Plum wrote:2. Sure, we can plan out some Murders. I'd say we start with someone we're decently comfortable with; he/she popcorns to someone he's comfortable with, we get about - four? five? no more, as you-ll see below - players together. If you're chosen you have to play, I think - and there's the tricky part, making sure everyone is okay enough with this that there'll be sufficient pressure to follow through. Then each player in turn posts three players they're interested in Stalking. Then everyone who has Forensic Tools is ordered to use them on the pool of potential Stalkees. This will make it harder for Cult to successfully use Resuscitation against the eventual Murders. When Night comes, Stalkers stalk one player from their list, chosen at random (hopefully this will minimize chances of too many overlapping Stalk/Murder actions while keeping Cult from knowing who will be targeted and whether they can combat it with Ward while also ensuring decent chances that there are as many extra Murders as chosen players and we can start clearing.
Wouldn't putting the tools in require a huge amount of coordination? And, just to make sure I have it right, they'd have to use it on the night of the stalks?
This is a more refined version of what I was thinking about earlier. However, when I was thinking about it before AND now unless I'm missing something good there are two major concerns that could screw it up that I see:
1.) The worst case scenario (all kills go through on town) sets up for a bad, bad world. Not only is the cult way closer, BUT I'll freely admit if I was picked and I saw every directed murder go through I'd be really, really tempted to jump ship and go murderer (especially if there was any non-sanctioned murders) because at that point its a screw sandwich.
2.) The flipside (and I'm pretty sure considering when I was fumbling earlier no one really talked about it here it was being talked about ELSEWHERE) is that they "waste" some wards to setup a cluster of people being alive and that both putting the killer AND the target in a position of severe doubt.
The minor concern (people not feeling 'pressured' to follow through with the plan) is easy enough. Los ropos por favor.
But, I need some help with the above. There HAS to be a way to utilize the murdering on both sides (dead jerks + 'clear' town) but I can't get it. I've been toying with the flipside (two people that I feel really confident about targeting a small group until they're all dead but that still has ward issues) HELP.
hit wrote:Am curious why ElG apparently didn't read my guide. The idea behind posting a picture in the thread and making it stupidly obvious that a guide is here is so we can avoid the WIFOM game of "oh, I just didn't notice x". This would appear at first glance to be one of those, but do scum really get a large benefit by lying about an investigate? Or is this more likely to be a legit mistake? I'll need to think on it.
But, that's the crux. She DID. And then didn't?
hit wrote:Random thought for everyone: let's say you knew you were the target of Benmage's stalk. What would be your reaction?
I wouldn't be surprised. I'd be pissed because its a continuation of the failure that was yesterday. However, even if he went through with it there'd be some good to shake out in the "well we get a confirmed town right (I AM TALKING ABOUT YOU AV) if SpyreX dies" so.
AV wrote:Maybe you and Seacore are scum together ^^
Or maybe you only sheep scum for bussing.
Or maybe you sheep erratically to defend against the accusations of sheeping.
---
Or maybe you're selective in it because you're town and you only like sheeping when you see a good case.
I don't think I've ever said sheeping was a scumtell...I said that you seemed to try to hide the fact that you were voting without adding anything. Oh - kind of like what you did with RC! Which was pointed out! Which --- you've tried to avoid being accused of!! Dun dun dunn.
---
I also asked you a couple of direct questions. Answers plox.
Ding ding we have a winner. Still playing it both sides is awesome though. "I'm just saying you're sheeping not that its scummy because its IMPORTANT business to talk about it if it means nothing but I don't think your scum unless I do"
And, Jesus H if by "sheep" you mean "Someone puts together a case you agree with so you vote it" meaning "You put in no thought when you put your vote" I swear to everything holy.
And, what questions? I'll go through and answer the 'questions' I didn't:
How was I supposed to know that you were planning it when you kept quiet about it?
Ohh, I don't know, maybe going "Hmm, why is SpyreX asking for a specific answer from El Gooski?" instead of feeding it in. Which leads to this:
How is that not sheeping? You didn't even follow up with your epic plan to entrap El G, you just started shouting that you had one. What was it? Why can't you do it now?
I'm not addressing the sheeping part because good lord. As for the 'trap':
ElG says RC clearly laid out xvart being scum because he compiled the list and didn't add his or, more precisely 'waited forever' (Which, of course, doesn't become a telling point until after critical mass has been reached and the initial response was 'so what'.) AND, and this is important, cited the alphabetical list and "B-X are far away from each other and that's because they're scum together"
So, I said go read the ISO and come back because I wanted to see if El G would address 1.) the fact that it was alphabetical and that theory was raw madness, 2.) the fact that in Reapers "when I die /wrists" he doesn't even mention EITHER xvart or babyspice and 3.) how much everything changed as a function of being run up.
Of COURSE, #2 was a huge one. That 'smoking gun' on xvart was a last ditch save self effort and should, if ISO-read be a giant flag and not a ohh look TOWN YO.
Unless you're trying to save a partner.
And, of course, you come in and not only screw that up ONCE but lead RC in the "is this what you mean *nudge nudge*. And when it pisses me off say "ITS MY SHOW WITH LOTS OF QUESTIONS OHH WAIT THATS THE ONLY ONE"
So, it was done for then.
But, that's not the question you actually want answered mr coy:
You said if El G is scum, then I definitely am. What makes you think this?
Hint 1: RC is scum.
Hint 2: El G is scum.
Hint 3:
GEE ITS A MYSTERY wrote:SO, the only AV - Reaper I see is a tinfoil AV - Reaper - El Gooski chain of love with him coming in and ruining where I was going.
VP wrote:
Spyrex and AV need to exit the vortex of tunnelling. You're both ceasing to contribute meaningfully to the thread and we don't need that. What do you think of MoI and the case I spent my entire Saturday afternoon working on?
I'm intrigued and like I said watching MoI come out swinging from the gates really raises an eye but I've got a hard time stomaching it being cult.
On the flipside, what about my newsletter. Its not TUNNELING its just that no one else SEES IT and I haven't seen anyone with a hammer to club me with some kind of powertownTM I could be missing.
I mean:
The pathetic answer to that question is "embarassing stupidity x 3."
-DGB