Mini 1637- Pokemon Generation I uPick (Game Over)
Forum rules
- TierShift
-
TierShift Jack of All Trades
- TierShift
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8384
- Joined: November 5, 2013
- Bert
-
Bert Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Bert
- Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Posts: 10720
- Joined: April 23, 2012
Hm I looked and tier responded to first recent batch of boon observations
Except mebbe this one
↑ pieguyn wrote:
you and I have very different ideas of how to play scum. I would never attempt to soft distance without following through with it later, because you risk being called out for being inconsistent and it looks really conspicuous if your partner ends up flipping at some point. if I was bussing here, I'd continue to rail the fuck out of him to get the most town cred possible from it.
I tried rereading again and in 1437 he calls vettrock's 1274 town, but when he initially voted vettrock 1283 he claimed he didn't like vettrock's Flames push, which 1274 was the continuation of. -.-
I also don't particularly get why he tried to vote you/me after his self vote instead of moving back onto vettrock. looking at it from this POV, it makes more sense.
I thought some other things didn't make sense as trying to save a partner. like, look at this
↑ Boonskiies wrote:Updated Read List:
Boonskiies
Seohyun
Flames
Formerfish
Bert
Tiershift
Vettrock
Pieguyn
VOTE: Pie
his idea of "buddy protection" here would be to vote me who was never getting lynched that day, while putting vettrock as his backup scumread. the end result of this is it does absolutely nothing to actually derail the lynch off vettrock.
I also think on a general level he could have done a _lot_ more to derail the lynch off vettrock if that's what he was actually going for. there was basically no actual push on any other target besides a few quotes related to me (1592, 1593), the former of which I actually thought was genuine bc I could see what he was picking up on (deliberately going against the general flow of reads is a relatively easy way to get town cred as scum and smth I abused the fuck out of in the game where we were scum together) and how he linked it to my scum game.
/shrug
the problem I have with this is it's not indicative of scum x scum interaction, it's just indicative of vettrock fabricating reads. I first thought it was indicative of what I mentioned before - vettrock-scum opportunistically voting between Boon/Flames depending on which looked more likely to go through.
↑ TierShift wrote:Pie, I immediately thought 1846 was not genuine. It felt as a snap-response, as though he was really mad I compared his actions to scum-motivated actions. That doesn't line up with him agreeing to my point later on and just making a throwaway gesture 'yeah, of course lol why is it important'.
His first response is to discredit me because he's scared.
I'm going to straight up admit I can't fucking read Boon's play at all. the end result of this is I don't disagree with what you're saying, but I have no idea if it's actually scummy or not or why he wouldn't do this as town. /shrug-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
look
the fact that I'm aggressive about pushing my reads does not mean I'm 100% convinced you're scum. like, seriously, please actually read what I said:
I basically just said as much. I'm open to other possibilities, just _I'm not going to go clearing you based on your role_, whether you like it or not. it is a theoretically incorrect play. and I'm trying to see how Boon's play makes sense as scum, and _I can see how some parts of it do_. I'm just not 100% sold on it _yet_ and continue to think _at this point_ you being scum makes more sense than Boon being scum.
if you're town, I really don't get where your attitude here is coming from, unless you're misinterpreting my posts. I hope this helps clears it up.
p-edit: @TS-
-
pieguyn
-
-
pieguyn
- TierShift
-
TierShift Jack of All Trades
- TierShift
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8384
- Joined: November 5, 2013
I'm not sure on seo town. If I were, this day'd be over.
And no, pie. The thing that you are doing that drives me nuts is saying that trying to confirm yourself through concensus is scummy and that it sets me up for discrediting you. The thing you're also doing is that when I comment on that, you go "OH MY GOD THIS IS 100% SCUM TACTICS". That is what's bothering me about you.- TierShift
-
TierShift Jack of All Trades
- TierShift
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8384
- Joined: November 5, 2013
great, I'm going through with this. ugh.
↑ pieguyn wrote:
you and I have very different ideas of how to play scum. I would never attempt to soft distance without following through with it later, because you risk being called out for being inconsistent and it looks really conspicuous if your partner ends up flipping at some point. if I was bussing here, I'd continue to rail the fuck out of him to get the most town cred possible from it.
Right, are you boon? Not all scum play alike. What I described is a common scum strategy, whether you do it or not.
I didn't even see that. That's inconsistent as fuck.
I also don't particularly get why he tried to vote you/me after his self vote instead of moving back onto vettrock. looking at it from this POV, it makes more sense.
I thought some other things didn't make sense as trying to save a partner. like, look at this
↑ Boonskiies wrote:Updated Read List:
Boonskiies
Seohyun
Flames
Formerfish
Bert
Tiershift
Vettrock
Pieguyn
VOTE: Pie
his idea of "buddy protection" here would be to vote me who was never getting lynched that day, while putting vettrock as his backup scumread. the end result of this is it does absolutely nothing to actually derail the lynch off vettrock.
I also think on a general level he could have done a _lot_ more to derail the lynch off vettrock if that's what he was actually going for. there was basically no actual push on any other target besides a few quotes related to me (1592, 1593), the former of which I actually thought was genuine bc I could see what he was picking up on (deliberately going against the general flow of reads is a relatively easy way to get town cred as scum and smth I abused the fuck out of in the game where we were scum together) and how he linked it to my scum game.
/shrug
Look at the time of day. Flames was at L-1 and vettrock had zero votes. He had no reason to go for buddy protection here, he just didn't go for the bus. He went for the massive towncred instead of seeing flames flip town and opposing the lynch. That's something that would make sense as a scum narrative. I'm not saying it's incriminating, keep that in mind.
the problem I have with this is it's not indicative of scum x scum interaction, it's just indicative of vettrock fabricating reads. I first thought it was indicative of what I mentioned before - vettrock-scum opportunistically voting between Boon/Flames depending on which looked more likely to go through.
Vettrock's completely inconsistent on his boon read, as nothing changed about boon since his selfvote, but vettrock's read on him did. That's more likely to stem from scumxscum than scumxtown.
↑ TierShift wrote:Pie, I immediately thought 1846 was not genuine. It felt as a snap-response, as though he was really mad I compared his actions to scum-motivated actions. That doesn't line up with him agreeing to my point later on and just making a throwaway gesture 'yeah, of course lol why is it important'.
His first response is to discredit me because he's scared.
I'm going to straight up admit I can't fucking read Boon's play at all. the end result of this is I don't disagree with what you're saying, but I have no idea if it's actually scummy or not or why he wouldn't do this as town. /shrug
you don't think 1846 was an overreaction?- TierShift
-
TierShift Jack of All Trades
- TierShift
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8384
- Joined: November 5, 2013
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
↑ TierShift wrote:And no, pie. The thing that you are doing that drives me nuts is saying that trying to confirm yourself through concensus is scummy and that it sets me up for discrediting you. The thing you're also doing is that when I comment on that, you go "OH MY GOD THIS IS 100% SCUM TACTICS". That is what's bothering me about you.
I'm saying it's scummy because it _is_. and I explained the reasoning why already, which you didn't address - the way you went about it comes more from a scum attempting to muddy the waters mindset than town who actually thinks there's a compelling reason for them being confirmed.
I'm saying it sets you up to discredit me because it _does_. and again I explained why and rather than addressing it you started imploding over it - by preemptively telling me not to respond to it because "I had already said it was scummy", it serves to make me look worse if I _do_ respond to it.
I do not see town motivation in your approach here. what I'm seeing is scum trying to falsely get themselves cleared, and then being overdefensive when they get called on it. now, obviously, I am considering the possibility this is playstyle, hence being somewhat willing to consider the possibility I am wrong here, but it's fucking impossible to tell when you don't actually explain why my points for you being scum are wrong and instead blow up over it. (this is not me accusing you of being scum again, it's me attempting to elaborate more on where my previous pushes have been coming from.)
p-edit: haven't read the above yet, reading it now- TierShift
-
TierShift Jack of All Trades
- TierShift
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8384
- Joined: November 5, 2013
I'm saying it's scummy because it _is_. and I explained the reasoning why already, which you didn't address - the way you went about it comes more from a scum attempting to muddy the waters mindset than town who actually thinks there's a compelling reason for them being confirmed.
I'm saying it sets you up to discredit me because it _does_. and again I explained why and rather than addressing it you started imploding over it - by preemptively telling me not to respond to it because "I had already said it was scummy", it serves to make me look worse if I _do_ respond to it.
I do not see town motivation in your approach here. what I'm seeing is scum trying to falsely get themselves cleared, and then being overdefensive when they get called on it. now, obviously, I am considering the possibility this is playstyle, hence being somewhat willing to consider the possibility I am wrong here, but it's fucking impossible to tell when you don't actually explain why my points for you being scum are wrong and instead blow up over it. (this is not me accusing you of being scum again, it's me attempting to elaborate more on where my previous pushes have been coming from.)
p-edit: haven't read the above yet, reading it now
Can't respond to shit if I can't see shit
We'll talk postgame-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
not really
it's not how I would have reacted, but I don't have a compelling reason to think he wouldn't react in that way as town.
the thing with this is, if you look through vettrock's posts, he wasn't really "forgetting" about his Boon read. it was more a case of disliking _both_ Boon and Flames and supporting the Flames wagon bc there was more support there.
Spoiler: vettrock's progression on Boon
I don't think it's particularly inconsistent, or that he's backpedaling. sure, it doesn't necessarily make Boon town, but that's the reason I first thought vettrock's D3 play looked like scum opportunistically voting Boon as opposed to scum bussing.
I'm still thinking about why there was basically no effort to save vettrock if that's what he was actually going for. as I said, if that was his strategy, he really did absolutely nothing over it; if you look at the posts where vettrock got wagoned, there was no defense of him nor any push on an alternate target besides a few posts related to me, who was never getting lynched that day. how do you see this making sense coming from scum defending a partner?
p-edit: and that post is exactly why your attitude here is shit if you're town. whatever- TierShift
-
TierShift Jack of All Trades
- TierShift
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8384
- Joined: November 5, 2013
- TierShift
-
TierShift Jack of All Trades
- TierShift
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8384
- Joined: November 5, 2013
Uh, I guess I see your point. I don't know how to explain it, then.
I'm still thinking about why there was basically no effort to save vettrock if that's what he was actually going for. as I said, if that was his strategy, he really did absolutely nothing over it; if you look at the posts where vettrock got wagoned, there was no defense of him nor any push on an alternate target besides a few posts related to me, who was never getting lynched that day. how do you see this making sense coming from scum defending a partner?
perhaps he wasn't going for the save. Rereading it, he probably wanted to get towncred for not hammering flames instead of defending his buddy.
Go reread it yourself. He basically avoids the vettrock wagon until it's too late. I'm going to throw away my previous theory of defending his buddy, as that doesn't fit with the timeframe.-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
↑ TierShift wrote:perhaps he wasn't going for the save. Rereading it, he probably wanted to get towncred for not hammering flames instead of defending his buddy.
Go reread it yourself. He basically avoids the vettrock wagon until it's too late. I'm going to throw away my previous theory of defending his buddy, as that doesn't fit with the timeframe.
so you think his scum strategy was to open by soft distancing, stop distancing for some reason, and then basically entirely avoid taking any kind of hard stance on vettrock whatsoever (bus or defend)?
I don't deny at all it's possible - I could see it coming from scum-him coasting and hoping he would somehow get a lynch that wasn't vettrock, despite doing absolutely nothing to push a lynch anywhere else - but if that's what he did he kind of worked himself into a corner here. /shrug
this would make more sense if I could figure out if scum-him had any explicit gain by doing any of this, or if this would just be him-scum failing at interacting with a partner. either way, will think it over- Bert
-
Bert Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Bert
- Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Posts: 10720
- Joined: April 23, 2012
Spoiler: hmmm random boon quotes from Day 3
You could have jailed Pie last night, who you say you are paranoid of but can't read well. Sort of an impulsive thing would be to jail pie, I mean, given your comments near the end of the Day 3. I'm in a place where I'm not getting good reads on any players remaining. I had Flames as most town going into today (before this game picked up steam), then Boon, then Seo, then Tier, then Pie.
so Boon chatting away is welcom
really I'm still sort of (sort of) sticking with my Boon townread. Doubt cast in my mind but who knows with this game lol
like my feeling is that Tier is being convincing, but I hate to say it but it feels like he has an agenda too much. AHHHH crap
I Dont know. On one hand it could be like, that old Tarot UPick game where supreme mistake in LYLO by one player can't remember who, and Nazarene-hydra is lynched. Because Tier is kinda begging for his life sorta in that old Tarot game, similar feels here. On other hand, this could be Tier doing ETL-style from an old Antihero game where mastin has ETL on the ropes (in this scenario, Pie is the Mastin).
still jubmled thoughts but i plan to go to the library this week and look at this- Bert
-
Bert Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Bert
- Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Posts: 10720
- Joined: April 23, 2012
- Bert
-
Bert Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Bert
- Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Posts: 10720
- Joined: April 23, 2012
- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
- Flames682
-
Flames682 Mafia Scum
- Flames682
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: May 30, 2014
-
-
pieguyn
- Bert
-
Bert Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Bert
- Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Posts: 10720
- Joined: April 23, 2012
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
I know Nati usually allows factional kill + alternate ability in the same night. plus most role madness setups like this would be broken if that wasn't the case (ex. if scum couldn't use another ability while killing here we'd get TS, Flames, Boon all town and autowin)- Bert
-
Bert Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Bert
- Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra
- Posts: 10720
- Joined: April 23, 2012
-
-
pieguyn Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 10493
- Joined: August 23, 2013
↑ Bert wrote:I Dont know. On one hand it could be like, that old Tarot UPick game where supreme mistake in LYLO by one player can't remember who, and Nazarene-hydra is lynched. Because Tier is kinda begging for his life sorta in that old Tarot game, similar feels here. On other hand, this could be Tier doing ETL-style from an old Antihero game where mastin has ETL on the ropes (in this scenario, Pie is the Mastin).
this game wasn't that old, was it?
and I know mastin said as soon as she first saw me that I'm similiar to her. ooooCopyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Bert
- Bert
- Flames682
- Flames682
- Bert
- Bert
- Bert
- TierShift
- TierShift
- TierShift
- TierShift
- TierShift
- TierShift
-
- Bert
- TierShift