Open 861: The Turing Test [game over]
Forum rules
- Radical Rat
-
Radical Rat They/ThemMafia Scum
- Radical Rat
They/Them- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4523
- Joined: November 22, 2015
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: Space Colony ARK
Dear God, this whole "I don't get scumread" thing is insufferable.
I don't think it's necessarily scummy, because the same thing happened somewhat in Terminator, but it IS obnoxious and makes the game way harder to follow for anyone else.
Anyway,
VOTE: Greeting
Ignoring the actual substance of posts in favor of superficial "tells" is probably as scummy as it's gonna get D1.- Loki Dokie
-
Loki Dokie He/HimMafia Scum
- Loki Dokie
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2280
- Joined: December 20, 2019
- Pronoun: He/Him
This post is kind of scummy, Hedgeyness is often a scumtell, My reasoning for voting Roden is bad but he isn’t actually townie either. Like wtf?In post 425, Greeting wrote:So apparently analysing and votingRodenshould be my priority now. Let's look at his ISO.
Rodenis emotional when town, hates being wrongly accused, fiercely fights back when wrongly accused.
Rodenis much colder when scum.
This shouldn't be hard.
His game start was... bad. I know that he tends to get eliminated Day 1 really often and he's limbait pretty much though. That's why I wanted to cut him some slack and give him a chance to prove himself and why I consciously decided to ignore his pre-existing 4 posts when I joined the game. Nonetheless, it also does feel like a convenient excuse to not make an entrance and sneak back in the game only once it's started.
I noticed thatLoki Dokieis being unusually aggressive in pursuingRodenfor essentailly a naked vote in 188. The justification being that:
This sounds like a very highly personal read and apparently un-outed alts are involved too, so it's also not provable. SorryIn post 406, Loki Dokie wrote:
If I’m somehow wrong on you, vote Roden. He has never wrongly sr me in any game ever. He’s one of those players like Mastina who never srs me as town.In post 402, Greeting wrote:
So you checked my random town game and decided that whatever it is doesn't match to what I'm doing here?In post 358, Loki Dokie wrote:VOTE: Greeting
I did a meta dive and based off of that, I think he could be scum here.
Mission failed successfully.Loki Dokie, but on the surface this is a bad reason to push a read so strongly. That is a minus for scumRodenin my books actually.
Still,Roden's attitude towards this game doesn't seem very towny.
Where's the scumhunting energy? All I see is never ending excuses for why there is none.In post 367, Roden wrote:
Ngl I opened up the browser when I got home, quoted the Loki post, and then just smoked and went on youtube for a few hours insteadIn post 363, Aristeia wrote:In post 352, Roden wrote:Posting just to say I'm not lurking, I've been dealing with a crisis with a friend and I'm more focused on that atm. I'll respond to stuff later tonight.
roden not actually following up feels pretty significantly +scum equity
What game were we both in where I was scum? Or is that just a general read?
VOTE: Greeting- Loki Dokie
-
Loki Dokie He/HimMafia Scum
- Loki Dokie
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2280
- Joined: December 20, 2019
- Pronoun: He/Him
Didn’t you say in 425 that you didn’t think Roden was scumhunting?In post 447, Greeting wrote:I need to take a break for a while, but this is a reminder to myself to look intoRoden's scumread offurtiveglance.- Dannflor
-
Dannflor he/himWhite Knight
- Dannflor
- Greeting
-
Greeting he/him; they/themMafia Scum
- Greeting
he/him; they/them- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1953
- Joined: August 28, 2021
- Pronoun: he/him; they/them
Wow. I just came back. The current push on me is so utterly horrible that I'm not sure if I even want to address it. I play like a robot, scumread someone for tone from a scumread page and try to read the thread carefully to err my mistakes?
I bet my ass there is scum on it. There's five of them after all.
I guess I understand them though. Eliminating a mafia today would mean that town only needs two points to win, and that puts them in a horrible position. So they'd rather put their necks out for LHF like me, because then they'll just manipulate the pairings with low posters.
Not going to waste my time arguing with this shit push, let's get to work.- Loki Dokie
-
Loki Dokie He/HimMafia Scum
- Loki Dokie
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2280
- Joined: December 20, 2019
- Pronoun: He/Him
If the push on you truly is this “horrible, then why tf wouldn’t you want to address it? If the reasons are bad, debunk them then but all of “this push on me is bad, scum on my wagon” etc, without addressing literally any of it, is really not compelling.In post 454, Greeting wrote:Wow. I just came back. The current push on me is so utterly horrible that I'm not sure if I even want to address it. I play like a robot, scumread someone for tone from a scumread page and try to read the thread carefully to err my mistakes?
I bet my ass there is scum on it. There's five of them after all.
I guess I understand them though. Eliminating a mafia today would mean that town only needs two points to win, and that puts them in a horrible position. So they'd rather put their necks out for LHF like me, because then they'll just manipulate the pairings with low posters.
Not going to waste my time arguing with this shit push, let's get to work.
If this actually is in fact a “shitpush”, I think you should be able to explain why.
The push on Kitty otoh actually is bad because he hasn’t actually done anything scummy but first you call RR a “potential deep wolf” for something entirely nia, hedge on Roden and then accuse him of making “excuses” for apparently not scumhunting and then want to look at his furtive case, he made BEFORE furtive unvoted him. Meanwhile, you haven’t argued why any of the reasoning for voting you is bad.- furtiveglance
-
furtiveglance Mafia Scum
- furtiveglance
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2887
- Joined: January 29, 2022
- Loki Dokie
-
Loki Dokie He/HimMafia Scum
- Loki Dokie
He/Him- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2280
- Joined: December 20, 2019
- Pronoun: He/Him
Oh sorry, I guess I mistakenly assumed that from this post.In post 387, furtiveglance wrote:
I was just chatting about the game in which you fakeclaimed Tracker, it's not why I scumread you.In post 384, Roden wrote:VOTE: Furtive
Furtive just misrep'd my play in a past game to justify his scum read on me. What makes it egregious is that we already had a conversation about this game before and doesn't have an excuse for suddenly not remembering the game correctly now.
He also misread me really badly that game and mindlessly tunneled me. Scum reading me this game before I really do much of anything shows a lack of reassessment or even any caution in making the same mistake again.In post 54, Roden wrote:
A bit yeah haha, it was a rough spot for town.In post 39, furtiveglance wrote:
Postgame got a bit heated in that one, LOL.In post 34, Roden wrote:
I did actually, in Newbie 2070.In post 33, furtiveglance wrote:
Did I see you fakeclaim Tracker in a game?In post 29, Roden wrote:
A little over a year, but the last time I played in the newbie queue was back in September.In post 22, whiskey delta wrote:How long has everyone been playing? Outta curiosity
I used to play a lot but it’s probably been about ~3 years since I did last. My home website went the way of the dodo sadly- Loki Dokie
-
Loki Dokie He/HimMafia Scum
- Loki Dokie
- Greeting
-
Greeting he/him; they/themMafia Scum
- Greeting
he/him; they/them- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1953
- Joined: August 28, 2021
- Pronoun: he/him; they/them
Fine. I am analysingIn post 455, Loki Dokie wrote:
If the push on you truly is this “horrible, then why tf wouldn’t you want to address it? If the reasons are bad, debunk them then but all of “this push on me is bad, scum on my wagon” etc, without addressing literally any of it, is really not compelling.In post 454, Greeting wrote:Wow. I just came back. The current push on me is so utterly horrible that I'm not sure if I even want to address it. I play like a robot, scumread someone for tone from a scumread page and try to read the thread carefully to err my mistakes?
I bet my ass there is scum on it. There's five of them after all.
I guess I understand them though. Eliminating a mafia today would mean that town only needs two points to win, and that puts them in a horrible position. So they'd rather put their necks out for LHF like me, because then they'll just manipulate the pairings with low posters.
Not going to waste my time arguing with this shit push, let's get to work.
If this actually is in fact a “shitpush”, I think you should be able to explain why.
The push on Kitty otoh actually is bad because he hasn’t actually done anything scummy but first you call RR a “potential deep wolf” for something entirely nia, hedge on Roden and then accuse him of making “excuses” for apparently not scumhunting and then want to look at his furtive case, he made BEFORE furtive unvoted him. Meanwhile, you haven’t argued why any of the reasoning for voting you is bad.furtiveglanceright now, but if you really want me to explain my actions deeper then here you go.
I don't play like a robot. I understand that it's said for the purpose of a mafia game, regardless of whetherfurtiveglanceis town or mafia, but I actually find this borderline offensive and I'm not going to dignify it with a response.
I stand by myRadical Ratread. In my experience, this is a player who is a deepwolf and I interpret the coded speech as a mask they wear to mask the awkwardness of having to write their first posts in a game. Being mafia is stressful, you need to watch your words much more than when you're town. Not only not to give yourself out, but also voting out a mafia is a lot more harmful to the mafia team because of their lesser numbers. Their response to my accusation was that they stopped the coded speech (354), and immediately went on the counteroffensive (355, 450), while dismissing the importance of my tell instead of even acknowledging it. Before you ask why I thinkRRis a potential deepwolf - the best answer I can give is gut/observation.
You're playing an extremely offensive (as in, the opposite of defensive) game and from what I've gathered, the core of your read on me is based on my entrance post. You might argue that you've caught inconsistency in 452, but chronologically your suspicion and even vote of me of me predates that post, which means that this isn't scumhunting, but looking for arguments to support an already pre-existing thesis. That's not how logic works, and the timing of your current vote suggests you're just riding the wave of suspicion on any townie you can find.
And I worry more about my reads being correct than consistent. If they're not, it means I reevaluated.
All in all, this is a shit push and the scum amongst the three of you have a lot to gain from miseliminating me today as it may not be possible for town to hold you accountable for this later in the game.- kutiplz
-
kutiplz They/ThemTownie
- kutiplz
They/Them- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: June 14, 2022
- Pronoun: They/Them
- kutiplz
-
kutiplz They/ThemTownie
- kutiplz
They/Them- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: June 14, 2022
- Pronoun: They/Them
Wait who are you
- kutiplz
-
kutiplz They/ThemTownie
- kutiplz
They/Them- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 77
- Joined: June 14, 2022
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Vivax
-
Vivax heMafia Scum
- Vivax
he- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1892
- Joined: May 28, 2022
- Pronoun: he
- Location: Austrian alps
I like this post. Could see myself voting RR today.In post 459, Greeting wrote:
Fine. I am analysingIn post 455, Loki Dokie wrote:
If the push on you truly is this “horrible, then why tf wouldn’t you want to address it? If the reasons are bad, debunk them then but all of “this push on me is bad, scum on my wagon” etc, without addressing literally any of it, is really not compelling.In post 454, Greeting wrote:Wow. I just came back. The current push on me is so utterly horrible that I'm not sure if I even want to address it. I play like a robot, scumread someone for tone from a scumread page and try to read the thread carefully to err my mistakes?
I bet my ass there is scum on it. There's five of them after all.
I guess I understand them though. Eliminating a mafia today would mean that town only needs two points to win, and that puts them in a horrible position. So they'd rather put their necks out for LHF like me, because then they'll just manipulate the pairings with low posters.
Not going to waste my time arguing with this shit push, let's get to work.
If this actually is in fact a “shitpush”, I think you should be able to explain why.
The push on Kitty otoh actually is bad because he hasn’t actually done anything scummy but first you call RR a “potential deep wolf” for something entirely nia, hedge on Roden and then accuse him of making “excuses” for apparently not scumhunting and then want to look at his furtive case, he made BEFORE furtive unvoted him. Meanwhile, you haven’t argued why any of the reasoning for voting you is bad.furtiveglanceright now, but if you really want me to explain my actions deeper then here you go.
I don't play like a robot. I understand that it's said for the purpose of a mafia game, regardless of whetherfurtiveglanceis town or mafia, but I actually find this borderline offensive and I'm not going to dignify it with a response.
I stand by myRadical Ratread. In my experience, this is a player who is a deepwolf and I interpret the coded speech as a mask they wear to mask the awkwardness of having to write their first posts in a game. Being mafia is stressful, you need to watch your words much more than when you're town. Not only not to give yourself out, but also voting out a mafia is a lot more harmful to the mafia team because of their lesser numbers. Their response to my accusation was that they stopped the coded speech (354), and immediately went on the counteroffensive (355, 450), while dismissing the importance of my tell instead of even acknowledging it. Before you ask why I thinkRRis a potential deepwolf - the best answer I can give is gut/observation.
You're playing an extremely offensive (as in, the opposite of defensive) game and from what I've gathered, the core of your read on me is based on my entrance post. You might argue that you've caught inconsistency in 452, but chronologically your suspicion and even vote of me of me predates that post, which means that this isn't scumhunting, but looking for arguments to support an already pre-existing thesis. That's not how logic works, and the timing of your current vote suggests you're just riding the wave of suspicion on any townie you can find.
And I worry more about my reads being correct than consistent. If they're not, it means I reevaluated.
All in all, this is a shit push and the scum amongst the three of you have a lot to gain from miseliminating me today as it may not be possible for town to hold you accountable for this later in the game.
I wonder if Kuti would agree.- Vivax
-
Vivax heMafia Scum
- Vivax
he- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1892
- Joined: May 28, 2022
- Pronoun: he
- Location: Austrian alps
Do I?In post 401, Greeting wrote:
There's not much of it. The thing withIn post 355, Radical Rat wrote:
Nothing to say on the actual substance of Vivax's posts?In post 323, Greeting wrote:Vivax seems less witty than usual.Vivaxis he likes to troll around. In this game he seems to be more invested and defensive, which I think for him is a bad sign.
I believed I had many faces in games. That's the point of playing it isn't it?- furtiveglance
-
furtiveglance Mafia Scum
- furtiveglance
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2887
- Joined: January 29, 2022
This reminds me, Greeting shading Vivax without showing a desire to vote them makes me happy with both as scumreads.In post 464, Vivax wrote:
Do I?In post 401, Greeting wrote:
There's not much of it. The thing withIn post 355, Radical Rat wrote:
Nothing to say on the actual substance of Vivax's posts?In post 323, Greeting wrote:Vivax seems less witty than usual.Vivaxis he likes to troll around. In this game he seems to be more invested and defensive, which I think for him is a bad sign.
I believed I had many faces in games. That's the point of playing it isn't it?- Radical Rat
-
Radical Rat They/ThemMafia Scum
- Radical Rat
They/Them- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4523
- Joined: November 22, 2015
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: Space Colony ARK
355 wasn't a "counteroffensive" until your response was bad. I actually found myself agreeing with a lot of your not-me reads, and asking for elaboration was me trying to find out if you were Town seeing the same things, or scum making things up, not an attack on you by itself. By handwaving away both the actual content of my posts, and of Vivax's, it gave the impression that you weren't actually engaging in good faith, and that's when I began scumreading you.In post 459, Greeting wrote:Their response to my accusation was that they stopped the coded speech (354), and immediately went on the counteroffensive (355, 450), while dismissing the importance of my tell instead of even acknowledging it.
And I did acknowledge your tell, with 354 which you haven't directly addressed. I stopped the gimmick after it caused issues with readability, but before you called me scum for it. If I were using it to hide as you claim, people struggling to read me through it would be a good thing, not a reason to stop.
I still don't think it would be a "tell" either way, but it would make more sense to push it in that case.- Radical Rat
-
Radical Rat They/ThemMafia Scum
- Radical Rat
They/Them- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4523
- Joined: November 22, 2015
- Pronoun: They/Them
- Location: Space Colony ARK
Also, most likely any wagon we make will have scum on it. With five scum it's absurd to think that they'll all defend each other and vote in blocs, especially when this setup has a strong emphasis on getting towncred early. "Scum on my wagon" is not an effective defense here.- Vivax
-
Vivax heMafia Scum
- Vivax
he- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1892
- Joined: May 28, 2022
- Pronoun: he
- Location: Austrian alps
You have ulterior motivations for scumreading me. I rarely see mafia alignments do that actually.In post 465, furtiveglance wrote:
This reminds me, Greeting shading Vivax without showing a desire to vote them makes me happy with both as scumreads.In post 464, Vivax wrote:
Do I?In post 401, Greeting wrote:
There's not much of it. The thing withIn post 355, Radical Rat wrote:
Nothing to say on the actual substance of Vivax's posts?In post 323, Greeting wrote:Vivax seems less witty than usual.Vivaxis he likes to troll around. In this game he seems to be more invested and defensive, which I think for him is a bad sign.
I believed I had many faces in games. That's the point of playing it isn't it?- Greeting
-
Greeting he/him; they/themMafia Scum
- Greeting
he/him; they/them- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1953
- Joined: August 28, 2021
- Pronoun: he/him; they/them
So,Rodenscumreadsfurtiveglancefor behavior from Newbie 2095. That was a fun game, where I pushed both of them off the hill. I think grudges could be in play here when it comes tofurtiveglance's push on me, but that's just a side observation.
In Newbie 2095,furtiveglancegot straight to work almost instantly. When pleasantries were over, around page 4, he started making early reads. By post 195, he had a full readslist. After that, he was very dedicated to the town cause.
In this game, his ISO is dominated by single, short posts, which give little insight as to what is his intention. It's more like just... loafing around. His reads are shallow, seemingly in random places. Earlier in the game,furtiveglance, attempted to questionAristeia(275, 276), which resulted inAristeiamaking a very towny, accurate observation post (374) which made me townbin her almost instantly. Interestingly enough, in spite of all the questioning,furtiveglancedid not react to 374 at all. This points slightly more towards mafiafurtiveglance, as the mafia explanation for this is that this wasn't genuine scumhunting, but putting on pressure for the show.
Now, as for whatRodenclaimed, I do see some merit in this claim. Looks like he pre-determinedRoden's alignment early on, and did not substantiate the claim (192).Rodendoes have a tendency to play more on the defensive than offensive. Still, the reaction onRoden's part is slightly exagerrated - but fits overall his emotional playstyle. It's like one of those things that slip away unconsciously. People may point out that you're emotional, you're trying to be more calm, but a slight overreaction on the side still happens from time to time. This works inRoden's favour here though.
(The post I am referring to is 252. The argument presented is like really unfitting too, becauseRodenis one of the most pocket-wary players I've ever played with on MafiaScum.)
Interestingly enough,furtiveglancenever votedRodendespite claiming he's scum and yet he points out the same about me andVivax. The argument itself is fair, but its usage in this context is manipulative. Here's the post in question.
He also goes to great lengths to pocket people. To the point where it looks ironic.In post 465, furtiveglance wrote: This reminds me, Greeting shading Vivax without showing a desire to vote them makes me happy with both as scumreads.
What I find probably the most weird is thatfurtiveglanceliterally lost a game of mafia to me as town and didn't use a single argument from that game to support his supposed scumread of me. Not sure about others, but I would definitely remember to use that kind of meta.
This is a much better and more convincing case thanRadical Ratto be fair.furtiveglance's ISO is chaotic and erratic, and does not have the level of insight he showed in Newbie 2095.
VOTE: furtiveglance- Greeting
-
Greeting he/him; they/themMafia Scum
- Greeting
he/him; they/them- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1953
- Joined: August 28, 2021
- Pronoun: he/him; they/them
- Greeting
-
Greeting he/him; they/themMafia Scum
- Greeting
he/him; they/them- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1953
- Joined: August 28, 2021
- Pronoun: he/him; they/them
My username on there is West. I didn't play many games there, like 4 at the most.In post 461, kutiplz wrote:Wait who are you
- GuiltyLion
-
GuiltyLion he/himSurvivor
- GuiltyLion
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12369
- Joined: August 19, 2015
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle, WA
gonna wait for a VC but I'm on board with the Greeting wagon and will vote there provided I'm not hammering. I agree with what RR & furtive are picking up on and calling out. every Greeting read and justification feels fake to me, people have touched on it a few times but Greeting's justification for scumreading/voting RR is bad - it feels like Greeting thought they could push RR over the early game gimmick and is ignoring any/all reasons to consider the gimmick NAI. I don't know if I have the right words/energy to describe it in detail but the way they continue to justify it in 459 feels rote, everything is built on the assumption that only mafia would pretend to be a robot in order to hide their alignment and Greeting isn't showing any self-awareness or doubt about the key assumptions in there (namely 1. town wouldn't pretend to be a robot, 2. the purpose of the character was to hide uncomfortableness).
454 feels like an AtE survival post, also why does Greeting see themself as LHF, in my last game with them they were widely townread and NK'd because they weren't limmable.
Also, I didn't like this either:
feels over-explainy and self-conscious over not commenting on Roden on entry.In post 425, Greeting wrote:I know that he tends to get eliminated Day 1 really often and he's limbait pretty much though. That's why I wanted to cut him some slack and give him a chance to prove himself and why I consciously decided to ignore his pre-existing 4 posts when I joined the game.
Speaking of, I TR Roden, not at a bet-the-game-on-town tier but enough to not want to lim there today
UNVOTE:"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"- GuiltyLion
-
GuiltyLion he/himSurvivor
- GuiltyLion
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12369
- Joined: August 19, 2015
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle, WA
why do you think that post comes from town and not scum?In post 463, Vivax wrote:I like this post. Could see myself voting RR today.
I wonder if Kuti would agree.
and why did you bring up Kuti specifically?"I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away"- GuiltyLion
-
GuiltyLion he/himSurvivor
- GuiltyLion
he/him- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12369
- Joined: August 19, 2015
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle, WA
actually I also just noticed that this:
is dissonant from this:In post 425, Greeting wrote:I consciously decided to ignore his pre-existing 4 posts when I joined the game.
if you consciously ignored his posts, why did you feel the need to say you're not sure why he's a wagon? like I get possibly wanting to cut Roden some early game slack and not join the wagon, but you actually defended him here moreso than just ignore the situation. and if you were truly like "I'm not going to try to read anything into his posts at all", then you definitely should not have been questioning a wagon on himIn post 323, Greeting wrote:I am not sure why Roden is a leading wagon considering he has barely said anything. If it's a pressure wagon then fine. But he hasn't said much."I think I no longer believe in monsters as faces in the floor or feral infants or vampires or whatever. I think at seventeen now I believe the only real monsters might be the type of liar where there's simply no way to tell. The ones who give nothing away" - GuiltyLion
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- GuiltyLion
- GuiltyLion
- Greeting
- Greeting
- Greeting
- Vivax
- Radical Rat
- Radical Rat
- furtiveglance
- Vivax
- Vivax
- kutiplz
- kutiplz
- kutiplz
- Greeting
- Loki Dokie
- furtiveglance
- Loki Dokie
- Greeting
- Loki Dokie
- Loki Dokie
- Radical Rat