcomes so we'll be conditionally posting targets based on alignment of flip before hammers.
Locking us in as an early hardpush to mislim, or early night kill, would give scum a guaranteed lock in extremely early towards that alternate win condition. Based upon the conventional wisdom of "no victories in a mini theme until night 3/ day 4" we assume there are 8 shards in play right now, give or take. We are assuming that scum has a total of 4, in a 2/1/1 split, but that's pure conjecture worst case scenario on our parts. Having two additional demon-degrees of safety completely turns this on its head though. Probably more singleton shards in circulation to let people power up, and since we only need to leave five undemonified players around, there's more room to power up town players if we can.
Depending on how today's elimination goes would dictate scum strategy, but regardless IF there is a desharding role in play, we would request it be used on us tonight. As we said, we don't see a world where we aren't targeted by scum or well-meaning town at this point, which makes us functionally useless as a PR. Not sure if we have a power drawback because we started 'powered up' or what, but that's where we are.
Co-written post, ten points to anyone interested enough to point out where PA took over.
In post 1905, Annie Edison wrote:You think they swapped their wincon plans and adjusted their play accordingly?Haven’t they been a bit too transparent about it though?
You're 50/50 with me your postsIn post 1906, Snarky Fishes wrote:I also think there are scum (me included) that have a mean streak. I genuinely think some players become very opinionated when they become scum and start to judge other players in an attempt to achieve their win condition by attempting to leverage control through, uh.
What's it called? A sort of self-righteous super aura field that makes you left alone and hard to engage with and people get all scared of interacting with you so they just town bin you instead because your conduct is impeccable or else you couldn't be doing all that fake judging you do without being called out on it.
-Bell.
In post 1910, unwnd wrote:You're 50/50 with me your postsIn post 1906, Snarky Fishes wrote:I also think there are scum (me included) that have a mean streak. I genuinely think some players become very opinionated when they become scum and start to judge other players in an attempt to achieve their win condition by attempting to leverage control through, uh.
What's it called? A sort of self-righteous super aura field that makes you left alone and hard to engage with and people get all scared of interacting with you so they just town bin you instead because your conduct is impeccable or else you couldn't be doing all that fake judging you do without being called out on it.
-Bell.
This is one of them I liked
you disagree?In post 1911, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 1910, unwnd wrote:You're 50/50 with me your postsIn post 1906, Snarky Fishes wrote:I also think there are scum (me included) that have a mean streak. I genuinely think some players become very opinionated when they become scum and start to judge other players in an attempt to achieve their win condition by attempting to leverage control through, uh.
What's it called? A sort of self-righteous super aura field that makes you left alone and hard to engage with and people get all scared of interacting with you so they just town bin you instead because your conduct is impeccable or else you couldn't be doing all that fake judging you do without being called out on it.
-Bell.
This is one of them I liked
In post 1912, Snarky Fishes wrote:you disagree?In post 1911, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:In post 1910, unwnd wrote:You're 50/50 with me your postsIn post 1906, Snarky Fishes wrote:I also think there are scum (me included) that have a mean streak. I genuinely think some players become very opinionated when they become scum and start to judge other players in an attempt to achieve their win condition by attempting to leverage control through, uh.
What's it called? A sort of self-righteous super aura field that makes you left alone and hard to engage with and people get all scared of interacting with you so they just town bin you instead because your conduct is impeccable or else you couldn't be doing all that fake judging you do without being called out on it.
-Bell.
This is one of them I liked
i realized i didnt have confidence in a lot of my reads cos i havent done any analysis. by presenting my thoughts in a polished and checked manner im hoping i can further engage and solidify my solving. having some summary of my genuine thoughts is smth i think i've been lackingIn post 1921, unwnd wrote:What made you want to try again?