Mafiascum.net

In post 5377, Ranmaru wrote:I'm saying, Orange scum did not kill N1.

In post 5381, brassherald wrote:Why did Orange not kill N1, then?

In post 5378, pidgey wrote:You are remembering it a little wromg thought. Gamma claimed he visited brass after joda mentioned in thread that he had info and that if someone visites an innocent child, would that have guaranteed attention. I dont think you can conclude that gamma has to be town if joda and shaz are town.

In post 5379, OnTheMark wrote:What

exactly

is your argument? Or are you just spouting shit to keep your scumread?

In post 5383, Ranmaru wrote:Otherwise, how else does the mod balance a Vig, and two scum teams?

In post 5387, BuJaber wrote:15 v 3 v 3 with one of town being vig seems balanced to me also

In post 692, Varsoon wrote:I think the setup is either: 14-3-3-1 (bulletproof SK, lots of town power, protectives in scum/town), 15-3-3, or 15-2-2-2 or something similar to that.

In post 5384, BuJaber wrote:

In post 5378, pidgey wrote:You are remembering it a little wromg thought. Gamma claimed he visited brass after joda mentioned in thread that he had info and that if someone visites an innocent child, would that have guaranteed attention. I dont think you can conclude that gamma has to be town if joda and shaz are town.

Doesn't matter jodax still claimed he saw gamma instead of anyone else.

Unless I guess gamma is scum but told the truth about visiting brass? But what scum role would that be? That makes even less sense

In post 5391, Ranmaru wrote:Mark, talk to me on Gamma.

In post 5061, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 5059, BuJaber wrote:You two don't have any issue with mark pushing for an SK lynch (who is likely town) instead of scum lynch?

I kinda let that slip from my mind, that is pretty ech but I don't really know if math is so blind to his play that he'd make that sort of blunder

In post 5100, Gamma Emerald wrote:That's not a crumb at all? It's just turn of phrase.

In post 5103, Gamma Emerald wrote:Is a bad argument necessarily scummy though?

In post 5113, Gamma Emerald wrote:It's this incessant desire you have to push Mark at every turn that makes you suspicious currently for me
Try to see things from other angles. It could just be that Mark is tinfoiling extremely hard.

In post 5124, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 5118, Ranmaru wrote:Gamma, talk to me about Mark. What do you think of Mark not updating his thoughts on other players besides Shaziro? What is your read on him, and his recent push?

I think I've been pretty open about this. I've felt like his incessant pushing is pretty bad. Why do you feel like prodding me about it now and why don't you recall any of my previous statements about Mark?

In post 5160, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 5150, brassherald wrote:Screw it, I'm not waiting. Joey told me in the Neighborhood last night that he had commuted Night 2. Therefore, he had not commute on Night 3.

OTM's theory is full of shit.

Say what?! So Joey is nonconsecutive commuter? What does this mean for OTM's role's viability? I feel like it lend's credibility to OTM's claim.

In post 5169, Gamma Emerald wrote:I was the only person he left a clear crumb on, and I don't see him going off the rails.

In post 5181, Gamma Emerald wrote:I keep letting that bit about my watch confirming Elbirn not visiting brass slip my mind for some reason. How could I forget something so important? I am such a fool!

In post 5209, Gamma Emerald wrote:I feel like I'm starting to trust you abit more here Mark. However I still don't believe Shaz is the best lynch. Even if he is SK I think as stated by others he's backed himself into a corner here. Either he tries to play the long con or hopes the kills don't line up in a way to incriminate him.

In post 73, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 49, Titus wrote:The German tanks are not subtle in their implications. The scholars wish to remind them that subtlety is the better form of valor at times. The rashness and impulsivity are not favored traits. If I picked up the implications then I doubt I am the only one that asks why you change your mind so erratically. I will see if I can work with you further without making the implications obvious.

VOTE: Gamma Emerald
Can we please avoid using words spuriously? Reading walls with no reads or point is very annoying.

I'm trying not to artificially inflate the thread when it's early-game.

In post 52, ActionDan wrote:There is no town motivation for a quote wall on page 2.

Pedit. Same reasoning as titus.

nope. I believe the start of a game is critically important to the rest of it so I'm trying to start it with less posts rather than more

.

In post 62, Titus wrote:Chara why do you seem so interested in defending Gamma?

I seek to place an embassy in Action Dan's country.

True, why are you defending me so soon Chara? I haven't really posted anything that game-relevant yet.

In post 63, Chara wrote:Titus: i don't care about Gamma. i think Dan's reasoning was bad and brass following him on it worse.
i have noted your spin on the situation.

Okay so I'm essentially the background for this argument, nice, I always wanted to be a background

In post 68, Titus wrote:

In post 63, Chara wrote:Titus: i don't care about Gamma. i think Dan's reasoning was bad and brass following him on it worse.
i have noted your spin on the situation.

Dan's vote ninjaed my post for the same reason. All Gamma did was a filler wall. Does that make him lock scum 4ever? No. But I agree with Dan's approach and you seem paricularly close to Gamma by chainsawing all who don't like gamma. Don't know if it's AI but... :/

I don't think they're chainsawing they seem to just think the idea is bad. If it was someone else they'd very likely take the same stance.

In post 5384, BuJaber wrote:Unless I guess gamma is scum but told the truth about visiting brass? But what scum role would that be? That makes even less sense