Wait, why though?In post 1349, MathBlade wrote:As I said, both me and my partner were top wagons. Means gamestate is bad. Means active scum.In post 1346, GeneralWu wrote:MathBlade, why did you claim again?
Needed to claim to fix D1 as D1 is most impressionable.
when you put it in this order it made sense, however, then I realized the quoted posts were completely out of order and all posted around the same time with the last post being the actual first post, which threw me for a loop.In post 1139, MalcolmTucker wrote:In post 712, Yeet wrote:Datisi is the leading wagon I believe despite taking up a lot of space and actually playing the game. To my understanding No one townreads him except one person who knows him more intimately than others, it seems. He is not a polarizing slot as much as a universally southnull slot.
Wu seems to blend into the background more with less content/words ratio.
Monkey is a more polarizing slot rather than purely getting flak. I could be biased since I was one of the monkey defenders.In post 715, Yeet wrote:I think we should mount the pressure on Datisi sooner rather than later.
Let’s get some wagons going, guys. I don’t want to stall around all day and move last minute and scramble when we can just go sheep sheep sheep.Re Yeet - I don't think they've been particularly scummy yet and their early assertions felt bold for a mafia who'd want to blend in, but this sequence of posts was really, really bad. At one moment claiming Datisi is the most heavily suspected player and then in the next post claiming not enough pressure is going on them. Which is it?In post 708, Yeet wrote:It is interesting that Datisi is pretty much universally very unpopular today (except in Aristeia’s eyes, but I worry she may be biased. Nevertheless I am still keeping her opinion very much in mind because I presume she knows him well).
Is he normally this unpopular at gamestart?
I do note Yeet's not posted at all since this sequence either. I dunno, if Yeet is mafia then they may have felt they went in too heavily in the early stages and want to sit back later. Although it could be more of a timezone thing depending on when they post, but that's around 17 hours now.
That’s time scum are in control and town are misleadIn post 1350, GeneralWu wrote:Wait, why though?In post 1349, MathBlade wrote:As I said, both me and my partner were top wagons. Means gamestate is bad. Means active scum.In post 1346, GeneralWu wrote:MathBlade, why did you claim again?
Needed to claim to fix D1 as D1 is most impressionable.
I feel like there was still plenty of time to wait for the wagons to shift away from you guys.
this is straight-up a scum manipulation postIn post 1344, VP Baltar wrote:Vote Wu and stop being a coward. Prove me wrong.In post 1341, Nero Cain wrote:told u guys VP was scumIn post 1339, VP Baltar wrote:Was just about to say this. Check when I was trying to get Nero to vote wu after he was going on all game about how scummy Wu was. Nero didn't have the guts to vote him when it counted.In post 1338, MathBlade wrote:I am feeling Nero scum IF Wu is.In post 1336, fua wrote:Mathblade already claimed by the time Nero fake claimed, though. This feels like another cheap gotcha.
This feels like bad bus.
Interesting.In post 1356, fireisredsir wrote:this got kinda wild. i feel like math is making assumptions about the game state and how it developed that are not really based on much and are not really accurate. but i think the whole "go go go disrupt scum plans" thing is kinda neat in principle at least
VOTE: tenebro
Uh just pointing out that we literally *just* saw an example where the day1 fakeclaim masons were town and scum, and respectively lasted until n4 and day5 respectively (and that you were being quite difficult abt flipping the scum half ....)In post 1287, MathBlade wrote:No I clearly don’t because D1 mason claiming as scum is Suicide.
Why fire?In post 1308, Nero Cain wrote:honestly? assuming the mason claim is real, monkeyvAri prob was a TvT and Fire is prob scum here.
...In post 1337, Nero Cain wrote:can't he just be like a Vi? (im getting cold feet)
Why fua? They don’t seem scummy.In post 1359, skitter30 wrote:Uh just pointing out that we literally *just* saw an example where the day1 fakeclaim masons were town and scum, and respectively lasted until n4 and day5 respectively (and that you were being quite difficult abt flipping the scum half ....)In post 1287, MathBlade wrote:No I clearly don’t because D1 mason claiming as scum is Suicide.
~
Anyways i dont particularly believe this but i'll let night actions sort it out
VOTE: fua
Didn't I tell you to read my posts b4 you tried to talk to me?In post 1360, skitter30 wrote:Why fire?In post 1308, Nero Cain wrote:honestly? assuming the mason claim is real, monkeyvAri prob was a TvT and Fire is prob scum here.
1. your wagon wasn't very significant once nordom replaced out. i don't think it was going anywhere. monkey one was tho, it was shifting towards monkey vs wu. datisi actually had a decent amount of votes at various points but i don't think he is generally scumread, doubt it would have been a lim there. maybe I'm biased there tho cause I scumread most of the people on his wagon. i also don't think it's clear or guaranteed at all that wu/datisi were the main wagons and scum shifted to you/monkey. things were still pretty fluid, and obviously there is the possibility that all 4 of those are town in which case scum wouldn't care which wagon was leading.In post 1358, MathBlade wrote:Interesting.In post 1356, fireisredsir wrote:this got kinda wild. i feel like math is making assumptions about the game state and how it developed that are not really based on much and are not really accurate. but i think the whole "go go go disrupt scum plans" thing is kinda neat in principle at least
VOTE: tenebro
What assumption do you think is wrong?
And why do you TR Wu?
And why do you agree tene is scum despite my “assumptions being bad”?
I'm clearly responding to the post above me.In post 1361, skitter30 wrote:...In post 1337, Nero Cain wrote:can't he just be like a Vi? (im getting cold feet)
Then join the Wu wagon?In post 1364, fireisredsir wrote:1. your wagon wasn't very significant once nordom replaced out. i don't think it was going anywhere. monkey one was tho, it was shifting towards monkey vs wu. datisi actually had a decent amount of votes at various points but i don't think he is generally scumread, doubt it would have been a lim there. maybe I'm biased there tho cause I scumread most of the people on his wagon. i also don't think it's clear or guaranteed at all that wu/datisi were the main wagons and scum shifted to you/monkey. things were still pretty fluid, and obviously there is the possibility that all 4 of those are town in which case scum wouldn't care which wagon was leading.In post 1358, MathBlade wrote:Interesting.In post 1356, fireisredsir wrote:this got kinda wild. i feel like math is making assumptions about the game state and how it developed that are not really based on much and are not really accurate. but i think the whole "go go go disrupt scum plans" thing is kinda neat in principle at least
VOTE: tenebro
What assumption do you think is wrong?
And why do you TR Wu?
And why do you agree tene is scum despite my “assumptions being bad”?
2. i don't. pretty neutral on him. thought he was a LHF wagon but ended up kinda coming around to thinking he could be a decent lim. still don't really scumread him tho
3. i've thought tene was scum basically all game, has nothing to do with you
Please stay on the shiny Wu wagon <3 I mean you could wait for VP to call you chicken for moving off
EbwopIn post 1367, MathBlade wrote:Then join the Wu wagon?In post 1364, fireisredsir wrote:1. your wagon wasn't very significant once nordom replaced out. i don't think it was going anywhere. monkey one was tho, it was shifting towards monkey vs wu. datisi actually had a decent amount of votes at various points but i don't think he is generally scumread, doubt it would have been a lim there. maybe I'm biased there tho cause I scumread most of the people on his wagon. i also don't think it's clear or guaranteed at all that wu/datisi were the main wagons and scum shifted to you/monkey. things were still pretty fluid, and obviously there is the possibility that all 4 of those are town in which case scum wouldn't care which wagon was leading.In post 1358, MathBlade wrote:Interesting.In post 1356, fireisredsir wrote:this got kinda wild. i feel like math is making assumptions about the game state and how it developed that are not really based on much and are not really accurate. but i think the whole "go go go disrupt scum plans" thing is kinda neat in principle at least
VOTE: tenebro
What assumption do you think is wrong?
And why do you TR Wu?
And why do you agree tene is scum despite my “assumptions being bad”?
2. i don't. pretty neutral on him. thought he was a LHF wagon but ended up kinda coming around to thinking he could be a decent lim. still don't really scumread him tho
3. i've thought tene was scum basically all game, has nothing to do with you
If we go with your assumption (which a mod VCA doesn’t seem to support) then the monkey wagon v Wu is either TvS or TvT.
Knowing which illuminates what happened there.
If you disagree those (Wu/Datisi) what were the main wagons which happened?
KIn post 1363, Nero Cain wrote:Didn't I tell you to read my posts b4 you tried to talk to me?In post 1360, skitter30 wrote:Why fire?In post 1308, Nero Cain wrote:honestly? assuming the mason claim is real, monkeyvAri prob was a TvT and Fire is prob scum here.
So then you’ve been pushing town Wu all game and never voting them and you now townread Wu because…?In post 1370, Nero Cain wrote:naw, p sure everyone u scumread is town. i know i am