In post 3415, Faster Than Light wrote: In post 3413, nickthename wrote: In post 3403, Aj The Epic wrote:Secondly, Nick keeps going "I'll get that case up later" constantly. I wrote a mala case in probably 10 minutes yesterday, it was that easy. You can get just about ANY post and go with it. Why is it taking him so damn long?
Because school just started and i'm fucking busy, what exactly would I get out of delaying it?
This. Feels like AJ's talking out of his ass and trying to accuse you of stalling. However, wouldn't the more effective stalling method be to post a good case against a counterwagon?
A 'good case' would no longer be stalling. How can you possibly even accuse my of not knowing what I'm talking about when as to date, I'm one of only two people who have written up a case again Mala and Nick, and one of only three to produce a case on Mala for scum. I didn't even SAY he was stalling. I was suggesting he was having an incredible amount of difficulty putting together reasons that Mala is scum. He's fitting a case to his read which has been incredibly inconsistent on Mala to begin with. Ergo, HE DOESN'T FEEL MALA IS SCUM.
2- I've reiterated, even in the post you reference as bad logic, that they could both be scum. The point is, my alignment doesn't fucking CLEAR anyone. It gives a truthful alignment tell. I'd rather get information on 3 players instead of haphazardly risk a mislynch on two in a row. Blindly fumble around and lynch Mala regardless of evidence D3? Sounds real fuckin' town, AJ. Even as a contingency plan, that's not going to give us the info we could mine out of this situation.
Blindly fumbling? Come on, dude! I've spent tons of times reiterating WHY mala is scum. I'll do so tomorrow as well, but besides Mastin, I trust the Nick wagon as a whole more than the Mala wagon.
(And your alignment isn't really apart of this gambit in theory. Obviously, scum has ulterior motive, but the alignment of the gambiter shouldn't matter.) I was speaking more towards correlating playstyle to alignment having no real connection. Take, for example, if notscience and SoS were scum (confirmed town this game for better example). Does Notscience's scum play resemble gif's scum play? No, not at all. (In fact, I have a game where both of them were scum to prove this). So, can I make a correlation that if ns flips scum, this means that this playstyle (probs inconsistent, short spam posting) is scum this game and Gif/sos posting (case posting, still fairly often, more consistent) is NOT scum? This is the fundamental issue I have with your case: No, it does not and you'd lose the game assuming that. Equally, does this mean here that Mutley and ns are both scum in that game because their post styles are similar? No, because scum aren't determined by style.
3- If you think, in some bizarre world, that everyone sheeping MY OWN POINTS and B&B's against Nick is actually scum hunting, you need to get your head straight. Rushing the day and pushing out this lynch was something I was dead set on, but I stopped and realized how fucking backwards that is. Sure, Nick is a top scum candidate of mine. But Mala's been sending up flags and I've figured out a way to determine THREE PLAYERS' alignments with only a lynch on one of them. That's eons better than your proposed 'scumhunting'. Also, the amount of shit that I've kicked up by doing this has produced lots of amazing reactions and things to look at when we're finally done with Mala and/or Nick, so, yeah, I think you need to take a step back and realize that Varsoon is doing the most scum-hunting in this entire game.
Wait. Have I not made my own case for Nick and mala, as stated before? Many people have had their individual reasons for Mala/nick and they won't be shoving the blame elsewhere either way. Discovering Nacho's alignment doesn't require a gambit. Hell, no one's alignment requires a gambit and I still think it's shaky at best to work. (plus, I think Nacho has strong association to Rach that can pin him regardless of this).
4-You don't know what I'm doing. Part of this gambit is, in fact, to reveal it in such a way. See point 3, man. My gambit has already produced awesome content. And, again, I reiterate, you have no clue what I'm doing, so stop saying it won't work. Just because I don't play by the same little codes and pathways that most players do doesn't mean that what I'm capable of is less effective. Open your mind.
So you want to say I'm not good enough to figure out this idea? And yes, it's produced content: It's given Nick a way out and he immediately bit even with all the contradictions that holds to his own stance. But do I think it will get anything effective enough to change the town's course of action for one person's idea, no.