In post 5806, Shadoweh wrote:Ugh, I really don't see Naut getting lynched when he's practically driving the train right now. I'd frankly feel bad voting him. Maybe that's just my chickenness talking. (Not that I don't like my avatar, I just literally can't change it <_< ) I'm kind of garbage this game.
This train needs a new conductor, stat. Come talk to me, I'm proof garbage can stop stinking.
In post 5812, Titus wrote:TA, your play is consistent with idiot. You FoS heavily on town. Withdraw when proven false and go back to the drawing board.
It's needlessly antagonistic and derogatory shit like this that keeps bringing your slot down to the scumfuck level for me. And other things, but I've no time to waste on you right now.
In post 5817, Nautilius wrote:Now, the reason that I quoted your cases and singled them out because regardless of shenanigans, one two cases were the only two pieces of content you contributed during the time where you were town as fuck and the most engaged. Part of it is that there's nothing ultra town lurking in those posts, fair, and I will address it when you do. The other part in that case is that it doesn't really make any sort of sense; your case on him was sheeping what people had already said plus one additional golden nugget where you go *and* he didn't sort them out, but that doesn't matter at all.
I don't understand what you mean by "and I will address it when you do". Address what? In fact, what is this paragraph even trying to say?
In post 5817, Nautilius wrote:You do correctly more that I called you town a bunch day 1. For light attitude. For posting that generally felt good. You can see how that doesn't necessarily hold too much weight day 9, right? You can see how I have townreads who have done a lot more than what you did day 1 hold up beyond your play, no?
You were defending the fuck out of me up until the tail end of Day 8. Obviously Day 1 shit shouldn't carry me this far, but apparently somehow it did for you. What's your point?
In post 5817, Nautilius wrote:I also did like your middle finger up to tierce, similar to how I liked shadoweh and tierce trolling of me. I generally like when townies with easier to figure out metas are snarky, I'm your face; it's an aggressive move to throw around your towniness that can be afforded because you are confident that you will be read correctly eventually. Here, the context is different. Tierce calls you out on something that's pretty readily justified and you respond with "you pushed mislynches, nyeh". Which is not exactly anywhere close to a compelling argument (or, since you were railing on me for using weak language earlier, this is scummy bullshit mudslinging and you know it. What else was your purpose?). Also, does bringing up a dead townies name mean that my case has less merit? Considering my argument doesn't consist of "oh tierce said he was scum".... No, it doesn't. Nice attempt at a discredit though!
Tierce was being snarky, so I decided to be snarky back. Way to completely ignore my original counterpoint, which was "you didn't jump on this as scummy earlier (in fact you called it town), and the person you copied this idea from came to think it wasn't scummy either, so why are you bringing this up again?"
In post 5817, Nautilius wrote:You townread quadz when he claimed macho cop and apparently have a hidden thought process that backs that up. I'm happy with that point staying right there.
This shows an exemplary lack of knowledge of my scum meta, for someone that knows my scum meta so well.
In post 5817, Nautilius wrote:You think I was setting up for your lynch by calling you a policy lynch (still implying you were town)? And it wasn't a reaction test because I didn't blow the lid immediately? These two points are horrible and shouldn't need refuting, but for your amusement: I have no need to posture for your lynch. Saying "man I would policy lynch that guy" isn't very good posturing to set up for a lynch. Secondly, reaction tests like that usually last a while, as you saw in stack the deck.
You
had
the reaction (according to you) and you
still
went on with the policy thing. Which is rather secondary to my actual point, which was YOU WENT FROM NEVER LYNCH THIS TO POLICY IT TO SCUMREAD IN <5 POSTS. Why the fuck are you wasting my/everyone else's time explaining what a fucking reaction test is when you're not actually addressing my point???
In post 5817, Nautilius wrote:Your response to meta case is: what about all those games I played in a hydra? Yes, you lurk as town in hydras. Do you want to know why? Because in those hydras, you have players that can cover for you and generally don't need you in order for the slot to prosper. When you are the only person representing your slot, you are responsible for that slot being read and you are responsible for pushing lynches through that slot. In no other toe games no matter how short (save curse of pleadon which wasn't a game) you have shown more dedication to the game and produced more content than you have here. This is not the case for your scumgames.
Dude.
Dude.
You are not town.
Hunter Hunter. One Day of goodposting, lurked to doom and gone. Xylbot, lurked to doom and gone until Tierce interested me. Raptured; goodposting Day 1, one case on Fery, lurked till LyLo.
Furthermore, you know full well I'd never bother to go to all this fucking effort to save my own ass as scum right now. Remember MyLO? Harry Potter? Ferygame? You bloody well ought to; you were in all of them.
In post 5824, Nautilius wrote:Oh and holy shit - TA, you claim to have no time for the game ever to do anything but suddenly become flush with time when I call your ass out and start pushing you? You don't think you could have made a little bit of time earlier...?
Early Christmas gift.A hydra of Syryana, Cogito Ergo Sum, and Bert's gut.
Darmok and God at Asgard.
