Peregrine wrote:The game doesn't work that way. You may present a case about why I'm scum, and I'll respond, or, if I think I am confirmed town, I'll point out the logic, but you want me to respond to a summary of my iso?
Here’s I hint – I don’t particularly care whether you like my suspicion of you or not. If I wanted to push your lynch I would do so to the other players in the game. I don’t care if you don’t like being called scum if I read you as possible scum and frankly think it is pretty stupid of you to argue with me about my own read.
Peregrine wrote:The point would be I've only played with you as town. And this doesn;t seem the same. That's why I also asked for your last 5 scum games in post 1594, the one you are qutoing here.
Don’t care that it ‘feels different to you’. Frankly given that you suspected me of scum in Heroes of Comedy makes this argument for meta stupid. You called me scum as Town incorrectly in the past consistently and now you say I’m different and thus I’m scum again? If you want to do a meta analysis of me do your own legwork. I don’t particularly care about your read on me.
Peregrine wrote:You and 5 others made the Yates lynch happen.
You and 6 others made the BenMage lynch happen.
You and 4 others made the Thor lynch happen.
So, my voting makes me a lynch candidate, but yours does not?
Absolutely it makes you a candidate. Firstly the only reason I was no the Benmage lynch was for deadline reasons. It was approximately 2 hours to deadline and Yates had become no-viable. The fact that you want to suggest my vote for him was equivalent to yours (which came when you could have chosen scum Yates freely) is laughable.
Secondly you didn’t lynch scum. You never even voted for him. I did and unquestionably was the driving force in making it happen. Any argument you make about this making me a candidate and not you is again laughable.
In the end you’ve pushed 100% mislynches so far and I’ve pushed at least 1 scum lynch. Yes, my record is worlds better than yours.
Peregrine wrote:Because you could be. If you were a totally new player, you'd be the thread scum king. Since it's you, and this is similar to your normal play, but not the same, I concede you might be town.
Not even close. You are happy to throw rhetoric when you can’t even be bothered to back it up. Where is you ISO discussing all my scummy play? Nowhere.
Again – I don’t care what you concede at this stage because you are one of three strong scum candidates.
Peregrine wrote: I don't know.
This should be your motto because frankly you don’t seem to be willing to really commit to anything. As far as I can see you don’t have anyone you don’t think could be scum at this juncture other than yourself. Way to fence-sit on the whole damn thread Peregrine.
Peregrine wrote:If I can follow the logic train and agree with it, then I can put syndrome as town.
Why? You aren’t even sure BK is Town so following his logic thread is meaningless. Furthermore I’ve already laid out in my large reads catch-up why Syndrome is Town. Lastly why can’t you make your own damn determination? You seem entrenched in making sure your reads are predicated on others input which is scummy as fuck.
Peregrine wrote: I haven't questioned my town reads yet. I might if I have to, but my scumreads are fighting me tooth and nail anytime I ask questions.
Can’t say as I have even seen any Town reads from you. They aren’t BK or myself. They would not be Johnny who you were just voting for. They wouldn’t be Syndrome since you need BK’s ‘help’ to determine that. Are Toro and Guile your Town reads?
Peregrine wrote: 1 of 7 players feels this way (BK).
What a scummy way to use bad statistics.
Strike 1 – you can’t include yourself when assessing how others feel so using 7 as the baseline is bad.
Strike 2 – I feel you are scum so it is at least 2 of 6. I honestly can’t be sure how others feel but Syndrome seems to think you could be scum based on your last post so the actual number is probably even higher than that.
One strike from being sent to the bench ...
Peregrine wrote:And what do you want me to prove? What questions have you asked that I've not answered?
Frankly any sort of actual scum-hunting out of you that wasn’t 100% based on someone else’s efforts is what I expect to see from Town. Why this mystifies you is beyond me.
Peregrine wrote:You are now isisting that I defend myself against nonexistent cases. Let me guess, do you want me to create a case against myself too?
Town-MoI does not ask players to create cases against themselves.
This is such 100% misrep bullshit I don’t even …
Please link me to where I asked you to make a case on yourself. Please link me to where I asked you to defend yourself from ‘non-existent’ cases. For the record you still have not commented on an actual case I presented at
Post 1541 so this is just such scummy bullshit.
Peregrine wrote:My bad. I should rephrase that. He was more scummy than Aco, Slandaar, and Yates.
No, he wasn’t. Yates was MILES more scummy than Benmage.
Peregrine wrote:Also, you're presentation of Ben as scum via meta really helped me to vote him too, coincidentally.
Oh you mean the meta comment that I never pushed (Thor did that BTW if you want to be factually correct) and never voted for him on?
Also this is
example of you not having your own reasoning and trying to hide behind other’s comments as justification for why you aren’t scummy. Guess what? That’s scummy as fuck.
