Peregrine asked for a case on Newman when I had JUST asked that same question and received and answer on that page.
Then his next post shows that he didn't even carefully read the case on Newman, that or he massively strawmanned it.
Korlash, you are so full of yourself I can't believe it. You entered the game like someone who knew what he was talking about save for a few inconsistencies, but now you've turned into a massive ball of conformation bias and hypocrisy. Time to rape your brain so that you will shut up and actually be productive, and you're the most egotistical person in this game so you can go take your little rant somewhere else.
1) Give me evidence that you are trying to discern if peregrine is scum or not
2)
↑ Korlash wrote:All your evidence on Newman is stuff you think would have happened in some parallel universe, if you're not scum bullshitting this case you're an idiot for thinking it's real evidence. I prefer to assume you're scum over an idiot since I more than meet this game's quota for fools and unintellectuals thank you.
Here is a great quote. In this one you are both egotistical, condescending, and inconsistent with your claim that everything should be neatly laid out. Where is the reasons? You didn't go evidence by evidence explaining this is true. How dare you waste time with us.
3) You weren't even considering a peregrine wagon for a large part of the time. You hadn't even read the case until last night! If you were scumhunting then you would have reviewed it in great detail as soon as you replaced in! I want to see you in a game with GreyICE and MoI, you try to play like them but ultimately fail because you don't know what you're doing.
4) I have made case on Peregrine and shown it to you several times; I have said that I don't want to vote pappums, I think your case is awful and I explained why. Learn to keep up, you may have played more mafia than me, but I study my play after each game, I improve much faster than you (oh, and I don't make hypocritical statements).