In post 101, waynegg wrote:And I'm not assuming she has no reason. I've asked her repeatedly to give her reason. Which she seems unable to do. A serious vote isn't a RVS vote. The two don't correlate.
^That was you assuming she had no reason.In post 38, waynegg wrote:A baseless vote is supposed to be taken as serious why?
So town give weak READS?In post 99, Desperado wrote:He gave reads unprompted, and his reasons for his reads weren't great (vibes, gut, little bit of meta) but he acknowledged that the reasons were weak and gave them anyway. He's town.In post 97, JasonWazza wrote:How did he do IT?
Differently to the rest DUDE?
Motivation is the key DUDE.
So look for the KEY.
How was it differently MOTIVATED?
Tell me that then MAYBE.
I'll sit back and LISTEN.
He has pulled that REASONING.Desperado wrote:In post 101, waynegg wrote:And I'm not assuming she has no reason. I've asked her repeatedly to give her reason. Which she seems unable to do. A serious vote isn't a RVS vote. The two don't correlate.^That was you assuming she had no reason.In post 38, waynegg wrote:A baseless vote is supposed to be taken as serious why?
This early? Hell yeah they do. Did you expect him to have strong reads on page two?In post 103, JasonWazza wrote:So town give weak READS?
The fuck is this SHIT?
Heard of Paranoid townie SYNDROME?
Reasons being shit don't MEAN.
That a dude is TOWN.
Meh.In post 49, Hydrochloric Hydra wrote:JASON IS TOWN.
KLICK IS A JESTER.
SAKURA IS TOWN.
WAYNEGG IS PROBABLY TOWN.
DISCUSS.
Where has she provided a reason? Please quote.In post 108, Who wrote:Wayne, does arguing semantics help the town in any way?
And Sakura has provided a reason.
Right. Was there something else you wanted to add?In post 105, Who wrote:He didn't give reasons until I asked.
Without foundation in fact HEY?In post 106, waynegg wrote:You are also bad at reading comprehension.
Baseless- without foundation in fact
Serious- with reason
Calling something serious doesn't make it serious. She said it was serious, which implies she has a reason. If she has a reason she should be able to provide that reason. Since she can't provide that reason, her vote can only be taken as baseless. My original question to her is simply asking for that reason, since she says she has one.
She had the same reason as SD, that you not wanting to take the time to decode Boxxy's restriction was not townie.In post 69, Sakura Hana wrote:It is proven that scum doesn't know how to read, let alone they use their inability to read to push for mislynches with bad reasoning.Belisarius + waynegg scumteam calling it.In post 28, Sakura Hana wrote:also I agree with that vote
If you really feel that way, then watch for it again, and if they do it again, you may have a point.In post 98, waynegg wrote:So Jason, you find nothing at all scummy about a player saying they have a reason for taking an action and then failing to be able to even begin said reason? Because right now, Sakura is voting for me because I pressed for her reason which has STILL not been given for voting me. And you feel like that's sum good town postingz from her. Check...
So THAT'S how I've helped to pop scum D1 in every game I've played on site..., though I've still yet to draw a scum role with around 30 games.In post 112, JasonWazza wrote:Without foundation in fact HEY?
Well i hate to GO.
Bursting your bubbles, but DUDE.
Nothing here is based FACTUALLY.
Unless your scum and KNOW.
The other scum butts YO.
Good point.In post 115, PeregrineV wrote:If you really feel that way, then watch for it again, and if they do it again, you may have a point.In post 98, waynegg wrote:So Jason, you find nothing at all scummy about a player saying they have a reason for taking an action and then failing to be able to even begin said reason? Because right now, Sakura is voting for me because I pressed for her reason which has STILL not been given for voting me. And you feel like that's sum good town postingz from her. Check...
Right now the point you are pushing is <less relevant>.
Reasons please.In post 120, Klick wrote:Hey guys, we should like totally lynch SD now cuz he's scummmmmmm
I think SD/Mitzi are partners based on this, and it's the only thing so far that I can really get a read on, besides feeling that the waynegg/Sakura argument is TvS.In post 13, SalmonellaDoctor wrote:Mitzi's picture doesn't look like an actual post restriction, just a joke (that almost flew over my head).
As for the morse code, it looks like it says "obviously scum," but with a typo.
~SD
