Back on 18, but before I read those 8 additional pages, basic rundown on my wagon:
TheNecromancers (8): Jordan_Downey, Talah, Xayzeck, Natirasha, Sharpest-knife-on-tree, Aegor, Doublade, Fear.
Jordan:
Jordan's posting immediately struck me as scum even in
68. The accusation was weak, ESPECIALLY given (1) it's me, Mastin, and (2) it's largely not true given that my reads form independently of where a player is voting. Saying we were setting up a town lynch after Xayzeck was also bad. This, coming from a player that isn't brand new to me, who has enough familiarity with my games and my style to KNOW that this is fairly par for the course. The backing doesn't even hold, either.
In post 74, Jordan_Downey wrote:Mastin had a P1 "could be scum" read. Then you bite into the lynchbait who expressed suspicion above the "Can we kill this?" read.
You're obv setting up SSK for D2. Cockiness I expect. Sloppiness? Not so much. I'm ashamed of your play this game.
No, SSK isn't being set up, and at the time I was simply throwing around probabilities. There's also the fact that he's calling our play sloppy. I'll admit, it certainly has been...but that sloppiness should be an indicator of a TOWN mindset, yet he's using it to show a scum one.
In post 78, Jordan_Downey wrote:I am gonna say that Xay is an easy lynch. He's getting better, but he's not on the same level as mastin yet. And mastin knows that.
There's also the fact that he claims to be familiar with my play, and yet thinks that I would attack an easy lynch like Xayzeck.
In post 104, Jordan_Downey wrote:Nope and neither.
I also don't agree PL always means town. It's easy to hide in a PL as scum when the target flips town.
Denies WKing Xayzeck yet that's quite strongly what they have been doing. The whole PL debate is also weird.
In post 107, Jordan_Downey wrote:I'm not in agreement at all with TheNecromancers, though I have seem manipulative aspects in their posts I personally not seeing much scum. We'll see how it goes.
This line when spoken by a town player is typically accompanied by an unvote. But the tone is scummy-as-hell here. Not seeing much scum, and waiting to see how it goes, in particular, don't feel like the town wording for those statements. ESPECIALLY given this.
Not really suspicious of us...yet suspicious of Spring. But keeping their vote on us...why? Because there's a wagon on us.
In post 472, Jordan_Downey wrote:Not a fan of fear's activity. Accusing people of having no content when also not including content.
Spring Starflowers voting is horrible even if I can agree with the fear vote. Still not introducing anything.
Letting the other head catch up before we decide if we'll change a vote, as including the above I still agree with the Necro wagon at this time.
This is also a horrible post, because Fear?
Voted us.
We?
Gave suspicion on Fear both before and after the vote.
Why does Fear voting us not give so much as a pause for them on our wagon?
Why does our Fear suspicion (which he should be agreeing with) go unnoticed?
The overall picture doesn't make sense coming from a town player. It doesn't add up. The viewpoint they're taking I can't see the reasoning behind from a town player. They're not really scumhunting, merely making statements that're largely about things most likely to be null. Their wording lacks commitment, yet they've basically committed to their vote the whole game. More than that, this simply doesn't
feel
like Jingle's towngame. Admittedly, I'm not too intimately familiar with said towngame, but this doesn't feel like it and it does feel like a scumgame.
The overall read is decently-strong scum, but not overwhelmingly so.
talah:
To understand this read, you have to understand our histories together as players. I've basically outlined it, but there's a difference between quoting and linking to.
Here is Gundam Seed, where we were basically introduced to one another.
The dead QT, where we talk. Check out message 56 where I cheer as talah catches onto the scum in Kalimar. Then message 64. (65 I think, too.) 69 as well. And from there all the way to 79.
Talah, in the dead QT wrote:Mastin rageposting. LOL. Let's hydra in a few months or something - I'm dead in all games now and it suits me okay, but I love your attention to detail and I think you'd be great to work with bouncing ideas off.
A bit about me also relevant wrote:I die (ESPECIALLY DURING THE DAY), you pretty much know the town's in for a whole lotta HURT.
And talah responded with a smiley. Basically, talah knows that I am an incredibly strong, valuable town player. Which talah even commented on.
talah wrote:It was nice to be able to re-read your posts and look for intent, and then
be able to quiz you on specifics
and have more insight to counteract 'teh mysteriez of succinct'. Actually if you'd survived a day or two I think
it would have been really easy for you to have obvtowned with that posting style+
openness
- obviously scum thought you'd already got there.
Note the contrast here to that game. Note how talah pushed me as scum, without asking questions, without asking inquiries, without that follow-through. I'm just as much open if not moreso this game. Yeah, I've begun by not explaining in detail. But I've been willing to, and have already done so slightly.
Next up,
Time distortion. It's as talah said in 172: We made posts basically without using our QT that synched up nearly perfectly, for better or for worse. I posted stuff that talah agreed with, and vice-versa, before the other had the chance to have posted it. Sometimes ninjaing each other on the same exact point just said differently, but using not only the same basic reasoning but reaching the same ultimate conclusion. Showing that, yes, we do synch up fairly well as town.
I already mentioned
172, but again, check out talah's attitude towards me there. He brings up this history. I am forced to dismiss it. He continues pressing valid points about me, and I was kinda not doing very well as a result. Yet here's a critical factor:
talah was extremely hesitant to keep his vote on me
. He voted me because he correctly had me as scum...but he wanted to be wrong. He tried giving me every benefit of the doubt possible, and recognized the chance he could be wrong, and if so, lynching me D1 would be a Very Bad Idea (TM). This game...none of that has been shown.
This game, I'm the one who brought up our history, and now HE is dismissing it. He's kept his vote on me, showing no hesitance about it, in spite of saying that he thinks he can read me correctly and the fact that, bluntly, I'm one of the towniest players in the game right now which means if EVER there was a game where he should be townreading me, it's this one.
Thus, why he's among my stronger scumreads. If not my strongest.
Xayzeck:
Honestly, I'm thinking Xayzeck is town, here. Xayzeck's slot has done a lot of stuff that screams either incredibly dumb or quite simply scum. But while there are flashes of eyebrow-raising scumposting that makes me tilt my head and think about his alignment being scum...I don't think it is. Because while a lot of his pushes are bad, I feel like they come from town all the same. This one's a bit more difficult to explain, but basically, strings of his posting look like town; strings of his posting look like scum. But overall, his tone and the content presented does make me think town.
Natirasha:
Though this is mainly a gut feeling, there actually is reasoning. However, I don't want to explain the read until Nati actually comes and posts more since the storm yesterday brought. (Consider this a close-to-my-chest read.)
The sharpest-knife-on-tree explanation is something that I will get around to after I've read the content in the last eight pages, since I took a skim and know he's posted in the majority of it. Basic rundown is that there are flashes of town, but that his overall mindset looks like scum, especially considering he's had some highly-hypocritical things which show either an extremely double-standard confbias or a scum mindset. So basic SKOT read is confbias-town or scum, with an overall feeling of decent-scumread.
Aegor:
Okay, bluntly, there's nothing town I see in Aegor, really. Quite honestly, the only reason I'm not more strongly scumreading Aegor is that I don't think I've ever had a game where I've townread him, meaning that I'm prone to thinking he's scum regardless of his alignment. So basically, my read here would be much more strongly scum if not for meta-showing-caution. This is in contrast to Dry-fit, in that while I saw bad stuff from Dry-fit that made me suspicious, I can also see Dry-fit as town with his posting; when looking at Aegor, I see bad but I don't see how he could be playing this way as town. Thus, confbias, and thus, not my strongest scumread, but still among them overall. (Because just 'cause I'm confbiasing doesn't mean I'm wrong.
)
Doublade:
Not sure if I can really explain the townread here that well. It's basically a combination of tone and mindset. Marquis has shown a ridiculously town tone, coming across as genuine. Furthermore, his thoughts are highly original and show he's thinking critically. He's not making blind assumptions, he's not slacking off, there's actual effort to putting puzzle pieces together; he doesn't seem to have the answers already. He's among my strongest townreads, and I can follow his thoughts perfectly.
Fear:
Similar to SKOT, but I'll just say that admittedly, I don't really have much experience with either head. (Though...emogirl doesn't fancy me as the type to be playing in this manner as town, but this is just from what I remember of The Fall which was a toxic game, soooooo, not a good baseline for her.) If I did, my scumread could be stronger or could be nonexistent, but what I've seen does point to scum, albeit only a little bit.
After catching up and doing the details on the players I didn't detail here, I can also detail other players-of-note. (That is, potential scum players.)