the ploben/ranger wolf/wolf theory continued...In post 1491, Ranger wrote:1430 and 1431 are both scum posting for different reasons, by the way, but right now I lack the energy to go into why.
A few I haven't pointed out.PantherPunt wrote:You can't even give a top of the head example? Not one?
Most I already have.
They're in my iso already, in my commentary. So while it's true, I can't name post numbers off the top of my head...I can say that I've covered this. Not as extensively as I wouldprefer, but adequately enough.
I'd advise you to look at how Dunnstral and PantherPunt have been treating my case.Chip Butty wrote:My intent there was to warn scum that they would not get away with trying to blow off your cases with broad discrediting-type remarks.
ranger has posts with reasons why ploben is a wolf (bc he is and ranger knows and it's fucking easy when you are viewing the game through the lens that your bro is, in fact, a wolf)
ranger has posts with reasons why dunn is a wolf and they are laughably 1) bad 2) incorrect or misinterpretations/misrepresentations
ranger has ~0 posts with reasons why I am a wolf. she just has said a couple times "this is a wolf post"
I can't put it more simply. Even if ploben isn't a wolf, RANGER ALWAYS IS