After she replaced in, I read a scum game of hers where she claimed beloved princess and threatened a town loss if she was lynched. That sort of gambit wouldn't work in the newbie games, but the scum easter egg hunt might have flown in a more gullible crowd. That's pretty much a long shot, though.
Listen girl, you're just over thinking. you're talking about a bastard game.. are you comparing a newbie game with bastard game? that's the worst comparison ever.. that game was suppose to be played in that way.. each player has a hidden win-condition along with their team alignment, i was janitor and my hidden agenda was to over face the God father and be the beloved princess of the town.
I had to what i had to do to survive. that doesn't tell you anything. and since you don't give a shit about meta, why are you basing your read on my scum meta???
After she replaced in, I read a scum game of hers where she claimed beloved princess and threatened a town loss if she was lynched. That sort of gambit wouldn't work in the newbie games, but the scum easter egg hunt might have flown in a more gullible crowd. That's pretty much a long shot, though.
Listen girl, you're just over thinking. you're talking about a bastard game.. are you comparing a newbie game with bastard game? that's the worst comparison ever.. that game was suppose to be played in that way.. each player has a hidden win-condition along with their team alignment, i was janitor and my hidden agenda was to over face the God father and be the beloved princess of the town.
I had to what i had to do to survive. that doesn't tell you anything. and since you don't give a shit about meta, why are you basing your read on my scum meta???
You keep popping up with the most bizarre comments. Where the hell did you get the idea I don't give a shit about meta?
My eyeballs are bleeding from all the meta dives I've done this game. I'm finding that one-off meta isn't nearly as useful as experienced meta, though.
I said that it was remotely possible (
see that part about a long shot?
) that you would try something like the non-random role assignments thing as a gambit.
But the main thing that is odd about you is what you'll do to survive - which has been jump from bandwagon to bandwagon, and switch your scum and town lists like laundry depending on who does or doesn't currently suspect you.
Amid the pressure of great events, a general principle gives no help.
On the path to becoming yourself, you'll need to choose alignment over validation from others, peace over addictive chaos, and being misunderstood over false acceptance. --TheHolisticPsychologist
On the path to becoming yourself, you'll need to choose alignment over validation from others, peace over addictive chaos, and being misunderstood over false acceptance. --TheHolisticPsychologist
oh really... you should try play a game with yourself and see how you would feel playing with a player like you and how you find yourself ending up in circle jerk. Haven't you seen how pissed off i am with this game with the way we have been running behind multiple wagons but not getting lucky with even one, do you even have a count how many wagons went all the way close to lynch in this game on this day phase?
i am tired of this stupid way of playing, it has come to a level that i offered my self lynch which i would never do even if i am the scum.
Like you said, I almost do anything to survive and not to give up any shit, you should thinks already since you seem to have done some meta check.... now stop giving me free lecture and just pick a side and put an end to this night mare... your over scumhunt right now not going to do any difference anymore for this day...
On the path to becoming yourself, you'll need to choose alignment over validation from others, peace over addictive chaos, and being misunderstood over false acceptance. --TheHolisticPsychologist
In post 1055, VisceraEyes wrote:So if that's the case EU then why do you feel like I fit that criteria? Have I not shown that I'm absolutely willing to "follow arguments" and "read what you're saying"? In what way am I less helpful to town than Mac?
Your reasoning makes very little sense in the context of who you're suspicious of. Mac has twice now had to apologize for "misreading" something I've said, and was blatantly misrepresenting my play as soon as I replaced in. How is he "more helpful for town" than someone who rereads a 30+ page game OVERNIGHT for the SOLE PURPOSE of having meaningful conversation regarding the lynch?
You know there is a HUGE difference between simply misunderstanding your posts and blatantly misrepping? Like I could easy stand firm and say nooo you said X, not Y! But I admit my mistakes and move on. You should too.
In post 938, VisceraEyes wrote:I'd like to hear everyone's opinion on a Mac lynch versus a GM lynch.
Ugh, just caught up with the last 5 pages or so after I went to sleep last night, ISO'd Mac and had something to eat . Basically, I don't get the feeling that Mac hasn't done anything, sure he's only put 3 votes down (one being the RVS), but I get the feeling that he's been actually discussing things. I'm way more upset about his hypocrisy about meta with dismissing a case about GM based on meta, but basing his own defense purely on meta. Still, I'd rather lynch GM.
In post 904, VisceraEyes wrote:Post 90 - GM
Townie post. I can't see scum unvoting someone for that reason - more likely to keep their vote on and call it pressure to post...especially with the current sentiment against lurkers at this point in the game.
This is, it's only a townie post if you (Carey) are not scum, otherwise GM is just trying to protect his scum buddy. This was part of why I was suspicious of your slot.
In post 972, VisceraEyes wrote:Do you know where he stands on me presently? Do you know if he actually thinks GM is scum?
After all this discussion, you've moved up a lot in my eyes, null leaning town I'd guess. Basically I was basing my case against you on of your (by your own admittance) weak case on Z, plus GM/Carey interactions that I feel could mean they're (you're?) scumbuddies. Guess I was rubbing some of my GM suspicions down on you/Carey.
In post 980, VisceraEyes wrote:At least he did something about it. Deras was just hopping onboard town sentiment. And hopped off just as quickly.
Ditto, I feel GM is scum, and I had a pretty strong feel that you were her buddy. I jumped off because you were both on my scumpile, but GM seems scummier, so I'd rather lynch her, but you were closest to a lynch and we were pretty close to deadline. Once a GM lynch possibility opened up, I switched my vote there.
Overall I'd still rather lynch GM, then AA9. The only one I'd rather not lynch is ff. The others I might compromise depending on how good the argument against them is.
There's no hypocrisy. AA9 attacks GM based on meta, I say make a case based on thread actions. VE attacks me based on pretty much how I play (so that's meta) and I say nope, here's some that proves otherwise.
In post 1055, VisceraEyes wrote:So if that's the case EU then why do you feel like I fit that criteria? Have I not shown that I'm absolutely willing to "follow arguments" and "read what you're saying"? In what way am I less helpful to town than Mac?
Your reasoning makes very little sense in the context of who you're suspicious of. Mac has twice now had to apologize for "misreading" something I've said, and was blatantly misrepresenting my play as soon as I replaced in. How is he "more helpful for town" than someone who rereads a 30+ page game OVERNIGHT for the SOLE PURPOSE of having meaningful conversation regarding the lynch?
Except you couldn't because it literally says Y in my posts. When that happens once it's like fine whatever... But when it's repeated it seems like you just trying to sling shit. Spouting lies helps only scum.
So anyway thanks for reaffirming my scum read on you by defending yourself further rather than discuss who SHOULD be lynched. I was starting to doubt it.
Don't doubt it; I've already said we should lynch Eye. You are just suffering from some bizarre cross between tunnelvision and policy lynch. What are you going to do when I flip town?
Of course you will. I make a case on Eye and you say "no, try again." It's like you want me to scumhunt within the people you want to lynch, and won't consider cases on anyone else.
Like you are CLEARLY not even reading the thread. I JUST said I'm considering lynching Eye. Like... Within the last 10 posts. I can you at least PRETEND to give a shit?
In post 1021, VisceraEyes wrote:But of course, you COULD be scumhunting. Defending yourself is cool and everything, but if you REALLY want to help town you should be telling us who you think is scum and why. I'm not lynching EU today, who else is suspicious to you?