Voided, if Nero is scum, he has investigation immunity. Given the level of vitriol they've spewed at each other, zMuffinMan and Nero have almost certainly not been cross-bussing throughout the entire game.
Particularly
not in this set-up. After KingdomAces' flip, we know only one team in the game has II. Therefore, an innocent on Muffin is a lot more meaningful than an innocent on someone else. An innocent on Garuda would have been a repeat of what happened with Nero. And at the time, I was thinking my Garuda suspicions were just stupid paranoia, because Nacho and Empire occasionally sound really genuine and protown.
Actually, my crackpot theory right now is that Garuda and Nero are partners. I mean, his earlier play towards Nero was pretty protective--Nero was always vaguely scummy but "looked like his town meta," or "was genuine," or some other reason for not voting him. Contrast that with how he white-knights players like ProHawk or Voidedmafia. Then on the day Nero was governed, he started attacking Nero hardcore and suddenly came out with meta inditing him (although I forget how much momentum was headed Nero's way when Garuda voted him). Garuda going into overdrive AFTER my innocent was weird, though. I'd have expected him to react how Ghostly Penguin did, and use that as an excuse to back off.
A bonus of this theory is that it explains the lack of N1 kill.
I'm writing a paraphrase of the QT, which I'm just going to run past Magua before submitting. I've realized that neighbourhoods really aren't as useful as they're cracked up to be for getting a read on someone. Because there's something about interacting with someone privately and one-on-one that makes you emotionally predisposed to like them, particularly if they're town-reading you and asking for advice. Like with Voided on D1, I almost feel
bad
suspecting Harakiri right now.