Stars Aligned III - The Tenth Day
Forum rules
- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Hiya guys @ Andy, Furco, VP...and the DGB/Katsuki hydra O_O.
And 1/2 the player list or so.
This game is Kingdom Hearts-tier with regard to the length, so it may take me awhile. Also, I can't read through the game in earnest until Thursday (I have a little quiz tomorrow I'm not prepared for yet), but I'll post notes from a readthrough ASAP.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I've noticed that my predecessors (!) claimed things. If my slot has any outstanding claims to make, please indicate it.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I am extremely interested to learn what rhetoric anyone supplied to argue that a player's flip was not necessary.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Far be it from me to fathom the mind of manho.
I have no idea what he's going for in that first quote of yours (I think he meant "let's let the cults guess," though it's not clear where he was coming from there). With regard to content per se, I do think manho is a player who tends to make shorter posts in general, and he lurks. He's not a player who posts a lot of detailed analysis. That's my guess on "iso shows MoI town."
BUT, I am only on page 2, though, so I'm reading your examples out of context. I read during class this morning. This is what my notes say up to that:
But I won't have a real chance to sit and read everything until later tonight at the earliest. I have to prepare some cases for a quiz tomorrow.Notes on SA3 wrote:Page 1
1. I have not heard Noise either night.
2. This is my second Stars Aligned game -- I was in SA2 -- but I was Murdered N1 in that game. I still followed SA2 to the end, but I didn't bother keeping track of all the complex rule discrepancies players claimed as I followed along, though.
3. Noise claims are pretty necessary to keep things straight and spot discrepancies later on. hito's rhetoric shows lack of familiar with the Ward action. Weakly implies that he is scum, since scum are on average maybe slightly less familiar with the Ward action. On the other hand, scum have daytalk.
4. Who's the other half of LostButterfly...? <_<
5. OK, so. It looks like Furco is scum on D1 for lying about Noise/Ward. This is not an error Investigators would make, especially since he follows up by saying that it should be rectified. So why is he still alive?
6. Oh. A mod error. Town on Furco, now and forever. I bet he heard noise N1.
Page 2
7. Furco is silly in 27. Searching for an RK is the ideal action for pretty much every player. But he is still town.
8. MoI's 29 looks scummy. Lots of irrelevant stuff -- no reason to discuss Murderers that don't exist, except to point out that it is a move for players who don't care about winning if taken early, etc. -- and a smear on townFurco.
I did glance through manho's iso and that of that Hungarian fellow back then, but I couldn't get much out of it out of context.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I suppose I'll figure out why you think manho is scum in a few hours or so.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
We didn't have Dispatch in SA2, but, looking over the rules, I don't see any reason not to use it liberally. What am I missing?- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Dispatch doesn't appear to give Corpse Dust, though.
So, dispatch doesn't end the day; the only effect is that whoever flips.Rules wrote:Violating any of these rules will result in a punishment according to their severity, from a private or public rebuke up to and including a Soul Rip. Players who have their soul ripped from their bodies will spend eternity as a plaything for the gods, while their bodies remain as a shattered shadow of what once was. Their role becomes Soulless, and count as a Neutral Survivor for the purposes of other Win Conditions. They lose the ability to post publicly in the thread, to post in The Sanctum if they were a Cultist, and lose their Night Action. They may still be targetted by other players' Night Actions. During subsequent Days, living players may post Dispatch: Playername at any time, and if a majority of living players do so, the Soulless player immediately becomes Dead. A successful Rob Grave action will reveal the player's alignment just prior to the Soul Rip. Soul Rips may be accompanied by a change in phase, at the discretion of the Moderator.
Granted, this seems like a silly mechanic as I understand it, so I think I'm missing something.
This will probably become clear when I read the thread, but ye know.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
OHOHOH.
I guess it depends upon whether NSs count toward the scum wincon or not. I'd been assuming that they weren't counted, since modkilled players are normally considered removed from the game. If they ARE, that can make the decision a little more complicated.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Oh. Then idk why Percy didn't just flip them to start. Seems silly.
Whatever. I'll read and post tomorrow sometime, or Friday at the latest.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Hi everyone! I've been reading. Here are my notes through page 20: -_-
HIGHLIGHTS:IEC, IN HIS DIGITAL JOURNAL, wrote:Notes on SA3
Page 1
1. I have not heard Noise either night.
2. This is my second Stars Aligned game -- I was in SA2 -- but I was Murdered N1 in that game. I still followed SA2 to the end, but I didn't bother keeping track of all the complex rule discrepancies players claimed as I followed along, though.
3. Noise claims are pretty necessary to keep things straight and spot discrepancies later on. hito's rhetoric shows lack of familiar with the Ward action. Weakly implies that he is scum, since scum are on average maybe slightly less familiar with the Ward action. On the other hand, scum have daytalk.
4. Who's the other half of LostButterfly...? <_<
5. OK, so. It looks like Furco is scum on D1 for lying about Noise/Ward. This is not an error Investigators would make, especially since he follows up by saying that it should be rectified. So why is he still alive?
6. Oh. A mod error. Town on Furco, now and forever. I bet he heard noise N1.
Page 2
7. Furco is silly in 27. Searching for an RK is the ideal action for pretty much every player. But he is still town.
8. MoI's 29 looks scummy. Lots of irrelevant stuff -- no reason to discuss Murderers that don't exist, except to point out that it is a move for players who don't care about winning if taken early, etc. -- and a smear on townFurco.
Page 3
9. Leaning town on xvart from 52-53 (he posts the Noise bit and corrects RC). The list itself is nullish, but the post before it is also good.
10. Is D1 going to end in an RC lynch? Cuz idk about this "why I want Furco alive" rhetoric. That is old news. May be scumtalk telling someone to point it out without noticing its been done.
[cheats]
Yeah...no IC, though, so idk.
10. Benmage is aggressively dumb in 55. Kunkstar is scum for wanting to lynch Fate. Then he votes Fate. Dunno what the "I didn't hear noise" claim is about.
11. OH. OK. So why the hell are both Benmage and Fate still alive? EDIT: Wait, why the hell does Benmage stalking Fate have to do with anything.
12. Fate is female?
13. Why does everything think Fate is scum?
14. Also, why would Benmage want to wagon someone he'd just stalked...? <_<
15. Also, why would ANYONE stalk N1, since town can only Stalk once? EDIT: Oh, right; Benmage is just a dummy.
16. LB echos my feelings in 83.
17. OK...why we got RC over Benmage is getting ugh.
18. OMG IT'S FARADAY OR MAYBE FARSIDE OR SOMETHING WITH MINA OMG HI MINA. <3
19. God I want to kill Benmage. Not because he's cult, though.
20. Seacore 130 is scummy. While it's true that killing Benmage is tempting, there's no real reason to do it prematurely.
(I've stopped bothering with pages now. I'll put little pages in occasionally, but I may forget.)
21. RC apparently DID hear noise (via rewq). Question is who's more likely to freak out in the thread when that happens. Not sure I know.
22. META-THOUGHT
I just realized that Fate definitely didn't Stalk N1, so he was probably proper scum (unless he got petty and stalked N1). But lots of people irrationally thought Fate was scum D1. Possible really fail distancing? I can't remember who did it, though.
23. sottyrulez gets scumpoints for whining about discourse not being productive.
Page 8
24. @ hito I think Murders and NKs have distinct flavor, so that wouldn't work (178). Also, you're forgetting the opportunity cost of missing a resuscitation kit.ALSO, YOU'RE FORGETTING THAT FATE IS NOT NECESSARILY CULT.ALERT ALERT ALERT. SCUM SCUM SCUM.
Vote: hitogoroshi
25. MoI is very wrong in 187. I mean, what he STATES is accurate, but he's ignoring really important information. Furco is town.
26. Yeah, SK wouldn't take Suicidal for sure...it's an impossible win. Of course, he could just be lying.
27. Vox failing to accept FurcoTown looks bad.
28. rewq is not reading the rules carefully enough.
PAGE 10
29. Good catch from Furco. AureusVox made the same error as hito before. Possible scum connection, if someone posted to make this error to appear town. I remember discussion about lack of familiarity with the rules looking town in SA2.
30. RC's certainty that BM is scum looks bad. So does his thought that both are scum (245) . Those are both unlikely cases. If Fate flips scum, I wouldn't be surprised to see RC flip scum-who-found-resus-kit.
31. SX is. Uh. Idk.
32. RC's vote for SeaCore kinda makes sense, though. I guess. What the hell did Seacore mean back there, anyway? I don't remember someone making that claim.
33. OMG ANDY <3<3<3<3<3 Even though implying Furco is not confirmed town is scummy, because the only way anyone would EVER think that at this point is if they were scum with him.
34. I will write SX/Fate slash someday.
35. @ Andy -- I think Furco's gotten better since SA2. A little. I know he made a solid effort in Holy Orders, for example.
36. I am disappointed with Andy's catch-up post, by and large. Please be town, Andy.
37. I agree with Mina or Faraday or whoever the hell LB is in that post. EDIT: I think it's Faraday
38. VDV's comeback post is really bad. Ignores TONS of stuff; votes someone with like 1 post. Who'd voted scum (probably).
THOUGH: If it looked like Fatescum was going to die, you'd think scum would try to distance from him a little more. But then there's so much irrational chainsawing going on protecting him so idk.
39. WTF WHY DO PEOPLE NOT GET THAT FURCO IS CONFIRMED TOWN GOD. @ BABY SPICE 292.
40. Now Plum's doing the same thing as VDV...I dunno...I suppose I might've thought Fate was town in context...
41. RC's 298 doesn't make sense. If someone claimed a Ward on you, that means you won't die, cuz it would show that they didn't really Ward you.
42. I JUST NOTICED THAT BABY SPICE'S AVATAR IS MR. TENNANT. YAY.
43. HOWEVER: Warding at random seems dumb. I'd think naive town would search for items.
44. Now everyone is careening away from my reads...as DGB says VDV is town...
45. Furco -- I think Plum played to her scum meta as I understand it in your Greek Mythology mafia. Or I'm pretty sure that was your game...
EDIT: It was DeathNote. BUT -- that's a game I'd flip through. I called her scum mostly on the basis of meta there and was correct.
46. Why does Andy have a high opinion of CSL? I don't know Tripod, though. Another player supporting a Bowser wagon on the basis of literally nothing. I don't get it.
47. gj finding BMtown, tho.
48. Andy is super-cute, but his post is not very pro-town...
49. Y'know, Bowser may actually be scum distancing from Fate, if that's what scum decided to do. idk. CSL's Unvote post (344) looks really dumb.
PAGE 16
FASCINATING FACT: MY SLOT HAS YET TO POST.
50. Mina-my-super-town-friend-half-of-LB returns. <3
51. Not sure why Mina doesn't like MoI/Spy/Andy for possible scum...SX is a little iffy, but that's all.
52. I love that she is the ONLY ONE to share my view of Bowser. I even thought everyone was being weird about Bowser BEFORE I knew that Bowser was CSL. <_<
53. VDV has the WORST SCUMLIST EVAR in 390. WORST EVAR. HORRIBLE.*
* I suppose he could add Furco to make it a little worse.
54. Hmm. I wonder what Andy will list as his scum meta re: Wicked...
55. THERE'S the Furco I know and love. <3
56. But seriously Furco, LB is definitely Town.
57. I think "Drippereth" is unambiguously intended for the Dripp+Katsu hydra.
BUT, Percy should probably confirm whether "Drippereth" pregame would have defaulted to El Goosuki. That kind of ability resolution stuff should be known to the players.
I still think Furco is near 100% Town based on someone's (Seacore's?) prior claim that Elli and Drip post outside the hydra in QTs. As such, there's no extra reason for Furco to make that mistake as scum. There IS a greater chance of him lying, but that's separate.
A thought: since Seacore knows this well enough to bring it up, you'd think he'd be more hesitant to lynch Furco. Slightly odd play there.
58. Furco's claim that Mina intentionally posted as Mina is LOL-tastic. Oh man.
Also: you're asking about pragmatics, not semantics.
59. I love you, Furco.
60. God, SSBF tries to 1-up VDV with an awful scumlist. Seriously. idk wtf is going on with you people. I guess RC is kinda scummy, tho.
61. Oh man. I will write Furc/all slash.
62. idk why Percy won't just confirm Furco's request. We're outguessing Percy to determine Furco's alignment regardless of whether hes the extra mile. Whatever.
PAGE 20
63. I really don't think LB is scum, Furc. I mean, I do have an irrational affection for Mina, but still.
64. SSBF is scummy (491). Possibly a weak distancing MoI, since his attitude there doesn't jive with his anti-Furc ideology.
65. Three cheers for AV voting MoI before it was cool! Yay! Maybe he's town after all.
66. Yeah..I like pretty much all his views. I still don't like hito's one point if Fate flips scum, though. AT ALL. But literally everyone all game (sans me) has been like OMG HITO <3<3 so I'm not gonna bitch too much about that.
67. Hito gets town points for saving Furcie. <3 He needs to explain that post from way back, though.
68.
hito, what's up with the part I voted you for? You make some definite town moves after that, but that part REALLY stuck out.
Scum right now are MoI/Seacore/VDV/SSBF, and maybe Andy, off the top of my head. Town reads on Furco, LB, DGB, Benmage, AV, xvart...idk, probably some others. I can answer specific questions people have. Note that the notes are just whatever came up chronologically as I read through, and I still have like 80% of the game to read.
Also, there have been 23 new pages since I joined the game. So that's just wonderful.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
IEC, IN THE SECOND CHAPTER OF HIS JOURNAL, wrote:PAGE 21
INTERESTING NOTE: MY SLOT HAS YET TO POST.
69. Feysal is...first post?
70. Don't know why LB thinks Seacore is town (534).Furcowagon Peak AFAICT wrote:MagnaofIllusion, kunkstar7, xvart, Baby Spice, Lost Butterfly, Seacore, Super Smash Bros. Fan
71. Mina is my super-town friend re: furco, though. I can blame all that weird crap on Faraday.
72. MoI's vote for AV continues the trend of his literally never targetting a player I don't think is town.
73. Kmd is in this game? Anyway, his response to hitogashi's example is bad. Retroactive scumpoints for him.
LOL AT THIS LITERALLY ALL BEING D1. MOTHER FUCKING GOD.
74. I thought Fate had thought Furc was town all along (560)?
75. AV <3
76. SX mocks what is literally my favorite post in the entire game so far (578).
77. BS thinking Furco is scum at this point is scummy. She was weakly defending him when his wagon looked golden.
78. I want to know why Plum is DGB's BaAaaaAA pipl (591).
79. I like Plum more again (599-600). Want DGB to say why she's no good.
80. OOH, xvart and BS have BOTH claimed a MoI Ward now...
Why didn't xvart claim this earlier when he was making the Wards list...?
Calling Furco scum makes xvart scum.
81. hito is town now. dunno wtf was up with that early-game post.
82. YAY FOR HITO USING ECON TALK. I LOVE THOSE FOLK. <3
83. LB is so town. I had the EXACT SAME IMPRESSION as him re: Baby Spice (638), but I'm still ambivalent about her.
84. FURCO. STOP TRYIGN TO LYNCH LB.
85. RC is less likely scum with Fate as of 718 or so. So too bad for the ultimate lynch, unless Fate stalked N1 like a dummy.
86. WTF RC's POST IS SO BAD 730 OMGWTFBBQ
87. SX introduces scumAdel's plan from SA2 AFAICT. But I liked the plan back then, I guess.
88. Really? I always assumed that Andy was at least queer. EDIT: OK, so I guess that doesn't not fit but.
89. I'm leaning town on VP, but the LBwagon is a bad idea.
90. xvart, however, is scum for joining said wagon (807).
91. I agree with Wicked's subsequent post 130%. We are twins!
92. OMG DGB DO NOT BE SCUM GOD. All my favorite players are scum this game. EDIT: Re:voting AV IIRC.
93. lolirl at Fate's 858 re: DGB. HOWEVER: DGB did lurk a lot as town in SA2, and I thought she was scum there until she flipped.
94. There's some real weirdness with all these posts complaining about a TIME PARADOX around here.
Also, stuff for a LOOOOONNNNNNNNNNNNG time has just been commentary on earlier events. I am skimming. When's the fucking RC wagon gonna come... <_<
95. Yay! Maybe NP will say something novel in a few pages when he finally joins the game -_-
END OF PAGE 40- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Is there no way to jump to a specific page? Going over manually is extremely tedious.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
OK, I'm through page 80 now. Almost done. O_O
Please don't end the day before I finish. Back where I am, the grave robbing situation still seems a little sketchy. I would hope that SOMETHING was accomplished in the past 20 pages or so but ye know.
Here's my complete CD2 thing. No new information, but now you have it pretty:
Iecerint, in Chapter Three of his lengthy journal, wrote:PAGE 42 (41 was actually in the last set, I think)
96. I agree with NP's evaluation of the Furco wagon 110%.
97. AV's vote for EG is a little sad...I think EG is scummy, but she's not top-tier. idk.
98. Yeah...I can't really tell why everyone is gradually voting RC...I was hoping for something more dramatic...
99. Agree with Furco re: DGB. The only weird part is her AV vote, but that goes both ways.
100. @ AV
101. I pretty much agree with RC's post...I have no idea why he's been wagoned...
102. WHOAWHOAWHOAWHOA. Andy contradicts his old Noise claim in 1185...? EDIT: nvm i guess...
103. Furco not wanting to claim insanities is...umm...
104. I am retroactively nostalgic for the xvart counter-wagon.
BTW -- why the hell didn't RC flip...? Did Furco fuck up his grave robbery? I am annoyed.
105. Plum is towntown.
106. I've always thought VDV was scum, but SX's point about his point about not wanting to take insanities is noted.
107. Thank god that Furco manages to keep this readthrough bearable.
108. Wraith's post isn't very good...idk...and then he votes a player (El Goosuki) that there is a 0% chance will be lynched. And the case he makes is crappy ("they lurk").
109. VDV <3 for wanting to kill MoI.
110. Why is LB voting for manho? Mina's best wagon is someone who isn't playing the game? Really? (1483)
111. Wraith switching...to voting Benmage... (1505)
...
...
112. And then Fate does a big Benmage push.
113. God Wraith is so scummy it is ridiculous. I also recently D1 mislynched him but still.
114. Hmm. Benmage-awful wagon is buildingvia Fate. But analyzing it really depends on RC's flip.
115. Hito is my lover (1623), what with scandalously positing those D1 scumconnections.
116. Trilobite is not scum with MoI.
117. I like Trilobite in 1636. SX voting BM is serious business.
118. Hito is a man after my own heart for calling people out for being policemen (1646).
119. @ Furco I play Zerg poorly be my friend plz (1649).
120. God and now SX is trying to shift the focus to AV to confuse people, cuz I don't know why the hell he'd do it otherwise (1660).
121. AAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH. NOW it's clear why Furco didn't do the grave robbing.
122. Whoa. Neat that LB was scum or Murderin' or whatever. Did not expect it based on Mina's posts. Faraday's were a little odd, though.
123. Wicked is mostly confirmed probably, unless there's total insanity. Yay. He was one of the sane ones.
124. Here's what my D2 start post would have been:
125. xvart's plan was neat.
126. Trilobite's vote for Benmage (1740) makes NO SENSE. AT ALL. We know Benmage won't ever go Murderer now that he can't kill his target, and he's certainly not Cult.
There was also the slight weirdness of hito choosing Trilobite to Ward, of all people. Odd.
127. Also -- why did NP ask whoever whether they searched for tools twice? There are certainly other possibilities...and if he did FT N0, there was no better option, except to Ward.
128. OH, so the Corpse Dust is why Dispatching could be sketchy. Now that makes sense. But it's still fine. Picking 2 town to double grab should be fine.
Though, scum can ward at least some of them (but not all without forsaking NK, unless Fate is actually Town).
129. MoI's point about BM's night choice is valid. Why didn't he just kill Fate? Not allowed? I guess I'll find out. He's ignored the question so far. EDIT: Explanation is fine, I guess. Bonus points since he really is targeting Wraith. <3
130. Why in the name of all that is holy did DGB use Forensic Tools.
DGB, why the hell did you do that?
I am reading the entire thread after the fact. EVEN I KNOW YOU SHOULDN'T DO THAT.
OMGUS.
131. AV remains a man or woman after my own heart (1773). I mean this is kind of policework more than scumhunting but GOD DRAW THE LINE SOMEWHERE.
132. Though SX's point on him is OK. He could've killed successfully if he was a Murderer, and we won't see evidence of that. I guess he could've reconsidered.
133. Feysal doubles up on Wicked with RK...
A thought: our successful resuscitators are bloody and insane already, so maybe we should make them the graverobbers. Or, at least, one of the mshould be NP. Feysal is a little sketchy.
ALERT: Since I now know that Fate "died" D1, it looks like he wasn't Cult, but a Murderer and all the mess from my earlier notes are invalid. Holy fuck. I am very annoyed.
134. Can't we double-graverob? It should just take two players to get everyone flipped. Or are we just worried about Wards?
135. Furco is good in 1798. But we're not lynching DGB, so I guess I'll find out why...
136. Hmm...but why did xvart Ward DGB if Furco already said he would?
137. Why is literally the ENTIRE TOWN hearing noise? This is absurd.
138. Is Rob Grave still a free action such that BenMage can Rob and also Murder? I'm all for him Murdering Wraith tbh.
139. I think different cultists can target the same player. As such, getting a fetish does NOT necessarily lead to kill immunity.
140. Christ, almost every single player in the game claimed Noise last night. Except for my lurker slot.
141. Wraith thinks there are two Murderers...why? Wicked could just as easily have been the scum target... (1893)
142. Not sure why Niki wants to lynch FT (1902). Lots of people irrationally want to lynch BM. Why does he ignore all those players?
143. Oh, NVM. NP shows me the actual post, and it is clear why it is terrible. (1906)
144. OMGWTF. ET TU, AV (1919). He wants to kill BM...why? WTF? Since when?
145. SHIT I TOTALLY MISSED HIS VOTE. I AM BLINDED BY LOVE. CHRIST. DON'T BE AN IDIOT.
146. I'm going to repeat VP's scumlist in 1921, because it is extremely excellent:
MoI
Furpants Tom
Wraith
Baby Spice
El Goos
147. Re: Trilobite's comment...does scum ward GRAVES, or PLAYERS-WHO-WARD. Cuz I'd assumed the former, but it seems like the latter would be more fair. idk. nightmare.
148. TNM is towntown. Players whining about BM not claiming his actions (including my predecessor) are confused or scum.
149. Wraith continues to make senseless scumlists in 1959 (except for DGB, who is scum or sort of not paying attention).
150. Wraith actually makes a decent point about BM in 1967, though. I suppose a short list from BM might be a good idea. BUT:
151. But then he sucks again in 1968...because BM could Murder Fate and the flavor would show up. And that would be a huge bluff for scumBM to make. And c'mon, it's BM.
152. I agree with Plum in 1974...Seacore has been well-behaved lately.
153. God, I want Wraith dead.
154.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
GOD MOTHERFUCKER THAT TOOK FOREVER.Iecerint, FINISHING HIS NOVEL, wrote:154. OK so -- just realized that NP isn't confirmed town, since cult knows their kill failed for SOME reason. So it could just as easily be flipped. I still think NP is town, though...but it's not enough to beat BM robbing at least 1 grave (not new info).
155. Wicked is mistaken in 2033. Bloody claims can be derived from the information claimed by players. If Forensic tools discover unexplained blood, it will still come out. The only effect of Blood status claims is that it will make scum less likely to slip up AFAICT.
156. Agree with VP about Magna (2066).
157. Manho is a total idiot (2088, where he thinks MoI is town).
158. Manho voted BM yesterday? Really? I missed it...that would be more idiocy. EDIT: Oh, AV is incredulous about thinking BM ISN'T cult? WTF AV. Go back to being AV from D1, please.
159. Oh, gross. Manho. How could you do this to me? <_<
Good thing there are so many scummy players.
160. I do agree with Trig about MoI->Furc TO AN EXTENT. MoI got really pissy when we lynched him over scumFurc in Brave and the Beautiful. I could see feelings spilling over to his early play here.
BUT, I still think he's probably cult due to other factors.
161. @ Baby Spice -- DGB is (well, used to be) extremely manipulative. The W/E bro attitude is a new thing. Same goes for Elli. Katsu is VI.
162. I have to say that I have a hard time believing that DGB and Elli would just flat-out err like that. I really do.
163. @ Fate 2170 -- no, it's different. The fact that 2 players targeted Plum AND there was no scum kill strongly implies that Wicked is town. He also seemed town yesterday. You have to posit a huge conspiracy otherwise.
164. DGB's unvote in 2200 is a towntell for her in context, unless she perceived that MoI would go on to lynch without her (or they're both scum).
165. Hooray for Wraith votes...but BM is going to kill him, anyway (we assume), so it's a little silly (2225).
166. VDV -- why the hell is Wraith not scum?
167. NVM. He answers this is 2269 ("rewq's iso 1 => Wraith town"). EDIT: rewq's iso 1 states that the rules do not state how many players are scum. Thesis is that scum would not screw this up (unless it's faked). Fair enough, though faking shit is more reasonable with daytalk. BUT, it looks like it was just 30 minutes after the relevant post, so that's not much time for scum planning. BUTBUT, it was D1, when literally everyone was playing the game, so there's also that.
168. re: Wicked 2279 -- I am no real feeling about kunkstar after reading some 93 pages of this game. He lurks and lurks and lurks. Reading over him in iso a little (but I have EXTREME fatigue at this point, so these are glances), his early push on Furco is scummy, but his town/scum list is OK, if brief. He's probably not my first choice for a lynch, but he's not a strong town read.
169. God. What the hell is DGB doing? She's a very competent player...
170. She made me laugh in 2298, though.
171. Oh, man, I love this woman. <3 (2303)
172. Very good wagon analysis by Furco in 2307. Very good. I'd been struggling with whether to vote MoI or EG or kunkstar (albeit leaning one of the first two), but that seals it for me. The 7 initial players on the MoI wagon are all very town. That looks like a wagon on scum to me.
I noticed two players unvoting MoI around the same time before. I'd bet one of them is scum, even though this same logic got us into trouble in Holy Orders. Can't find it looking back now, though.
173. Trig (2315) -- it's relevant because of the PEOPLE on MoI's wagon.
174. Seacore's point in 2318 is a good point. Even manho knew not to investigate N1. <_<
175. Furco 2325, if you become bloody by Murdering, you lose your res kit. Stalking MoI is suboptimal because you waste your rez. A bloody player, or at least a rez-less player, should do those things.
176. LOL @ DGB 2365.
177. Seacore's graverob plan makes WAY more sense IMO, except that the scumwards will mess things up.
178. Why isn't Wicked robbing twice...?
179. My only problem with the Dispatch plan as it existed when I replaced in is the Ward angle. Why has no one mentioned it?
180. I now dislike DGB's "Hello" post in context...the shift to MoI doesn't really make sense...it looks like she's possibly trying to tie herself to me, probably because she knows I love her and will hesitate more than is rational to lynch her.
181. Fate is almost certainly a Murderer. There's no reason for cult to budget themselves like that otherwise, because they'll just waste their extra rez kits when they Ritual, anyway.
182. -_- @ Katsu
183. @ Wicked 2452 -- Having Benmage graverob is excellent, because he is already damaged goods due to taking Suicidal, etc.
184. Wicked, you know that I have no control over whether I'm a murderer. I'm at the mercy of the Hungarian fellow and manho.
Granted, they didn't mess things over for me, so that is that.
185. Also @ Wicked -- Actually, the chances of two players warding the same player are extremely low. Very low. If ALL PLAYERS were required to Ward, the chance of it happening is 0.2%. When you factor in that players could also Stalk/Search, the chance is much lower. BS and Xvart warding MoI is not null, though it COULD be a coincidence.
186. I have no idea why you think Niki is town...unless you just think ElG is scum...
187. @ AV -- I think BM is concerned that the Murderer will Stalk him today, thinking that BM might be going Murderer, too.
Really, this would be a godsent.No one should Ward BM tonight.We need to get rid of him so he doesn't screw up lylo, anyway.
YOU HAVE NO EXCUSE FOR BEING BEHIND AGAIN.
OK SCUMLIST AND TOPICAL STUFF COMING UP.
BUT THERE ARE SOME QUESTIONS IN THERE SO PLEASE AT LEAST CTRL+F YOUR NAME TO SEE IF THERE'S ANYTHING OUTSTANDING. Also, note that I did this as I went along and my views on some players have changed considerably from early on.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
SUPER TOWN
Benmage
Furcolow
Wickedestjr
TOWN
Fate (I mean, this is what I think he'll *flip*)
Andrius (I had my doubts early on, though)
hitorogoshi (I had my doubts REALLY early on, though, for what looked like a scumslip that no one noticed; I'd like him to respond to it)
Plum
Seacore (I had my doubts early on, though)
SpyreX (I had my doubts early on, though)
TNM
Trilobite
VPBaltar
TOWN?
AurorusVox (He was my strongest town read until his bizarre behavior D2 wrt BM)
FurpantsTom (Push on BM early D2 is very scummy, but no other complaints)
VDV (Town UNLESS Wraith is scum)
***Wraith (REALLY hate to admit it, but rewq's iso 1 is indeed a fairly solid towntell) <---- take note, BM***
CULT?
RC (This is partly wishful thinking)
Feysal (Him XOR NP: 100%)
NP (Him XOR Feysal: 100%)
kunkstar
Nicodemus (I agree that he's the most likely scum on ElG's wagon)
Triglav (I'm not sure where to put him...but probably here...)
CULT
LostButterfly (No extra murder => she was cult)
BabySpice (Push on Furco)
MagnaofIllusion (Push on Furco)
xvart (late Ward claim, some odd stances)- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Regarding the graverobbing plan --
I like the plan, but it seems like scum can PROBABLY still mess us up with Wards without breaking a sweat. Assuming LBscum RCtown, that leaves 6 scum. 1/3 to ritual leaves 4 to Ward 4 graves. No flips result. And given that the ENTIRE TOWN CHRIST EXCEPT like me and one other player heard Noise, they appear to have made lots of fetishes in preparation, so that won't be a limiting factor.
I don't know how to deal with this, though...
I encourage people to read the bits of my novel that apply to them at the very least. I took ages writing it so ye know. Most of the issues I address were brought up by someone a few posts later, so many of the concerns are not a huge deal, but nevertheless....- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I'd also request a deadline extension, but it looks like MoI is already voting himself sooooo. <_<
One thing FT already told Furco that I want to repeat is thatMurdering or otherwise becoming bloody destroys rez kits.I don't think Furco ever acknowledged when FT said as much.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Mod: As currently written, players with 9 insanities may murder 2 players in one night. Is this intentional, or is the intent just to give insane Murders twice the flexibility with regard to kill targets?- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Mod: If scum (or whoever) Wards a corpse n times, does that block *all* Rob Grave attempts, or only n attempts?
I think the Ward on BM is a bad idea. He wants it because he thinks the Murderer may kill him because he's in a position to challenge him for the Murder win based on the insanities he may accumulate.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Have you heard unexplained Noise? You may be beyond Wards assistance in that regard.
If Murderers can commit two simultaneous kills, they can become Murderers and win the game in the same night.(MOD: Well, it depends on the pragmatics of "2 murders BEFORE this one"...). At any rate, we can keep your long-term insanity growth under control, I think, so long as Cult doesn't help you along (in which case, hell, they can deal with you) and we watch the Robbed Graves.
I've also just noticed something extremely disturbing. Ima ask Percy about it.Last edited by Percy on Sat Nov 20, 2010 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
@ AV -- I think you may have typo'd at some point during D2 and thrown a "not" in there.
Anyway, my position is that it is nigh-totally bogus to think that BM is cult, and anyone who makes a claim that absurd cannot be taken seriously. You have to believe a big list of things that don't make sense to think BM is cult (like, they're POSSIBLE, but they posit a big conspiracy). In a game with as many sketchy players as I perceive there to be, pushing for BM of all people for the lynch looks scummy.
That said, I think your D1 play was really good. Or, at least, I could consistently have some notion about a post and then you would show up and say it.
Also, you're forgetting that letting any cult graverob will get them Corpse Dust. Which, as Seacore indicated, isn't the end of the world, but is pretty suboptimal.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
@ VP -- I understand that. That statement was address at AV for this:NEVERMIND. I see what you mean. I retract my statement.
One contingency I might suggest is that the counterwagons are significantly less likely to be town if MoI flips scum. Maybe we should make two lists based on MoI'sbut we get no flip. We could still possibly do contingency on his sanity, I guess, though cult could easily have no Insanities at this point, unless they used MegaAttack and NP and Fey are just telling the truth (low probability).- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
k. then it just gives flexibility to prevent Warding from messing them up if they're still managing and the game has gone on forever. Got it. I based it on a myopic reading of the rules.
There's still that one issue, but I suppose that'll have to wait.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Also, I just reread my notes, and I'd forgotten that Benmage took Suicidal D1. Coupled with the fact that he won't be able to do his 2nd and 3rd kills in one night ala Vi's clarification, he's a very contained threat and everyone who says mean things about him is again silly or scummy.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Matching up NP and Feysal is a good idea. One is scum and one is town, and they're both bloody already, so it's minimal cost.
Wicked/Andy seems a little arbitrary. I'm not sure why they're being selected. Maybe you can explain why? Are you just trying to ensure at least 1 town? Then why Andy?
Only concern is that Wards might let scum get Corpse Dust. Are people told if their Rob Grave action was not successful? If so, we can find evidence of scum screwing with things after the fact.
@ Trilobite -- I didn't have a town read on you until D2. You didn't stand out too much to me one way or the other D1 IIRC; you may've made a few bad calls, but I can't remember anything specific.
A major point in your favor is that you aren't scum with MoI.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I don't understand this. You aren't told that you resuscitated successfully?Feysal wrote:nopointinactingup is an excellent example of this. He would not need to grave rob to prove himself not a murderer, because we already know he cannot be. nopoint claimed to have resuscitated Wickedestjr before he said he had been attacked. There is no way nopoint could have known Wickedestjr had been attacked if he were LB's murderer. The same unfortunately does not apply to me.
@ SC -- I missed that warding bodies gives an extra insanity. I suppose that's a point in that direction. My list is only a non-cult/cult list.
Part of the reason I was really concerned about the graves was that the rules as prior written had it so that Robbing a Warded grave would turn the body to dust without a flip. This makes it a really OP cult action. I asked Percy and Vi via PM to avoid alerting cult. Percy has told me that that wasn't the intent, and has adjusted the wording of the rules accordingly. This is what I mentioned I'd noticed earlier.
Not really...the fact that they're already bloody in fact makes it BETTER for them to Rob Grave. Laundering per-se doesn't do anything for us, and whoever Robs Graves is going to be bloody either way. AND, the blood that Feysal and NPAU have is already explained-away by resuscitation, so finding it via Investigation would be stupid (in fact, it would be an ElG-tier bad action). So I dunno why you're complaining about this. BM agreeing with you makes just slightly more sense, as that is BM.AV wrote:A major disadvantage of B is that Feysal & NPAU won't be able to launder, which as has just been raised, is pretty important.
Communing them to infer Insanity status is a decent argument against Plan B, but it's not really fullproof because most of the cult is probably still insanity-free. But if we do go with A, that's a good N2 action.
One disadvantage of A that people haven't noted is that it gives Town players a bunch of insanities. This is a bad thing, because the insanities that build up eventually start affecting voting possibilities and can mess with the lynches; this happened a little in SA2.
@ SC, could you explain why Plan A does much to the cult? The idea is just that it forces them to take insanities? But it also makes the towniest players take insanities...?
Plan A is fine if I'm missing how it really does anything to Cult. Otherwise, I want to keep at least the NP/Feysal dichotomy part of Plan B in order to maximize the chance that it's an ideal Town/Scum pairing for those robberies.
I'm not voting because Plan B has that particular element that I like, even if it has other flaws (like, NP/Feysal shouldn't be on Fate, who is unlikely to have items).- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
My mistake @ the first. That changes matters. It's no longer quite as wonderful to have those two go together.
I support Plan A unless MoI flips with an Insanity. If he flips with an Insanity, the counter-wagons are no longer optimal second-robbers. NP/Feysal split beats them at that point AFAICT, because I think there's a greater chance of 1 scum in NP/Feysal than in counter-wagons to scum/Town.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
???Fey wrote:I left out Wraith, since he said he was going to resuscitate, which means he cannot be resuscitated. The cult cannot kill him anyway.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Oh, I see. I expected to see it in "Target," but it's in Side Effects. Can't rez rezzers.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I'm waiting for a VC so I don't mess up, but I'm ready to pile on whenever.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
UNLESS we want to switch in BS for ElG or w/e.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
idk is basically stuff we already have in 2 forms.
BUT.
man that is a cute plushie.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
The wording in my PM specifically indicates that I was not able to prevent FT from passing on. In other words, the fact that he did not survive is implicit in the wording of the PM itself. I doubt it was a mod error, though that would be lovely.
I am assuming Greater Ritual. Murder target is also a possibility, but much less likely.
EDIT: Trilobite is NOT found to be a liar IIRC...are you misinterpreting that action claim?
What does N1 graverobbers have to do with anything? Do you mean N2 graverobbers?- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Yes, I failed to protect. No, I am not bloody. I also didn't get an Insanity.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Though THAT part does appear to be a mod error.Rules wrote:Notes: If more killing actions target the player than there are players Resuscitating them, then the kill is not prevented, though you still become Bloody when the killing action resolves.
Why is it implied that someone rezzed me?- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Yes, it lists that there was failure...
I guess it says something else if you benignly target someone who wasn't targeted?
EDIT: Oh. Yeah. That would make sense.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
OK, I was notified of the failure, so that can't explain it.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
@ VP, that doesn't explain why *I* would be informed, though. Replacing in names:
But I *was* notified. Unless this just means that I won't be notified given that FT doesn't die.SE given that FT also rezz'd wrote:FT's target hears Noise. Any Resuscitate action targeting FT tonight will fail, and the player who targeted FT [Iec]will not be notified of the failure.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I think the intent might be that I'm not told in the event that FT rezzes and isn't targeted by anything. This is a sensible rule because it prevents players from having a bunch of players rez in a circle and then finding the player who cheated.
But it makes it sound like I shouldn't be told in either case. Probably just an oversight, but idk.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
The rules post should probably be edited, then...there's a line about not being notified about failure that doesn't appear to apply.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
It has to be that he Stalked someone N0 intending to go Murderer. Not very mysterious.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Andy, I'm pretty sure Commune is based on your insanity BEFORE the one that it gives you. So he'd have to have only 1 insanity. Correct me if I'm wrong.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Yeah, Iecscum cleverly claimed to have protected the dead man with discrepancies between his claim and the ruleset as-written that Percy subsequently had to clear up. And didn't even explain away any insanities in doing so! I literally cannot count all the scum motivations.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I am literally blown away by xvart's stalk target.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I could see xvart as scum, especially if ElG is town. Scum just saw us give ElG a free pass, albeit that time for something that didn't explain away an insanity. This time, xvart randomly claimed stalk on Furco, though he then appeared repentant. Scum may have decided that they could get away with it due to our treatment of ElG.
And I already had a scummy vibe from xvart.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Well, Benmage, too, maybe, but I meant how ElG used Investigate even though it was a useless decision.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Furc, I'm not sure why you're taking this attitude toward VP. Did he do something objectionable that I missed? EDIT: I understand that you're not voting him.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Ye know, you'd think MoI would've claimed Murderer last night. Whatever.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
I think Furco's anger at VP is misdirected anger s/p people's failure to follow the plan.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
ElG took Suicidal, too...?
Anyone entertaining killing off Furco gets pro-scum marks from me. His behavior this game has been as pro-town as Furco gets, and we have way too many players to kill before that (ElG, xvart in the short term; followed by players who are actually scummy).- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Furco had corrected me by saying they were responding to our treatment of you rather than that of ElG (in the event that xvart is scum).- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
He has that information in his CD3. He has claimed 0 insanities, and I THINK Triglav just confirmed that.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
Didn't someone else claim to have Communed Feysal, though? Or did I just make that up?- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
It's not impossible (like, NPcult could use rez kits both nights), but it's relatively unlikely.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
If no one claims rez on SX, cult 100% rezzed SX. If cult rezzed SX, SX is 90% cult.
Waiting to see if any stragglers want to claim SXrez is the obvious move.
I share people's indignation at ElG's behavior. And xvart's.- Iecerint
-
Iecerint Survivor
- Iecerint
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15766
- Joined: May 13, 2009
- Location: San Francisco
NB: This exact same scenario came up in SA2 IIRC -- scumPlum rezzed someone who ended up being cult. This eventually got her, but it took awhile.
Surprised she hasn't brought this up re: SX's situation AFAICT. - Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint
- Iecerint