portia and pavowski both start with a p, which makes u teammatesIn post 11, Pavowski wrote:Since Val and Vote both start with V and linguistic logic will not be denied
![Cool :cool:](./images/smilies/icon_cool.gif)
portia and pavowski both start with a p, which makes u teammatesIn post 11, Pavowski wrote:Since Val and Vote both start with V and linguistic logic will not be denied
shit, ur onto meIn post 15, Zyla wrote:Luke! Vote Marci, she's masonhunting!
yeah it was a scum team accusationIn post 23, alstroemerial wrote:Me tooIn post 21, Lukewarm wrote:I read that as a scum team accusation
i just read the post he linked, and tbh i think ur reading a bit too deep into it. the posts give off same vibes, which would be hard to fake.In post 31, Lukewarm wrote:VOTE: Val
Just went and read that post in their first game, and this is not anything like it.
In their other game, they opened up with a scum case, that because it was on page 2 of the thread, was clearly pretty weak. But, they came at it like a scum case none the less. They are trying to catch a lie and talking about word choice being indicative of alignment.
When questioned about their first post they said:Now compare that to this one, where their first post basically boiled down to "Not_Mafia's name is Not_Mafia" -- what thing of substance did they bring to this game?In post 72, Val89 wrote:My reason for dressing up an RVS vote in the amount of verbiage I did was to make sure there was at least something substantial to discuss
sure it could describe newbie scum, but it could also describe newbie town just as well. those were p1 posts, i dont think its really weird for posts on p1 to seem that way.In post 40, Lukewarm wrote:This is interesting. That was the very post that led me to vote for them.In post 34, marcistar wrote:so far i think alstroemerial is a bit townie, (23 is just a town mindset i think.)
They had made 4 posts (at the time, was one of the most posts) -- and none of them were about the game.
-RVS vote
-Explained that RVS vote was because of the alphabet
-Talking about WotM
-Talking about Not_Mafia's voting habits
It was starting to feel like someone who felt like they should be posting, but was nervous about jumping in --- which can describe new!Scum
agree with u luke, this seems pretty weird.In post 44, Val89 wrote:I still think since Not_Mafia is at E-2, we should just go ahead and make him the lim for the day rather than piviot to Lukewarm, though. We can deal with him tomorrow.
so what would u label luke as rn?In post 73, alstroemerial wrote:Regarding Val's super long post about Not_Mafia, I interpreted it as a complete joke because nobody should be using that sort of logic seriously, and Val doesn't seem like the type. As a result, Luke's response threw me off a bit because it seemed to be taking it completely at face value. So I wasn't sure if Luke was, like, playing along, or...? Similarly in terms of 40, I'm like, uh, not everyone had posted yet and it was the first page? So I wasn't sure if it was serious or not. I mean, if it was, what I'll say is I was holding myself back from over-posting because I didn't want to monopolize the thread when not everyone had even confirmed yet.
so far i've kinda thought luke seemed a bit off (mostly cuz i dont like his points on val98 very muchIn post 81, alstroemerial wrote:Marci, do you have any thoughts on the game so far? What do you think of Zyla?
which part of it isnt convincing, lukes side or val89s side?In post 119, Pavowski wrote:Man. When I left it the Luke/Val thing felt town v town to me, butthe fact that it's still going strong makes me .... less convinced.But since that truck seems firmly in the ditch, and I think it's early for anybody to be at e-2, let's try to change the subject a little bit.
i just normally dont vote for awhile, i usually wait until theres something that feels like a good vote. ^.^ i think theres only one game i "participated in rvs" inIn post 119, Pavowski wrote:I was wondering the same thing. Why no vote yet, Marci? You've certainly had the opportunity.In post 114, Portia wrote:Why not vote yet in the game - do you normally not RVS.In post 13, marcistar wrote:portia and pavowski both start with a p, which makes u teammatesIn post 11, Pavowski wrote:Since Val and Vote both start with V and linguistic logic will not be deniedtry to fight this undeniable logic
i agreeIn post 128, Lukewarm wrote:After playing like 4-ish games with Not_Mafia, I am against a Day 1 Not_Mafia elim, and generally suspicious of people who lean into eliming him Day 1 -- he is an easy miselim target / angle for the scum team to push. Plus, I have also found him to be a pretty good scum hunter, and would like to see any pushes that he leans into before I personally try to sort him.
i remember seeing it and i couldnt tell at allIn post 128, Lukewarm wrote:Although, I do not believe I have actually encountered scum Not_Mafia before
stalking me???In post 139, Lukewarm wrote:Marci! Come talk to me!
im not rlly sure rn, im still trying to figure out my reads >.<In post 146, Lukewarm wrote:Is there anything else this game that you think we should be talking about?
In post 160, Lukewarm wrote:MarciIn post 159, alstroemerial wrote:I checked around Marci's topics and found a newbie game where town!Marci didn't vote until after post 500...![]()
![]()
i dont think so, zylas 121 and 151 are the most serious points raised against him if you choose to believe val was jokingIn post 162, Pavowski wrote:Is anybody actually making a case for a NM elim right now? The worst he's done from where I sit is not post very much and cast a reflexive vote on Umlaut
hows voting you a scumclaim from val o-oIn post 184, Lukewarm wrote:^^Nice, a scum claim
from what i've gathered, i dont think alstro has played with not_mafia before, so 23 just seems like they want to prevent not_mafia from possibly messing up town. i think scum could've just ignored it.In post 199, Umlaut wrote:34 and particularly the quick townread on alstro is a good look for Marci and I want to call her town, even though I don't actually see what's so townie about 23.
In post 199, Umlaut wrote:Val's 58 is lol, largely fluff and more aimed at self-justification than at actually convincing anyone to follow his vote, scummy post. Though the followup in 60 makes me wonder if he's just shitposting.
it seems alot of people think like that about 166, im not quite sure what i think about it tbh.. when i thought of it originally, it sort of fits the vibes of how portias posting has been yesterday.
i suppose that is true.In post 200, Pavowski wrote:I just think it's interesting I'm getting pinged for low content by these two. I don't post as much as some, but the shoe is surely on the other foot (or feet) here.
whats pot and kettle mean in these terms o-o i dont think ive seen anyone use it.In post 200, Pavowski wrote:(Yeah, I know, given my recent posts this is a bit of pot and kettle, but it is what it is, and Marci asked.)
val have u ever responded to this? i kinda think luke might want you to..In post 102, Lukewarm wrote:Also, how can he genuinely be accusingmeof scum readinghimbecausehestarted scum readingme?
When the reality of the situation is thatI voted himin post and thenhe started calling me scumin33
I would like to Uno Reverse Card him here, and say that from my PoV, his entire scum case on me appears to have started immediately after I voted him in post 31
thanks
can u respond to this as well umlaut?In post 219, Val89 wrote:That wasn't the only case Umluat did that - He also says 115 "by luke" is "actually kinda town", but it's one of my posts.
can u take a break from ur luke fight then and try to further ur reads in one of these nulls o-o if u have any questions about my posts ill respond whenever i see them (:In post 219, Val89 wrote:I'm not seeing what others are seeing regarding Zyla, and they are still null for me currently, as are you, Marci. People say you are pinging town, but maybe it's something you have to played with you previously to pick up on. Not_mafia also remains null for obvious reasons..
usually ur so obvious town, but this game doesnt feel like the other ones ive seen from you.. granted i dont think ive ever seen u so sure of something on d1In post 241, Lukewarm wrote:I do feel like I should be pretty obviously in my town game for anyone who has played with me before.
In post 245, Lukewarm wrote:@Marci - the last time you saw me this sure on a read, it was in regards to how Bingle played Day 1 of our last game, which narrowed the suspects down to exactly [Hopkrik, Vanders] - Bingle later confirmed everything I theorized about him
- I am calling you in for your vote as well.
i do think ur very good. at this point ur goingIn post 250, Lukewarm wrote:Marci -- you have at told me that you you think I am good at this game.
can anyone confirm?In post 251, Lukewarm wrote:And to be frank, I would have expected to see the similarities in how this is playing out in my town game. Where I reached 100% certainty that T3 was scum, and then whipped up the votes
i dont remember it being on d1 tho, i thought it was later on..? am i misrememberingIn post 262, Lukewarm wrote:Marci -- you literally just saw me go at least this hard (if nor harder) in that neighborhood game lol
tbh i dont blame him, it was alot to read thruIn post 278, Lukewarm wrote:But the thing that really made it stand out was thatthat was the ONLY think that Val felt like responding to in all of Umlaut's catch up posts
is there certain posts that feel this way for you..? or just all of them?In post 279, alstroemerial wrote:I haven't seen a confirmed scum!Val yet, but I'm getting a really different vibe than 2068. It could in part be that Val didn't get as much serious heat in 2068.
i like how ur still trying to work around him, but dont worry too much about him im pretty sure he was truthful in the "not quick hammering in newbies" thingIn post 279, alstroemerial wrote:I don't want to vote because that would bring Val to E-2 aka "NM E-1" and I don't want to go there when there is so much of the day left.
can u explain what sort of info u would gain?In post 293, alstroemerial wrote:A Val flip would give information for sorting Portia, Umlaut, and Marci in my opinion. Not so much info on Luke. A Luke flip, while I’m opposed to it, would admittedly give a ton of information on almost everyone.
i didn't really townread this post from portia, but i did see it as something that might be reasonable when i originally read it.In post 302, Umlaut wrote:Why is this something anyone is townreading? (1) "Regardless of the flip" is effectively saying it's better to keep someone alive even if they're scum, which is pretty much never true barring special mechanical circumstances that can't actually occur in this setup anyway. (2) "Keeping the game alive" by having two hyperposters tunnel one another into the ground forever is not actually good for the health of the game anyway.In post 263, Portia wrote:I don’t want to eliminate Val or Luke. They keep thread Alice to an e stent I think town suffers regardless of the flip. I want to see where they push off each other. Bet that might just be me.
im pretty sure people have taken stances, and more likely itsIn post 351, Val89 wrote:That's a fair assesment. We are approaching page 15, and I'm getting a little frustrated that everyone seems content to sit back and watch.
thats true, post count shouldn't be what is looked at imoIn post 355, alstroemerial wrote:While I agree that there's been a range of activity levels, I don't think it's fair to call everyone else coasting just because they aren't on as much. People have jobs, etc.In post 351, Val89 wrote:That's a fair assesment. We are approaching page 15, and I'm getting a little frustrated that everyone seems content to sit back and watch.In post 348, marcistar wrote:val seems a bit more aggressive rn imo
are youIn post 360, Val89 wrote:Fair. But then why am I sat at 2 votes; and one of those I think is a left over from RVS?In post 356, marcistar wrote:im pretty sure people have taken stances, and more likely its against you. without you providing content on slots outside of luke, ur preventing ur chance to fix this before it gets too far.
You are giving scum space to hide.
not everyones confident in being able to rip this stuff apart, its largely unreadable and people are starting to just gloss over it.In post 360, Val89 wrote:I'm frustrated because there is already a bunch of content to sort through; and all we seem to be getting out of it is variations on 'eh, seems TvT, or maybe of them is scum. Probably val, dunno'. The response has been to ask to the slots that have been posting out their earholes to post even more.
In post 338, Pavowski wrote:At the risk of derailing this conversation, I think we need to entertain other possibilities. Val points out that the Luke/Val extravaganza is allowing townies to coast, but there is at least 1 mafia out there coasting as well (unless these 2 are scum together, in which case I am quitting this site forever).
In post 346, Pavowski wrote:I am currently of the opinion that you and Luke are both town. Maybe not the most towniest, but town. If that's on the fence, I guess I can't argue with you, but I am not resigned to voting strictly between the two of you yet.
In post 309, Umlaut wrote:Gives me an elim pool of {Val98, Not_Mafia, Zyla, Portia}..
In post 275, Portia wrote:I think pressure on more slots I the way to do. Right now I would pressure Astro if I had pressuring. Skill. Pablo did well enough to answer my first day questions. A
ahh misunderstood ur list thenIn post 368, Lukewarm wrote:I do not have him higher then Pav. If they are on the same line, they are the same level atm
Alstro is generally townie, but his shift to Portia seemed odd, because from what I can see in his iso, that read was pretty dependent on Val's flip - so he is just a little lower because I am unsure why he when there.
Why do you ask? Do you have Umlaut lower? Alstro higher?
who would you rather be voted, if zyla and luke weren't an option?In post 385, Val89 wrote:I've literally no idea what Zyla has done to deserve sitting at E-2 though. Two to the votes seem to be 'Zyla's coasting', and I've already explained why I think that could be fairly applied to a lot of players in this game.
cant tell, it all makes me confusedIn post 403, Lukewarm wrote:Open question for the thread, before I leave my house and will be away from my computer for several hours
Does Val's last 6 posts sound more like:
Scum frustration that a townie is pushing them for what they think is a bullshit reason (caught for the wrong reason)
A Townie, mad that their scumread is disagreeing with their scumcase on them, because, like....
i don't really have strong opinions on her, i havent really been too convinced of her being townie yet though.In post 414, alstroemerial wrote:Also, if anyone who is voting Zyla (Marci, Umlaut, Pav) is at the point of "I really think Zyla is scum" as opposed to "I want to pressure Zyla" I would be curious to hear a case.
hmm i quite like this idea, i havent thought much about porita and just wrote him off as town originally.In post 414, alstroemerial wrote:I still don't like that Portia hasn't done much despite being around -- when Luke pointed it out, he got it wrong in saying "zero" reads instead of "one", and since then people have been like "yeah Portia did give a read and Luke was wrong so we need to chill". But since then, Portia has been around but besides 168 hasn't added a ton more. As I said earlier, I don't like the "sidelines" comment because, as Portia says in 263, keeping the thread active is good.
sure shes given readlists, but i dont really see her pushing too much to further her reads, which is why it feels a bit weird right now. when i try to think of her alignment its just a hugeIn post 426, Not_Mafia wrote:Why is Zyla getting wagoned?
what has val done that made you townread him..?In post 468, alstroemerial wrote:Val has made me think he's more likely to be town but without changing my mind on Luke -- so I really don't want to do either, but if we really had to in order to prevent a no elim, I would say let's go with Luke.
In post 475, Lukewarm wrote:@Everyone
The more I think about it, and the more I look back over her iso, the more sure I am that Zyla is town. Don't like that she is the current leading wagon
If absolutely everyone is against flipping inside of me+Val, how does everyone feel about flipping Not_Mafia today?
can you point out the things that make you think shes town? people keep using meta as a reason to townread her, which i dont really understand. from what i've seen her reads don't seem too in depth.In post 498, Lukewarm wrote:But if any of :Zyla, Pav, or Umlaunt were the elims today, I think I would scream.
Would rather be the elim myself.
umm valIn post 514, Val89 wrote:You see how this works in Lukes eyes; if Not_mafia is town, then that makes him just a little bit more scum. If he is town, then that makes me just a tiny little bit more town. Why does a Not_mafia town flip not make Lukewarm +++scum, given he *is* the one trying to rally up votes against him; from what appears to me to be very little?
nothings really convinced me yet, im not satisfied with just you saying you feel shes townIn post 531, Lukewarm wrote:@Marci, why are you still voting Zyla?
I have been asking pretty nicely for people to move to new pastures![]()
![]()
alot of its still at nulls tbh, im trying my best to figure this out but >.< its so hard for me to read thru the big posts luke/val makeIn post 537, Pavowski wrote:Marci, I see you asking lots of questions but I'm not sure where you stand on a lot of this. I see your reads list in 191 where you were mostly null on a lot of this, and based on content in between it seems like, thanks to Luke/Val, you are reading Val scummier than you did in 191. Got any updated takes?
hihiIn post 568, Shrek wrote:ello pavowski ello zyla
ello all the people ive never met
my role claim is vanillia townie now excuse me while i read back on the thread and see everything thats happened
ahhh, im not sure if ull "eat the nightkill" since ur slot was under alot of suspicion, but the later part is prob true.In post 576, Shrek wrote:portia is being grilled and i would also prefer to eat the nightkill as a vt than an important power role. i have less of a problem claiming with vt since i know i dont have any useful abilities to start off with anyways and i feel like portia needs something to pull them out of the hole since theyd have to claim sooner or later anyway. best to get it outta the way now
i agree with this, 580 i think they only made because of the backlash, they were trying to please people with that post, so that they wouldn't be pressed much from it.In post 620, Lukewarm wrote:Shrek's iso feels like someone trying to stay alive,
can u explain on this..? im not sure where u see this, is it just because theyre both laying back or is there an interaction of them..?In post 628, Shrek wrote:i think alstro actually has high teammate equity with pavowski.
why did you choose to stick to your vote, instead of switching to pavowski if theres such a noticeable change..?In post 629, Shrek wrote:to clarify on the pavowski end i feel like in our last game together even if he got elimmed on d1, he was a lot more proactive and forward than this which is weird for a change in playstyle so suddenly.
this line from that phat chunk seems like a town thought process.In post 632, Shrek wrote:it's still best to get a controversial person out first whether that's me or n_m to begin with since anti-town people only make it more difficult for the town to vote correctly down the line.
i remember i didnt really like those reads from her originally, and didnt see how u thought it could be so townie.In post 643, Lukewarm wrote:Next was her read list full of quotes and questions that I particularly liked (starts at 255 in her iso)
In post 646, Shrek wrote:also to everyone on the fence right now i would at least encourage you to go through not_mafia's iso and check that first
i was just reading to decide this since deadline is so closeIn post 655, alstroemerial wrote:Can Marci and Umlaut at least put a votesomewhere? With the current wagons as Shrek, Luke, and N_M, I'd really rather it not be Luke but I'll do what has to be done to prevent a no elim.
yea kindaIn post 659, Lukewarm wrote:So Shrek is also null atm?In post 658, marcistar wrote:doesnt = townie, just means that itll be easier to read him in future phases than it would be to read not_mafia.
yeah hes null, nulls the most i can do right now
im confused, how was it obvious val was gonna be killed? i thought u were gonna be killed because of how townread u r ;-;In post 690, Umlaut wrote:Want to hear other players' thoughts on the nightkill but I think it's pretty obvious why Val.
so what do u think i am?In post 697, Lukewarm wrote:And imo, she was super townie in her scum game, and a bit scummy in her town game. Like, she tried really hard as scum to not let her teammate down, so if anything my brain wants to say "scummy marci is a town marci" and vice versa
WAIT BRO-In post 700, Lukewarm wrote:If you did not shorten my quotes down so misleadingly, the answer would be right there for you. smhIn post 699, marcistar wrote:so what do u think i am?In post 697, Lukewarm wrote:And imo, she was super townie in her scum game, and a bit scummy in her town game. Like, she tried really hard as scum to not let her teammate down, so if anything my brain wants to say "scummy marci is a town marci" and vice versa![]()
In post 697, Lukewarm wrote:she is down to null I guess
whats ur definition of easy votes wthIn post 723, Pavowski wrote:I'm a little more sus of Marci than I was for taking what look like "easy" votes,
i agree, my not_mafia was totally just an easy vote. i dont remember if i said around the timebut i wasn't confident at all in that vote, but i didn't want to vote shrek at all.In post 729, Pavowski wrote:Not a hard-and-fast term, but given that the prospect of a NM elimination was pretty much "meh" on d1 and Zyla was never really in serious danger of getting eliminated -- especially when you voted her -- I would consider those easy votesIn post 726, marcistar wrote:whats ur definition of easy votes wthIn post 723, Pavowski wrote:I'm a little more sus of Marci than I was for taking what look like "easy" votes,
having hard time in all my lately gamesIn post 736, Pavowski wrote:Kinda my point exactly here, I have yet to see a strong read from you one way or another.
what about it are u not following? it looked fine to me..
im trying to read back and make a readslist because i feel bad for the inactivity the past few days,In post 731, Zyla wrote:LessIn post 730, Pavowski wrote:Why is Marci townier today?In post 724, Zyla wrote:Marci is Null still, but townier than yesterdaytodayreally, and more just since I last posted my reads list, bad wording on my part. Her posts after that point were looking townier to me than the ones before it, so she's just not one of my major suspects atm
ngl, i lowkey partly forgot about itIn post 790, alstroemerial wrote:I truly do not think that N_M is mafia at this point, though I am willing to be proven wrong. I'm going to be kind of in and out due to a personal family matter, but at the pace of the game, I'm not worried about keeping up. I'm looking forward to the (hopefully) injection of energy from a new player. Marci, I know you said you were going to do an updated look. How's that going? For me I have Luke, NM, Alstro (obviously) in townread, Marci and Pavowski as townlean, Umlaut as null, and Zyla-slot as scumlean. I don't have any powerful scumreads so I have to go into the lean. :/
im lowkey curious what the tell is, but u dont have to tell if u dont wannaIn post 807, T3 wrote:Using my OP marci tell I'm putting her at strong townread.
oh its umlauts birthday? happy birthday umlaut
whats so scummy about him..? i don't really see anythingIn post 846, Not_Mafia wrote:Marci vote pavowski
i dont agree with lukes argument for that,In post 861, alstroemerial wrote:If Not_Mafia was crumbing a PR, then what do you think of Luke's argument for the VT/PR massclaim?
outing whoIn post 861, alstroemerial wrote:In that case, even if maf didn't catch onto it, wouldn't it be a nonissue?
yall pavowski just like completly fooled me, yall making a mistake killing tracker like thisIn post 913, alstroemerial wrote:With one mafia down, I figure that the jailkeeper can block the kill from protecting the target or blocking the mafia. Last night I was trying to block the mafia-- the wagon made Umlaut and T3 look pretty solid, and I was already TR-ing NM and Luke. That left Marci, and so I looked through the ISOs and saw things like 860 in retrospect.In post 910, Umlaut wrote:Alstro, care to say whom you're jailing if this flips green?
For tonight, I think it's more efficient to try to block the mafia than try to guess the target. Given that the wagon is more solid evidence than my reads, it would be NM or Luke. More likely Luke just because I don't see why NM would have done that sort of bus move yesterday, and the hammer could have been a resignation thing.
I'm pretty sure it's gonna flip red though.
n0 i visited meuh and got that she wasnt visiting anyoneIn post 917, Lukewarm wrote:results?
tfw ur too beautiful for alstro to handleIn post 932, ArcAngel9 wrote:Night Actions:
Night 1:
alstroemerial jail keeps marcistar - Successful
Night 2
alstroemerial jail keeps marcistar - Successful
bRo i was trying decently hard to keep it scumsided because i know im a weakling without a partnerIn post 941, ArcAngel9 wrote:this game moved from a strong scum game to a strong town game down in a day!!!
i read it, but i dont have the best memory so i forgot about itIn post 942, ArcAngel9 wrote:Just a question. Did anyone followed the flavor?? I won't feel bad if you haven't. I forgot the context i had at the beginning but i tried to link it to the earlier version and completed the flavor.
its fine, its always a tough position after not hitting a pr N1In post 947, Pavowski wrote:I'm still kicking myself about d3. Right before things turned on me, t3 was at e-1 and I thought to myself I should really hammer before anybody changes their mind. Figured even if it would have looked scummy (and it sure would have) at least we'd have made it to d4 and been in elo. But Alstro moved their vote from t3 before I could get home from work.
Playing as scum is hard![]()
Oh well.
i believe i brought up the idea that we couldve let val liveIn post 955, Pavowski wrote:Honestly I think it went off the rails for us (or I should speak for myself, for ME) when we swallowed the PR bait Val dropped d1. I was certain he was gonna flip cop. After that I was kinda playing on my heels. If we'd had him as a mislim option (as you pointed out early d2 Luke) ... well, who knows!
when i thought through the idea you seemed like a bad idea to kill, and if we went for pr hints val would've been by far betterIn post 967, Zyla wrote:I am curious now, @Pav & Marci, is the reason that I didn't get NK'd the fact that there wasn't a possibility of tracker in the game?
dw i stalk luke all the time its fineIn post 972, Pavowski wrote:I swear I'm not stalking this crew but the popcorn setup looks hella fun.In post 971, ArcAngel9 wrote:You can join popcorn mafia!! It’s in open queueIn post 970, marcistar wrote:hope we can play together in future games
Half this group is playing again!
In post 973, Lukewarm wrote:I have talked to other people who have played popcorn in previous incarnations, and it appears to be a decisive set up.
Like people either really like or, or they hate it lol