Well, well, wellIn post 140, PlusJOYED wrote:UNVOTE: echo
VOTE: sirius
I'd like to put more pressure on sirius to see what they do
VOTE: plusjoy
For having inappropriate means to pressure me.
Well, well, wellIn post 140, PlusJOYED wrote:UNVOTE: echo
VOTE: sirius
I'd like to put more pressure on sirius to see what they do
How does town!72offsuit further the town agenda by not putting effort though?In post 197, 72offsuit wrote:How does! ScumMe saying "im going to give low effort" further !scumMe's Agenda. Honestly think it through for 2 seconds.
IMO echo's post is town pressuring because of their single-minded desire to get rid of me. Scum doing that would just get called out. I have no idea why scum would keep voting for a person.In post 195, 72offsuit wrote:1. You are twisting my words here, be it intentionally or through confbias by misquoting, by removing the context.In post 188, shellyc wrote:If it's an easy way to win, this contradicts your thinking of scum being conservative. If scum could tunnel and win, the argument that I'm scum hedging my bets doesn't stand.In post 169, 72offsuit wrote:Tunneling a player as scum is a pretty easy way to win.
My statement was in response to you saying Echo is town for pushing aggressively against you. It has nothing to do with your play, if you bothered to try to consider my post from a town perspective, which if you are town, i am 75 percent likely to be town.
2. Im questioning the intent behind your read on echo in that post to try and sort your slot. Instead of explaining why you think echos push is town pressuring rather than scum tunneling, you turn it into an attack against me.
3. Scum can win by both tunneling and leading a miskick on town, or by being non-comittal and keeping options open to hop onto a leading wagon that is most convenient. I'm discussing what i think is your intent in this game. You on the other hand are discussing general scum theory and simply trying to shade me.
I actually copy DIE MAFIA SCUM from SJReaver in Newbie 2018. I use it because you're scum and you need to die.In post 196, 72offsuit wrote:After i discuss the discrepancy in your playstyle which you ADMIT to, you conveniently attempt to mimic your post from newbie 2025.
Shelly wasn't at E-1 so he can't. It"s really pretty scummy regardless.In post 184, 72offsuit wrote:If you think this is scummy behaviour, then y wudnt u let him do it, if u in fact think he is scum. Why pre-empt him?In post 116, PlusJOYED wrote:So now they'll probably say "oops it was an honest mistake" or they'll say they wanted to lure scum.
Yeah idk. They might be scum trying to wagon a quick elim, or be a tunnel vision townie. I'm leaning towards scum rn; it makes no sense to even attempt a solve or scumteam yet this early, and they have 2 scum reads but have townpassed just about everyone else, completely ignoring our reasoning for reads.In post 193, shellyc wrote:I have come to the conclusion that 72offsuit is scum here.
#26 says low effort. Scumhunting requires effort to push and question. Tell me why this isn't a scum motive.
#27 wagons me and takes me to L-2 which I regard as a scumtell. Scum would push me to a mislim.
#60 sets me up as lynchbait
I used the words "Unfortunately, you are incorrect. I'll prove you wrong." Because I know I am town, and you push me, you must be incorrect.
#73 randomly says that's a bad reaction which doesn't make sense.
#74 I say you are incorrect but I didn't regard you as scum yet. I respect all efforts to push an elim.
#129 pure personality. time to use informal language so you TR me. Doesn't make sense at all.
#157 I refuted this earlier
So basically all your posts are tunneling me with flawed logic - which corresponds to your claim that scum tunneling is an easy win.
VOTE: 72offsuit DIE MAFIA SCUM!
Hey now, I'm trying to solve here, and shelly just agreeing with me on most posts is why I don't townread them yetIn post 185, 72offsuit wrote:Wouldn't be surprised at all if the scumduo is Shelly+Plus. Back and forth discussion just for the sake of it.In post 117, PlusJOYED wrote:yeah that was regarding shellys post. The wording came across as a lil scummy but could be nothing.In post 114, Noraa wrote:I was going to agree that 72offuit's post didn't prove what it concluded so it was confusing. But then I just wanted to check to see if I understood PlusJOYED's post correctly.
1. i'm already voting sirius and i think i have one more person voting with me, so i don't like that you asked this... why do you need someone with you?In post 155, PlusJOYED wrote:Would prefer to exert pressure on Sirius, sceptorous, or niaking. Anyone wanna join? Though I'll be unvoting at E-1 unless they prove to act very scummy since I don't wanna hammer yet.
i do it when catching up too, it's just easier for me to get my thoughts right off as i read somethingIn post 164, Noraa wrote:In post 163, shellyc wrote:What does this refer to?In post 161, Noraa wrote:Ig that's just posting style thenchains of posts. I haven't seen any so far besides 72offsuit's so I thought they were sus but it seems it's just posting styleIn post 163, shellyc wrote:What does this refer to?In post 161, Noraa wrote:Ig that's just posting style then
I'm trying to obvtown this game. And unvoting at E-1 will only happen if they don't act scummy.In post 211, EchoVision wrote:1. i'm already voting sirius and i think i have one more person voting with me, so i don't like that you asked this... why do you need someone with you?In post 155, PlusJOYED wrote:Would prefer to exert pressure on Sirius, sceptorous, or niaking. Anyone wanna join? Though I'll be unvoting at E-1 unless they prove to act very scummy since I don't wanna hammer yet.
2. why would you tell them you're unvoting at l-1 do you know how much pressure that takes off a wagon
3. the only person thatshouldhammer without intent is scum, and even then it's risky for the scum
but if you think those slots are scum why would scum hammer
Now, now, now. Who agreed with who? I made the effort in 193 to read 72's ISO, and you just sheeped it all. Don't you SR 72offsuit, who I highly SR? So you think im bussing 72offsuit, or is this a null readIn post 209, PlusJOYED wrote:Hey now, I'm trying to solve here, and shelly just agreeing with me on most posts is why I don't townread them yet
Reading sirius' past games they literally play like a jester every game... this jester play comes from either alignmentIn post 213, PlusJOYED wrote:Rereading sirus ISO he legit seems like a VI jester play. What benefits does a townie have to act like a jester in a game without a jester slot? Maybe for some kind of gambit? idk
I could definitely see why a scum would like to act as a jester though. Let people start ignoring them to drown out the jester noise while people die 1 by 1.
My vote stays on Sirius
This is a very townie post. IMO scum wouldn't react like that when TRIn post 210, EchoVision wrote:stop leaning town on me fuck you guys don't read me
null read you stillIn post 215, shellyc wrote:Now, now, now. Who agreed with who? I made the effort in 193 to read 72's ISO, and you just sheeped it all. Don't you SR 72offsuit, who I highly SR? So you think im bussing 72offsuit, or is this a null readIn post 209, PlusJOYED wrote:Hey now, I'm trying to solve here, and shelly just agreeing with me on most posts is why I don't townread them yet
I have a different vibe from PlusJoy. this is pure gut thoughIn post 218, PlusJOYED wrote:null read you still
Seriously? I ignore pastgames but like wtf? If he acts like that every game how does he ever make it past day 1? Am I just crazy?In post 216, shellyc wrote:Reading sirius' past games they literally play like a jester every game... this jester play comes from either alignmentIn post 213, PlusJOYED wrote:Rereading sirus ISO he legit seems like a VI jester play. What benefits does a townie have to act like a jester in a game without a jester slot? Maybe for some kind of gambit? idk
I could definitely see why a scum would like to act as a jester though. Let people start ignoring them to drown out the jester noise while people die 1 by 1.
My vote stays on Sirius
shh, no discussing ongoing gamesIn post 219, shellyc wrote:I have a different vibe from PlusJoy. this is pure gut thoughIn post 218, PlusJOYED wrote:null read you still
Yeah I know, but this is a gutread mainly. idk your tone is differentIn post 221, PlusJOYED wrote:shh, no discussing ongoing games
I read thru most of 72's posts and this one doesn't have good reasoning if you ask me. Plus prolly did read thru everything but that one post stood out to him bc I'm guessing based on past experience, he knows that noobs r easy to pocket and saw Echo's post as pocketing. It seems to me like fair reasoning even tho Echo's intent wasn't to pocket but to someone that just replaced in, I'm sure it does look pretty sus.In post 177, 72offsuit wrote:Seems really off to replace into a game and vote without reading the whole threadIn post 102, PlusJOYED wrote:Pocketing this early huh? Gotta get those with less confidence in their reads to vote with you ASAP.In post 83, EchoVision wrote:no that's okay! the main point of this queue is to learn and become a better player, which just comes with time. there's certain things that every new player justIn post 82, Noraa wrote:@EchoVision I wanted to play forum mafia on a different site. They recommended I come here to learn. I shall observe more to learn faster that way I only seem 97% like a noob lol.hasto go through, we've all been there.
once you get experience and some games under your belt, it becomes easier and easier to look at a message and go "okay that's noob scum" or "that interactions undoubtedly town v. town" or "yeah that's something that a noob scum would never say, so they've gotta be noob town"
there's nothing wrong with having your plays or messages classified like that, it's part of the learning experience
i'm usually wrong anyways so fuck me
VOTE: echo
idk what to make of shelly yet but I'm kind of impressed they got to E-2 in just 2 pages lol
In post 220, PlusJOYED wrote:Seriously? I ignore pastgames but like wtf? If he acts like that every game how does he ever make it past day 1? Am I just crazy?In post 216, shellyc wrote:Reading sirius' past games they literally play like a jester every game... this jester play comes from either alignmentIn post 213, PlusJOYED wrote:Rereading sirus ISO he legit seems like a VI jester play. What benefits does a townie have to act like a jester in a game without a jester slot? Maybe for some kind of gambit? idk
I could definitely see why a scum would like to act as a jester though. Let people start ignoring them to drown out the jester noise while people die 1 by 1.
My vote stays on Sirius
Still on Sirius though
God help us all
Your conclusion was that plus and shelly were scum. Personally I think that what you have on plus rn is nowhere near enough evidence to be saying he is scum. He hasn't done anything that strikes me as sus so far. As for shelly, I have to agree that her tone was a bit off but idk if it's just me but I feel like I wouldn't have the best responses to anything if I reached E-2 that fast. Ik it's just Echo joking around ig but I'm sure seeing Vote:shelly a bunch of times from him wasn't exactly pleasant on the receiving end. And after people all started voting her, even the tiniest bit of "suspiciousness" in her posts got brought up. Other people were sus too but people seemed to only focus on her bc she was the one closest to getting eliminated. You said so urself that it should still be RVS so why are people honing in on one person?In post 185, 72offsuit wrote:Wouldn't be surprised at all if the scumduo is Shelly+Plus. Back and forth discussion just for the sake of it.In post 117, PlusJOYED wrote:yeah that was regarding shellys post. The wording came across as a lil scummy but could be nothing.In post 114, Noraa wrote:I was going to agree that 72offuit's post didn't prove what it concluded so it was confusing. But then I just wanted to check to see if I understood PlusJOYED's post correctly.