, uncomfortable with the amount of attention she is receiving, decides that with a slight change, she would be more in tune with the gathered. Politely, she asks them to now call her by her real name,
Rena
, rather than her nickname from younger years. "That name--while nostalgic--doesn't feel as appropriate for me right now."
"Alright, fine by me,"
Seanald
comments, "But I'm still voting we lynch ya."
ffullisade
contributes with a simple, "We agree."
"So, why, exactly, are you suspicious of me?" Rena asks.
"FOR COMMENTS LIKE THAT!" is the resounding cry from all four attacking her. She is in the center of attention for the citizens present, and not in a good way. >>>
Haylen is officially playing as Rena from here-on out.
In post 3474, Rena wrote:So why are we lynching me? Because you know not giving reasons to allow the person to defend themselves is as scummy as hell, right?
My god I want this dead.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
When you claimed why didn't you claim him as your neighbour?
Didn't seem relevant and no one asked. People were trying to make alignment decisions based on the existence of neighborhoods, and as my neighborhood isn't relevant to my role, I didn't see any harm in making sure everyone was aware of all of the neighborhoods.
In post 2348, Haylen wrote:Ok, I'm about a third of the way through the thread, going to stop reading now because It's late and I can't think straight. The good news is I have 9 A4 pages worth of notes (on paper, need to transfer to ipad) so far and several scum reads. Yay!
Rena is any of this going to see the light of day? I had you as town because I didn't think scum would be bad enough to promise something like this and never deliver, and then you did. You mention them ("your notes") again in 2451, and you promise to be caught up overnight in 2488 (even though you already had tons of pages of notes and several reads???) but nothing ever comes of it. The best I can find is these
In post 2531, Rena wrote:Pro-tip, careful with iso. You don't get everything in context.
Nacho, BeautyBeast, Koobla, OmDes are my town reads. Less sure on Beauty though.
Which are not at all reflective of all of the work you claim to have done. No reasons, no notes, TERRIBLE reads (seriously, Thorscum? Editing to add in Ryu as leaning scum and then voting bacde anyway?). Are you the last blue?
, but I could do without the OMGUS that came with it.
tell that to KOC.
Though its not like reasons haven't been given.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I never said anything about you not asking for a case.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Truth be told I'm beginning to doubt my BB read, not because of the meta thing but because the "everyone who reads me should know I'm town." Thing that comes with sheeping is protown as long as you're sheeping me. Since it has been so prevalent, I am not sure whether this is genuine scum leading town or town thinking everyone should know I'm town. What say you?
In post 3484, Rena wrote:Its not omgus if it's true. I've always had a problem with people wanting to lynch others without giving them a chance to defend themselves.
You've had the abridged version of those notes, the majority of it was my distain over B+B's scummy actions.
That's all I see about ffullisade's slot in your ISO, as you surely aren't talking about Majiffy being a dick (which happened after you said you had your notes)
In post 2391, Haylen wrote:This lynch makes me very happy from what I've read at the moment. I don't have time to write my whole case now but the reasoning involved that stupid non-normal informed townie claim.
vote oversoul
I was going to push for this lynch, Thors or BeautyBeast if my reasoning didn't change during the last half of the thread I need to read.
Are you just calling people scum who call you scum again?
In post 2464, Rena wrote:But they've spent the entire game advocating sheeping "anyone who has the same opinions as me is town" with one or two SHEEPING IS WRONG...but only if you're not sheeping me posts in there. That's both inconsistent and hypocritical. Besides, sheeping is definitely anti-town.
Are you just calling people scum who call you scum again?
You should try reading the thread before I find myself becoming uncivil.
I just iso'd you and picked out all your yaay sheeping posts and booo stop sheeping posts. I need to learn how to use the multi-quote button
Oi nacho! Last time you called me obvious town, you also said I had a top secret towntell. This was in a multiball game, I think, Large Normal? You were scum there and you told me later it's you did it because I have a habit of automatically assuming those who call me town are town themselves. Then I get mislynched when that player flipped scum.
Why haven't you accused me of being scum yet? My known meta as town is to active lurk, generally active as scum, most active as SK? I rarely make a shit tonne of posts, especially day one, definitely not this many in the space of 24 hours. I'm fullfilling my old SK meta so far.
In post 2468, Rena wrote:I plan on flinging shit until I'm not posting from my work place
Why waste my time quote mining and writing up a case when you are doing a bang up job of convincing others that you should be lynched?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.