What intentions am I ascribing to you that you didn't have?In post 3021, ffullisade wrote:no. what I am saying is that you are using certain words to ascribe an intention that I don't have. that is what I am saying
Specifically.
Okay, so we will move past you making up my voting history in your own head and not react or change our stance in any way.In post 3021, ffullisade wrote:not for that
Meanwhile we will continue to accuse Thor of misrepping us when the only one who has been proven to be using false info is Mollie.
No admission of this will happen.
Quote the explanation?In post 3021, ffullisade wrote:I thought I did.
SO...you're just going to ignore the multiple points I noted that suggested what I'm doing is town play and settle for 'but *maybe* you're scum!' as the rebuttal?In post 3021, ffullisade wrote:okay. or *maybe* you are just scum. *maybe* it really is that simple.
If this is a scumtell, shouldn't my answers all be provably false because town wouldn't do what I'm doing?
And if my answers aren't provably false, haven't I just shown how it's not a scumtell?
This is Mollie agreeing with my understanding of the conversation.In post 3021, ffullisade wrote:okay
Which means she agrees with it.
Which means I am amazed she has previously acted so confused about where we are in the conversation.
I agree that those seem futzy too, and called you on them at the time. 3 and 4 are my main concerns though.In post 3021, ffullisade wrote:2 precludes 1
I...did ask them again.In post 3021, ffullisade wrote:I think you should ask the ones youfeellike I didn't answer, cos Ifeellike I answered them all.
Then you dodged them again.
Why do I need to ask them again a third time?
I *feel* like you dodged them twice so I *feel* like I don't need to ask them again...?
I said I (Thor) was all over you (Mollie)In post 3021, ffullisade wrote:I didn't ignore you in audio mafia what are you even talking about here. one minute you are saying that I WAS ALL OVER YOU and the next you are saying that I ignored you wth
You did ignore me. Remember when I asked you to explain how me 'changing the order of your actions' was a scumtell on me?
And you dodged and avoided and said 'but I already answered that'?
And then you were scum.
Y'know, kind of *exactly* what is happening here?
Yeah...
You do realize I already provided you links to the dodged questions once already and you responded at that time that you were intentionally dodging those questions - why do you want to answer them now? And the 'I didn't want links, I wanted re-stated questions' answer...seriously? Why? Was I hard to understand the first time through?In post 3021, ffullisade wrote:I didn't want links I wanted you to restate your questions. and I think I *did* answer your questions you are the one who keeps pushing this dumb agenda. you know who pushes dumb agendas it is scum that is who
In post 3021, ffullisade wrote:except I didn't dodge.
Oh, okay, right- you didn't *dodge* you *blatantly avoided*.In post 2776, BeautyAndTheBeast wrote:it isn't dodging the questions it is me blatantly avoiding going 1 on 1 with you cos I can't.
Should I start using that instead od 'dodge' now?
Fine, you blatantly avoided my questions, this is different from dodging because...well...um...actualy, both of them result in you not answering the question and acting like it was never asked, so maybe it's just that you didn't do it subtly? I guess that's the difference.
Big whoop.
How does it not? I asked you to explain that.In post 3021, ffullisade wrote:that it does not qualify as a lie.
This doesn't qualify as explanation.
I'm talking about your play in this game.In post 3021, ffullisade wrote:wrt the bold: there is a disconnect here. I didn't target you in audio for meta reasons, never went after you for them so what in the world are you even talking about
You are aware, for meta reasons, that I do tunnel as town.
Because you've seen it.
You've been scum and seen it.
It happened TO YOU.
Then, in this game, you claim...Thor wouldn't derp tunnel like this as town!
...so...yeah.