Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:07 am
do people actually get banned for gamethrowing???????In post 973, mastina wrote:Fuck no, you'd be fucking banned for gamethrowing for that.
Page 40 of 240
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:07 am
like I don't see it happening that often
do people actually get banned for it?
do people actually get banned for it?
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:08 am
everything she posted in this threadIn post 974, Titus wrote:What would town!Cheeky have done?In post 969, mastina wrote:Because it was a push that was win-win regardless.
I don't claim, Cheeky gets away with pushing me and has an excuse to not push anyone else.
I do claim, then my claim's out in the open and exposed.
CheekyTeeky had every reason to push me as scum and no reason NOT to.
Also.
CheekyTeeky might not have even seen a way to back out as scum.
As town who picked up on my hints, CheekyTeeky would immediately have a way to get out of it; as scum who picked up on my hints, CheekyTeeky likely wouldn't know how she should respond.
Also.
The way CheekyTeeky did respond once the claim was out was a scum reaction, so.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:08 am
I have a plan. Chill.In post 973, mastina wrote:As a vig.In post 726, PJ. wrote:1) cause she's probably a real mason
3) Cause I've only seen garbage play so far
Would you fucking vig an innocent child because you thought their play was garbage?
Fuck no, you'd be fucking banned for gamethrowing for that.
This is literally no fucking different than that, and yet it's Panzer's logic for justifying his threat.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:08 am
okay look ik that I probably shouldn't have answered that but like
I think it was funny :c
I think it was funny :c
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:09 am
this is so exciting! Alexa play mission impossibleIn post 978, Titus wrote:I have a plan. Chill.In post 973, mastina wrote:As a vig.In post 726, PJ. wrote:1) cause she's probably a real mason
3) Cause I've only seen garbage play so far
Would you fucking vig an innocent child because you thought their play was garbage?
Fuck no, you'd be fucking banned for gamethrowing for that.
This is literally no fucking different than that, and yet it's Panzer's logic for justifying his threat.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:11 am
wait wait wait wait wait. Why me first? Not her?In post 970, CheekyTeeky wrote:You should be pro at dodging bullets by now. Unfortunately with Mastina's bad push you're likely to be shot at first though :/In post 964, Elsa Jay wrote:I liked it until she revealed us and made me ready to get shot soon again.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:11 am
Doesn't mean it wasn't a not-wrong call. A lack of losing the debate doesn't in of itself mean that claiming was bad, because there was a notable lack of winning it in a sense. Good reasons to make it, more or less. I'm kinda getting tired (good god my eyes are shaking I need a nap) so I'm kinda losing coherency here so I kinda can't explain it properly to lay out my thought process but again, I will defend the call. Maybe it wasn't necessary, sure, but it was still I think something overall advantageous. Even if not optimal, still USEFUL, if that makes sense.In post 766, Xtoxm wrote:you werent losing this debate
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:11 am
u have less screws in ur headIn post 981, Elsa Jay wrote:wait wait wait wait wait. Why me first? Not her?In post 970, CheekyTeeky wrote:You should be pro at dodging bullets by now. Unfortunately with Mastina's bad push you're likely to be shot at first though :/In post 964, Elsa Jay wrote:I liked it until she revealed us and made me ready to get shot soon again.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:13 am
I'ma actually go update the scummies right now I should do that
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:13 am
... Is that an analogy for me being stupider or me being less crazy?
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:13 am
Nahhh.In post 779, Xtoxm wrote:skyg looks like maybe scum also
This is a good solid 60% chance Skygazer's towngame.
It
could
be scum, remaining 40%, because it's too early to make a definitive call, but this def reminds me more of her town self than her scum self right now.Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:14 am
Stop defending yourself and focus on catching scum.In post 982, mastina wrote:Doesn't mean it wasn't a not-wrong call. A lack of losing the debate doesn't in of itself mean that claiming was bad, because there was a notable lack of winning it in a sense. Good reasons to make it, more or less. I'm kinda getting tired (good god my eyes are shaking I need a nap) so I'm kinda losing coherency here so I kinda can't explain it properly to lay out my thought process but again, I will defend the call. Maybe it wasn't necessary, sure, but it was still I think something overall advantageous. Even if not optimal, still USEFUL, if that makes sense.In post 766, Xtoxm wrote:you werent losing this debate
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:18 am
Titus would know that I'd never fucking claim mason as scum, actually.In post 838, Shiro wrote:She really isnt above claiming mason with her scum partner. It kinda bothers me that Titus defended it like that cause she would know that as well..
Because no I fucking don't fakeclaim mason as scum?
Yes, I know.
I invented pretty much the mason gambit.
Yes, I know.
I am infamous for it.
Yes, I know.
That makes every mason claim of mine automatically suspect.
Doesn't change the fact that it never comes from scum and that yes I can and do legitimately actually roll mason from time to time.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:21 am
If we were scum I'd have us claim Neighbors instead or something so when one of us flips mafia the other would get towncredit. I'd auto-veto a Mason claim.
So yeah, Mastie ain't lying.
So yeah, Mastie ain't lying.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:21 am
Someone said mastie has done it before as scum...who was it?
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:22 am
ElsaIn post 859, jjh927 wrote:843 introduces more information to the lie that makes it considerably more implausible in that;
a. it suggests Mastina claiming mason d1 was something she was always planning on doing
b. this plan was discussed and strongly dissented against by Elsa
exaggerated
.But did not
fabricate
.The proof will be there in the postgame; that conversation's QUITE real I assure you. Not QUITE the way Elsa said it, but ehhh close enough to it. When the game's over, I'll even directly quote it in here for you to see. It happened.
Best I can do now tho is a paraphrase.
Need to check with Krazy first on his rules there tho on how specific I can get. (I imagine down to the minute would be discouraged.
)Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:25 am
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:27 am
I'm just mad Mastie ignored my plan for revealing later more.
I told her to say something elsa in a sentence and I'd post a big tittle anime girl with "MASON" on her books with a fireworks display.
This was underwhelming in comparison.
I told her to say something elsa in a sentence and I'd post a big tittle anime girl with "MASON" on her books with a fireworks display.
This was underwhelming in comparison.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:28 am
If it makes you feel any better.In post 918, Alisae wrote:Why is no one posting I’m f5ing the page constantly D:
You've gone from "scum" to "probably town but if scum I'll let em win because e earned it".
(Largely because your thoughts may have some merit to them in some areas. Not sure about all areas, but some.)
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:30 am
That requires trust in you that I utterly lack.In post 952, Titus wrote:Give me 2 nights. If the power of Dark Cookies cannot resolve it, then we react.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:34 am
I was thinking more along the lines of his scumplay here.In post 967, Alisae wrote: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=77288
wasn't alch scum in this?
In that game, he just seemed...BETTER...than what I'm seeing here. But he was very much scum there, I assure you.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:38 am
A town Cheeky picking up on my hints would've known to back off.In post 974, Titus wrote:What would town!Cheeky have done?In post 969, mastina wrote:Because it was a push that was win-win regardless.
I don't claim, Cheeky gets away with pushing me and has an excuse to not push anyone else.
I do claim, then my claim's out in the open and exposed.
CheekyTeeky had every reason to push me as scum and no reason NOT to.
Also.
CheekyTeeky might not have even seen a way to back out as scum.
As town who picked up on my hints, CheekyTeeky would immediately have a way to get out of it; as scum who picked up on my hints, CheekyTeeky likely wouldn't know how she should respond.
Also.
The way CheekyTeeky did respond once the claim was out was a scum reaction, so.
A town Cheeky having failed to see my hints would've had a reaction which was more fluid and organic; Cheeky's reaction was very stilted, artificial, and looked preplanned, with a lack of panic attached to it. There was the backtracking, sure, but it was backtracking that was inevitable.
I know I'm not explaining this well, I'm half asleep right now and need to do a proper explanation when I wake up.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:39 am
Yes--check the ban announcement thread and somewhere in there you'll find a ban where a vig vigged an ic. I don't remember who, or when, this happened, but it definitely is a thing which you can find.In post 975, Alisae wrote:do people actually get banned for gamethrowing???????In post 973, mastina wrote:Fuck no, you'd be fucking banned for gamethrowing for that.
Posted: Mon May 27, 2019 10:39 am
I mean.In post 976, Alisae wrote:like I don't see it happening that often
do people actually get banned for it?
It doesn't happen that often because it's a bannable offense so just about everyone who is in any way rational knows better than to do it.