mini 2140: partition (this is over)
Forum rules
I checked the other partition game from 2011 to see how it played out. Scum were spread out one was in group 1, one was in group 2, and another was in group 3. On the vote count there was a message on day 1 saying groups have changed and vote count got reset. A scum player got switched to another group and the group that got lynched on day 1 were all town. I wonder if the same thing is going to happen here. Lynching in group 1 does look risky if they are all town plus add the group change on day 1 if that happens. My guess is one scum will be in group 1, one in group 2, and another in group 3.
On the bolded part is it safe to assume there won't be a group change on day 1 since the setup is different?In post 141, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:This isn't the exact same setup. there aren't any roles in this gameIn post 137, Adorable wrote:On the vote count there was a message on day 1 saying groups have changed and vote count got reset. A scum player got switched to another group and the group that got lynched on day 1 were all town.I wonder if the same thing is going to happen here.
Thanks for clearing that up. I only checked the mod iso to see what the flips looked like.In post 146, Morning Tweet wrote:@Adorablethat game had PR craziness. Roles that could swap groups and stuff like that.
This game there are no power roles. so the groups are static this time, no chance of them changing
I'll note this down if group 1 doesn't get lynched on day 1, then I can expect maybe Morning Tweet is scum in my group who plans on keeping me alive for day 2 who will put me in another group opposite of hers.In post 144, Morning Tweet wrote:In post 135, Daenerys and Dragons wrote:Morning Tweet needs to start scumhunting.Spoiler: your wish is my command
no, i dont expect anyone to read that. i just worked thru the thread in this post rather than in my notes cause idk
You know, im sure somebody probably brought this up already, but if we figure out that there's 2 scum in group one, maybe we could wait for the next day and then target group one players. I guess scum could screw us with the partitions again though.
Spoiler: reads
I start to wonder why did mafia put 8 players in group 1, 2 players in group 2, and 3 players in group 3. It takes 7 to hammer and there's no way group 1 will get hammered by the other groups for not having enough players. Mafia want to avoid getting lynched which will be more likely there is definitely scum in group 1.
VOTE: Group 1
VOTE: Group 1
I'm always a null read or I would be a scum lean since I'm not an active member. I get the feeling scum looked up my completed games and they put me on Group 1 and plan on lynching Group 2 or Group 3 on day 1 and on day 2 they would put me in a group that would get lynched. I also think whoever are scum in this game are trying way too hard to look towny and it is Group 1 who is getting town read alot.
I think 2 scum are in Group 1 and that's why I'm voting there.
This post looks like shade throwing and you didn't elaborate on why you didn't like my entrance and this is the kind of post I normally scum read when I don't see a player elaborate.In post 142, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I don't like Adorable's entrance either
I think 2 scum are in Group 1 and that's why I'm voting there.
The players in Group 3 are scummy and I was also going to vote there yesterday and then I started to think scum must have looked up the players completed games which makes me think the players on Group 3 get scum read more often than me.In post 354, Hoctac wrote:Puff, why do you think scum would include you with them in group 1 if you think they've researched you and seen you as a null/scumlean most of the time, rather than put you in group 2/3, so that those could get lynched more easily today?In post 350, Adorable wrote:I'm always a null read or I would be a scum lean since I'm not an active member. I get the feeling scum looked up my completed games and they put me on Group 1 and plan on lynching Group 2 or Group 3 on day 1 and on day 2 they would put me in a group that would get lynched. I also think whoever are scum in this game are trying way too hard to look towny and it is Group 1 who is getting town read alot.
This post looks like shade throwing and you didn't elaborate on why you didn't like my entrance and this is the kind of post I normally scum read when I don't see a player elaborate.In post 142, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I don't like Adorable's entrance either
I think 2 scum are in Group 1 and that's why I'm voting there.
You also admitted you think there are 2 scum in Group 1 but you don't want to vote there. The two scum in Group 1 look like to me they are the ones who want to vote in Group 2 or Group 3. You are a player I have been leaning scum on. So you think I'm scum who wants to vote myself off on day 1? What kind of logic is this?In post 355, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I don’t think you’re that hard to read nor do I think you’re lynchbait simply be being less activeIn post 350, Adorable wrote:I'm always a null read or I would be a scum lean since I'm not an active member. I get the feeling scum looked up my completed games and they put me on Group 1 and plan on lynching Group 2 or Group 3 on day 1 and on day 2 they would put me in a group that would get lynched. I also think whoever are scum in this game are trying way too hard to look towny and it is Group 1 who is getting town read alot.
This post looks like shade throwing and you didn't elaborate on why you didn't like my entrance and this is the kind of post I normally scum read when I don't see a player elaborate.In post 142, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I don't like Adorable's entrance either
I think 2 scum are in Group 1 and that's why I'm voting there.
Your entrance pinged me because all you did was ask some questions about the setup and offered no other content. What little analysis you offered in your first posts didn’t make sense - you conjectured there would be 1 scum in each group based on the previous run of this game, but the partitions in the previous game were completely different. I don’t believe you would come up with such bad analysis as town.
Who are the two scum?
If you think it is 1/1/1 and think I'm the only scum in Group 1, then this would mean my scum buddies who put only me in Group 1 would expect me to do some power wolfing taking control of the game thread and my scum buddies would have high expectations of me being really good pretending to play as town.In post 365, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:I don't have two active scumreads on people in group 1. I think it's rash to vote there without having at least two strong scumreads in group 1 on the offchance scum did actually only put 1 scum in that group.In post 358, Adorable wrote:You also admitted you think there are 2 scum in Group 1 but you don't want to vote there. The two scum in Group 1 look like to me they are the ones who want to vote in Group 2 or Group 3. You are a player I have been leaning scum on. So you think I'm scum who wants to vote myself off on day 1? What kind of logic is this?
I'm entertaining the idea that scum put scum!you and only you into group 1, and that's why you want to vote yourself. Who is your other scumread?
Why are you still leaning scum on me? Do you disagree with my analysis on your entrance posts?
I already responded to this on 357.
I pretty much said this on #350. Two or three scum in Group 1 I think they put me on Group 1 and plan on lynching on Group 2 or Group 3 on day 1 and on day 2 they would put me in a group that would get lynched.In post 491, Hoctac wrote:Could you address this please, Puff?In post 360, Hoctac wrote:So why not put you in Group 2 if they really don't want Group 1 lynched?In post 357, Adorable wrote:The players in Group 3 are scummy and I was also going to vote there yesterday and then I started to think scum must have looked up the players completed games which makes me think the players on Group 3 get scum read more often than me.
Majority of the players don't want to lynch in Group 1 and that would make me look really bad and scummy for saying this if this is 1/1/1. I'm not going to go for that weird angle on day 1 with me being the only scum in Group 1.In post 487, Cat Scratch Fever wrote:No? Scum would want to get group 1 lynched in that case, and you would be deliberately playing scummy. Why would you think the opposite...?In post 481, Adorable wrote:If you think it is 1/1/1 and think I'm the only scum in Group 1, then this would mean my scum buddies who put only me in Group 1 would expect me to do some power wolfing taking control of the game
As it is, you’re pretty scummy. I’m not sure if you’re deliberately playing scummy though.
You are crazy! Ame put us at L-1, you hammered and unvoting doesn't count.
I counted just now to see how many players voted Group 1 and 6 players voted Group 1. You unvoted and Group 1 now has 5 votes.In post 585, Hoctac wrote:I forgive you, Ame.
Puff, what's your assessment of the current situation? Did we lose or are we all good?
In post 374, Mohab500 wrote:This feels like scum acting like they're scumhunting tbh, this statement adds little to nothing here: we know scum is trying to act like townt so can you please tell us something more discreet? What do you mean by trying too hard to be towny? And was that last part a jab against Group 1 or are you actually defending Group 1?In post 350, Adorable wrote:I also think whoever are scum in this game are trying way too hard to look towny and it is Group 1 who is getting town read alot.
If two scum are in Group 1, I think Mohab is the last scum. These two posts above look like scum throwing shade and this doesn't look like something a towny would say.In post 427, Mohab500 wrote:I don't get this post at all, you make several paragraphs about how some guy referred to a hypothetical group with 'them' instead of 'us'. The rest of your posts give me a similar vibe, too: seems like you're writing for the sake of writing, and reading for the sake of reading, not actually trying to do anything useful or help us find scum at all. I am starting to get an Albert + dsj scum feel.In post 238, dsjstr wrote:Part of that has to do with the slip I saw,I just noticed that MT referred to the town as "them" when saying that there are at least 5 town in group 1 and they should not vote for their own group. This seems weird to me and looks like MT could have slipped. If they are town then theyIn post 13, Morning Tweet wrote:First impressions: i feel that it is unlikely scum placed 2 of themselves in group 2, or 2 of themselves in group 3
That seems like a lot of risk, because at a glance you'd expect us to probably pick group 2 or 3 for the lynch, and it'd be hard to stop it if one of those groups gained traction. all it would take is one scummy member in the group and you'd lose that group and 2/3rds of the scumteam
Whereas if you placed 2+ scum inside group one, it'd likely be easier to steer the lynch away from one to one of the smaller groups.after all, there's at least 5 town in group one and im sure at least some of them would not want to die
I just realized while writing this that if we lynch group one, and there's zero scum in there, we lose the game immediately. ack!
would have included them self as part of the town. Instead he talks about town being other people, now what does this have to do with group 3? If you look at MT's first read list you will notice that Mohab is the only strong town read. I personally
don't see the reasoning to be strong Mohab could have just faked that he wanted to lynch his own group and then he actually does change his vote. MT continues to town read him as they both switch over to group 2 which had gained some traction.
Just realized that group 2 is also at L-3, but basically I am scum reading Mahob because I scum read MT but that's just one person from group 1 so it would be better to go for group 3.