Am I the last to arrive? Tsk. I must work on my timeliness.
I've not played xylbot before, but I doubt that will cause me too many problems.
↑ Untrod Tripod wrote:Where's this coming from?
↑ Voidedmafia wrote::Badposting:
We aren't at a point where we can PL anyone. And I don't really get why you're railing against him, anyways.
(Also, damn you're no one here.)
I think you've gotten everything that you're going to get from Shos on this. I hope you don't mind me interjecting here.In post 339, PimHel wrote:This post shows a good summary why not.
In post 292, shos wrote:I'm shooting for a {BBmolla, Parama, Syry} scumteam for the while.
Ok, lets give it a whirl.In post 362, Kublai Khan wrote:||| MAFIABOT || Use command !Prod to prod. |||
And you had to wait for a prod to tell us? Wait, you knew coming into this game that you wouldn't have time to play it, but signed up anyway? Here is your entire contribution to the game thus far:In post 385, wind-up wrote:No time! D: *headdesk*
Yup, that's it for the week that you've been in the game. Sadly you don't have the worst record. That award goes to Untrod Tripod who has been in the game for three weeks and here is his entire contribution to the game:In post 306, wind-up wrote:Flimsy wall, don't like him asking Varsoon for reads after hammering him either. Especially since he said they'd be useful somehow.
On top of this sad contribution to the game, we can add that he ignored a question directed at him. Funny how quickly he showed up after a prod was issued (assuming the mod actually issued one before he showed up).In post 281, Untrod Tripod wrote:using me being on a wagon you yourself supported.
Hmm? It was a response to Shos and serrapaladin who both asked why I voted for Syryana.In post 398, Voidedmafia wrote:Was this directed at molla or Parama?
Obviously, he hasn't put any effort into this game. Would you support a force replacement of Untrod Tripod?In post 442, serrapaladin wrote:Man, I really don't think so... If he were lurking scum, I'd think he'd make it more active. He's not even trying to look as though he's participating. If this game were any larger, I'd agree with a PL, but we don't really have the time for that.
The reasons for my vote on Untrod Tripod were because he wasn't contributing, the game was stalling, my vote on Syryana wasn't doing anything and the notion that some pressure on Untrod Tripod might get him to say something of substance. Since then we've been given a tool to replace players who aren't playing and a tool to impose a deadline. So, I thought I'd try those routes first.In post 453, PimHel wrote:First lynch Untrod.
If scum, attack Serra for his quick change on Untrod or Rufflig for trying to force-replacing Untrod, while Untrod is now at his peak in activity.
If town, which I doubt, Serra is still a good option for faking reads.
So leave Syry alone.
Was there some reason you couldn't move your vote from Untrod Tripod?In post 550, Voidedmafia wrote:Hammer away, Shos.
This please. OverSoul, your large wall contained no reasons for the conclusions at the end. I'd rather not take the time to tear apart the conflicting points contained within it.
You've been putting off those reads for awhile now. You now have a partial reason why PimHel is picking on you, too.In post 541, serrapaladin wrote:I'll give in-depth reads first, when I find some time, though. I really don't know why PimHel is calling be out on that so much more than for example Voided or BB, but I'm happy to oblige.
I didn't insist that there are, but the odds are good. This comes from the test setups. I'll clean things up a bit and do some coloring.In post 676, Oversoul wrote:Why do you keep insisting that there are two scum teams?
In post 53, Kublai Khan wrote:mafia:Tracker, Gunsmith, Ascetic;sk:Soulshifter; town: Mirror, Jack of All Trades, Amnesiac (Doctor), Cop, Alien, Secret Role (Super-Saint), Inspector Gadget (Naive), Townie, Townie (Death Miller)
mafia:Mafioso (x2), Randomizer;sk:Mad Monk; town: Bodyguard, Night Watchman, Astrologer, Hot Nurse, Magistrate, Paranoid Suicide Bomber, Townie (x2), Secret Role (Radiant)
mafia:Cheater, Witch;mafia2:Delayer, Watcher; town: Mystery Role (Bodyguard), Voteblocker, Coward, Ascetic, Amnesiac (Disabler), Secret Admirer, Doctor (Quack), Townie (x2)
mafia:Mad Gunman, Mafioso;mafia2:Mafioso, Witch; town: Morpher, Doctor, Radioactive Friendly Neighbor, Reviver (False), Twin, Townie (x3), Townie (Death Miller)
mafia:Redirecter, Mafioso, Malfunctioning Inventor; mafia-ally: Inventor; town: Watcher, Role Cop (0%), Unlynchable, Eavesdropper, Twin, Cop (Paranoid), Mystery Role (Magnet), Townie, Retired Cop (Paranoid)
town: Cop, Watcher, Cheater, Retired Arsonist, Ascetic, Townie (x3), Radiant, Lovestruck Townie;wolf:Beta Werewolf, Vicious Werewolf, Alpha Werewolf
mafia:Roleblocker, Mafioso, Ascetic;sk:Devil's Advocate; town: Arms Dealer, MUP, Vigilante (SK Miller), Gunsmith, Secret Role (Ascetic), Angel (Fallen), Townie, Cop (Naive), Townie (Miller)
mafia:Godfather, One-Shot Redirecter;mafia2:Godfather, Watcher; town: Cop, Gunman with a Conscience, Malfunctioning Inventor, Computer Hacker, Retired Arsonist, Twin, Townie, Sibling (x2)
So, that is 18 test setups. 15 of 18 have multi-ball scum in them. I'd say the odds are good that there is more than 1 scum team. There is exactly 1 setup where there is 1 scum team and 1 vigilante.In post 183, Kublai Khan wrote:mafia:Mafioso, Paranoid Suicide Bomber;mafia2:Redirecter, Frame Artist; town: Cop, Reviver, Witch, Cheerleader, Magistrate, Unlynchable, Reviver (False), Secret Role (Ascetic), Townie (SK Miller)
mafia:Tracker, Mafioso;sk1:Death Arsonist;sk2:Serial Killer; town: Census Taker, Kill-Immune Townie, Darwin, Day Cop (Naive), Delayer, Unlynchable, Sleeper Bodyguard, Townie, Cop (Naive)
mafia:Mafioso, Eavesdropper;mafia2:Disabler, Watcher; town: Double Voter, Mystery Role (Mad Monk), Role Cop (0%), Retired Arsonist, Eavesdropper, Ascetic, Cop (Naive), Radiant, Townie (Death Miller)
mafia:Doctor, Mafioso, Hitman;sk:Poisoner; survivor: Ascetic; town: Anarchist, Reviver, Sleeper Vigilante, Sleeper Reviver, Voteblocker, Mystery Role (Magnet), Townie (x2)
mafia:Day Disabler, Cheater;mafia2:Mafioso, Ascetic; town: Double Voter, Cop, Gunsmith, Coward, Townie (x4), Skulker
mafia:Role Cop, Frame Artist; town: Turncoat, Cop, Faerie Godmother, Death Vigilante, Magistrate, Cop (Random), Townie (Miller), Sibling (x2);wolf:Beta Werewolf, Alpha Werewolf
Cult Leader;cult:mafia:Reflecter, Godfather; town: Mason (x2), Cop, Mutant, Amnesiac (Jackie Chan), Disabler, Super-Saint, Cheerleader, Doctor (Quack), Townie (SK Miller)
mafia:Role Cop, Mafioso;mafia2:Godfather, Spy; town: Cop, Mystery Role (Inventor), Doctor, Thief, Nervous Watchman, Super-Saint, Day Cop (Naive), Townie, Townie (Death Miller)
sk:Vampire; town: Vigilante, Jack of All Trades, Combat Medic, Magistrate, Townie (x3), Secret Role (Green Goo), Lovestruck Townie;wolf:Beta Werewolf, Vicious Werewolf, Alpha Werewolf
mafia:Doctor, Mugger, Secret Admirer; survivor1: Ascetic; survivor2: Witch; town: Double Voter, Bomb, Turquoise Goo, Delayer, Death Vigilante, Role Cop (0%), Mystery Role (Magnet), Lovestruck Townie
A 3-man scum team with a mafia-ally is possible. Keep in mind that PimHel did not use his ability until last night - this might have been a game-ending play on his part. Otherwise, he could have waited one more night.Kublai Khan wrote:mafia:Redirecter, Mafioso, Malfunctioning Inventor;mafia-ally:Inventor; town: Watcher, Role Cop (0%), Unlynchable, Eavesdropper, Twin, Cop (Paranoid), Mystery Role (Magnet), Townie, Retired Cop (Paranoid)
What possible motivation would PimHel have for trying to voteblock a member of the mafia? Why would PimHel believe there is a non-town, non-mafia faction left in play?In post 809, Voidedmafia wrote:Wait, wouldn't it mean that he did believe Syr was scum (or at least not town)?In post 807, The Rufflig wrote:Which means that PimHel merely did not believe that Syryana was mafia - a disappointing conclusion.
Because he couldn't coordinate his ability with the mafia kill. He had to avoid likely mafia nk targets.In post 819, serrapaladin wrote:But why would Pim target Syr over someone more obviously town like Rufflig or Tierce, if all he wanted was to block a town vote?
I don't follow you. Under what circumstances would you feel that this could be a gambit?In post 856, Tierce wrote:I imagine so, but the bit about it being a gambit would be entirely different if he had lived.
SerraPaladinIn post 862, Tierce wrote:Rufflig, who's scum?
You don't seem surprised at my answer. You didn't even ask why it is SerraPaladin.
I'm having a really hard time answering that without being snarky. It seems that you don't trust me. Ok.In post 879, BBmolla wrote:Why you're not voting your scumread is a bit more important than why he's your scumread.
You placed shos on your scum list before hearing from Voided Mafia knowing full well that Voided Mafia might be able to condemn Shos or partially clear him. If there was any doubt that shos might be condemned as a malfunctioning inventor, Voided Mafia would have been killed to avoid the immediate threat. The scum had to let the uncertainty about shos be lifted as they felt a pressing need to deal with PimHel. Why PimHel? His sudden flip-flop on Parama read like a day-cop to them, so they missed his mafia-ally crumb. PimHel getting off another investigation would have had less chance of successfully identifying a scum than shos being exposed as a fraud. (Note: malfunctioning inventor may give an ability that does not malfunction according to the role list.) If shos was scum, the mafia would have had to risk PimHel staying alive another day and taken out Voided instead.In post 778, serrapaladin wrote:Scumreads are Syr and shos.
VM, what happened with your nightaction? I doubt there are two mafia-allies, so if he's an actual inventor, he's basically town.
You have actual scum candidates and you stop to take the time to ask about if a townie looking player might be a survivor? This just feels like you were quietly probing the waters to see if there was a possibility of a Rufflig mislynch in the future.In post 512, serrapaladin wrote:So this guy is third party? I doubt he's scum, but third party sounds about right.
Your read on Untrod going from scummy to townie was completely WIFOM. I don't really see the difference between Untrod and wind-up. The former was present, trolling and not producing content. The latter was not so present and leaving a string of broken promises to produce content. The key point being that neither was producing content. However, you were quite fine with letting Untrod stick around. You had a problem with wind-up. Which means if I'm right about you, then I'm going to have to go after Tierce next.In post 463, serrapaladin wrote:My initial vote on Untrod was mostly because he was being useless, but given we're down to 10, probably with a good 5 non-town role, I thought better of it. Syry and shos have both been objectively more scummy. Best case, Untrod is town who doesn't really care about the game. Worst case, he's the actual jester or something and wants to get himself lynched. Either way, I don't like his lynch at all.
!xmafia replace wind-up
In post 914, serrapaladin wrote:What about your post should I have reread, Rufflig?
In post 893, The Rufflig wrote:I'm not third party. I'm town. I can prove it.
I'll say it again, I can prove that I am a townie. My ability is not given to mafia or third parties. My ability is demonstrable, so you don't have to take my word that I have such an ability. In essence, I can confirm myself as a townie. Do you need the proof?In post 895, serrapaladin wrote:If you're a survivor, you don't actually have any interest in lynching scum, so that would make the most sense to me.
In post 846, serrapaladin wrote:Didn't Voided clear you? Why are you voting him?
In post 848, serrapaladin wrote:But why would scum-VM clear you? Unless of course you're both scum...
In post 885, serrapaladin wrote:Voided could have only condemned shos, who is scummy independent of his claim. I highly doubt scum-shos would kill Voided, as Pim was under much less suspicion, and Voided's death would implicate shos. It's pretty silly that you had to come up with the hypothetical that scum thought Pim was a day-cop for your musings to make sense.
You went from Voided Mafia cleared shos to a possible shos/Voided Mafia combo and from there to doubting Voided Mafia as part of a combo with shos. Finally, you ask why I'm not buying a Syryana/shos pairing. I don't think you really believe "that the chance of a single use on a townie confirming his as Malfunctioning is rather slim." If that were true, then you wouldn't have thought Voided Mafia had cleared shos at the beginning of the day. I'm not following your logic on this "progression".In post 895, serrapaladin wrote:I haven't been rolefishing at all. I explicitly said that I DON'T want to know about WHAT happened, just WHETHER something happened or not. I wanted to see whether there's any evidence that shos might be a Malfunctioning Inventor.
<snip>
Rufflig, are you being serious about not coming up with a better explanation? You know that people can lie, right? There is no way of knowing whether shos actually targeted Pim last night. If anything, it's a bit convenient that shos' target also happened to be the NK target. Why does Syry/shos not make sense? Please ISO Syry and look for mentions of shos. He's making the classic mistake of completely ignoring his scumbuddy. shos sending 1 role at town-voided to confirm himself and the second one at his scumbuddy, while claiming to have targeted the NK target, makes sense. I don't know how exactly the Malfunctioning Inventor works, but I would assume that the chance of a single use on a townie confirming his as Malfunctioning is rather slim. In terms of being above suspicion, Pim was as good a target as any, so I could see why Syry/shos would choose him.
<snip>
So yeah, Syry/shos makes the most sense, and if there is a third, it's probably Tierce.
Hypothetically, you're protecting serrapaladin from being lynched by sacrificing yourself and this was planned ahead of time. There you go, possible scummy motive.In post 972, Voidedmafia wrote:Now, Ruffling, explain what I would get by intentionally lying about this.
The first half, no. The second half, yes. Though the reason may not entirely be town points. serrapaladin may have an ability that will make it much easier for him to win than for you to win. There is also a remote chance that serrapaladin is a cultist leader. In which case, you would have to sacrifice yourself for him.In post 989, Voidedmafia wrote:so I, as scum, when asked by buddy-serra if I used an item N2, claim that I did so while knowing that I never receieved one that night.
At a later date, when pushed on by serra that I'm lying, I admit to such to sacrifice myself to give serra townpoints?
Is this correct?
I am not insisting that my reason is correct. It is just one possible reason. What I do feel is that Voidedmafia's play does not make sense from a townie perspective.In post 992, Oversoul wrote:I'm not sure I buy the theory that Voided is trying to get lynched to save buddy serra especially if you think this is MyLo with serra's claim.
Why wouldn't they just move onto someone who isn't their buddy and attempt to get them lynched?
In post 808, serrapaladin wrote:Voided, can you confirm shos?
In post 809, Voidedmafia wrote:Serra, Tonight or last night?
In post 811, serrapaladin wrote:VM: Last night. Did you use whatever he gave you?
In post 813, Voidedmafia wrote:yes.In post 811, serrapaladin wrote:VM: Last night. Did you use whatever he gave you?
In post 814, serrapaladin wrote:...and?
In post 815, Voidedmafia wrote:Why do you need to know what I got and how I used it to confirm Shos?In post 814, serrapaladin wrote:...and?
Shos says he gave me something. I've confirmed I got it. At the very least we've already confirmed that Shos's roleclaim is true. What else do you need in that regard?
In post 816, serrapaladin wrote:Because if he's a normal Inventor, he's town (as I don't think we can have 2 mafia-allies), but if he's a Malfunctioning Inventor, he can be scum.
I don't care what you got, I care about whether it worked as intended. If he's Malfunctioning, you would still get an ability, but it wouldn't do what it says on the tin.
If Voidedmafia is now telling us the truth, it is very hard to read that conversation without thinking that he was not being misleading (at best) at the start of day.In post 821, Voidedmafia wrote:Oh, it worked as intended, alright.In post 816, serrapaladin wrote:I don't care what you got, I care about whether it worked as intended. If he's Malfunctioning, you would still get an ability, but it wouldn't do what it says on the tin.
Pretty much right here. The three of us are in favor of it and no one else has bothered to say one way or the other. I'd appreciate it if the rest of the players would give a simple up or down vote to the idea - explanations optional.In post 1032, Syryana wrote:I'm good with it.In post 1031, Oversoul wrote:Where are we on mass claim?