KILL IT WITH FIRE
VOTE: Pretentiousdra
↑ TheTrollie wrote:VOTE: slumberpartybois
Matt hasn't called me scum yet? that can only mean one thing
↑ ThunderHog wrote:
The crap that p-dra does is nothing more than fill the game with useless posts that make little to no sense. The MOST annoying part is the fact that all of the useful stuff that he HAS said are, in fact, pro-town.
↑ Zoidberg wrote:↑ kuribo wrote:chesskid, the thread's barely been open a full day, come off it
zoidberg, I'm gonna overlook your smartass post, but if you keep it up, you're gonna be in for a storm warning
I don't claim to be able to read fate after three fucking posts, nor should anyone with half a brain. I pride myself on being able to read DGB, btw, and I don't have a read on her because she's not fucking posting. I'm not willing to lynch her either.
My massive erection for fate? Oh, excuse me if I'm not willing to lynch a fucking null-read on day 1.
Zoid, consider this post your official Storm Warning.
OMG GUYS HE GAVE ME A STORM WARNING. I AM SO FUCKING SCARED RIGHT NOW.
↑ vollkan wrote:↑ Ythan wrote:↑ vollkan wrote:How? Quilford claimed he'd done something for X reason. X reason did not appear to make sense. So I questioned him about it.
Yes, it didn't end up being a smoking gun, but that doesn't mean it was "silly" - nor does it mean I was "trying too hard" (hint: "The Interrogator" is my title for a reason)
It was dragged out far too long for how little sense it made as a push.
Time-wise, it lasted 45 minutes.
If you want to talk about things that don't make sense lasting too long, maybe try looking at the first 15 pages of this game.
More constructively:
- Quilford's 343 contained two relevant points:
1) Impliedly, that the p-dra wagon had a risk of going to lynch; and
2) Expressly, that Quilford had decided p-dra was town.
- 1) above was plainly false and 2) was unexplained
- In 350, quilford then added that the reason for the unvote was to "free" his vote. This doesn't make sense because, like I said, you're just as free to move your vote to a player when you are voting somebody else as you are when you are not voting anybody
- 355: I respond to Quilford's argument that the wagon was getting high (It wasn't)
- 361 is just me clarifying the same point about "freeing" (which Quilford argued was being too technical)
- 369: he explained at least the fact that he was compiling the list, so I ended pursuit there.
↑ Kawaii wrote:
I'm sorry but everything you've posted thus far this game is like complete BS.
↑ DrippingGoofball wrote:↑ vollkan wrote:↑ Ythan wrote:↑ vollkan wrote:How? Quilford claimed he'd done something for X reason. X reason did not appear to make sense. So I questioned him about it.
Yes, it didn't end up being a smoking gun, but that doesn't mean it was "silly" - nor does it mean I was "trying too hard" (hint: "The Interrogator" is my title for a reason)
It was dragged out far too long for how little sense it made as a push.
Time-wise, it lasted 45 minutes.
If you want to talk about things that don't make sense lasting too long, maybe try looking at the first 15 pages of this game.
More constructively:
- Quilford's 343 contained two relevant points:
1) Impliedly, that the p-dra wagon had a risk of going to lynch; and
2) Expressly, that Quilford had decided p-dra was town.
- 1) above was plainly false and 2) was unexplained
- In 350, quilford then added that the reason for the unvote was to "free" his vote. This doesn't make sense because, like I said, you're just as free to move your vote to a player when you are voting somebody else as you are when you are not voting anybody
- 355: I respond to Quilford's argument that the wagon was getting high (It wasn't)
- 361 is just me clarifying the same point about "freeing" (which Quilford argued was being too technical)
- 369: he explained at least the fact that he was compiling the list, so I ended pursuit there.
Here's something I was looking for.
↑ Om of the Nom wrote:@Everyone on the Wyrd wagon: Who would you go after tomorrow if Wyrd got lynched today and flipped town? What if he flipped scum?
↑ SlumberPartyBois wrote:
because we were developing reads and wanted to be able to fish for reactions without it being public knowledge that we were working as a bloc.
↑ One Direction wrote:kill her plz plz plz
↑ SlumberPartyBois wrote:↑ Om of the Nom wrote:Yes that was facetious but still somewhat true, there has to be at least one scum in the hydras, if not two. Otherwise it would be completely unbalanced. The scum is definitely not Wyrd, and it's most likely Kawaii. OD actually wouldn't be a bad choice for scum either.
fyi this isnt how neighborhoods work.
↑ One Direction wrote:'OMGUS much' a thing said by an actual player outside of the newbie queue in this game
↑ One Direction wrote:Quick question for you, DGB.
Why have you spent such a large portion of this game whining about spam posting when you once posted 258 times in a single game (1/6th of the entire thread)?
(This is actually Empire.)
↑ Pretentiousdra wrote:So this is bullshit for a few reasons. 1) You are reacted to his vote on you by discrediting him immediately even though you have later admitted that he was caught for the wrong reasons. Ergo, that your initial reason he was scum was not correct. 2) We all have a scum read on you in the QT (besides Wyrd who hasn't said jack about anyone other than us/Kawaii being scum).
↑ Pretentiousdra wrote:DGB, I'm not voting you because I think Fate is scum and there is more utility in getting rid of him in the QT so the rest of us can coordinate our roles. If it's impossible to lynch him I'll be voting you.