Posted: Thu Mar 03, 2022 3:27 am
Quick note that Scorp plays scummy no matter what alignment he is. I'm going to just treat him like N_M and wait to see what happens instead of gambling on it.
what made you change your mind from "i don't see what people see in datisi" or whatever the hecc it wasIn post 893, fua wrote:I said I disagreed with her scumreads which I thought were wrong, went back to check if she was SRing anyone else and noticed she was voting Datisi.In post 891, VP Baltar wrote:What made you post this?In post 862, fua wrote:Datisi night actualky be scum, though. I need to look at that slot again.
eh.....In post 902, Datisi wrote:i'm sure y'all are very happy to hear that
I think maybe we have played before? Or maybe I've meta read a game you were in, idk. I'm aware of who you are at least and my impression of your reputation is that you know how to play mafia.In post 898, Nero Cain wrote:but how do you know that? Have we played b4? I think that fluff posting in lieu of content is a pretty scummy thing to do, no? I mean maybe you could make the argument that I'm not very good and I can only spot low-level scumplay.
this is like, one of those times where i want to ask - what do you expect me to pressure you about? your slot is scummy because you dropped into the game, made a pretty much meme push on me, threw weak questions at ari, and left when she voted you. there is nothing to parse there, you and i both know that you're a better scum player than that, so it's not like i can actually draw a "well he's scum completely fucking up the game, gg" conclusion from that. and the only possible pressure i can put on you is general "what are your reads", which like. i find more value in seeing what you come up with yourself than what you come up with if i'm yelling at you about it.In post 489, humaneatingmonkey wrote:So Datisi makes no attempt to pressure my slot even though he admits it's scummy, and didn't attempt to parse even further when prompted by Nero. No hot takes and no solves, just unproductive questions thus far.
i have seriously pushed two (2) people, only one of which could even be classified as someone getting attention their way (and even then i was the first to pressure them!) so this is a bunch of bullshitIn post 493, Nordom wrote:Content to just push on players who are getting attention thrown their way and I haven't really gotten the impression that it's a town tell of "Pressuring for information" from them.
tell me you didn't understand my post without telling me - because town, noob or otherwise, isn't capable of getting cognitively overloaded. andeven if it were a reaction test, noob town isn't gonna do such a complex reaction test. and deasvail isn't a noob. so like what is the point of this question.In post 494, humaneatingmonkey wrote:why is it not noob town trying to scumhunt?
i think baltar would have really good reasons to force himself to post a nice readslist early on in the game too, so i don't think that's especially townieIn post 586, Eyes without a face wrote:Town lean on VP. I don't care about what reads he has here, but he took the time to explain them which I don't think scum would do at this point given that many players are posting read lists that are not explained at all.
you're gonna get hit up don't ya worryIn post 652, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Datisi hit me up when you're here
I started with the full list of names at the start of my catch up and was slotting them into those piles as I was going along and getting feelings one way or the other. So while I had a null category, by the time I finished read I was kind of tired and didn't feel like writing out WHY I felt null on a bunch of people still (including you), I just knew I wasn't ready to make an alignment call on those people yet.In post 909, Datisi wrote:@baltar, is there a reason why you did not include me in the early readslist? i see you have a null category, and pretty sure i had posted at the time
who?In post 704, Nordom wrote:Uh, Daitisi I guess, but I'm waiting for them respond.In post 701, tenebrousluminary wrote:Nordom, who is scum?
where are you doing this, exactly? you've started tunnelling me from the start of the game, you never actually gave a concrete reason why i'm scum, and you never re-evaluated in thread. so like... what exactly are you doing?In post 708, Yeet wrote:It is interesting that Datisi is pretty much universally very unpopular today (except in Aristeia’s eyes, but I worry she may be biased. Nevertheless I am still keeping her opinion very much in mind because I presume she knows him well).
"i'm keeping ari's thoughts in mind... but also, everyone, turn your brain off and sheep me on this read i gave no reasoning for!!"In post 715, Yeet wrote:I think we should mount the pressure on Datisi sooner rather than later.
Let’s get some wagons going, guys. I don’t want to stall around all day and move last minute and scramble when we can just go sheep sheep sheep.
In post 709, VP Baltar wrote:Overall, I find it helpful when I have a big catch up like that to take notes and sort how I feel about people. I just decided to post my hip-shot notes in thread.
...In post 714, VP Baltar wrote:I don't mind changing my reads if something shifts for me.
... (but louder this time)In post 721, VP Baltar wrote:Being real with you, it's unlikely I ever support a D1 Datisi wagon.In post 715, Yeet wrote:I think we should mount the pressure on Datisi sooner rather than later.
In post 727, Nordom wrote:Basically, Daitisi was one to throw their hat into the popular pressure of Wu and Monkey. It just came off as lazy and convenient to me.In post 726, VP Baltar wrote:What's the bullet point case on datisi again?
lol the backpedallingIn post 736, Nordom wrote:Pressure, throwing shade, what does it matter? My point is that he felt to give attention to him when Monkey was an obvious player of contention. If it were a "passing observation" it'd be one thing, but he felt that he had to get involved in the process with the pressure on Monkey. It wouldn't be such a red flag with me, but Datisi was also involved with the shit with Wu, which I felt was a weak push in the first place.
What's this supposed to mean? I'm not followingIn post 912, Datisi wrote:In post 709, VP Baltar wrote:Overall, I find it helpful when I have a big catch up like that to take notes and sort how I feel about people. I just decided to post my hip-shot notes in thread....In post 714, VP Baltar wrote:I don't mind changing my reads if something shifts for me.
... (but louder this time)In post 721, VP Baltar wrote:Being real with you, it's unlikely I ever support a D1 Datisi wagon.In post 715, Yeet wrote:I think we should mount the pressure on Datisi sooner rather than later.
oh bOY WHEre to startIn post 751, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Datisi hasn't pressured me actually. Which makes me suspicious because if Datisi remembers me as the one who "ripped through town" in that one game, then he must have due cause to pressure me. Also, when prompted by Nero, he gave up assessing my meta at the mere sight of the word "daddy". I believe Datisi would have spent some proper time sorting me. Datisi is also bolder to announce his reads, however bad. He also tries to create a townblock in my experience. That doesn't happen here. His participation does not influence this game, which is pinging my bottom.
VOTE: nordomIn post 754, Nordom wrote:If Datisi's replies in a satisfactory manner, I'm switching my vote to VP.
On why I wouldn't vote you: I think if you're town, you're a huge asset so it is nonsense to lim you early game. If you're scum, that is likely to get sorted by night actions, or the number of people in this game who can read you correctly more often than not. So yeah, pretty anti-D1 dats lim unless there was an EXTREMELY compelling case.In post 915, Datisi wrote:i was expecting you'd at least catch that the second one is meant to ask "what/how/why?"
the first one is me wondering whether you've been studying guardians and are trying to purposefully drop as many things that you know i consider towntells from you as you can
9-player gamesIn post 774, humaneatingmonkey wrote:I assume Datisi is able to create a townblock because that's how i remember his playstyle in early games.
so i'm not yet openwolfing hard enough for you to consider yeeting me? notedIn post 918, VP Baltar wrote:On why I wouldn't vote you: I think if you're town, you're a huge asset so it is nonsense to lim you early game. If you're scum, that is likely to get sorted by night actions, or the number of people in this game who can read you correctly more often than not. So yeah, pretty anti-D1 dats lim unless there was an EXTREMELY compelling case.In post 915, Datisi wrote:i was expecting you'd at least catch that the second one is meant to ask "what/how/why?"
the first one is me wondering whether you've been studying guardians and are trying to purposefully drop as many things that you know i consider towntells from you as you can
On the notes, vote changing. It did occur to me when I posted my notes that if I was scum I would totally do that to subliminally get you on my side because of Guardians, so you probably should disregard that as a towntell going forward. What I said in Guardians is true...I take notes as town, especially on catch ups, and talk in the PT as scum, but we explicitly talked about that in Guardians so it is entirely WIFOM at this point.
i'mma keep it real, i kinda skimmed over them because i was trying to make sure i'm up-to-date on major events, especially those concerning my slotIn post 920, VP Baltar wrote:Hey Datisi, what are your thoughts on what I said about fua while I have you here?
In post 917, Datisi wrote:VOTE: nordomIn post 754, Nordom wrote:If Datisi's replies in a satisfactory manner, I'm switching my vote to VP.
gee, i wonder where i saw this kinda reasoning before
last two games i saw a post like this, it came from scum both times
(i'm not yet certain if i wanna end up on nordom, but this feels fitting to change now, both as a scumread on nordom and as a not-quite-scumread-anymore on skitter)
This is a move that I think is a scum play on me. My read is that Deas decided to push on me when they saw that I was obstinate to their posts and wouldn't be pocketed so easily. This is kind of like them "cutting me off the pass" before I could potentially vote them.In post 884, DeasVail wrote:I would be interested to see what fireisred picked up on regarding Nordom, but I don't think that Nordom is town. I will attempt to explain why I think this but I'm not sure it will be exactly right. In any case though, what struck me as I was reading the latter part of the game was I guess, just the way that Nordom is playing. There is clear activity, and lots of asking questions of other players, but most of these actually appear rather pointless. 707 as an example, feels like it comes from a place of "hmmm i want to ask this person a question" rather than having any real town basis. But also, regardless of pointlessness, why is someone so keen on looking like they're asking other people questions, so deiriding of people engaging with them? The interactions with fireisred, with skitter, with me even, do not feel like real attempts to actually figure someone out or get a sense of what they are thinking. It's overall just very dismissive.
The Datisi read and progression in particular makes no sense and does not feel like it comes from a genuine place. Nordom was fairly consistent in scumreading Datisi for a while there, to the point where he apparently believed he was the first on the wagon (which I doubt given Nordom's 493 specifically talking about wagons). There was also encouragement of Yeet's Datisi suspicion in 724, but then in 754 he gives the cop out of "if Datisi replies in a satisfactory manner, I'm switching my vote to VP". If Nordom thinks Datisi is scum, why is he almost.. expecting to be moving his vote? I don't get the sense of real genuine scumhunting processes behind this. There isn't any interest in why other people might think Datisi is town, for example.
More recently 883 feels like an attempt to distract from a blunder by a desperate attack on me?
VOTE: Nordom