In post 2313, Titus wrote:Getting lucky doesn't mean it was right. Associations are better done with dead scum. Yet you don't seem keen on that analysis.
I forget about scum who die early, lurk hard, and I had nothing to do with killing, and have definitely done it as town before. Haven't done it as scum.
We're still pretty fucking sure Elli is scum and will be perfectly fine with his death at the end of the day. But, we're dying at the end of the day and have a 90% scumread on Metal Sonic's lurking ass that we'd like to firm up and sell to you before we're gone from this cruel world forever.
we are not going to stall this lynch and I wouldn't worry about metal it will be taken care of I promise you.
now put your vote back on elli
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 7:58 am
by sangres
we're going to take care of things before the day end and you're going to like it.
don't get impatient, love.
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:37 am
by ActionDan
What the fuck guys.
You don't lynch uncc'ed PRs.
Looking at you Nacho. this happens to be a maxim of yours.
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:40 am
by Amrun
It doesn't make any sense, though , Dan!
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:43 am
by ActionDan
how so? Besides "elli not doing anything" what in particular has elli actually done that was in any way scummy?
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:50 am
by Amrun
I meant his claim not making sense.
And he said he was going to start from page 59 or something, that he'd already read from there, but still had no content from it -- I pointed it out and said so, and he said "yeah" and then never provided content. Then he came back later and said "catching up now" and never did it.
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 8:50 am
by No Brains Here
In post 2530, sangres wrote:we're going to take care of things before the day end and you're going to like it.
don't get impatient, love.
It sounds like I will like it, yes! Very much indeed. Whatever it is, it must be very pleasing.
This means can carry on with lynching Elli! It must be done for the spectacle to amaze us all.
It's a subtle, but vital, difference. Talking TO a player is working with them, it's trying to appeal specifically at them. Talking AT a player is talking which just so happens to be addressed to a player, but isn't really meant for them.
Bahaha. Don't make it too obvious you're scum, dear Mastin.
You sheep herder.
Getting everyone to follow you won't help you, nope never ever
You're making a wonderful case for why I'm town, TIP, considering talking to a player is exactly what I was doing.
In post 2377, Sugar Cain wrote:I like AD scum Mastin, I've stated as much in thread I think? Nero hasn't been opposed to it, so I think he also agrees....
why are you only addressing Nero, and ignoring me?
~Sugar
Sorry, Mara, but the reason is because I know Nero a whole heck of a lot better than I know you. We may have played before, but never truly interacted. Whereas with Nero? I know him. But anyway, if you agree with me that AD's scum, I'd really appreciate having help lynching him.
In post 2431, ActionDan wrote:Mastin, precisely how much did you meta me? Did you look at both my completed scum games + the QTs?
My meta is whatever games we've played together in.
In post 2475, Amrun wrote:Your "evidence" is so wrong I don't even know where to begin. Scum asks two other players to hammer without reading. Conclusion? They're his scum buddies! Jesus fuck, it's so wrong I just want to curl up into fetal position and let someone else explain why it is so wrong.
Except that's
exactly
the kind of stunt I can see him pulling as scum*. (I feel like I've said this before...)
*"Wait, does that mean you have a scumread on Elli, now?" A mild one, yes. His claimed PR is enough where I'm not going to lynch him today, but he's definitely not a townread. But I can't emphasize this enough: Elli shouldn't be lynched with that claimed PR. He's lying? He still has to fake results, and fake them believably. He's telling the truth? We don't want him lynched. He's probably lying, yeah, but I'm not willing to risk it today.
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:31 am
by OhGodMyLife
Unvote, Vote: Elli
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:35 am
by Sugar Cain
Are we really the only ones that want to/think its important to see this massive catchup post from RC?
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 9:42 am
by Amrun
In post 2539, Sugar Cain wrote:Are we really the only ones that want to/think its important to see this massive catchup post from RC?
No.
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:08 am
by Toogeloo
RC has basically been fluffing his way through the day, no different than Elli hadbeen. RC hasn't been purposely anti-town, like Elli, but his play isn't really any different.
I don't give two fucks about the claim being power. Elli essentially popped into the thread and said, "Here's my claim, bye now!" He's had no content at all, and even at L-1, has had no fight to stay alive. This is not playing to a town win condition in any shape or form.
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 10:26 am
by Sugar Cain
In post 2541, Toogeloo wrote:Elli essentially popped into the thread and said, "Here's my claim, bye now!" He's had no content at all, and even at L-1, has had no fight to stay alive.
The "no will to stay alive thing" Is more townish than scummish IMO
In post 2541, Toogeloo wrote:Elli essentially popped into the thread and said, "Here's my claim, bye now!" He's had no content at all, and even at L-1, has had no fight to stay alive.
The "no will to stay alive thing" Is more townish than scummish IMO
There is a difference between frustrated town giving up and someone just not giving a fuck the entire game. Like I said earlier, if Elli is town, he has played so against his wincon, especially as a PR, that I would consider it bannable.
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2013 11:41 am
by TheIrishPope
I think elli as scum would have self hammered, can anyone back that up or destroy it with meta?