Posted: Wed Oct 02, 2013 8:14 pm
And Kaze's fake paranoia is hilariously bad.
Interesting that you think that. I can actually see why it might look that way from glancing at Kaze's ISO.In post 550, T S O wrote:And Kaze's fake paranoia is hilariously bad.
Thoughts on Kaze this game? What is your read? I asked you what you think earlier, and you came up with this response...which doesn't help that much within the context of this game. I feel like I might have been easily fooled for a while yesterday when Kaze was interacting with me. TSO's observation actually reaffirms what was farther in the back of my mind yesterday.In post 504, fferyllt wrote:I recently did a meta dive on Kaze. His game has been evolving pretty quickly. His first game at MS was a scum game. All his games since then have been town. His tone has gotten lighter and less formal with every game. The stuff that has stayed the same about his town games is reasoned stances and observations. I should go back and look at some of those games, though. IIRC he's been mislynched 2-3 times. I didn't pay attention to why he was mislynched. Was more interested in looking for differences in tone and expressiveness by alignment.
I've done a meta dive to develop a sense of his tone as different alignments, but what I came away with was an impression of someone whose game is changing pretty rapidly. His one scum game was also his first game, and the tone was pretty formal compared to more recent games. So, adjusting for the direction his game changes have taken, the big difference to me between his scum game and his town games is that the first game's posts felt organized with tight, well defined stances. In other games, his stances and reactions to game events have been more disorganized and hence fluid.In post 551, Bert wrote:houghts on Kaze this game? What is your read? I asked you what you think earlier, and you came up with this response...which doesn't help that much within the context of this game. I feel like I might have been easily fooled for a while yesterday when Kaze was interacting with me. TSO's observation actually reaffirms what was farther in the back of my mind yesterday.
Gotcha. This is really useful to know.In post 552, fferyllt wrote:The waffly/hedgy stuff bugs me enough that I want to call Kaze leaning town, not strong town.
Got it.In post 552, fferyllt wrote:the big difference to me between his scum game and his town games is that the first game's posts felt organized with tight, well defined stances. In other games, his stances and reactions to game events have been more disorganized and hence fluid.
Yeah, I felt the same way when I first caught up with the game. I remarked earlier that I read Gravija as town too. Kaze's opening nullified/questioned my townread on Gravija. This all does make me feel better about Kaze, though!!! <3In post 552, fferyllt wrote:I want to factor in my impression of his predecessor. Gravija had a really strong newb vibe, and was reacting to stuff that irritated him without paying much attention to whether what irritated him was scummy.
As I said:In post 540, fferyllt wrote:Not terribly impressed.
The part about fluctuating wagons, I'm not sure what she means or why that would make her want to move her vote.
In post 360, goodmorning wrote:Because.
I am thoroughly satisfied with a lynch on either one (the other is T S O, obvs) at this point and so will continue to sway between them until it becomes clear which one is today's lynch (probably T S O, probably the better option).
No. I am saying notsci v. Cabd was Town v. Town. I was saying that you and Sakura are the Scum, but if by some anti-miracle one of you flips Town then Cabd could be Scum, meaning notsci v. Cabd was NOT Town v. Town after all.In post 549, T S O wrote:He's calling me and Sakura Town at this stage, but then says if we flip Town then Cabd or ffery are scum.In post 196, goodmorning wrote:Well I think this is Town v Town unless one of {Sakura, T S O} flips Town in which case Cabd (tinysmall chance ffery) is Scum.
I thought you didnt like pre-flip associative tells?In post 554, goodmorning wrote:No. I am saying notsci v. Cabd was Town v. Town. I was saying that you and Sakura are the Scum, but if by some anti-miracle one of you flips Town then Cabd could be Scum, meaning notsci v. Cabd was NOT Town v. Town after all.
I fixed the caps off so I could quote this later without burning my eyes.In post 496, notscience wrote:Bert I'm telling you, it's a TSO/Cabd scumteam.
You want to fucking go TSO?
Because I'll lynch your sorry scumfuck ass before you before you can even blink!
You have done jack shit for Cabd, you voted him.
You had no reasonings.
You had no standings.
Nothing.
And guess who got all of that shit.
Me.
So sit down and wait to be lynched, scumfuck.
Cabd's frivolities were far too forced. I felt Sakura's suicidalness was a sign of them being scumpartners but ffery managed to change my mind.
Tomorrow, as in literal, not game state. Which is today. And my reads are quite transparent at this stage.In post 502, Bert wrote:And why tomorrow, not today? Your reads stagnated, much like GM's.In post 498, T S O wrote:I was thinking along the lines of with a Cabd-you scumteam, anything not him would be good.#
NS, I'll talk to you tomorrow.
I couldn't read if this was sarcasm or not. Do you think there is a double bus or not?In post 506, agi102 wrote:Double bus?ns wrote:Bert I'm telling you, it's a TSO/Cabd scumteam.
I WON'T BELIEVE IT
THIS ISN'T HAPPENING
And TSO loves to get a scum PM with one of the strongest players in the game and immediately hard-bus the slot.In post 507, notscience wrote:Exactly my point Agi.
Cabd loves to take what the assumed-meta of a role is and invert the fuck out of it.
Didn't you do this before, see people call you Town for it and do it again?In post 512, agi102 wrote:Sure I'm caught up
I don't have special thoughts about anyone
I'd use my vote if I did
So why do you think town-Cabd would be motivated to do it?In post 517, Kazekirimaru wrote:Looks awkward, yes. Belligerent. Not sure if alignment-indicative, though.In post 479, Bert wrote: It's what I call the "intimidation factor." Why is Cabd resorting to this, and is it alignment-indicative or a tell in any way, shape, or form? Surely, this looks like it's supposed to arouse fear in the other and persuade someone to back down from attacking him?
Why not talk it out, or at least be more reachable for everyone
Tell me what you think, please?
How is this an insult and not the truth? Yet again, you fail to justify your accusation with anything solid.In post 517, Kazekirimaru wrote:lol. Do you always throw out insults when you feel like people are on to you?In post 494, T S O wrote:notscience, please. let's try to be useful.
as of now, all you've done is tunnel my scumread and try to take credit for it. which is great, but makes you pretty useless all the same.
I'm just gonna try to show the progression of you pushing a mislynch.In post 517, Kazekirimaru wrote:@Bert - Why do you continue to call me a she? ._.
Unvote
This wagon. I don't like it anymore. Bad feels.
My next choice would be Cabd, but TSO and ns are on it and I don't know what to make of that. I haven't liked ns lately. Perhaps I'm overthinking it. Perhaps not.
Meh. Vote floats.
And what were your observations of me as either alignment? What's the difference? Why is this relevant?In post 525, Kazekirimaru wrote:- I'm really not comfortable putting down a vote quite yet. I'd have left it on TSO if he weren't on L-1. Newbie games tend to have derphammers.
- I really don't know.
- TSO. Though I'd be comfortable with either, I'm not familiar with Cabd or his play. All I know of him is that he's a meta player. I've at least played with TSO and feel like his play here is inconsistent with his town play I remember.
And here, you finally get back on the wagon you were edging back to on #525.In post 542, Kazekirimaru wrote:VOTE: TSO
I'm tired of agonizing over this wagon. And I didn't realize how close we are to deadline. >.> TSO is scum. He needs to hang. Wagon analysis be damned. #yolo
Hey, can I ask you something?In post 543, Cabd wrote:Hi. While there's formalities tomorrow morning, I'm somewhat sorta kinda mostly a free man right now.
While I catch up:
Hey bert, why are you continuing to ask the same question of me when it has been asked and answered? You aren't expecting a different answer, are you? You keep pushing it to make me look bad and that's not okay bro.
Wrong, nice attempt to misconstrue.In post 559, T S O wrote:And TSO loves to get a scum PM with one of the strongest players in the game and immediately hard-bus the slot.
You have no meta provided to show either of these things. All you have is baseless conjecture.
In post 556, Sakura Hana wrote:I thought you didnt like pre-flip associative tells?In post 554, goodmorning wrote:No. I am saying notsci v. Cabd was Town v. Town. I was saying that you and Sakura are the Scum, but if by some anti-miracle one of you flips Town then Cabd could be Scum, meaning notsci v. Cabd was NOT Town v. Town after all.
Why are you lining up lynches?
In post 530, goodmorning wrote:I do discourage pre-flip/D1 associative stuff. None of my tells on them are associative. They are just 2 strong scumreads in a game where I have quite a few strong townreads.
In post 555, T S O wrote:I did misinterpret that.
Your lack of anything resembling an accusation, a case, etc. means I'm concluding you have nothing.
The lack of reading from the scum in this game is legendary.In post 530, goodmorning wrote:Can't you? Let me remedy that in a bit then.In post 412, Bert wrote:Hey GM, what's your case on TSO? I can't find a post of yours detailing one.
Was I attacking Cabd's slot or Cabd? Cabd. So him replacing in has, in fact, more relevance to my case than to yours.In post 561, notscience wrote:Wrong, nice attempt to misconstrue.In post 559, T S O wrote:And TSO loves to get a scum PM with one of the strongest players in the game and immediately hard-bus the slot.
You have no meta provided to show either of these things. All you have is baseless conjecture.
Cabd was a replacement.
And you jump INITIALLY to "it's not my meta to do that as scum!"
Self-scum meta?
lolno
Consider this an intent to hammer.
Yeah guys, these posts totally mean he's the shepherd, amirite.In post 164, T S O wrote:In post 98, Cabd wrote:Not too much to catch up on, though. Looks like you guys managed to transition out of RVS nicely.
This is the part where I play scummy all day one, obvtown it up in twilight, and get shot at night one, right?In post 88, Cabd wrote:Sup. We're here to wreck shit.
AND I PROMISE NOT TO KILL YOU THIS TIME GM I KNOW MY PAST RECORD OF KILLING YOU DEAD SUCKS BUT HEY AT LEAST I ENDGAMED YOU LAST TIMEIn post 91, Cabd wrote:Treat me like i'm five years old. Explain exactly what you hope to accomplish with this gambit of yours. How will town react? How will scum react? How do you account for false positives, and what percent chance do you feel it has of working?In post 83, agi102 wrote:Ok, so Sakura and Gravija don't understand this gambit. That's ok.
Also, link me to a game where someone has been replaced for idiocy.
Lots of players here know me as somebody who has done quite a few gambits, including claiming scum as scum, so from one gambit guy to another, tell me what you want out of this.,In post 92, Cabd wrote:Light townread on cliche, agi looks like day one lynchfodder of choice.In post 101, Cabd wrote:Sakura, you have until page 15 to be obvtown.
Ffery has until the end of this page to form a townbloc.
And notsci, you seem vaguely more interested in this game than some of your recent finished ones. You scum bro?In post 107, Cabd wrote:ffery/GM, thoughts on these two? Notsci, do you agree with cliche-read?In post 92, Cabd wrote:Light townread on cliche, agi looks like day one lynchfodder of choice.These quotes basically give me a gut feeling of scum.In post 137, Cabd wrote:Come and play for real, TSO. Throwing out a vote on me for no stated reason is a bit low quality given your usual play as town.
It's like you're constantly using psychology to put yourself in the Town driving seat and I just get a bad feeling from it.
PEdit: yeah ffery, I do.
Yeah guys, these posts totally mean he's the shepherd, amirite.In post 164, T S O wrote:In post 98, Cabd wrote:Not too much to catch up on, though. Looks like you guys managed to transition out of RVS nicely.
This is the part where I play scummy all day one, obvtown it up in twilight, and get shot at night one, right?In post 88, Cabd wrote:Sup. We're here to wreck shit.
AND I PROMISE NOT TO KILL YOU THIS TIME GM I KNOW MY PAST RECORD OF KILLING YOU DEAD SUCKS BUT HEY AT LEAST I ENDGAMED YOU LAST TIMEIn post 91, Cabd wrote:Treat me like i'm five years old. Explain exactly what you hope to accomplish with this gambit of yours. How will town react? How will scum react? How do you account for false positives, and what percent chance do you feel it has of working?In post 83, agi102 wrote:Ok, so Sakura and Gravija don't understand this gambit. That's ok.
Also, link me to a game where someone has been replaced for idiocy.
Lots of players here know me as somebody who has done quite a few gambits, including claiming scum as scum, so from one gambit guy to another, tell me what you want out of this.,In post 92, Cabd wrote:Light townread on cliche, agi looks like day one lynchfodder of choice.In post 101, Cabd wrote:Sakura, you have until page 15 to be obvtown.
Ffery has until the end of this page to form a townbloc.
And notsci, you seem vaguely more interested in this game than some of your recent finished ones. You scum bro?In post 107, Cabd wrote:ffery/GM, thoughts on these two? Notsci, do you agree with cliche-read?In post 92, Cabd wrote:Light townread on cliche, agi looks like day one lynchfodder of choice.These quotes basically give me a gut feeling of scum.In post 137, Cabd wrote:Come and play for real, TSO. Throwing out a vote on me for no stated reason is a bit low quality given your usual play as town.
It's like you're constantly using psychology to put yourself in the Town driving seat and I just get a bad feeling from it.
PEdit: yeah ffery, I do.