Morning Tweet committing around half a dozen greeting tells. Fortunately for her, two cancel out and she's on an even number.
A sound case.
VOTE: Almost50
A sound case.
Go ahead! I'm excited to hear what it says. Though, if it's another prankster sending in a John Cena entrance, I might just quit The Force.In post 17, Morning Tweet wrote:Is anyone interested in playing the tape, or shall I?
Good field work out there, Battle Mage. Blake Belladonna, I believe Battle Mage may want you to notice him.In post 29, Battle Mage wrote:Vote: Blake Belladonna
That's valuable evidence, Morning Tweet! Careful with that.
Tails ditched me earlier. Not in a great mood.In post 75, GeorgeBailey wrote:i hope sonic is ok
Gamma Emerald is correct. You can literally see the gloves on my hands, civilians.In post 82, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’d assume Detectic over here knows what he’s doing and would use gloves
Sigh, there goes my arm. Well, at least I have another one.In post 90, SirCakez wrote:In post 74, Hectic wrote:That's valuable evidence, Morning Tweet! Careful with that.
Pick tape up and examine for fingerprints.
It self destructs in response.
Yeah, you're right. I was just reaction testing by hiding it behind my back. Frankly, I'm a little disappointed by the lack of concern for my well-being.In post 108, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also “self destruct” doesn’t mean an explosion, I think your arm is fine Detectic
The Civil Lying Committee gave me the green light in this case. It's like when you're having dinner with your local Godfather and theIn post 113, pisskop wrote:I'm a little concerned that you felt the need to lie to us, Detectic
Elaborate? For most it'd be the other way around.In post 129, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I'm not lynching farside or a50 today no matter what. I want to see what happens with them.
In post 151, SirCakez wrote:As the tape recorder self-destructs, you look around. You are in a long, dark, rusted hallway. Behind you is darkness. In front of you lies a monstrous doorway. Do you enter?
Why would you assume the 3 in your hood areIn post 152, Albert B. Rampage wrote:There could be a masons.
In this case, 21 players could break down like this:
3 masons in their hood
18 players remaining, 3 hoods with 6 players each
I do agree with everything said here though. The Collision Enquiry Unit approves.In post 152, Albert B. Rampage wrote:So here's what I'm thinking:
1) It's not safe to massclaim our PTs
2) It's safe for someone to claim not to be in a PT, although they might be lying about it and we don't have the means to verify.
3) If you're in a PT, you should announce your presence to the PT participants. Otherwise, you are damaging town cohesion and would therefore most likely be scum.
4) As the game progresses, if we clean out 2 scum from a single PT, it's probable that the remaining are town.
This is unfortunate.
Seems my plan was foiled. Bats and snakes are pretty slippery tbf.
I don't buy it. I would trust everyone in this room with my life, and I have no reason to believe otherwise. Jigsaw's just trying to pit us all off against each other, guys.In post 195, SirCakez wrote:Hectic clicks the tape recorder on.
"Your obsessions have lead you to the inevitable. Murder, enacted in reality. I see a weakness within all of you. A weakness that can only be removed two ways. Death. Or murder. Make your Choice. I expect one amongst you to be dead before the timer runs out. If not, my Acolytes among you will do the job themselves. Give in your impulses! And you may have a chance to save yourselves...I will not communicate with you again until one amongst you has fallen, whether to blade, gun, or machine.
Live or die. Make your Choice!"
The recorder clicks off.
Thanks, Elsa. I can always count on you.
Are you aware of the fact that what Elsa is suggesting is allowed by the rules? He's suggesting the Acolytes are split into two PTs, and I think it's a fair thing to speculate about given the ratio of scum to town in this game.In post 263, momo wrote:I'm really not liking this line of thought from Elsa Jay. This game is 16:5. We know that. It's mod-confirmed fact. This implies that there is one scum team and I agree with pk when he says at this point, it's almost irrelevant if there's a traitor. EJ is doing setup analysis, trying to appear as if he is contributing to town but it's through a series of posts that don't actually give town meaningful information. When one of the lines in the mod post is "confirmed 16 vs 5" there's no need to get into all of this.
VOTE: Elsa Jay
I have reason to believe this isn't a good idea at the moment. Standby, civilian.In post 272, Almost50 wrote:I disagree. If hood membership is outed to hood members it should be outed to the whole roster. Assuming there is at least one mafia member in each hood the mafia will know the composition of the hoods as soon as players post in their hoods.In post 160, pisskop wrote:I dont think we should be making assumptions about hoods right now. But I really do agree that we should be posting in our hoods so that everyone else knows they are there.
The Carriageway states setup spec is NAI on average. Why is it Acolyte-indicative coming from Albert?In post 289, BBmolla wrote:The ABR thing is straight forward, lots of times setup spec allows scum to post a lot without posting anything, IIOA
In post 549, Elsa Jay wrote:I gotta go to work and the sun fucking sucks. My role sucks. I'm sad now. See you in 2 hours.
Hmm, that does sound pretty healthy and fun; maybe I should try that out sometime.In post 553, Morning Tweet wrote:This is the only viable way to play mafia! taking time and stressing over whether or not to post your thoughts cause you're afraid how they're received is zero funIn post 547, Hectic wrote:Holding back on what you say sounds like a good way to look like scum when you're town. If you say whatever comes to mind, people will realise you're town because off meta when you do it in enough games I reckon.
Fine. If you don't deliver on that, thereIn post 564, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Drop me a vote on Vecna before you go and I will arrange a champion's feast to celebrate your return.
In post 317, Vecna wrote:Yeah, Drixx not looking at the front page whether it was just a copy of the playerlist is kinda.....yikes
Why? Wouldn't scum!him have more reason to suspect it's a joke than town!him?In post 319, momo wrote:Ninja'd me here on my last post but this completely.In post 317, Vecna wrote:Yeah, Drixx not looking at the front page whether it was just a copy of the playerlist is kinda.....yikes
This is bad. You're drawing these conclusions out of thin air, Albert. There's nothing to suggest there's going to be 1 scum in each hood and 2 outside. Also 335.In post 329, Albert B. Rampage wrote:If you're a townie, you see Drixx open up about not knowing the player list in his PT on page 1, and you're not in any hood yourself and not curious at all about his post to comment on it...I find that suspicious.
In post 325, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Scumreads: Guilty Lion, Vecna, Xtoxm, BBmollaFor sure there's scum outside the PTs. Probably 1 scum in each PT and 2 outside of it if there are 3 PTs. Statistically, our best bet is to lynch inside [A50, BBmolla, Xtoxm, Guilty Lion] today.In post 325, Albert B. Rampage wrote:3 have claimed not to be in a hood: A50, BBmolla, Xtoxm,.Guilty Lion
In post 338, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You should. BM is town.In post 337, Drixx wrote:I'm like 99.9% of the way to swapping my vote to Vecna at this point.
Dislike this overconfidence. Though I might be confusing playstyle with scuminess.In post 370, Albert B. Rampage wrote:GuiltyLion and davesaz could very well be bussing each other. In any case, we should concentrate our votes. Bring me a chair and rope.
Setup-speccing that there might be a traffic analyst in a game where 80%+ of people are in hoods is really strange.In post 387, Almost50 wrote:I guess I missed GL's claim he was in no hoods. However, my point still stands. Scum do have a PT of the own, thus can communicate privately. A Traffic analyst would get the liar(s) is any. Nit lynching anyone who claims not to be in a PT today.
Why town-indicative, Morning? Are you assuming he prefers playing as town?In post 396, Morning Tweet wrote:Not A50. I like how he commented on how he loves his role
Now that's one I haven't seen before. Some nice foreshadowing.In post 896, Morning Tweet wrote:.3.
This post doesn't really fill me with confidence regarding Elsa though. I mean, I agree that Almo is scummy, but the reasoning here is iffy.In post 947, Elsa Jay wrote:Almost I'm starting to think your going out of your way to try and make the vigilante(s) waste a shot on me. Usually you've just left me alone day 1 and such because I'm "entertaining". I think your just trying to detract from the other potential wagons today.
Where's my hand-crafted banderoles, Albert? Don't make me pull out a cliffhanger!In post 566, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Splendid, I'll have the hand-crafted banderoles displaying welcome back Hectic on the mezzanine.
It was a catchup, why is that relevant to you scumreading me?In post 1013, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You disagreed with me in post 969 about something I said in post 329. I'm over it, Hectic... LOLIn post 1006, Hectic wrote:You've gone from townreading me to mysteriously having a scumread as soon as I disliked some of your posts and started pushing Almo.
Are you actually not kidding around here? Want to give some reasons? Though I do appreciate this plot progression, I'm sure the audience are on the edge of their seats.In post 1014, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I'm 99% certain that Hectic is scum. This is our lynch today. I can see you guys are having a hard time pushing a bandwagon beyond 3 votes, so I'll try to reduce my activity for the final 7 days until we can consolidate around Hectic.
No, they're both independent reads. I don't team-solve day 1.In post 1017, GuiltyLion wrote:so do you think both of them are scum together or what?In post 1007, Hectic wrote:Honestly though, reading back on Elsa's posts, I still scumread him for feeling weird and off-tone; I just don't like the reasons you're using to scumread him for.
I'm trying to chew on this thought process here - my initial gut reaction was that it seemed plainly disingenuous to push A50 while saying "I also scumread your main scum read, but just for different reasons", but then the more I thought about it the more I'm thinking scum probably doesn't make this up because it's so on the surface inconsistent?
can I get crowd opinions on this one? I'm entirely unsure how I feel about it
What do you mean? The post was made up of skimming through around 15 to 20 pages. I liked Vecna because of pointing out towny things I agreed with like expressing Blake was town for wanting to avoid a Dave toxic gamestate.In post 1040, davesaz wrote:In that post that ABR quoted, it looks like Hectic shifts gears in the middle like he wanted the conclusion and had to find something to get there.
I disliked the way/reasons he was using to push Elsa. It felt agenda-driven and still kinda does. People seem to really disagree with me though lulIn post 1051, farside22 wrote:Hectic: wgy are you voting A50?
In post 325, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Solid townreads: Drixx, Morning Tweet
Townreads: BM, Hectic, momo
People I don't want to lynch Day 1: Farside, A50
Scumreads: Guilty Lion, Vecna, Xtoxm, BBmolla
In post 843, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Anyone here except Hectic works for me, can you rank them for me please?In post 842, Morning Tweet wrote:XTOM, DAVE, BB, HECTIC, or BLAKE
You don't just go from townreading someone and advocating not lynching them today (all of the above), to being "99%" sure they're scum. This is exactly the sort of false bravado and confidence scum like to exhibit, and sometimes gets them townread:In post 912, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Here's the list of players I will NOT lynch today: Pisskop, momo, drixx, BM, Hectic, MT, farside, EJ. I think today is a crapshoot as far lynching correctly because town is dysfunctional, and am mainly angling for Day 2 analysis. I need to get the building blocks of early, serious bandwagons that have a chance to tip over to a real lynch. Make of that what you will.
In post 973, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I'm not buying the a50 suspicion for one second LOL
In post 975, Albert B. Rampage wrote:The gig is up, Hectic, we know you're scum now!
In post 977, Albert B. Rampage wrote:*pulls the curtain to reveal the sign*
WELCOME, SCUM!
The jig is up you got caught.
In post 1000, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Anyway, in other news, Hectic is scum.
In post 1013, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You disagreed with me in post 969 about something I said in post 329. I'm over it, Hectic... LOLIn post 1006, Hectic wrote:You've gone from townreading me to mysteriously having a scumread as soon as I disliked some of your posts and started pushing Almo.
The post in question (971) that got him to scumread me were some disconnected thoughts I typed up from 20 pages of skimming. If his case is that I'm scum for suspecting Almo and Elsa who both suspect each other, he's pushing me for NAI reason that I've explained - I don't preflip solve and my reads are almost always independent - he disregards that reason and continues to push me without giving any reasoning.In post 1014, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I'm 99% certain that Hectic is scum. This is our lynch today. I can see you guys are having a hard time pushing a bandwagon beyond 3 votes, so I'll try to reduce my activity for the final 7 days until we can consolidate around Hectic.
In post 129, Albert B. Rampage wrote:I'm not lynching farside or a50 today no matter what. I want to see what happens with them.
In post 338, Albert B. Rampage wrote:You should. BM is town.In post 337, Drixx wrote:I'm like 99.9% of the way to swapping my vote to Vecna at this point.
In post 514, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Drixx, BM, momo, Morning Tweet and Pisskop are all town.
Do you see people's reasons for calling me an Acolyte? It sounds like cutting corners and poor storytelling to me!In post 1102, Morning Tweet wrote:ABR or hectic might be scum-- not sure there yet
i was promised something exciting, BM! unless i missed it
This isn't true as a blanket statement at all, and varies from player to player. Are you aware of Albert's meta? Regardless, you need to look at each instance independently, and see if the switch is justified. Does his flip look justified based on that post I made? I really don't see it at all. I only surround myself with grey flags; you wouldn't find a red flag within touching distance of me.In post 1099, momo wrote:I disagree with this. Scum will try and keep their reads as consistent as possible to avoid suspicion, especially a player as active as ABR. It's hard to read ABR this game, but the fact that he was willing to make a noted change to his reads as the game progressed has to be counted as townpoints, def not scummy.In post 1087, Hectic wrote:You don't just go from townreading someone and advocating not lynching them today (all of the above), to being "99%" sure they're scum. This is exactly the sort of false bravado and confidence scum like to exhibit, and sometimes gets them townread: