WHAT AN IDIOTIC THING FROM THE SHORT-CIRCUIT ON.
Checking Persivul is absolutely fine.
There's absolutely no way you get lynched before me. Your flip might validate me a little. My flip and the normal guidelines would make you a second IC. I'd prefer to lynch scum today, but if people suspect the two of us, I'm the lynch today, not you.In post 496, mavsfan41 wrote:With her gone, there’s now less resistance to lynch me and if I’m lynched, when I flip miller, that will give Persivul’s claim more credit.
Correct, and consider my play yesterday. I knew I could check the claim who didn't get lynched,so:In post 499, Tanner wrote:Okay. 2 Millers in a game with no way to confirm either is broken. It gives scum two free mislynches. In order to make this game Playable, Town has to have something to confirm the other Miller. Persi's role fits that. 2 Millers without something like a Rolecop is straight up broken.
Wake is always useless like this.In post 528, mavsfan41 wrote:@Wake88: I’ve never played with an IC before and looked up the role. The first paragraph does mention how a mod-confirmed IC from the start has fallen out of favor cause it can be boring for the player in this situation. That seems like case I take it?
Yep.In post 549, Tanner wrote:...Why do you people insist on making this game more complicated than it really is?
farside was shot. She suspected Panda/Luca/Persi. Both Panda's and Luca's slots are horrible (I'd argue Panda's more so than Luca, but ya know). We swing there. Persi and mavs are of the same alignment, they're de facto cleared Town, and if (and that's a really really big if) they're scum,it will be obvious later once actual Town PRs start coming to light.
Still useless.
I just read farside's ISO. I see no PR crumbs, so she was presumably killed for her reads. She scum read saladman. He was replaced by panda. She scum read panda and said she was most confident in that read. Panda looks really bad on page 23.In post 426, farside22 wrote:Scum reads: red panda, luca, knight/persivul.
I'm fine with this one as well tbh, but Luca replacing out doesn't help my read on him at all.In post 611, Persivul wrote:I just read farside's ISO. I see no PR crumbs, so she was presumably killed for her reads. She scum read saladman. He was replaced by panda. She scum read panda and said she was most confident in that read. Panda looks really bad on page 23.In post 426, farside22 wrote:Scum reads: red panda, luca, knight/persivul.
VOTE: Red Panda
Agreed. A Luca lynch wouldn't disappoint me, I just like salad slot a little better.In post 612, UnaBombaH wrote:I'm fine with this one as well tbh, but Luca replacing out doesn't help my read on him at all.
I'm hesitant on Luca/Panda and I don't think she was killed for her scum reads. She seemed like a really obvTown player that would have easily been taken to LyLo. I think Scum thought she was an easy target to take out. But NKA is tricky because you have to know the mind behind the kills too. Some people take out Strong Townies they don't want to compete with late game, some take out people shit tunneling them.In post 549, Tanner wrote:...Why do you people insist on making this game more complicated than it really is?
farside was shot. She suspected Panda/Luca/Persi. Both Panda's and Luca's slots are horrible (I'd argue Panda's more so than Luca, but ya know). We swing there. Persi and mavs are of the same alignment, they're de facto cleared Town, and if (and that's a really really big if) they're scum,it will be obvious later once actual Town PRs start coming to light.
Yeah, but that's something to explore much later down the line. Like, we should be sorting sus people right now. So far I don't think Persivul has acted very scummy. Also, when more PRs are outed, then it'll be abundantly clear if there's too many. (i'm guessing the PR ratio is mostly the same in normals?)In post 568, UnaBombaH wrote:Persivul could be a scum going for the towncred when mavs flips.
Them "clearing" mavs isn't as heavy a commitment for scum as some might imply.
Honestly, I think Salad and Luca were just low-activity posting. Salad was just responding to me cause I was the one of the main focus at the time, and Luca looked like he was struggling to stay in the game. I don't think either of these slots are readable, and I think their replacements should be given new slates.In post 572, Tanner wrote:The way Salad has singled out Una/George, Panda keeps pushing Una, and the way Luca's been acting around those two slots too. Make me think s/s is unlikely there.
It does feel really off, ngl. I'd say it feels more LAMIST than opportunistic though. Everyone knew double miller would be questioned, it was the focal point of D1. It seems like there was no intent to start a wagon, but rather to show off.In post 580, mavsfan41 wrote:I think you’ve got the right idea about Knightmare voting opportunistically, but how do you feel about Panda? The textbook opportunistic vote would be me day 2 after Drew-Sta flipped miller.
The UnaBombaH vote does seem like a weird one though, but Una hasn't been especially pushed this game. So I don't really see it as scum trying to grab LHF. I think I see this more as a vanity wagon?In post 580, mavsfan41 wrote:Methinks their “gut” feeling was that UnaBombaH attracted attention with no real reason.
Because the limelight was on me at the time, and you provided minimal comments on my slot, while voting me. It honestly seems like i'm your vanity wagon right now.In post 590, Knightmare491 wrote:Thank you for scum claiming with this OMGUS vote. I'm the only vote on you, how does that count as a "wagon gaining traction?"
Honestly, we shouldn't be basing our reads off gut feelings right now lmao. That feels like D1 trying-to-get-out-of-rvs talk.In post 603, UnaBombaH wrote:All the mechanical clears aside, and only considering reads or the lack of them....Luca Blight/Tanner/Panda/George?
Tanner is a gutread I cannot shake.
There's something off with the slot, despite all their valiant, good efforts.
BS, I'm the only one talking about you.In post 616, GeorgeBailey wrote:Because the limelight was on me at the time, and you provided minimal comments on my slot, while voting me. It honestly seems like i'm your vanity wagon right now.
I still struggle to see how this is town reaction to two millers. Someone who's been on the site since September last year and has played many games.In post 156, GeorgeBailey wrote:How rare is double miller?
Currently, yeah. The point is that I think your push is safe and insincere.In post 619, Knightmare491 wrote:BS, I'm the only one talking about you.
I've played mostly micro and newbie game. And 90% were open, I can't setup spec for shit.In post 620, Knightmare491 wrote:I still struggle to see how this is town reaction to two millers. Someone who's been on the site since September last year and has played many games.
First you say popular wagon, then you say it's safe. Can you decide on one thing?In post 621, GeorgeBailey wrote:Currently, yeah. The point is that I think your push is safe and insincere.In post 619, Knightmare491 wrote:BS, I'm the only one talking about you.