Nintendo Mafia (Game Over)
Forum rules
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
the baker?The Master Hand wrote: GO NINTENDO.
-The Baker
which one of you is that?
sameThe Master Hand wrote: Activity-wise, we're going to attempt to stay fairly active. We'll tag our posts, but most of the time we just discuss and post under one head rather than both saying stuff here. More affective hydra this way.
~Twistedspoon(the superior head)- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
Lelouch VI Britannia wrote:Its official Master Hand should be shot by the Vig just for his defensive actions right in above post.
¿Qué?Lelouch VI Britannia wrote:For the record i am being serious too... I actually know what I am doing
I agree with ODM regarding mass nameclaiming... but, eh, some other issues with the post.
Why'd you ignore Lucresia's post Random Vote?ObliviousDruidMuncher wrote:@Mb and Dana: Why are you still RVSing? Shit's happened. Though I could give a fuck about the votes on me.
@Lelouch: Why'd you ignore Espy's vote which had no reasoning?
This is rolename fishing.Lelouch wrote:crap can we think of a few more likely roles?
<snip>
I'm going to watch the Lelouchtown wagon rise and then pick scum off of it. He's not scum, his way of going about business is just out of the ordinary.
You also seem to be picking out Lelouch as scummy despite then later saying he's not scum. Clarify this for me please.
~ Hopp- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
"oh well he did it too" *walks off*mb53 wrote: Why aren't you attacking ODM for postingthe exact same thingthat I did?
blatant mudslinging there
"look, they did it too" = scum tell.
VOTE: mb53
This post makes no sense to me whatsoever. Why cough? What do you mean by radical?Lelouch VI Britannia wrote:Cough basically people who are RADICAL are heavily investigated but the silent guys get away with it all, I want to make everyone a Radical.
If it wasn't for mb53's Tu Quoque then you'd have my vote right now. Talk sense or we'll reconsider- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
and omgus isn't?mb53 wrote: Terrible cases are terrible. And scummy.
Vote: Pinky and the Brain
i digress. My vote says all i need to
gives me bad vibesDekes wrote: The Lelouch wagon is completely boring. I'll let you guys handle it
so you're not scumhunting with us because it's boring? Just because a player is boring it doesn't mean they aren't scum, no?
your passiveness neglects town's strongest weapon; their opinions.- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
I don't like this post. The 'NEWB CARD' and list of role claims came a couple of pages ago, and you had already posted after the occurences without really batting an eyelid too much. The vanilla claim and OMGUS also came before your previous post, and this post only seems to be a feigned attempt at having an opinion on Lelouch following mb's nudge.Tragedy wrote:@LVB: 'OMGUS' and the 'NEWB CARD' won't help you at all at this state.
It's still pretty stupid to make a list of role claims on whose town or not.
You shouldn't go to far with it anyways.
Claiming as 'Vanilla' won't get you anywhere else too.
Uhhh.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Tragedy
lolwut?Lelouch VI Britannia wrote:his[espeo's]idea of a massive name claim RETARDED because now if the Mafia knows all the town Names then they know who NOT to claim for a nameLelouch VI Britannia wrote:MOI CHA! Wise Ol Man will show up and tell us everything unfortunately his house has been blown up and he is in space or dead you must pay a witch 3000 Rio to speak to him. Anyone else notice Ebisimaru? I can't find Goemon! So lets make a player list and think what setup we have first guys.
<snip'd - huge name speculation>
Glass houses. Stones.Lelouch VI Britannia wrote:Don't be moronic
@ Lelouch: If you had to name, say, two people other than Tragedy that you had a (confident?) town read on, who would they be?
~ Hopp- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
@ esurio: Isn't Lelouch is talking about PMs primarily?
Hmm?crazypianist1116 wrote:Tragedy case is weak considering how short Tragedy's first post after Lelouch's vanilla claim was
Okay, so here's context. Take out mb's post immediately underneath (#135). It seems unnatural doesn't it for Tragedy's post (#137) to suddenly come after Lelouch's (#136) when all the points addressed to Lelouch have nothing to do with his #136. It's really quite obviously a post prompted by mb's post.
We also have this recently:
Tragedy says this with a RVS vote still down on DBE.Tragedy wrote:
So you're still voting on Lelouch despite you think he's a Town VI, beautiful.mb53 wrote:I still think lelouch is town VI, rather than scum VI. There hasn't been much scum motivation through is stupidity, and it appears he istryingto get reads on people.
Your scuminess has been proven.
This paticular snippet is reading quite strongly town to me, actually. Even being hounded to death, he's astute enough to realise that there's some 'incriminating' evidence on him, and yet mb is going "TOWN TOWN TOWN" with no paticuarly compelling logic, and so he's suspicious of mb. Don't think that newb-scum would do this, so I'm leaning newb-town.Lelouch VI Britannia wrote:MB IS ACTING OD AS FUCK BECAUSE He KEEPS CALLING ME TOWN EVEN WITH THE CURRENT INFO ON ME AND IF I DIE THEN HE GETS TOWN CRED FOR HAVING DEFENDED SOMEONE HE NOTICED TO BE TOWN!
I'm not liking his seemingly unprovoked flip-flop on Tragedy, but eh. I can buy newb-town doing that.
~ Hopp- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
Humm.mb53 wrote:
This post reads town to me.Thil wrote:Every time I log on I just feel overwhelmed by the sheer number of posts this gets, and I just feel like it would be folly to try and glean something from all of them in a couple hours. Though I think Lulu's explosive attitude isn't helping his case (I personally don't like his choice of words) I feel like he is just frustrated town. I don't particularly care what specific role, any town is worth keeping alive. I don't really have much that I can decipher from anyone else, but I'm working on it...
I'm calling that dana, P&tB, and tragedy are scum.
Vote: Tragedy
Random inclusion of dana is very odd. Very, very odd.
Why dana, mb?
@ esurio: I think you've missed what I said before -isn't LVB talking about PMs primarily in that thread you linked to?
Anybody who's voting because of esurio's digging should feel free to answer this as well.
Although nobody asked about it, I think it's worth mentioning that the reason I can buy LVB's change of heart with regards to Tragedy in that it could feasibly be him sheeping a town read (us).
So you think that scumbuddies would suggest "OMG YOU CALLING TRAGEDY (a scumbuddy) A DOC YOU'D BETTER CHANGE YOUR MIND QUICK AND CALL HER SCUMMY"?lewarcher82 wrote:For instance about Tragedy: he denied ever saying she was a doc. I called him out on that. He answered he has changed his mind, cuz Tragedy has apparently done something horrible that made him change his mind. What? No idea. Mistery. Not a word. My read: noobish attempt at distancing, probably suggested by his scumbuddies, since they apparently have daytalk.
Not buying it, tbh.
@ TMH: What are your opinions on:
a) esurio's out-of-thread investigation on LVB?
b) The people who then went 'GENIUS, ESURIO! VOTE VOTE VOTE!!!'?
~ Hopp- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
Huh.
Well, I guess my town-read on Lelouch was totally misdirected.
...
Well, Tragedy is still probably scum. Perhaps even moreso now.
She's been consistently chainsawing people attacking Lelouch.
Tragedy wrote:@Lewarcher:"you say you are not really a noob VI, so you sure can handle a couple of votes, don't you?" "you played the part of the retarded newb pretty well, congrats."
So you're just voting him because he's a VI? You should at least teach the poor idiot about some parts of Mafia instead of going through the whole process of 'lynching the Newbie VI' without even making him understand the concepts.
Bad teachers are bad.Tragedy wrote:@Lew: So just because your case is pretty crappy of esuriospiritus, that's why you went back to lynching Lelouch?
"I do change my vote if my target starts looking townier or if some good case emerges. "
So you're not going to make a decent case on esuriospiritus and quit on a case you call 'crappy'?Tragedy wrote:
So you're still voting on Lelouch despite you think he's a Town VI, beautiful.mb53 wrote:I still think lelouch is town VI, rather than scum VI. There hasn't been much scum motivation through is stupidity, and it appears he istryingto get reads on people.
Your scuminess has been proven.
... And what about me?TheJakalope wrote:Ok, what immediately comes to my mind is that since mafia knows generally who is innocent, and I know I'm innocent, I would think the scum WOULD defend/come to my side, so that when you guys did lynch Lelouch, they could use it as leverage later on in the game if they came under suspicion. With this logic, espeonage shows up on my radar.
See, this makes no sense.TheJakalope wrote:How do you not see how obvious his "plan" was. he just wants to screw over the town that wasn't agreeing with him. He was arguing with just about all of you, why would he give you guys the scum-lynch if he didn't like any of you?
The people who weren't agreeing with him were by and large the people he 'thought' to be scum.
Therefore, if he is town, he wants to screw over scum (because he thinks the people disagreeing with him and annoying him he genuinely thinks to be scum). He doesn't want to screw over town, as town weren't the people annoying him. So he wouldn't claim scum, as that would screw over town, helping the people who pissed him off so much (because he believes them to be scum).
UNVOTE:
VOTE: TheJakalope
Tragedy lynch can wait until tomorrow.
@ TMH: You may have been going to do this anyway, but just in case, please quote Toasty's post on your next post for ISO purposes. Ta.
~ Hopp- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
Outing you as scum is the ultimate consumation of our love.Tragedy wrote:Love you, Hoppster <3~
(But seriously, you're scum. Thanks for reassuring me.)
Breaching the topic of meta: I'll have another read of it, but I[Hoppster, not Twistedspoon or this hydra account]have played in one Open game with The Master Hand hydra, and I do seem to remember them being an similarly aggressive hydra as town. I'll post a link if anybody wants it. Their play feels virtually identical (except a few more expletives here and there).
~ Hopp- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
VOTE: Tragedy Still scum from yesterday, with the addition of her cop-out lurker vote. Like, seriously. Lynch plz.
esurio: Why are you voting for Ythan instead of Tragedy?
@ SSBF: Re TMH -Lelouch was a douche. I don't think it's fair to blame anybody for that.
Just so you understand the thoughts behind the hydra LL-reads: Twistedspoon always had a scum-read, but I had a null/leaning-town read for the most part. Then he claimed scum and Twistedspoon laughed at me in the QT. >>
This head is going to be posting for the most part now, which should make things clearer in future (most of what Twistedspoon says is gibberish anyway tbqh).
Yes, I did have a better case on Tragedy (excluding LL's scumclaim), but seriously, a Tragedy lynch-wagon was just COMPLETELY UNREALISTIC by the latter ends of the day, and keeping our vote there would just be no help at all. Plus, Tragedy made sense as a LL-buddy.
MOAR TRAGEDY VOTES.- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
This was Hoppster btw in case it wasn't obvious. >>Pinky and the Brain wrote:<last post made by this account>
@ esurio: Okay, thanks for the explanation.
Is this sarcasm? I honestly can't tell.Tragedy wrote:Oh really, but Pinky has a good reason to call me scummy here.
Although I DO look scummy attempting to lynch a lurker, but everyone's just defending the lurker and lynching the SUSPICIOUS one. Really, town? I don't see THIL doing anything other than myself.
This is getting more scummier as hell for people to just HOP on me because I'm trying to LYNCH a LURKER, that you're ALL "DEFENDING".
You're also getting waaaay too paranoid here. I haven't defended Thil at all. I just said you're scummy for voting Thil when there was the issue of Lelouch claiming scum.
You're also referring to people in general - yet I'm the only person voting you. Yes, I'm encouraging people to vote you but it's just me at the moment.
Are you calling me scummy for encouraging people to vote you by saying it's scummy for people to hop onto the Tragedy-wagon (choo choo!)? Nobody else is on the wagon so I can't see who else it COULD be directed at, yet in the context you're not actively attacking me so I really can't tell. If you are calling me scummy, why no vote?
Even if you're not calling me scummy, why no vote? You're not even voting for Thil who you confess to trying to lynch.
(And don't be scared of the wagon, Tragedy, it's made out of LOOOOOVE! <3)
~ Hoppster.- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
Yeah, that was Hoppster again. -_-Pinky and the Brain wrote:<Last post on this account>
SO IS THIL SCUM IN YOUR OPINION OR NOT I'M SO CONFUSED.Tragedy wrote: DOES IT LOOK LIKE I'M PUSHING?... Nope.
General Thoughts as In everybody.. Everyone should at least understand why I was originally pushing for THIL.
Also just noticed this:
You're criticising town for lynching suspicious people. Lulz. <3Tragedy wrote:Although I DO look scummy attempting to lynch a lurker, but everyone's just defending the lurker and lynching the SUSPICIOUS one. Really, town?
AND WAI YOU NO VOTING ANYBODY STILL? >>
You don't think ANYBODY is supicious (apart from yourself)?
Explain this to me plz (from before, obviously).Tragedy wrote:I'm still sitting my vote on DBE.
~ Hoppster- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
SO WHY YOU NO VOTING HER?Tragedy wrote:DBE hasn't been making a case since she has returned.
So where is she now?
SO WHY YOU UNVOTE HER AT ALL?
(Also, she is site-wide AWOL I believe. She has been having computer issues.)
@ RedCoyote: You do need to read SSBF's post, because HE DONE FOS'D YOU! OHHHH SNAP. *clicks fingers*
mb's stance on Lelouch has been a bit dodgy at times, but seriously, Tragedy is the vote for today.
I MEAN LOOK AT THIS SHE DIDN'T VOTE LELOUCH AT ALLTragedy wrote:I would be going for lulu if he could look any scummier, but at least I'll have Andy chasing me to die.- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
YOU STRONGLY IMPLIED IT.Tragedy wrote:I'm back~
Anyways, did I say Lelouch was scum here? Nooo.
Translation: SO YAH LULU SRSLY SCUMMY COULDN'T LOOK SCUMMIER BUT NOT GONNA VOTE UNLESS HE GETS EVEN MORE SCUMMY EVEN THOUGH I HAVE STRONGLY IMPLIED THAT WOULD BE IMPOSSIBLE.Tragedy wrote:I would be going for lulu if he could look any scummier
Y'know, the expression: "Damn, Tragedy, could you be any more in denial?" <--- Me implying that you could not be any more in denial.
No, that's my point which I have been building up to (LIKE A NINJA).Tragedy wrote:I unvoted DBE to jump on Thil, you forgot that~?
Why unvote a lurker to vote another lurker?!
TRAGEDY, NEXT TIME YOU'RE SCUM YOU SHOULD TOTEZ KILL ME N1.
Don't you have any defence against his suspicions though? No witty rebuttal? This isn't the RedCoyote I know.RedCoyote wrote:
I noticed. Just because he suspects me doesn't mean I can't think he's town.P&tB 442 wrote:@ RedCoyote: You do need to read SSBF's post, because HE DONE FOS'D YOU! OHHHH SNAP. *clicks fingers*- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
that would be quite naive considering we're a hydraPinky and the Brain wrote: ASSUME FROM NOW ON THAT ALL POSTS ARE FROM THE HOPPSTER HEAD
so what do you think of the hammer then, CP?crazypianist1116 wrote:Hey guys, sorry for lurking so much at the end of day 1. I want to reread this thread since it's been so long since lynch occurred.
¬_¬Pinky and the Brain wrote: This head is going to be posting for the most part now, which should make things clearer in future (most of what Twistedspoon says is gibberish anyway tbqh).
~Le Twistedspoon- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
I am saddened by the lack of Tragedy votes.
In an attempt to kick-start the wagon, I am compiling my case into one post. Those of you reading along at home might want to have Tragedy's ISO opened up in another tab so you can follow it as I'm going along.
Spoiler: Interpretation of Tragedy's posts
tl;dr- Tragedy is scum. Vote Tragedy.
I approve of the voting bloc. Now, vote Tragedy please.
~ Hopp- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
Oh, look, Tragedy's ignoring me now. How adorable. <3
Okay, compiling the ISO analysis of Tragedy into a case:
Her erratic voting/Inconsistent stance on lurking
Okay, so she makes a RVS vote (which incidentally is the first post of the game, so it couldn't actually be for lurking, and she later implies it was due to Simpsons Mafia)... And then keeps it for17 posts, with no paticular reason provided at the time (however she has recently qualified/implied it was for lurking).
However, she then says mb53's scumminess has been proven (for a totally incorrect reason) - keeping her RVS vote on Darla. lolwut?
When she does unvote... it's to vote another lurker. Useless vote, changing her vote for a useless reason, presumably to fake scum-hunting. She criticises him for his number of posts - guess who has less? Uh-huh, Darla, whom she unvoted to pursue Thil. Riiight. She even acknowledges Darla has less posts, advocating a Policy Lynch yet keeping her vote on Thil. Ooookay.
Then, Darla shows up - Tragedy responds with a greeting. No "WHERE YOU BEEN, DARLA?" Just "Hey!" She then reassures Ythan over his activity. Huh. She then implies she is aware of Darla's continuing failing activity today, but decides it's no longer voteworthy.
Lack of a vote on Lelouch/Distancing from the wagon
So, yeah. She says nothing at all about the whole Lelouch shenanigans. She makes an obviously prompted and horribly feigned post on him here, and makes a post here strongly implying she finds Lelouch terribly scummy yet decides to keep her vote on Thil. She then calls TheJackalope (Lelouch's replacement) scummy, but yet again keeps her vote on Lelouch.
She makes literally NO MENTION of the building wagon on Lelouch, nor of the digging done by esurio.
Fail-Defences/Dodging/Ignore
Self-explanatory, this. Deflection from here. Dodge. Ignoring Dekes. Dodging my points. Dodging this. Dodging this. Still dodging. Is this a defence?
~ Hopp- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
It's alarming me how people are jumping on my beautiful Tragedy wagon in what seems to be a lazy counter-wagon to this Espeonage wagon. >>
So, yeah. I don't like Thil and mb's votes on Tragedy.
I'm horribly torn.
Thil: Explain how Tragedy's voting today is any more useless than yours yesterday.
You still think I'm scum? Also, if you want to spread the pressure, why vote for Tragedy (who already has votes) rather than myself?mb53 wrote:3. Nothing wrong with spreading the pressure
@RC As I said, my suspects are pretty much the same as yesterday, and I thought that tragedy would be the best place for my vote at the moment
TRAGEDY: PLZ BE DOING SOMETHING WITH YOUR VOTE, THANKS.While you're at it, acknowledging my case would be good.
@ GhostWriter: Thoughts on espeo & Tragedy plz.
~ Hoppster- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
No, my point was that your vote seemed to be because she was attacking you without voting you, with the implication being that her voting is useless (which it is). However, my point was that your voting on D1 was equally as awful as her voting today.thil13 wrote:@PatB: I'm sorry, I don't follow... I agree with your case of tragedy scum(and think that the evidence supports it, plus my being the target of her aggression) and you say my vote is useless? Is this because it is essentially an OMGUS vote?
Tragedy wrote:
Of Espeonage.crazypianist1116 wrote:Tragedy, who are you suspicious of?SO MAKE A GODDAMN VOTE.
And stop ignoring me please. <3
@ espeonage: What's your Tragedy read?
~ Hoppster- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
VOTE: Espeonage
Let me guess, you knew Tragedy wasn't scum as well, just like Lelouch wasn't scum?
Then who is scum, pray tell? And why dodge the matter of the Tragedy wagon all yesterday?
@ dana: Was the Tragedy hammer simply due to the claim?
@ xtoxm: Why did you have Tragedy as null? Please expand on this.
@ RC: I appreciate that it was a joke(?) about the unreliable vote count programme used by the mod, but did you really have nothing else to say? You also showed intent to move to the Tragedy wagon - why did this not materialise?
@ Kdub: What was your read on Tragedy whilst catching up?
@ mb: Scumspects still the same as yesterday (and, by extension, roughly the same as Day 1)?- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
Bunnylover wrote:@Everyone voting Espeonage: Whats the different between Espeonage and Mb53?
Mb53 has scum-reads. Although, granted, Espeonage could be onto something with Xtoxm.
Also, why no vote yet?
Xtoxm wrote:On Tragedy and Espeonage: Neither has impacted on me in any way to alter my reads of them from null. If one of these two are to die today, then i'm not too bothered which one.Xtoxm wrote:This Espeonage wagon has grown far too quickly. I looked into him over the night phase, and i'm pretty sure he's town.
What changed?
Also, judging from your post you suspect there is scum on the Espeonage wagon. Any idea who?
Kdub wrote:I wasn't thrilled with mb53 or thil's votes on her
Why not?
@ RC: So are you saying you believe Espeonage is (overconfident) town?
~ Hoppster
(Woo, I remembered.)- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
Kdub wrote:PatB:
Their votes seemed quick and not well-supported by earlier interactions with Tragedy. Are you asking me because you disagree?
No, in fact I also didn't like their votes. I just got the impression that you were sheeping what I had said before, so I wanted to see whether you actually had reasoning.
thil13 wrote:What I do with my vote is completely up to me, I don'tI want to use it yet.think
Eeeugh. Don'tthinkyou want to use it? What makes you doubtyourselfon whether you want to vote or not?
Xtoxm wrote:Request replacement
I have no interest in playing with people who are just going to moan and insult me.
o.0
... insult? Are you kidding me? You've been on the site for over 3 years, and I really struggle to believe you've been replacing out ever since people tossed a "can't play mafia"-esque insult at you, which FYI I would probably put on the same level as (or perhapsmarginallymore offensive than) a "THIS ARGUMENT/POST IS STUPD" remark, which happenall the fricking time.
And, to be frank, it's hardly as if you've actually been playing with him (or any of us). 7 posts (3 of which contain NO content) in almost a month? Seriously? Yes, I'm moaning, because it seems like game is doomed to be plague by replacements.
~ Hopp- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
Pine wrote:I notice you have no problem giving TMH a hard time for hydra-lurking, yet you don't mention Pinky & the Brain, who have lurked a hell of a lot harder, have fewer posts, and about a third of those posts were "oops, forgot to sign which head this was" posts.
It suprises me that you claim to have just finished re-reading, and yet you feel compelled to say this. I'm not one to blow my own trumpet (usually), but I do think that I have been one of the more pro-active case-makers.
(I am also in a similar boat to Toasty, as I'm quite sure Twistedspoon is deliberately ignoring this thread/the hydra QT now.)
danakillsu wrote:I really do wish I could contribute something to this game, but nothing's happening that I can comment on. Can the people on random wagons just vote someone that might be lynched, so we can get a move on?
Which wagons specifically do you mean by this?
lewarcher82 wrote:@esurio: dunno about the others, but this is what I think about dana. I used to think he was scummy, basically for the reasons discussed since the beginning of day 2. I then liked his iso 32, but his ISO 35 is back to usual scumminess. He is a viable lynch. But after TWO damn wagons grew and colapsed, I still think that espeo/pine lynch would not only dispose of one scum, but also provide us with interesting information about the counterwagons.
I fail to see why the people voting thill don't understand this simple fact. And the reason I fail to see it is that they won't tell.
The reason we don't understand the simple fact of resulting information being interesting may be that you're not really saying anything at all by calling it 'interesting'.
thil13 wrote:Then I guess I don't understand it
Okay then thil, tell me, what exactly did you mean by this:thil13 wrote:Right now my reads fit in with the group, and just listing them out would rehash what has already been said.
What reads were you talking about (please list them out/rehash them for me)?
Mod: Vote count, please?
Dekes wrote:I'ma go out have some fun.
BUT MAFIA IS FUN TOO!!!!!111!
~ Hoppster- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
thil13 wrote:Ythan, anything I have to say would be taken as scummy to you.
Got roleblocked last night.
Oh dear, this is an awful post.
Is Ythan town for attacking an un-CC'd cop (in you)? Or is it scummy of him?
You claimed cop. You claimed a guilty on Pine. Pine flipped scum.
Yet when you're then attacked the next day, your answer is "anything I have to say would be taken as scummy to you"?
That's not the attitude of a cop.
VOTE: thil
lewarcher82 wrote:ok, let us start from here:vote: ythan
why would a scum player:
1) claim cop in a themed closed setup, risking a cc;
2) invent an absurd story about him investigating only one night out of two.
I would certainly not rule out the latter. And for the former, he was looking likely to get lynched. As scum, it's not unreasonable to try and draw out a CC as you go down.
danakillsu wrote:Hmm. After reviewing the evidence, I tend to agree that thil's actions read more like inept scum than unfortunate town. I'llvote: thiland see what happens. The wagon should at least get us some information. So I guess we have a vig, a SK, and mafia shooting at the same time, then?
I wouldn't be too opposed to a dana lynch either, though. Whilst I'd prefer thil, the above post is reading strongly to me as scum poking the waters on getting a thil lynch.- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
The Master Hand wrote:Ythan, Danakillsu, Pinky and the Brain: If you cannot see the value of someone claiming cop with no counterclaim and catching scum, see it now. The moment thil gets an incorrect read, he's lynchable. How can you guys turn against someone who caught scum?
See, but he's not going to get any incorrect results - he's not going to get any, period. Either he's going to continue the 'OH I WAS ROLEBLOCKED' charade, or if he's actually town he's just going to continue to be roleblocked.
Essentially, you are giving him a free pass for the rest of the game.
thil13 wrote:If that's what the rest of the town chooses, I will, and then I will enjoy watching you guys squirm.
Hmm, coming from somebody who apparently wins with the rest of the town. Wut.
danakillsu wrote:Bunnylover wrote:@Dana: What information will it give us?
What information will what give us?Iwas talking about the wagon, not necessarily his lynch. I'm still not sure if I plan to lynch him.
o.0
Ummm. He's a claimed cop, and you weren't sure whether you wanted to lynch him, but you voted him?
Kdub wrote:Ythan, do you think that scum fakeclaiming cop would claim to have failed to send in an action N1? If anything, that strikes me as more likely to be an honest answer. That just raises extra doubts when he could have easily claimed an innocent on someone if he was lying.
WIFOM. It's certainly not a town-tell, it's probably null. But, as I've said, it is something I would do as scum.
thil13, to Ythan wrote:All you have been doing is pointing every last detail about my actions, call them scummy, and dismiss what I say and label it scummy posting. I would say YOU sir, are being disingenuous.
'K, why no vote?
lewarcher82 wrote:I am still very nervous about the current situation, tho, and the path I picked is already being pressured. So for the time being I prefer to put my vote on another FoS of mine and give thil some more time to post some content.
What will this achieve (giving thil time)? He's already very scummy, are you suggesting that if he suddenly starts being less scummy we should excuse his past scummy behaviour and focus on his actual content just because he's claimed cop (who doubtless will be 'roleblocked' for the rest of the game)?
The Master Hand wrote:Ythan...these are the following options for thil
1)He truly is a cop who found Espeonage scum. if this is the case then your tunnelling on him and a town flip makesyouthe lynch
Why Ythan? Why nobody else voting thil (dana, myself, Dekes, esurio)?
crazypianist1116 wrote:Something rubbed me wrong about PaTB's thil vote. It seemed rather forced in response to a somewhat reasonable post.
How so? Thil's post was a truly awful post. As of that post, I would have no idea at all whether thil found Ythan's attacks scummy or not. Did that not concern you?
Ythan wrote:I'm going to relent for (just) the moment. If I determine that I should claim I will let us decide whether my information is as significant as I think.
So why no unvote?
danakillsu wrote:lewarcher wrote:you know what would make you look a little less scummy? If you quit joining wagons without explaning why.
lewarcher wrote:I don't want to help you to look less scummy
Yeah...
Well I'll tell you this much. You're not looking very town, Ythan's not looking very town, The Master Hand is looking pretty town, and thil's a complete wild card. So I'llunvote vote: lewarcherfor self-contradiction.
That's not a contradiction. The first post is just a different way of saying thil is scummy because he joins wagons without explaining why.
~ Hopp- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
Link to hydra-fail post for ISO purposes. Sorry 'bout that.
Requoting would be impractical due to immense quotage.- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
Ythan wrote:I have explicitly stated that I have information. I have denied having the kind of information certain narrowminded players assumed I was claiming.
Sorry, me being incompetent again. Failed at interpreting this post:Ythan wrote:The part where I said I didn't have role information.
Ythan wrote:Queen of the shitty readers, or lying.
@ thil: A rephrased version of the question - whatdid you think at the timeof Ythan's posts allegedly (according to others) hinting at him being a (counter-claiming) cop?
@ Ythan: Did anything in paticular motivate/provoke you to claim, or was it literally just to 'see what happens'?
GhostWriter wrote:Still happy with my vote
Why did you bother posting this?
~ Hoppster- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
thil13 wrote:@PatB: I didn't believe him, and if he had explicitly claimed cop I would be very inclined to call him definite scum.
Is this based on:
a) His play not fitting with the claim (not fitting with that of a cop)
b) The actual claim alone (ie. you doubting there would be two cops in the setup)
c) The way/manner in which he had been (allgedly) soft-claiming cop
d) Other - please state?
~ Hoppster- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
thil13 wrote:C, a counter claim should be outright and not just a small hint. Counter claiming is a big move that will show who is scum and who isn't. The fact that he sort of played around it didn't make me think he was cop..Besides, I already AM the copearlier, thil13 wrote:Pine, it would be no surprise to me if there were more than one cop with the amount of people that signed up for this, so unless the mod wanted to put in every obscure role, he may have doubled roles, but that's just what I think. There very well could be another cop, or more than one doctor/vig/whatever.
thil, don't these contradict each other? Leaving aside thewayin which Ythan would have been allegedly breadcrumbing/soft-CC'ing, you're saying that you arethe[implying one and only]cop(as an additional reason for doubting a Ythan cop counter-claim), yet earlier you said you wouldn't be suprised with more than one cop.
Kdub wrote:Un-cc'ed cop claim that caught scum >> reads. That's my "opinion".
To what extent would you stick with this? Or is this an absolute rule that you will apply for the rest of the game, regardless of anything else, as long as thil remains un-CC'd?- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
Spoiler tags basically sum up what I say in the spoilers - thil is scum, don't lynch Ythan, thil is scum, etc.
Spoiler: @ The Master Hand (also stuff saying thil is scum)
Spoiler: @ other people (also, let's not lynch Ythan. Oh, and thil is scum)
Spoiler: @ thil (who is scum, read on)
Prefer dana to Ythan if it has to be one of those two. Even still, dana's posting has been reading as more town recently. But with 4 days, it looks really unlikely I'm going to get my thil-scum lynch. >>
I am willing to switch over to the dana (who is L-2 atm) wagon if by tomorrow the thil wagon is still depressingly failing.
~ Hopp- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
lewarcher82 wrote:PaTB wrote:
Remind me why we can lynch Ythan but not thil.
I have already written what I now think of Ythan, but here is a new formulation of my point of view, which I challenge you to contraddict. Ythan has been on site for two years, you guys will not get me to believe he has possibly thought that his night actions implied thil is scum. I don't buy it.
I simply see no reasons to lynch thil. I don't agree with the cases on him and when I voted him, I was convinced that Ythan was going to claim something very different and much more compelling. I will not support a thil lynch under this circumstances.
So, you don't think it's a possibility Ythan-town thought his night actions meant thil-scum, yet you do think it's a possibility Ythan-scum thought he could convince us that his night actions meant thil-scum? Using the very same night actions youdon'tthink Ythan-town would have thought meant thil-scum? So you're basically saying Ythan-scum didn't even bother thinking through his fake night actions at all?
Ythan-town and Ythan-scum are the same player, both have been on the site for two years. If you don't think that Ythan-town would have thought his night actions = thil scum lynch, then you can't possibly think that Ythan-scum would have thought his fake night actions = thil cop mislynch.
Somebody tell me why Ythan-scum would have come out with his doctor night-action derp.
Let me summarise thil's play today for you.
- "I'M NOT SCUM, I PINKY-SWEAR"
- "YTHAN YOU ARE SCUMMY"
- <notable absence of Ythan vote - any vote, in fact>
- "ACTUALLY LET'S NOT LYNCH YTHAN"
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
Pinky and the Brain wrote:Spoiler: @ thil (who is scum, read on)
Thanks for dodging, thil.
With a mass-prod I still hold out hope of the masses coming to this thread and realising how obvious scum thil is.
WE STILL HAVE TIME, PEOPLE.
Pinky and the Brain wrote:Let me summarise thil's play today for you.
- "I'M NOT SCUM, I PINKY-SWEAR"
- "YTHAN YOU ARE SCUMMY"
- <notable absence of Ythan vote - any vote, in fact>
- "ACTUALLY LET'S NOT LYNCH YTHAN"
Added to this to take account of recent posts:
- <dodges PatB's persistent pushing of obvthilscum>
- <dodges PatB's persistent pushing of obvthilscum>
More to say but no time, need to get this in so people vote thil.- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
The Master Hand wrote:Because I hold my townread on him regardless. We'll get a better look into what's going on after tonight, when they (mafia) CAN kill thil (no YthanDoc) and RB someone else like the person who killed one of them the other night.
They could have killed thil if they wanted to by RB'ing Ythan.
Ultimately, though, thil is probably not going to be NK'd, because he's scum.
So, removing flips (and myself of course) that leaves 3 scum in:
- thil
- mb (now DemonHybrid)
- GhostWriter
- cp (now weirdalex)
- esurio
THAT'S PRETTY DAMN GOOD ODDS.
I crumbed it in my first post of Day 3:Pinky and the Brain wrote:Let me guess, you knew Tragedy wasn'tscumas well, just like Lelouch wasn'tscum?
Then who isscum, pray tell? And why dodge the matter of the Tragedywagonall yesterday?
For those of you following along at home, that's "scum x 3, wagon".
So, here's why we are lynching thil today, his scumminess aside for those of you with a town-read on him.
- Even ignoring everything, he has a 3/5 chance of being scum.
- I was RB'd last night. Either scum have two roles/players with the ability to roleblock, or one of us was RB'd by town*, if we are to believe thil is town. Likelier? Thil is scum.
*on the off-chance I was RB'd by town, PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF NINTENDO DO NOT CLAIM. thil is scum regardless, no need in forcing out a claim from town.
VOTE: thil
POWER-LYNCH, GO!- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
UNVOTE: for GW's theory.
Thinking about it, I suppose at this point we are looking to take out any SK rather than Mafia as to minimise NKs and maximise mislynches.
thil admittedly makes a lot less sense as a SK than Mafia, so I am actually wondering if it's better to spare him for today and lynch him tomorrow instead.- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
I'm sceptical of Dekes visiting nobody N3. I'll pull up the relevant quotes tomorrow morning when not on a phone.
Essentially, the gist of it is that he strongly implies he has used up all his actions (as a JOAT), but doing nothing N3 gives him just 2 Nights to use up his actions, when JOATs usually have 3 or 4 actions.
@ Kdub: Thoughts on SK hunting?
I'm concerned that with a likely SK in play we won't have enough mislynches to parse the 5 completely of scum, given that we need 2 mislynches to guarantee hitting all 3 scum but the SK means 2 probable deaths a night. Hitting the SK will give more room for error.
Got a bit more to say which I'll type up tomorrow.- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
lewarcher82 wrote:Samus is the hero of a game.
Samus is a bounty killer.
Someone shot a scum member.
Still, Samus says: we have no vig
This line of logic is pointless unless we have a mass name-claim.
For all you know, other people might have name-claims even more suited to SKs.
lewarcher82 wrote:as far as I see, we have 3 players who are convinced the 1 vs 1 is compelling: GW, bunny, kdub.
You're wrong about bunny there, and oddly enough, neither kdub nor GW are voting either myself or thil.
lewarcher82 wrote:@patb: why arent you voting thil?
I stand by my statement that a SK lynch is much more preferable. Really, any player is more likely to be a SK than thil. I'm confident that a SK would not claim cop, paticularly in a Large. I would honestly put thil's chances of being SK at zero.
Assuming 2 scum 1 SK on the wagon, the other people on Tragedy's wagon have a 25% chance each of being a SK but 50% of being scum.
DH's slot is unlikely to be SK after replacing out despite massive lurking (as lurking would be beneficial for a SK - subsequently replacing out renders all his lurking moot).
GhostWriter I feel is also fairly unlikely SK following a PR claim (although not as unlikely as thil).
I'm doubtful esurio as a SK would have taken the risk of drawing attention D1 (with the whole out-of-thread investigation shenanigans).
That leaves wierd.
wierd's recent posts feel like he is really trying to squirm out of a lynch, paticularly:wierdalexv wrote:I agree with Kdub that it would make no sense to lynch out of the 1 vs. 1 unless we are pretty much certain.[/stream of consciousness]wierdalexv wrote:My claim is pretty much guaranteed to get me lynched; Samus has a doppelganger who would Be an SK and I have a typical SK role and apparently my play looks like an SK. However, I'll claim if you want me to.wierdalexv wrote:And, while I Think of it, That last Post softclaimed a lot harder than I Realized. Wow.
I want a claim.
(I can't see the softclaim. I get 'HULLAETTPR' or something stupid like that.)
Spoiler: Vote Count
^ I think this is still correct.
VOTE: wierdalexv
I think the third scum on the wagon is GW.
I don't buy Dekes visiting nobody N3, and the breadcrumb is awful (and notably does not come until ISO #60).
I didn't include the quote before, so here it is:Dekes, on Day 4 wrote:Important:
I am responsible for no deaths N1. And no actions at all for that matter. I'm a JOAT, one of them was a mass block.I pretty much wasted all of my actionsand the only informative thing is that PatB is a bit more likely town (which becomes a lot more likely looking at his recent play).
^ Here is Dekes implying he has used up all his actions by Day 4, but having No Action on N3 would give him only 2 Nights for his actions.
I suspect that scum have a tracker, and they tracked somebody else that night, but GW couldn't claim that because it would be obvious PR-hunting from scum, so he is claiming to have tracked somebody who is now dead and of course can't dispute the claim.
GhostWriter wrote:I believe Lew is the scum RB.
He believes this because he allegedly tracked Lew to thil, which would of course mean thil is town. However:
GhostWriter wrote:I think that the best course of action is to lynch Thil
[...]
Thil has the best chance of flipping scum
After forcing a lewarcher claim, GW is very quick to decide that thil is actually scum.- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
Hoppster wrote:Well, obviously I was wrong about scum not having two roleblocking roles.
VOTE: Looker
Looker and esurio are scum.
Lynch on either one plzkthxbai.
Oops hydra-fail.
There is no reason to mass-claim because we have two scum lined up nicely for us to power-lynch.
Bunnylover wrote:PATB should be our lynch today.
It doesn't matter if he helped us, we still have his information and we can use it if he flips town (which he probably won't).
Or, just as an alternative that you might want to consider, we can power-lynch the two scum I caught instead of discussing my lynch like absolute idiots.
lewarcher82 wrote:TMH: man after esurio's claim opposing patb's lynch is ridiculous. If esurio aint no vig, who is? I take it you are not, right? Who's missing? kdub? looker?
this is not about the 1 vs 1 or other half-compelling cases that could be explained easily with a scum joat or stuff like that. This is a table of truth. Extremely easy, as far as I see.
@PatB: is it possible that you are sensor and esurio AND looker are not both scum? Answer!
Don't worry, they're scum.
Town obviously has a shitload of power about, and therefore it's common sense that scum would probaby likewise have a shitload of power.
Thinking about it, there's actually very likely to be a third scum left not on the wagon, given we have at least:
Cop
1-Shot Flavour Cop
Tracker
Doc
Even Night Sensor
Leading me to conclude: Mafia Goon + Mafia Doc + Mafia Roleblocker + Mafia Jailkeeper(?) + Mafia Vig.
This would leave three scum alive, which would make it mylo if I am town.
And believe me, I am town.
So don't be idiots and lynch me, paticularly when I have given the scum to town on a FUCKING SILVER PLATTER.
Really, you just have to look at the backup mods - Reck and Dram, famed for swingy setups, and clearly this is one fucking swingy setup.
Why would scum-PatB kill thil or GW when both were on the wagon for my 'fake-claim'?
It's clearly a ploy from scum to frame me and push me for the mislynch, safe in the knowledge that even if I'm not mislynched they have a townie sitting nice and safe off the Tragedy wagon.
If you are voting me and you are town, you need to unvote me now.
Looker wrote:Either way, I have a shitload of reading to do before I place a vote.
Derp.
Thanks for the scum-claim.- Pinky and the Brain
-
Pinky and the Brain Goon
- Pinky and the Brain
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 116
- Joined: March 26, 2011
- Pinky and the Brain
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain
- Pinky and the Brain