You shouldn't be encouraging people to ignore scumhunting amongst the rest of the player list.
(This was directed at Creature. Read the page for context.) This is a good question, and I would like answer as well assuming Creature hadn't already answered it.
Yeah, this makes no sense. You're at this point in time "stuck" presumably in terms of getting reads this game. Okay, maybe that's a true statement, maybe it's not, but it doesn't matter. Anyway, someone tries to reach out to you to help you, and you flat out reject it claiming it's a -EV move??? How could you getting a grasp on the game hurt town's chances?
In post 1426, Spiffeh wrote:It's probably a little lazy to just write him off as town from it but in a game where I don't have many confident reads it's something
Honestly, I feel like you are trying to buddy me, but at the same time, I don't know why that would benefit scum!you. (And yes, using 4-years old meta is rather on the lazy side.)
In post 1433, Netflix and Chill wrote:And I feel like him establishing 'an easy posting style to hide behind' should give you more concern than it has been. And I certainly don't think the latter part outweighs the former.
(I do think your lack of meta experience with me means that your read on me is rather inaccurate. The style of posting I'm doing this game is pretty typical for me as either alignment; albeit admittedly, I'm not usually this far behind, so there tends to be a bit more real time interactions as well.)
That doesn't change the fact that DEB was still an easy target to focus on and also a valid target to avoid actually searching for scum.
In post 1441, Bell wrote:Also, your position on Noraa and Gloria is genuinely gross.
And this is relevant how? I don't think I've even really given a read on the slot anyway, so idk what you find gross about my position on them.
In post 1446, Not Known 15 wrote:VOTE: Double the Trouble
I have played with Norwegianboy in the past.
This isn't town. This is scum drowning the thread with distracting and spammy posts.
Uh, there are plenty of other players that are drowning the thread with distracting and spammy posts. Why are you singling out Double the Trouble here?
In post 1453, Dr Easy Bake wrote:Eh, nothing has grabbed my interest yet. Typical D1 shit, I’ll Hammer who ever gets up there.
The sad thing is I've seen DEB as town play in this antitown manner before. He doesn't even have a gimmick this game as an excuse for not playing.
In post 1454, Polar Bear Express wrote:"Me(ircher)thinks that ydra and pichu(hoctac) are big slimebutts bc of their interactions. BUUUUUUUUUT methinks a PL on Queen Noraa is more appropriate for dis occasion"
@Noraa:
This is rather a misrepresentation of my position. Obviously, fading scum is the best outcome from today. Hence why my vote stayed on Ydrasse at the time. On the flip side though, I can see where Creature is coming at and agree with the sentiment. That doesn't necessarily mean I condone policy executing your slot, and I'll go on record and officially state that aside from possibly Dr Easy Bake (because 1) he has high scum equity 2) he's unreadable and 3) it's unlikely he'll become more readable as the game progresses), I'm not supporting any eliminations that amount to a policy launch.
Maybe. Maybe not. But let's consider the following: suppose I don't know what I am talking about. What exactly am I gaining by giving nonsensical takes? (Because if it is truly nonsensical, no one is gonna follow it or trust it just because I said so.)
In post 1461, MURDERCAT wrote:And honestly I'm here for it because I think that was a weak buddy attempt.
You're gonna have to elaborate on how that's a buddying attempt because I didn't make a comment on Noraa's alignment this game with that post. I stated something that I believe to be true.
Thinking you are annoying is not shading.
@MURDERCAT
:
In post 29, Dunnstral wrote: In post 25, mastina wrote:And the majority of the scum I'd expect to be in {Double the Trouble, Polar Bear Express, Not Know 15, Battle Mage, Dunnstral, Dr Easy Bake}.
There's going to be 2-3 scum in there probably.
Are we really doing this already
This isn't an observation, but Dunn's annoyance about the draft speculation seems more likely to come from town than scum. Stuff like drafts are scum's best friend because they can very easily distract an entire thread from doing actual scumhunting.
In post 180, Dunnstral wrote:We're up to 5 posts where Bell directly interacts with a tree stump, so far, in case anyone was wondering
This qualifies. He's calling out Bell on a behavior that simply isn't helpful for town.
Okay, there's a bit less than I thought, but I still feel pretty confident that he's town.
Huh? I'm pretty sure Dunnstral townreads me at this post. He has at no point expressed an indication that he scumreads me (up to this point in the thread.)
Quantify "too many". Last I remembered, the majority of people do not have a positive read on Dunnstral at this time.
I think you should reevaluate more objectively. Try to keep your natural tendency to OMGUS people who express a read you disagree with to a minimum.
In post 1491, Bell wrote:Called me out for voting sir easy bake when Dunstral did the exact same thing.
This is true, but I believe Dunnstral did it a bit later. Also, looking at
834 again, it's a bit different because I think he's trying to get DEB to vote DEB. Regardless, I've been townreading Dunnstral most of the game whereas I've been scumreading you most of the game. It's a double standard, I know, but it does mean I give Dunnstral the benefit of the doubt here as compared to you.
I agree with this take btw.
In post 1496, pichu wrote:Ircher i have an important question for you
are you aware that Ydrasse and i's early 1v1 was in jest or are you taking it at face value
@Pichu:
Eh, it's kinda middle road. The first part I think I remember to be clearly in jest, but I didn't consider the whole thing to be in jest. The overall tone of it though still feels off regardless.
That's fair.
Stuff like this continues to be the reason I think the town treestump's suggestion was and still is a bad idea.
It's also very generic.