MOD – I’ll be LA from 4:30pm EDT today until Monday morning for my usual weekend family duties. And specifically this weekend with a charity golf Scramble on Saturday to help with and Mother’s Day on Sunday my posting is likely to be restricted to late nights if at all.
UNVOTE:
@KK and Hito
– have your groups finished judging yet? I don’t see evidence they have and want to be sure I haven't missed it.
@EVERYONE
– Although I think Ajax is scum I’d like confirmation from the Judging groups that everything is complete before we go ahead and lynch him. So please no more votes on him (L-2 is even a bit much thus my unvote) so as to not faciliate an 'oops hammer' screwing up the judging.
Lastly
– anyone who thinks Ajax is Town / doesn’t agree with Quilford’s
Post 126 needs to explain who that isn’t clearly indicative of scum Ajax making up responses.
--
@Hito
– regarding your post re: Insults. This is a Team game. I have more than my interests on the line. Before we even had roles the four members of our team got together and discussed Rage issues. Grey and I have had success very recently NOT raging at all and getting good results (the Tiger eaten MST3K Mafia for example had us sweep scum with only 1 Town casualty over 3 game days). I’m personally working towards a more calm meta as I recognize that the current site meta has moved my general game in a direction I’m not generally happy with. This is all I will say on the matter.
Hito wrote: If Ajax flips scum, we lynch Gaoth tomorrow, no questions no compromise.
While I like where your head is out here I would honestly like to discuss the play strongly defending him as an alternate candidate (Fonz). I know you read him Town currently but his current play is pining my gut as similar to Seinfeld Mafia scum-Fonz. I’ll be re-reading that game to aquaint myself with why this weekend most likely.
That said if I was a Cop I’d be scanning either KK or Fonz tonight if Ajax flips scum.
--
Zar wrote:Molla's vote hop into Gaoth, OTOH, was a bit quick to and comes right after being questioned about keeping his vote on quilford.
Remind me again … aren’t you voting Gaoth at this point? Because I don’t find it very a Town oriented thought process to be analyzing the votes on a wagon you are still on from the standpoint that the wagon would be unsuccessful before a flip even happens.
Especially when your justification for said vote is effectively “tone”.
--
KK wrote:And I've played games where I've seen you go a couple of days either not posting or skim-posting before jumping back in with a massive catch-up post. So I'm not understanding your attack.
Yes but you have done nothing in the way of scum-hunting at the point I made that post, at least to myself, Grey and Llama. I’ve already pointed out why I think that was the case in my last post (directed to Fonz who said you were scum-hunting but you certainly can respond if you wish).
Your reaction was not one that makes sense from a Town perspective IMO.
KK wrote:Actually, you don't have any experience with hydra-KK. I've only been in a hydra once and I don't remember any of your group being in that Mini.
My thoughts were mistaken – I recalled you in Blackest Night Mafia but thought you were part of the Stove hydra … as it turns out you played solo as Town there. My point remains – Town KK there seemed much more balanced and un-ragey.
KK wrote:There, easily faked. Even if I didn't fake it, does it actually hold any merit? If I were to die after posting that, should other people think that you are 4 times more likely to be scum?
Look, I understand where you're coming from. The reads of partners should be considered when you are weighing reads and considering your next post. But I'm saying that they aren't substitute for cases. You posted gut reads from your teammates that say I'm "scum" and "terrible". How the hell did you want me to respond to that?
Where did I ever suggest you were ‘4 times as likely’ to be scum? That reeks of a straw-man right there. I suggested that 3 members of our time directly found your play scummy. Players may take that for what it is worth but if I ever flipped Town they know that it is three players scum-hunting from an honest Town position that got said read of KK as scum. So your “IT SUCKS TO POST THAT RRAARSW” post strikes me as someone who does not want to have to deal with that possibility.
KK wrote:Ah okay. That makes more sense. The thought of a even-numbered group seems a little off. Okay. Let's wait for MagnaofIllusion.
I think it best to only confirm the exact number of players in my judging group tomorrow.
Lastly – you need to explain your ‘Quilford is scum’ read from
Post 153 and what scum-slip you are calling out for Reck.
KK wrote: @BBmolla - re-write your post succinctly and with a point. Because it's just abstract goop at the moment.
See this furthers my ‘KK is scum’ feelings. That post, while large and filled with quote stripes, is far from unclear. Suggesting it can’t be parsed is terrible.
--
BB wrote:MoI I think your Fonz meta seems to be stretching a bit. Link maybe?
It’s gut at this stage for me mostly combined with his strong defense of Ajax. I’ll be re-reading my Scum-Fonz game I played with him and try to get you some direct links to why I feel that way after the weekend if we haven’t lynched Ajax by then.
BB wrote:MoI are you actually getting anything out of your argument with Fonz other than proving you're right?
It’s helping me sharpen my read on him. I’ll know more when he responds regarding why Ajax is Town and why KK was scum-hunting from my last post.
"I am a leaf on the wind ... watch how I soar!"
Pretty much Geriatric game restricted at this point ... unless there are players I REALLY want to play with.