This to me is a crumb.In post 2300, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:This could also potentially point to hiding behind Dunnstral: "I can get behind this", but the problem with this as a crumb is he goes on to say "I'm going to have to favor the one who's probably going to be dead tomorrow", indicating he's favoring LLD, who doesnt make sense as a target. I feel that if this post were meant as a crumb, it would have been worded more carefully so it could not be misinterpreted. There's even potential here that there's some kind of EMMI crumb toward the end if this post. This post is too unclear to be a crumb, so I'm going to assume it was not one, and "getting behind" something is not a crumb on the same level as "hiding behind" something as a Hider crumb.In post 2051, Something_Smart wrote:I can get behind this.
It's quite unfortunate that two people I respect are disagreeing so heavily, but I'm going to have to favor the one who's probably going to be dead tomorrow.
Also, I think I agree with the reads here-- I can follow the town reasoning for SM, but Emmi not so much. But of course it's entirely possible LLD sees something I don't.
Mini 2247: Mountain Dew Mafia (Game Over)
Forum rules
Plan still works long as we nail scumIn post 2314, Wisdom wrote:Dont get too invested in your planning because Im not scumIn post 2276, Critter wrote:(This is all assuming Wisdom is scum)
No. I said what I said for a reasonIn post 2360, Dunnstral wrote:I don't think that helps us, gamma already has his targets, right? This would just make unrelated people claim info for very little gain. Unless you just want to mass claim.In post 2357, Critter wrote:I think mass PR vs not PR claim would be good.
I think since you’re being elimmed he doesn’t have targets and it’s up to him
Then we focus in PRs until Gamma is dead.
When Gamma is dead fair game on everyone and if a scummy player claims PR earlier they have to justify thoughout without advantage of other PR roles known
What about it? I don’t see how that relates and it wasn’t made anywhere near EoDIn post 2361, Dunnstral wrote:This post thoughIn post 2308, Dunnstral wrote:Spoiler:
Quoting this because he also says "behind Kyo" here, just to show that it is unfortunate wording rather than an intentional crumb on his part. It's just the way he speaks.
That doesn't make sense, what he quoted isn't related to hiding or night actions or anything.Wisdom wrote: Maybe Im reading too much into it but maybe the omission was so it would be made clearer that it's a crumb.
The way to convince me this isn’t a crumb is to find the better one.In post 2051, Something_Smart wrote:I can get behind this.
It's quite unfortunate that two people I respect are disagreeing so heavily, but I'm going to have to favor the one who's probably going to be dead tomorrow.
Also, I think I agree with the reads here-- I can follow the town reasoning for SM, but Emmi not so much. But of course it's entirely possible LLD sees something I don't.
Otherwise the smart play is to elim you and if we are wrong you’re VT so then I die and Gamma gets off another check win win.
That’s not an incorrect assumption though lolIn post 2367, Dunnstral wrote:I think you are under the assumption that being "later" makes it more viable, but I don't believe that is the way S_S operates. I think he sets his crumbs early.
SS could think I will hide behind Cabd. Crumbs.
Nope Dunnstral better. Crumbs again.
Later is explicitly better
Like this defense from Kyo is like stretching pasta noodles to the point of breaking badly.In post 2359, Critter wrote:This to me is a crumb.In post 2300, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:This could also potentially point to hiding behind Dunnstral: "I can get behind this", but the problem with this as a crumb is he goes on to say "I'm going to have to favor the one who's probably going to be dead tomorrow", indicating he's favoring LLD, who doesnt make sense as a target. I feel that if this post were meant as a crumb, it would have been worded more carefully so it could not be misinterpreted. There's even potential here that there's some kind of EMMI crumb toward the end if this post. This post is too unclear to be a crumb, so I'm going to assume it was not one, and "getting behind" something is not a crumb on the same level as "hiding behind" something as a Hider crumb.In post 2051, Something_Smart wrote:I can get behind this.
It's quite unfortunate that two people I respect are disagreeing so heavily, but I'm going to have to favor the one who's probably going to be dead tomorrow.
Also, I think I agree with the reads here-- I can follow the town reasoning for SM, but Emmi not so much. But of course it's entirely possible LLD sees something I don't.
That’s hogwash.
Even if we don’t get the roleblocker today they have to do shenanigans in order to get to Gamma and leave me alive another day.
With Dunn being very likely scum this means roleblocker won’t be useful unless multitasking.
So in the rare case gamma doesn’t get his check off we learn a lot
And PR or not informs what is likely the last checj.
You don’t have to say if you’re a PR that activates but PR/not PR should be done
Even if we don’t get the roleblocker today they have to do shenanigans in order to get to Gamma and leave me alive another day.
With Dunn being very likely scum this means roleblocker won’t be useful unless multitasking.
So in the rare case gamma doesn’t get his check off we learn a lot
And PR or not informs what is likely the last checj.
You don’t have to say if you’re a PR that activates but PR/not PR should be done
Like with how much I screamed PR I am surprised I am not dead already.In post 2407, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:alright I've read now.
VOTE: Dunnstral
If this is red I'll leave Critter alone. If not, he needs to die toMorrow.
Be even more surprised if I make it to tomorrow.
I get you want to not shoot me but you’re gonna. Just accept it.In post 2400, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:It's you or critter today and if either of you flip town it's the other tomorrow, barring any other believable crumbsIn post 2341, Dunnstral wrote:I've been pushing bears all game pretty much. You should vote for Wisdom if you believe this. Or we can ignore the hider stuff and just get bears today, I'd do that.In post 2338, Towelie wrote:Yeah it’s 100% not critter
I do think it’s in (Dunn, Wisdom) 100% of the time here.
I still think last scum is that bad bad bear.
Dunn is prob scum for disappearing this Unvote sucksIn post 2449, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:UNVOTE:
Just want to give EMMI a chance to post a result if it has one, still on Dunn in spirit and will revote after EMMI has returned
Then if you’re town you’d leave reads.In post 2463, Dunnstral wrote:Not scum, just tired of arguing and letting my flip speak for itself
EMMI needs a prod or replace soon or we should just hammer Dunn so game doesn’t get apathetic.
We’re at almost 8 days now.
EMMI really needs a replace.
…Just finish catching up.In post 2498, Jada wrote:Right now, I would say Critter. That's not because of him being scum but him being so far off base that he'd be a threat to have around at end game. I wouldn't hero shot here with such a strong townblock.In post 2497, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:Jada, when you catch up, I have a hypothetical scenario that I think is the only way I'm gonna get to know your play fast enough to go into Day 3 feeling like I can play at a useful level. (Catchup posting is garbage for learning how people play, IMO.)
Let's say you get a magical dayvig shot at the time you catch up to this post. The catch is, you have to shoot in your townreads. Null or lower is off limits. Somehow you cannot lie to escape the conundrum -- it's magic, after all.
Who do you take down? Who's your deep wolf in this scenario?
Again, this is more to give me a feel for you, the player on the far side, than it is to get an actual read on your alignment. There's no right answer, there's no gotcha, I don't have enough brain power to set up one of those right now.