Posted: Sat May 01, 2021 3:13 pm
Also, mine
hah, jokes on you I’d already met her/been involved with her/things had gone to shit by the point that game happenedIn post 230, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:yea so if you've got that sweeet sweet green role pm I guess you are doomed to fall in love with someone who will break your heart soon.
Sorry buddy <3
In post 221, Menalque wrote:I don’t remember you being this sheepy as town before?
It's not what you did. It is how you did it.In post 200, Lukewarm wrote:Basically, I scumleaned him. I was given more information that indicated that the reason I scumleaned him was NAI. I moved him back to a null read.
And for some reason, you find that scummy ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
These are like mild salsa takes in terms of spiceIn post 234, T3 wrote:Grandpa and the Pringle definitely seem town.
im town too pooky. you seen me play>:(In post 198, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:im townbinning a50 and you so farIn post 194, Bingle wrote:@Pooks
I'll let you know if there's important bidness in the walls, dw.
Do you have motivation/reads yet?
Mena gets a shiny medal as soon as he catches the first bad guy
Okay, looking over people's isos, I saw this, and realize that I misunderstood Bingle's suggestions. After a re-read, I realize that I simply misunderstood Bingle's instructionsIn post 126, Gypyx wrote:that's... not his suggestion though?In post 123, Lukewarm wrote:Yeah. I am actually suspicious of Bingle making the suggestion for the psych to automatically out a guilty result. Because imo, that seems more likely to out the sitter then to out mafia.In post 120, Dannflor wrote:Lukewarm, do you have any non-pokemon related thoughts on any players yet?
I think that they know that too, because they were in the Open Setup review of the game that the mod linked to in the first post, and there they talked about the Psych having "a fake inno and a fake guilty on a questionable reliability investigative."
So from my PoV, Bingle came out with some anti-town advice, and then said for no one to question them
In post 129, Bingle wrote:Let me give you a quick rundown on how Bingle do.In post 123, Lukewarm wrote:Yeah. I am actually suspicious of Bingle making the suggestion for the psych to automatically out a guilty result. Because imo, that seems more likely to out the sitter then to out mafia.In post 120, Dannflor wrote:Lukewarm, do you have any non-pokemon related thoughts on any players yet?
I think that they know that too, because they were in the Open Setup review of the game that the mod linked to in the first post, and there they talked about the Psych having "a fake inno and a fake guilty on a questionable reliability investigative."
So from my PoV, Bingle came out with some anti-town advice, and then said for no one to question them
Bingle will argue the optimal strategy for town as he sees it, regardless of his alignment. Bingle is good at mechanics speak. Bingle is very good at mechanics speak. Bingle is widely regarded as among the best at mechanics on site. Bingle has said, specifically, that there are a bunch of things that are mechanically optimal, and that we should not discuss mechanics speak further for the rest of the day.
Either, Bingle is telling the truth that this is a protown maneuver or Bingle is crippling his ability to lean into mechanics speak, setting himself up to be questioned thoroughly on not D1 (historically the day when Bingle wants to be questioned in order to establish himself), and taking a harsh departure from what is a tried and true strategy Bingle has used as both town and scum for literally years to a pretty good result in a lobby that is at least half full of people who know Bingle pretty well.
Feel free to scumread me for it (I in fact enjoy scumreads, they are delicious) but we are done talking mech for D1.
In post 134, Almost50 wrote:I do have to comment on this though:In post 117, Lukewarm wrote:I am actually a little confused how the psychologist role helps us in this set up.
If he can get a "can kill" result on the baby sitter, but gets a "not able to kill" result on the cowardly mafia + any mafia that has already committed a kill, then on day 1 wouldn't a "can kill" result be a 50/50 chance at being the babysitter or mafia. And then starting on Day 2, they will basically be getting "is babysitter" and "is not babysitter" results, right?
That makes me question this advice given by BingleIn post 33, Bingle wrote:Optimal play is for baby to target Allen and Allen to aim for scrum.
We all pseudoclaim a psych inno D2 and maybe later day phases on the basis of how kills pan out.psych claims immediately if has guilty
@Luke:REGARDLESS OF HIS ALIGNMENT; you should always treat Bingle's mech talk as gospel. It is accurate and indeed best play for Town. End of discussion.
Note: The above is not limited to this game. It does apply here but is a general rule of the thumb.
In post 148, Lukewarm wrote:I have never played a game with Bingle, so I guess I will take your work for it for now. His advice doesn't really come into play until day 2 anyways, so we can talk about it then.In post 134, Almost50 wrote:I do have to comment on this though:In post 117, Lukewarm wrote:I am actually a little confused how the psychologist role helps us in this set up.
If he can get a "can kill" result on the baby sitter, but gets a "not able to kill" result on the cowardly mafia + any mafia that has already committed a kill, then on day 1 wouldn't a "can kill" result be a 50/50 chance at being the babysitter or mafia. And then starting on Day 2, they will basically be getting "is babysitter" and "is not babysitter" results, right?
That makes me question this advice given by BingleIn post 33, Bingle wrote:Optimal play is for baby to target Allen and Allen to aim for scrum.
We all pseudoclaim a psych inno D2 and maybe later day phases on the basis of how kills pan out.psych claims immediately if has guilty
@Luke:REGARDLESS OF HIS ALIGNMENT; you should always treat Bingle's mech talk as gospel. It is accurate and indeed best play for Town. End of discussion.
Note: The above is not limited to this game. It does apply here but is a general rule of the thumb.
Why are you lying? You keep saying "Almost50 had almost no influence on me dropping my scumread on Bingle" but you literally reply to that quote and agree with them, what am I suppose to think? (in post 148) That they didn't have influence on you? Of course I will make that claim. Just look at how you acknowledged it; it clearly seemed you were influenced by A50 here.In post 199, Lukewarm wrote:
Yeah, it feels like you are not actually reading my posts, and are instead trying to make it fit to this idea you already have in your head. Almost50 had almost no influence on me dropping my scumread on Bingle.
This is why I dropped it:Bingle claimed that he has done the same thing in every game he has played for years. I cannot imagine that this is a lie, because it is something that could easily be disproven by anyone willing to look back over his game history or by anyone who has played games with him in the past. I decided to move bingle back to a null read at this point, because I believed him here that it was NAI.In post 129, Bingle wrote:what is a tried and true strategy Bingle has used as both town and scum for literally years to a pretty good result in a lobby that is at least half full of people who know Bingle pretty well.
Almost50 chiming in was just an extra little nudge that re-accessing the situation as NAI was the right move.
In post 236, T3 wrote:I honestly can't shake my soul scumread on pooky.... I don't know what's different but he somehow feels off...
1) I joined it due to Gypyx derailing when Bingle was top wagon.In post 197, Lukewarm wrote:As for why I scumlean Professor, it was a combination of a bunch of posts.
Spoiler:
Once I iso'ed him, I saw a lot of evidence that he was just following whatever other people were saying. Jumping on wagons without reason, blindly agreeing with other people when they made posts that I automatically questioned, and harping on someone's rsv vote.
None of them would have stood out individually, but when I iso'ed him there was a bunch of little things that pinged me, and no posts that made me townlean him, so I am happy with that vote for now.
Hey!In post 246, GrandpaMo wrote:Sorry I forgot to put spoiler tags up there^^
Okay, I am done interacting with you over this one comment tbh.In post 243, GrandpaMo wrote:Why are you lying?