- e
mini 2140: partition (this is over)
Forum rules
- schadd_
-
schadd_ he/itpandora's pukebox
- schadd_
he/it- pandora's pukebox
- pandora's pukebox
- Posts: 7307
- Joined: December 28, 2016
- Pronoun: he/it
- Location: mountain bathroom
- Happy Scumday!
- Contact:
Vote count 1.3
group 1 (3):Daenerys and Dragons, Albert B. Rampage, Adorable
group 2 (3):Ame, Mohab500, Morning Tweet
group 3 (4):Cat Scratch Fever, clidd, dsjstr, Raya36
not voting (3):enomis, Kanna, Hoctac
with 13 alive, it takes 7 to select a group. day 1 ends may 25th at 23:10 central US time; in (expired on 2020-05-25 23:10:00)
Last edited by schadd_ on Wed May 13, 2020 12:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.mnemonic for you: Toni Morrison Made Comprehensive Dialogues Despite Nearby Hordes of Reactionaries that are Verily Contemptible
todays featured user: shaft.ed
this year, i plan to exclusively listen to music released in 2022. send me things that are like that!- clidd
-
clidd Jack of All Trades
- clidd
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8236
- Joined: January 18, 2020
- Location: Spain
- clidd
-
clidd Jack of All Trades
- clidd
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8236
- Joined: January 18, 2020
- Location: Spain
Mohab, could you explain what you found scummy about my slot ? I feel like my eyes will end up ignoring your posts if I don’t understand how you’re interpreting group 2 individually.In post 428, Mohab500 wrote:- Mohab500
-
Mohab500 She/HerGoon
- Mohab500
She/Her- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 962
- Joined: January 24, 2018
- Pronoun: She/Her
- clidd
-
clidd Jack of All Trades
- clidd
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8236
- Joined: January 18, 2020
- Location: Spain
- dsjstr
-
dsjstr Mafia Scum
- dsjstr
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: November 23, 2019
- Location: Nunya
Being in a 1 v 3 might not be as good as it sounds. Who ever the mafia is will kill someone from group 2 because of all the lynchbait in group 3. They will probably divide the 3 into separate groups which will lead us to imploding in on ourselves. Even if the person from group 2 is town how likely is it that the right bait is lynched? We need to stop talking about lynching based on the setup and start solving. No reason to rush this.
UNVOTE:- clidd
-
clidd Jack of All Trades
- clidd
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8236
- Joined: January 18, 2020
- Location: Spain
Spoiler:
''@Clidd, do you have a read on Albert outside of partition composition?''
If you want, I can go into details, but basically it is because of the way he is playing. The aggressiveness he showed in defending the idea that group 1 is strategically feasible to be lynched seems to me an ignorant behavior that I see coming from an interpersonal trait characteristic of his profile, where he is probably frustrated/irritated by the gamestate, which makes sense within the scenario in which Town!Albert demonstrates emotional levels that would not make much sense in the Scum!Albert mentality, where he would be aware that his reasoning is fraudulent. In other words, it is my interpretation of the slot to distinguish that his expressions/reactions are within a natural spectrum of conduct, very different from what I feel about Ame, for example (which is forced).- Albert B. Rampage
-
Albert B. Rampage Illogical Rampage
- Albert B. Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Posts: 27261
- Joined: April 8, 2007
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
This isn't right. If there's 1 scum left, it will be 2-1-1, town can lynch a group with one person in it, then it will be 1-1-1 and town can lynch again. This is the best odds of winning possible.In post 455, dsjstr wrote:Being in a 1 v 3 might not be as good as it sounds. Who ever the mafia is will kill someone from group 2 because of all the lynchbait in group 3. They will probably divide the 3 into separate groups which will lead us to imploding in on ourselves. Even if the person from group 2 is town how likely is it that the right bait is lynched? We need to stop talking about lynching based on the setup and start solving. No reason to rush this.
UNVOTE:Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards.- Daenerys and Dragons
-
Daenerys and Dragons Goon
- Daenerys and Dragons
- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
Actually idk if I townread Mohab anymore. Adorable seems like obvious lynchbait to me and their first post suggests they aren't aware of the set-up which scum would be. That could be a fake "slip" of course but based on the rest of their play I just don't think they would do that.In post 374, Mohab500 wrote:
This feels like scum acting like they're scumhunting tbh, this statement adds little to nothing here: we know scum is trying to act like townt so can you please tell us something more discreet? What do you mean by trying too hard to be towny? And was that last part a jab against Group 1 or are you actually defending Group 1?In post 350, Adorable wrote:I also think whoever are scum in this game are trying way too hard to look towny and it is Group 1 who is getting town read alot.
I'm also getting the feeling they were only voting for their group at first to get town-cred. I bet they planned to move to group 2 after the whole time.In post 391, Mohab500 wrote:Quick read, the way Albert is playing it seems he's banking on lynching Group 1 then not even having a day 2, so I am in favour of a group 2 lynch for the moment (for real now).
The only situation I see Albert being scum is him trying to bait the lynch on group 2 by acting very loud about lynching group 1. But it makes no sense to put scum in a group of 2 then bait it. So I really don't think Albert is scum. No scum would be that obvious about an agenda without their agenda being to be noticed.In post 409, Mohab500 wrote:I just noticed, checking meta isn't even necessary at this point. This guy is misleading the rest of town, so I say if we only lose two town members at the most, we should just lynch group 2 to get rid of him. VOTE: group 2 I think my vote is on them, but just to confirm.
I still think this is townIn post 456, clidd wrote:Spoiler:
''@Clidd, do you have a read on Albert outside of partition composition?''
If you want, I can go into details, but basically it is because of the way he is playing. The aggressiveness he showed in defending the idea that group 1 is strategically feasible to be lynched seems to me an ignorant behavior that I see coming from an interpersonal trait characteristic of his profile, where he is probably frustrated/irritated by the gamestate, which makes sense within the scenario in which Town!Albert demonstrates emotional levels that would not make much sense in the Scum!Albert mentality, where he would be aware that his reasoning is fraudulent. In other words, it is my interpretation of the slot to distinguish that his expressions/reactions are within a natural spectrum of conduct, very different from what I feel about Ame, for example (which is forced).- Raya36
-
Raya36
- Daenerys and Dragons
-
Daenerys and Dragons Goon
- Daenerys and Dragons
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 952
- Joined: May 19, 2016
- dsjstr
-
dsjstr Mafia Scum
- dsjstr
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: November 23, 2019
- Location: Nunya
Mafia get a NKIn post 457, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
This isn't right. If there's 1 scum left, it will be 2-1-1, town can lynch a group with one person in it, then it will be 1-1-1 and town can lynch again. This is the best odds of winning possible.In post 455, dsjstr wrote:Being in a 1 v 3 might not be as good as it sounds. Who ever the mafia is will kill someone from group 2 because of all the lynchbait in group 3. They will probably divide the 3 into separate groups which will lead us to imploding in on ourselves. Even if the person from group 2 is town how likely is it that the right bait is lynched? We need to stop talking about lynching based on the setup and start solving. No reason to rush this.
UNVOTE:- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
But Albert is acting way too obvious for that??In post 461, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:if there is some weird scum conspiracy to lynch a bunch of town in 1 to win then Albert would be scum obviously
-dragons- Albert B. Rampage
-
Albert B. Rampage Illogical Rampage
- Albert B. Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Posts: 27261
- Joined: April 8, 2007
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
They only have a NK N1. 5 players left in group 2 and 3. 4 left after NK.In post 462, dsjstr wrote:
Mafia get a NKIn post 457, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
This isn't right. If there's 1 scum left, it will be 2-1-1, town can lynch a group with one person in it, then it will be 1-1-1 and town can lynch again. This is the best odds of winning possible.In post 455, dsjstr wrote:Being in a 1 v 3 might not be as good as it sounds. Who ever the mafia is will kill someone from group 2 because of all the lynchbait in group 3. They will probably divide the 3 into separate groups which will lead us to imploding in on ourselves. Even if the person from group 2 is town how likely is it that the right bait is lynched? We need to stop talking about lynching based on the setup and start solving. No reason to rush this.
UNVOTE:Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards.- dsjstr
-
dsjstr Mafia Scum
- dsjstr
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: November 23, 2019
- Location: Nunya
[quote="In post 1
Hmm, this will create more WIFOM. It obviously justifies 1-?-? because that would be the only time the mafia could pull it off.maf wrote:welcome to mini 2140! You are ayour faction is responsible for forming a partition each night. i will take whatever the last bolded proposition is, as long as it places every living player (or every player that will be living come morning) in one of the three groups, and no groups are empty. you may ask me randomize the order of the groups and the players within the groups. if i don't get a valid partition i will create one randomly.mafia goon.
on the first night, you may also select someone to be killed.
you win when you control half the vote during a day phase, or when nothing can stop that from happening.
please confirm by proposing a partition for day 1 (or affirming another suggestion)- Albert B. Rampage
-
Albert B. Rampage Illogical Rampage
- Albert B. Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Posts: 27261
- Joined: April 8, 2007
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
- dsjstr
-
dsjstr Mafia Scum
- dsjstr
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1860
- Joined: November 23, 2019
- Location: Nunya
- Morning Tweet
-
Morning Tweet SheThe Modfather
- Morning Tweet
She- The Modfather
- The Modfather
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: September 5, 2016
- Pronoun: She
thats exactly what i'd expect scum!albert to do. it's lower effort, and it plays into the WIFOM very nicelyIn post 463, Raya36 wrote:
But Albert is acting way too obvious for that??In post 461, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:if there is some weird scum conspiracy to lynch a bunch of town in 1 to win then Albert would be scum obviously
-dragons- Albert B. Rampage
-
Albert B. Rampage Illogical Rampage
- Albert B. Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Posts: 27261
- Joined: April 8, 2007
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
What are you saying here?In post 465, dsjstr wrote:[quote="In post 1
Hmm, this will create more WIFOM. It obviously justifies 1-?-? because that would be the only time the mafia could pull it off.maf wrote:welcome to mini 2140! You are ayour faction is responsible for forming a partition each night. i will take whatever the last bolded proposition is, as long as it places every living player (or every player that will be living come morning) in one of the three groups, and no groups are empty. you may ask me randomize the order of the groups and the players within the groups. if i don't get a valid partition i will create one randomly.mafia goon.
on the first night, you may also select someone to be killed.
you win when you control half the vote during a day phase, or when nothing can stop that from happening.
please confirm by proposing a partition for day 1 (or affirming another suggestion)Guard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards.- Raya36
-
Raya36 Mafia Scum
- Raya36
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4661
- Joined: May 22, 2017
So you're thinking scum want us to lynch group 1 and Albert is the one in charge of aggressively pushing that? And that's why he's in the smallest group maybe? In case that backfired?In post 468, Morning Tweet wrote:
thats exactly what i'd expect scum!albert to do. it's lower effort, and it plays into the WIFOM very nicelyIn post 463, Raya36 wrote:
But Albert is acting way too obvious for that??In post 461, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:if there is some weird scum conspiracy to lynch a bunch of town in 1 to win then Albert would be scum obviously
-dragons- Albert B. Rampage
-
Albert B. Rampage Illogical Rampage
- Albert B. Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Posts: 27261
- Joined: April 8, 2007
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Hahahahaha what!!!?In post 470, Raya36 wrote:
So you're thinking scum want us to lynch group 1 and Albert is the one in charge of aggressively pushing that? And that's why he's in the smallest group maybe? In case that backfired?In post 468, Morning Tweet wrote:
thats exactly what i'd expect scum!albert to do. it's lower effort, and it plays into the WIFOM very nicelyIn post 463, Raya36 wrote:
But Albert is acting way too obvious for that??In post 461, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:if there is some weird scum conspiracy to lynch a bunch of town in 1 to win then Albert would be scum obviously
-dragonsGuard your honor. Let your reputation fall where it will. And outlive the bastards.- Morning Tweet
-
Morning Tweet SheThe Modfather
- Morning Tweet
She- The Modfather
- The Modfather
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: September 5, 2016
- Pronoun: She
I haven't decided. I'm leaning towards that not being the case, though. I think 2-3 scum are in group one.In post 470, Raya36 wrote:
So you're thinking scum want us to lynch group 1 and Albert is the one in charge of aggressively pushing that? And that's why he's in the smallest group maybe? In case that backfired?In post 468, Morning Tweet wrote:
thats exactly what i'd expect scum!albert to do. it's lower effort, and it plays into the WIFOM very nicelyIn post 463, Raya36 wrote:
But Albert is acting way too obvious for that??In post 461, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:if there is some weird scum conspiracy to lynch a bunch of town in 1 to win then Albert would be scum obviously
-dragons
The scenario im talking about is if scum distributed 1/1/1. Scum in group one advocates for group one annihilation. Albert in group two advocates to kill group one. And the scum in group three could do it too
I can feasibly see Albert!scum opting to choose to do a super obvious scream that group 1 is obvscum (as WIFOM), but im leaning towards that not being the case- Albert B. Rampage
-
Albert B. Rampage Illogical Rampage
- Albert B. Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Illogical Rampage
- Posts: 27261
- Joined: April 8, 2007
- Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- Albert B. Rampage
- Morning Tweet
- Albert B. Rampage
- Raya36
- Albert B. Rampage
- Morning Tweet
- dsjstr
- Albert B. Rampage
- dsjstr
- Albert B. Rampage
- Raya36
- dsjstr
- Daenerys and Dragons
- Raya36
- Albert B. Rampage
- clidd
- dsjstr
- clidd
- Mohab500
- clidd
- clidd
- schadd_