This here is a scummy action, regardless of meta. serra referred to it as "it fits more with town-Desp", I said it doesn't, and serra explained why IN GENERAL he thinks scum wouldn't do it. It has nothing to do with meta.In post 1733, Desperado wrote:Cool, how about you stop voting no one and do something about it then?
Me vs you, let's go.
And while we're at it, this here is another action that screams scum. You're desperate to catch me in a contradiction that doesn't exist so that you can end the argument in your favor. Scum do that because the longer an argument goes on, the easier it is for people to realize who is scum and who isn't.In post 1746, Desperado wrote:Right. First they just weren't reminiscent of the one day we played together months ago, now they just can't be town in generic terms.
If any of you isn't voting Wisdom or myself by your next post, you are doing it wrong.
^In post 1742, serrapaladin wrote:It's attracting votes by proposing a 1-on-1 against someone with more towncred. It wouldn't be a very smart move unless wisdom is his buddy. I can't think of a single time scum under pressure has reacted like that against anyone but their buddy.
Again, this was in regards to the specific action that serra was talking about.In post 1774, Desperado wrote:but then you later amended it to "your meta is irrelevant, your actions are just scummy."
And how does that mean town? Scum are actually the ones who are afraid to alter their reads in fear of contradicting themselves or making it too obvious that their change is opportunistic.In post 1773, FakeGod wrote:Wisdom's d1 reads stayed consistent entire day. (TNE_scum, mantis_town, Serra_scum, Bert_town, Nati_scum)
Bullshit.Nati's behavior toward the endgame (when he switched between Des/Serra/Mantis and finally fitz) seemed like scum trying to ensure a mislynch, compared to Desp who was ok with not lynching if it came to that. (I think d1 NL is fine)
fitz was a deadline lynch, there was no way for him to claim.In post 1775, FakeGod wrote:I need to go FOS people who backed off mantiz lynch after neighbor claim then lynched fitz without a claim.
Sweet Pertayter, aka a hydra of Ms Marangal and Om of the Nom.In post 1777, FakeGod wrote:Also, someone tell me who "tater" is please
What do you mean here?In post 1784, Natirasha wrote:The fun part, FakeGod, is that your very consistent with your own reads.TNE_scum
Except town have no way of knowing if they are actually correct in their reads and therefore paranoia makes them doubt them and second-guess themselves. If you see someone not doing that, they're prolly scum (See penguin's tne push, penguin's Wisdom push or Desp's Nat push).In post 1785, FakeGod wrote: Someone keeping the same reads throughout the game means he has read the game, determined with logic/gut/whatever who are town/scum, and sees merit in defending his reads because he actually believes in them.
Why?In post 1820, Natirasha wrote:I'm actually having second thoughts on Serra-town right now.
Leave mollie alone and continue reading.In post 1828, FakeGod wrote:You guys want me to finish reading?
Natirasha^In post 1867, Wisdom wrote:Natirasha I'm starting to feel bad about you again.
What was weird about serra's last post?
What is your current read on FakeGod and why?
Are you on board for a Desp lynch?
In post 1943, FakeGod wrote:When I read the soft claims, and then saw THAT, I knew I had a scum in the bag.
Sorry, but he ain't no cop.
In this post, you're undoubtedly apologizing for your bad play (bold), as a response to FakeGod's claims about your play not making sense as a co. Therefore, the second sentence is without a doubt an extra reason that you provide for your play being bad. Saying that it was unrelated is a lie.In post 1944, Natirasha wrote:Nah, my play has been bad today.I went into day two with a specific idea('lynch Wisdom'). Then he proved himself town. I kinda stopped caring.
Kinda funny too, in my five years here, this is the first time I've ever rolled cop I think.
And, on why I would 1v1? I know I have the fact I'm a cop to fall back on. Its easy to 1v1 when you fixed the dice.
unless he has a guilty.In post 1802, Natirasha wrote:He's a shrewd one. If I'm wrong, lynch me tomorrow, Wisdom, okay?
Like I said, why would he do that? He already suspected you are a cop, why not keep quiet and kill you at night? Now it's worse for him, both because he has all the attention on him, and because doctors might protect you if they exist.In post 2003, Natirasha wrote:Now, as to asking if he'd try to lynch a claimed cop on day two as scum. I think the answer is yes. He already did his job--got me to claim.
In post 1880, Huntress wrote:I'm still catching up but so far I've got scum reads of varying strengths on Bert, Sweet Pertayter, Wisdom and possibly also Mantis. I had a null to town read on TNE but that is being shaken, but not quite stirred, by Fakegod.
I'm not in favour of a Desp lynch.
Also ^In post 1881, Wisdom wrote:Explain your reads.