Page 40 of 86

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:29 am
by Andresvmb
I haven’t called you stupid. I called your play stupid. Which it is.

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:30 am
by GrandpaMo
In post 969, Andresvmb wrote:while confusing Neighbors and Masons, and then doubling down on your stupidity
i thought this implies you calling me stupid by confusing neighbors / masons lol

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:30 am
by Nathann
VOTE: Kazyan?

Not sure if I liked their earlier pop-in.

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:31 am
by Andresvmb
In post 976, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 969, Andresvmb wrote:while confusing Neighbors and Masons, and then doubling down on your stupidity
i thought this implies you calling me stupid by confusing neighbors / masons lol
It’s not. I don’t claim to have any insight into your general level of intelligence.

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:32 am
by GrandpaMo
In post 978, Andresvmb wrote:
In post 976, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 969, Andresvmb wrote:while confusing Neighbors and Masons, and then doubling down on your stupidity
i thought this implies you calling me stupid by confusing neighbors / masons lol
It’s not. I don’t claim to have any insight into your general level of intelligence.

Okay -- it's funny because that's the only thing you notice while replying to my previous quote.

Anyways -- I think it is time to ignore you and see what is happening around the village. If I assume your scum, I have to decipher who else could be scum with you.

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:33 am
by Andresvmb
Hahaha sure.

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:35 am
by Andresvmb
In post 977, Nathann wrote:VOTE: Kazyan?

Not sure if I liked their earlier pop-in.
I agree - talk to me about what you’re seeing there. They got called out and immediately produced a response and have somewhat taken a bit of a backseat.

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:36 am
by GrandpaMo
In post 980, Andresvmb wrote:Hahaha sure.
What an evil laugh.

Also just for a suggestion (only if you are town and we could have just been TvT tunneling.), use this time away from me, to really reflect both town / scum motives and come from an unbiased perspective.

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:36 am
by Kazyan
I guess GMo gets some town points here because 2/11 of his possible scum partners--Andre and Titus--have essentially been ruled out?

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:36 am
by Jolyne
andres is blatantly town that's annoyed with ur fps play

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:37 am
by GrandpaMo
In post 935, Kazyan wrote:Scum could have seen the play as GMo and DGB actually being townie neighbors and backing Titus into a corner. scum!Titus couldn't have fired back on GMo for risk of GMo actually getting voted out, and if he flipped as an actual Neighbor, that would have made Titus the automatic elimonation on day 2. But, then, town!Titus would have GMo and DGB either being weird or throwing the match as a scumteam, which would surely elicit...something. Idk
You think this is scum @Naathan?

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:37 am
by DrippingGoofball
In post 902, GrandpaMo wrote:UNVOTE: Enchant

Waiting for what Dwlee and DGB have to say about this...
I townread you and Enchant, am I wrong?

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:38 am
by Andresvmb
In post 982, GrandpaMo wrote:Also just for a suggestion (only if you are town and we could have just been TvT tunneling.), use this time away from me, to really reflect both town / scum motives and come from an unbiased perspective.
I’m not doing anything you suggest - I don’t give a shit about your opinion.

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:38 am
by Kazyan
Which pop-in do you guys not like? The grid, or my take on the GMo/Titus spat?

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:39 am
by GrandpaMo
In post 987, Andresvmb wrote:
In post 982, GrandpaMo wrote:Also just for a suggestion (only if you are town and we could have just been TvT tunneling.), use this time away from me, to really reflect both town / scum motives and come from an unbiased perspective.
I’m not doing anything you suggest - I don’t give a shit about your opinion.
Damn, that hurts if you're town. </3

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:40 am
by DrippingGoofball
In post 809, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 808, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: Titus
Okay I hard claim masons with DGB - Can you confirm?

I told them in mason chat, that titus is town but they are voting them. So if you want to carry the weight that either of us are scum, you can drop it now.
Why did you do this?

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:40 am
by GrandpaMo
In post 984, Jolyne wrote:andres is blatantly town that's annoyed with ur fps play
I am trying to see it that way. Like half of me wants to say Andre is obviously scum for pushing this and other half is like I understand why Andre didn't like my play especially when it didn't come into play / worked.

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:41 am
by GrandpaMo
In post 990, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 809, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 808, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: Titus
Okay I hard claim masons with DGB - Can you confirm?

I told them in mason chat, that titus is town but they are voting them. So if you want to carry the weight that either of us are scum, you can drop it now.
Why did you do this?
Okay I have no reasons to explain again. Refer to post -- keep reading till you find my retract post.

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:43 am
by DrippingGoofball
In post 809, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 808, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: Titus
Okay I hard claim masons with DGB - Can you confirm?

I told them in mason chat, that titus is town but they are voting them. So if you want to carry the weight that either of us are scum, you can drop it now.
In post 874, Nathann wrote:New Scumplay meta: fakeclaiming Neighbour with a Townie you're not in a Hood with? Gotta write that one down. :lol:
I once fakeclaimed mason with a townie who went along with it.

But neighborhood with TWO other players? That's really ambitious.

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:45 am
by GrandpaMo
In post 993, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 809, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 808, DrippingGoofball wrote:VOTE: Titus
Okay I hard claim masons with DGB - Can you confirm?

I told them in mason chat, that titus is town but they are voting them. So if you want to carry the weight that either of us are scum, you can drop it now.
In post 874, Nathann wrote:New Scumplay meta: fakeclaiming Neighbour with a Townie you're not in a Hood with? Gotta write that one down. :lol:
I once fakeclaimed mason with a townie who went along with it.

But neighborhood with TWO other players? That's really ambitious.

See I actually just wanted to claim mason but then Andre outting that info realized that I probably will look worse than not good so it wouldn't work in the first place, so I tried to make it seem like you would out the info and confirm then really just pressure titus in which titus would flail or defend good.

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:46 am
by DrippingGoofball
In post 886, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 877, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:
In post 35, GrandpaMo wrote:did i not post here dammit
This is a hood slip. He must have posted in his hood at day start and forgotten to post here is my guess
Another amazing point -- that I could have just claimed hood with DGB and let DGB confirm me out of knowing what I was doing and then use this to back me up.
.I would totally have gone along with it LOL but neighbors instead of masons, and throwing in Titus? That's too much.

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:46 am
by Nathann
In post 935, Kazyan wrote:Scum could have seen the play as GMo and DGB actually being townie neighbors and backing Titus into a corner. scum!Titus couldn't have fired back on GMo for risk of GMo actually getting voted out, and if he flipped as an actual Neighbor, that would have made Titus the automatic elimonation on day 2. But, then, town!Titus would have GMo and DGB either being weird or throwing the match as a scumteam, which would surely elicit...something. Idk
@Andres @GrandpaMo, yes, this is the post that pinged me wrong. Right after there was a pretty big event happening, someone jumps in with this? I think it's obvious why this analysis isn't particularly likely to have actually taken place (why would two Town Neighbours deliberately lie and back Titus into a corner?), and the fact that it has basically no actual conclusions in it? Gives me a vibe of Scum trying to hold up thread presence rather than of Town actually thinking through what is happening.

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:47 am
by GrandpaMo
In post 995, DrippingGoofball wrote:
In post 886, GrandpaMo wrote:
In post 877, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:
In post 35, GrandpaMo wrote:did i not post here dammit
This is a hood slip. He must have posted in his hood at day start and forgotten to post here is my guess
Another amazing point -- that I could have just claimed hood with DGB and let DGB confirm me out of knowing what I was doing and then use this to back me up.
.I would totally have gone along with it LOL but neighbors instead of masons, and throwing in Titus? That's too much.
YES SO MY LOGIC ISNT LIKE 100% FUCKED because I KNEW U WOULD HAVE SOME MERIT TO CLAIM NEIGHBORS WIT ME LOL

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:54 am
by DrippingGoofball
In post 931, Titus wrote:
In post 921, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Titus who do you think is scum?
Andres atm.
I would like to advertise my services as a confirmer of mason fakeclaims in any game LOL

VOTE: GrandpaMo

Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2021 8:56 am
by Jolyne
VOTE: Kayzan since town is getting caught up with ego pushes to punish what they view as "bad play" lets get the biggest LAMIST slot here that is v shallow.