In post 36, morph the cat wrote:Other head here. I think that the procedure and process of putting together, agreeing on and enforcing a charter would give scum a lot of room for posting stuff that doesn't move the game state forward. I also think it would be a rare charter group that could avoid being infiltrated by at least one scum.
I agree with this.
With the charter there's something amiss.
In post 26, Porkens wrote:Madotsuki, I think we should hang everyone who looks like scum, and I think going through the process of drafting the charter will help us figure out who isn't helpful and needs to die first.
So tell me what you've gleaned
from this drafting process.
For all that you've dreamed
All I see is a mess.
This is all a huge distraction
from elimination of that evil faction.
Still, you seem town
for putting this charter down.
If you were scum you wouldn't try,
you would just use the normal lie.
In post 93, Hadrian wrote:Here's the problem. All of you are just talking the magna carta redux. And talking about the charter, no matter what position you take, is the most alignment irrelevant thing. It's not scumhunting. You can't actually get an accurate read on someone based on whether or not they agreed with the charter. I'm especially disappointed with the morph hydra for actually admitting that they have early town reads on the people who agrees with the charter. Like that is the most shallow of "scumhunting" there is.
Thank you
For saying what I was thinking too.
In post 93, Hadrian wrote:And that brings me to porkens, who I'd really love to write off as town right now, but the thing is that he could have totally thought of the charter before had and just decided to keep it.
You think that's so,
that he'd give it a go?
In post 140, hiplop wrote: In post 128, SpyreX wrote:I could get behind suyre but
@Hiplop:
Explain how you get from your first post to that post in your head.
uh...reading? first post was rvs iirc
Can someone explain what hiplop is trying to say?
Surely there's one out there who knows of a way.
In post 154, HighShroomish wrote:awesome- I gave two posts with different reactions to the charter. The first was a reaction to why he would have made the charter if he was scum- as a way to keep scum alive. The second was a reaction to the town reason- honestly wanting to make play better. The first is just blown off. The second, on the other hand, is treated like a muddy raccoon.
In what way does this make sense?
Your posting manner seems devilish
And so as a consequence
Vote: HighShroomish
Why you would divide your responses so
is a complete mystery to me.
This explanation seems made up, you know.
I will await your demise gladly.
In post 159, morph the cat wrote:I personally found your replies in 154 and 156 to be genuine-town as fuck, and my other head agrees.
I trust you two, to some extent.
But I do not know how you went
and found a town read on High Shroomish
for whom you should have a doom wish.
In post 164, HighShroomish wrote:Ah, yes, because having a grand total of six posts over the past two days means he is definetely ignoring the thread. Definitely not lurking elsewhere.
You do have this right.
I doubt there is a secret to bring to light.