A Musical Mafia! (Game over)
Forum rules
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
Wow.
OK, so I just noticed that the day started this afternoon, and I've spent the day catching up during my brother's birthday. I'm gonna go ahead and give an introduction, since I'm getting the feeling that most of you guys have played with eachother at some point, based on all the meta discussion.
This is only my third game on this forum, or on any forum at all. I play a lot of Town of Salem, and I play games in person all the time, but this will be by far the most involved game of mafia I've ever played in my life. The other games I've played here are a newbie game (with Cakez and Amihan (yo!)), and a micro game of One Night Werewolf. It was an exciting game. Maybe read it. The whole game is about is barely longer than this game has been so far.
So I've skimmed, and I think I got the gist of most of what's going on. I don't understand all of your guys vocabulary yet, and I'll try to pick up everything from here until the end, but just wanted to warn you guys that I've missed some stuff.
So let's get started on this Miller stuff? I have a problem with Amihan's lack of follow up here, but I don't see reason for scum to counterclaim Miller, and then fail to follow through. As of now, I think what Amihan did was a gambit (it's the kind of thing I do), and I don't think it's scummy at all. Also post 349 gives me the heebies.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
I find this attitude disturbing and condescending. I don't think it makes you scum, but I think it's anti-town, because it's implying that people should let you do their thinking for them. I'll come to my own conclusions, and I'll use logic to get there (not sheeping).
There is no actualcontentin these posts. Like, please let us know where you stand. Tell us your reads. Don't imply that there's a problem with us developing our own.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:I'm largely ignoring beeboy here.I dislike how much we are being discussed. It makes no sense considering we had done nothing at the time
I get that beeboy has 140 posts (HOW) and many of them are a bit useless, but you don't get to just ignore the person yelling to lynch you, especially when other people are clearing hearing that and saying "Yeah, maybe we should just lynch you."
I don't see town!FS ignoring beeboy here.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
Thanks for reminding me. What was all this about? I see no analysis in your posts, so can you explain to me why your "serious vote" is on Axelrod Gunnarson?- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:like, podoboq ignores the reasons that beeboy is giving for the read on us
then say "meh you suck but you're not scum for it"
and then wait
and then say "yeah you're town"
this ain't normal
-EP
I pointed out beeboy's problematic posts because they're problematic. They aren't necessarily scummy, they're just bad for conducive gameplay.
Literally telling people to sheep you is bad for town.
In my (limited) experience, townies aren't as aggressive and flamboyant as beeboy has been. So yeah, I'm townreading him anyway.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
I don't know what "bastard" means in the context of mafiascum. I also don't know how this game is non-whatever-bastard-means.
I think I know what Jester is, though. They win if they're lynched right? Do they kill somebody who lynched them the following night?- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
↑ SirCakez wrote:http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Bastard_Mod
Basically a bastard game is one where the mod is basically trolling the players, and there's overtly crazy/unfair roles like cults, jesters, etc in the game. This game has been designated non-bastard, so none of that can be in this game.
Jester wins if it's lynched yeah.
Makes sense. Couldn't find anything on the glossary on the wiki. Didn't think to just search it. Good info to know.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:I'm largely ignoring beeboy here. I dislike how much we are being discussed. It makes no sense considering we had done nothing at the time
↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:
These stances make no sense. Like, he is basically scumreading anyone making any sort of impact in the game. This is a super opportunistic position in the game and needs to be lynched.
@TrueOgre
In my skim, I was very confident in my reads on beeboy and Cakez as town. Both of them reading FS as scum makes me question FS pretty strongly.
I think their opinion on Cakez is kind of just bullshit, and I think "ignoring" beeboy is mindless. I'll be re-reading the thread after I get my classwork done this weekend, but in the meantime, based on my skim, I'm pretty comfortable pushing the wagon along.
But yeah, honestly, I think most of my read is coming from town reading Cakez and beeboy. Maybe part of it comes from the skimming. Maybe part of it is something subliminal coming from the Trump icon. I'll be reviewing this weekend, and I don't expect a lynch to happen before then.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
Can you explain why? Is it just because of inactivity and↑ Swordsworth wrote:....What if Pistachio is shot and flips town? What does this suggest about Ami, and would that warrant an instant vote?- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
↑ Spiffeh wrote:↑ podoboq wrote:
Can you explain why? Is it just because of inactivity and↑ Swordsworth wrote:....What if Pistachio is shot and flips town? What does this suggest about Ami, and would that warrant an instant vote?
467 in general is just really awful
It has nothing to do with the activity
Do you feel differently?
I agree that it's pretty bad, and I think it warrants suspicion, but that alone isn't enough to for me to consider him my "ultimate lynch for today." It just seemed like a stretch, so I was wondering if you were seeing something I wasn't.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:sorry guys beeboy sucked the fun out of this for me a bit.
is it still just a lot of unproductive noise or
See, this is my problem with the FS slot. It feels like most of their contribution is discounting the people on their wagon, rather than discussing relevant parts of the game. Like, the Miller CC and Mirhan's response to it seems like the topic of the moment, and FS comes in with this when nobody's even discussing that wagon.
This could just be apathy for the game after feeling like he was tunneled by a loud and stubborn player, but this attitude isn't helpful for town.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
↑ Tammy wrote:↑ podoboq wrote:↑ Spiffeh wrote:↑ podoboq wrote:
Can you explain why? Is it just because of inactivity and↑ Swordsworth wrote:....What if Pistachio is shot and flips town? What does this suggest about Ami, and would that warrant an instant vote?
467 in general is just really awful
It has nothing to do with the activity
Do you feel differently?
I agree that it's pretty bad, and I think it warrants suspicion, but that alone isn't enough to for me to consider him my "ultimate lynch for today." It just seemed like a stretch, so I was wondering if you were seeing something I wasn't.
What do you think was bad about it?
Post 467 reads as potential scum trying to understand town's opinion, so that he can play around that. It's entirely possible that Pistachion and Amihan are both town (which is kind of what I'm thinking at the moment), and this post is suggesting that our best course of action might be to lynch both.
So the biggest problem is that his only actual content is on the Miller CC. Basically, the only original thought in that post is a suggested play that I think benefits scum, and he hasn't said anything else, so that's all I have to read.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:
i can see why someone would think these three are scum so that's good i guess
ami and pist are town probably
↑ Tammy wrote:↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:
True Ogre's entrance post is pretty balls.
Withholding vote is fine, ESPECIALLY not after beeboy tells him to vote us and then ogre does.
Look at how terrible withholding vote is there. Ogre OPENLY admits to being unsure of people that they want to sort, that they are considering to maybe be scum, and then just... doesn't vote. nope.
"I will entertain Sakura argument" is basically saying "I don't want to commit yet (which is fine) but i'm not gonna do anything about it (which isn't fine)"
"keeping an eye on axelrod" uh huh.
Can you put this into English though?
What's wrong with him not voting?
1. Ogre targets certain people as "I think these people might be scum but I am not sure"
2. Voting someone is one way to maybe get a bit of that information
3. Ogre waits for beeboy to actually do this and I still don't know why.
tonally? this bothers me.
↑ podoboq wrote:Both of them reading FS as scum makes me question FS pretty strongly.
I think their opinion on Cakez is kind of just bullshit, and I think "ignoring" beeboy is mindless. I'll be re-reading the thread after I get my classwork done this weekend, but in the meantime, based on my skim, I'm pretty comfortable pushing the wagon along.
But yeah, honestly, I think most of my read is coming from town reading Cakez and beeboy. Maybe part of it comes from the skimming. Maybe part of it is something subliminal coming from the Trump icon. I'll be reviewing this weekend, and I don't expect a lynch to happen before then.
podo, do you feel like you're disconnected from the game? I'm bolding this to make sure you don't miss it.
VOTE: podoboq
this is the right vote, hippy, but subject to change
here, town vibes i got since i last posted maybe dramonic, definitely ami, pist, beeboy, probably tammy
-EP
so yeah both heads are here. trump party!
Yeah, honestly, I do. This game moved at a WAY faster pace out of the gate than my newbie game, has over double the players, and most seem to have some meta knowledge on eachother. I considered replacing out, but I think this is a good opportunity to learn, so I'm gonna stay the course.
I'm trying to engage though, and I think I've been providing some value.
If your last few posts are legitimate, and you're willing to engage in the new things that have happened in the game which are unrelated to the wagon on you, then I'm totally happy to unvote here. If in my reread, I reevaluate your slot more positively, then I'm totally happy to unvote here.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
Not scumreading this. I just got out of a game with Ami where she had to play incredibly aggressively because she replaced into the craziest scummiest slot. She had to play hard because we had reason to scumread her.
If she wants to be able to lay back a little bit and relax more through this game, that totally makes sense to me.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
↑ The Pied Piper wrote:
Agree. I think that post of Amihan's is too honest to be newbscum.↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:It's super blatant. Scum doesn't often say shit like that. Town doesn't usually care.I checked earlier and they don't have any completed scum games. None of the newbies do, except podoboq if that one night ultimate werewolf game counts (I'm not inclined to count it since he didn't know he was scum or who his buddy was).Snarky was scum in o617 but that's it.
I actually knew I was Minion, and knew that Alex was my wolf. It was Alex who didn't realize he was wolf, because he believed my claim of being Troublemaker, and switching his alignment. The game was wacky.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
No, not really. In the One Night Werewolf game, a townie gave up on contributing early because he didn't like the mechanics of the game, being that players can change alignments, or not know their alignments. That's different from giving up because there's a wagon on you.↑ The Pied Piper wrote:
That post looked to me like he hadn't read the thread since his previous post. Have you ever played a game where someone got discouraged like this as either alignment? How would you distinguish between scum apathy and town apathy?↑ podoboq wrote:See, this is my problem with the FS slot. It feels like most of their contribution is discounting the people on their wagon, rather than discussing relevant parts of the game. Like, the Miller CC and Mirhan's response to it seems like the topic of the moment, and FS comes in with this when nobody's even discussing that wagon.
This could just be apathy for the game after feeling like he was tunneled by a loud and stubborn player, but this attitude isn't helpful for town.
He says he's worried about a scum counterclaim from Amihan, then us lynching pistachion. He says he doesn't know what we'd do after that, but I think it's obvious that you just lynch Amihan in that case. This is moot now, because Amihan claimed it was a gambit, but if she stuck to her Miller claim, and pistachion flipped Miller, the play seems obvious, and it's a 1for1 trade. That's good for town.
He suggests lynching pistacion, then suggests not lynching Amihan in retaliation if pistachion flips Miller. That could be protecting a scum partner (Amihan) or more likely, getting town cred for suggesting not to lynch someone he knows will flip town (Amihan), knowing that if we follow through with the pistachion lynch we would definitely lynch Amihan next. Again, these lines of play have changed since Amihan claimed it was a gambit, but that's where town was when he made that post.
It's less what they've said about FS and more what FS has said about them. I think FS's post on Cakez being scum for his readslist is bullshit, and I don't like the way they've acted about beeboy. Basically, I wouldn't expect town!FS to have the reads on those two players that they do. So I looked into Seniors because Cakez and beeboy clearly thought that was a tree worth barking up, and in my ISO, I had a problem with Seniors' perspective on Cakez and beeboy.↑ The Pied Piper wrote:
Which points that beeboy and Cakez made against Seniors resonates most strongly with you and why?
Honestly, I think beeboy's "You didn't buddy me" reasoning is hollow, but Seniors' response to it is lacking.
The only out I give FS to get me off their back is to engage with town. If FS is scum, engaging with town will give us more opportunities to read them. If FS is town, then I can encourage them to rejoin the game. So I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt and extending an olive branch.↑ The Pied Piper wrote:
Why are you telling them what to do to earn your unvote? Do you think this task would be too difficult for them to complete, if scum?↑ podoboq wrote:If your last few posts are legitimate, and you're willing to engage in the new things that have happened in the game which are unrelated to the wagon on you, then I'm totally happy to unvote here. If in my reread, I reevaluate your slot more positively, then I'm totally happy to unvote here.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
I think this idea is cute, but I'd rather not put any stock in flavor claiming. Maybe a townie has a highly scummy musical for flavor. Somebody will use it as an argument to lynch him. I think it's cool to do that at some point in the game, but round-robin flavor claiming day one seems to early.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
Sorry I've been a bit absent recently. Kinda haven't had much to add. Here's a tiny readslist.
TOWN
Amihan: Her gambit has been immensely useful for the town as a reaction test. If she's scum, she made a huge mistake.
Pistachion: I mean, he isn't counterclaimed. I'm not voting pistach unless something pretty serious happens.
beeboy: Too much loud nonsense to be scum. He drewwaytoo much attention to himself.
Cakez: I think his perspective on things is very towny. He's open to contribute, engages in just about every conversaiton, and his opinions seem to align with mine for the most part.
SCUM
FriendlessSeniors: Not contributing in a meaningful way, and attacks Cakez for what is clearly bs.
dramonic: The only way dramonic seems to know how to contribute is by flinging shit at people then ducking away and seeing what stuck. He's scumreading people, but refuses to provide any logic as to why. I've asked him why he's scumreading Axelrod, but no response.
Mirhawk: Hate hate hate the response to Amihan's gambit.
Swordsworth: Hate his response about as much, but he has contributed less, so I'm willing to back away from him now on the expectation that there is more to come.
Assume everyone else is null at this point.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
↑ Sakura Hana wrote:
So this is the first thing that caught my attention since I remembered pist actually being CC'd. I went and ISO'd Ami and she retracted her claim.
One question why's your townread on pist being based off "no counter claim"?
Point 1) Pistachion could be scum fake claiming miller, Pistachion could be scum or town being an actual miller, lack of counter claim doesnt equal town, specially since the setup is unknown, the only thing the miller thing means is that we cant rely on a cop to check it.
Point 2) Nevertheless Pistachion's 560 Looks towny.
UNVOTE:
If pistachi0n had done scummy things, I might not be reading her as town. But claiming a town role (which to my understanding is usually unique) in your opening post is too bold for scum. It's entirely possible that she's just scum getting cute, but I'd seriously bet against it.
Things could change my read on her, but it needs to overcome the strength of her claim.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
↑ Mirhawk wrote:He's barely even here. We would be better off lynching a more active player. That way there would be far more information available to the town in general. As we would be able to examine how other players interact with the lynched player.
How do you not know that, this conversation happens literally every time a policy lynch is proposed.
I agree with this logic in a vacuum. Not sure at this point how I think we should apply that logic with regard to Swords.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
Hello again.
It definitely depends on how they presented their argument for not lynching. In Mirhawk's case, there's a legitimate fear that it comes from knowledge town doesn't have. In that case, definitely not giving towncred. There's not a binary answer to this.↑ The Pied Piper wrote:If somebody flipped town,wouldyou give towncred to the people who suggested not to lynch them?
I've definitely townread people who have me as a scumread. A person scumreading you should not automatically result in you scumreading them. Town's scumhunting shouldn't be localized onto the people who are scumreading them.↑ The Pied Piper wrote:Would you expect townSeniors to townread Cakez and/or beeboy in response to being attacked, or do you expect townSeniors to have a more nuanced read on Cakez and beeboy than they do?
↑ The Pied Piper wrote:
What do you think of Errant's latest posts? (ErrantParabola is the head that signs as -EP and writes longer more thoughtful posts. hiplop is the head that does one liners and forgets to sign his posts.)podoboq wrote:The only out I give FS to get me off their back is to engage with town. If FS is scum, engaging with town will give us more opportunities to read them. If FS is town, then I can encourage them to rejoin the game. So I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt and extending an olive branch.Well I really hate this. That thing I said about focusing your scumhunting elsewhere....yeah.Spoiler: sliced down FS post
Maybe I shouldn't be townreading Axelrod, but he's right about Dramonic, and using his opinion on Dram as a reason to scumread him is either:Spoiler: more of that post
"1. Finding reasons to scum read us that aren't legit
2. Not actually evaluating these reasons because you don't CARE how legit your read is as long as they make your case look good"
On FS: Unless I'm missing something, there's been basically one post of major significance since our last interaction. And I don't like it.
On Dramonic: Cakez says this is just how Dram plays. If that's just true, and Dram is town, fuck him anyway VOTE: Dramonic. He's contributing nothing. Call it policy, because it is. Dramonic doesn't deserve to survive into day two if he insists on being useless. If he's scum, we get no opportunities to read him. If he's town, he's the most expendable member of town.
I entirely expect him to come in with a oneliner about how I'm scum, and so are the other people voting for him.
Dram, if you're actually town, and you're seriously so dense that you assume we're all scum for disliking this play, then ISO people and start giving some logic that town can use.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
That's a hell of a lot more than we've gotten out of him this game, and it happened within the first week. We've waited a week here and the best we got is this:
Whether or not dram is normally like this, it's not OK. I haven't posted much, but when I do, I at least try to offer something. I'm giving people an opportunity to read me, and I'm putting ideas on the table with reasons. What's dram actually offering to this game? If he's scum, are we just going to continue to not lynch him because of the fact that we know he plays like scum as town?- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
I think pistachion and Amihan are both town. Scum
knowsif pistachion and Amihan are both town.
When I see your response to the Miller garbage, I'm not saying that it looks to me like you know who the actual Miller is. I'm saying it looks like you know they're both town, and are stirring the pot making sure that one of the two of them comes out of it being scumread by town.
For reference:
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
I like how he's engaged with other players. He mentions things he finds scummy, asks about them, and requires that people justify their actions. That's how I play the game.
I like how he was hard on beeboy for the Sakura waffling, specifically.
I'm not "offering" to unvote FS. I'm telling them what they need to do to be worthy of an unvote. "If your play demonstrates that you're towny to me, I'll take my vote off. As it stands, I'm voting for you, because you haven't been playing the game like town should."↑ tictac wrote:↑ podoboq wrote:If your last few posts are legitimate, and you're willing to engage in the new things that have happened in the game which are unrelated to the wagon on you, then I'm totally happy to unvote here. If in my reread, I reevaluate your slot more positively, then I'm totally happy to unvote here.
Ungh. Offer to unvote Seniors in response to OMGUS from Seniors.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
Because I'm not comfortable with the slot based on Swordsworth's (lack of) contribution. If Ranger can contribute something, that can obviously change, but if Ranger plays similarly to Swords, it's not looking good for that slot.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
I'm not voting him yet. I'm just saying that if a wagon moves on him in the next seven days, and we're coming on deadline, and nothing has changed, I'm OK with that wagon.↑ pistachi0n wrote:
Yeah, we should look at Ranger's slot, but it's awfully bold to intend to vote someone who hasn't posted at all.
I have no intention of lynching him before he gets a chance to start posting.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
So can you explain why the dramonic wagon is a vanity wagon from your perspective? What's the more viable wagon we should be on? Until a few posts back, I was heavily considering you as the answer.↑ Mirhawk wrote:@Cakes
I get what you're saying, but if replacing out was a sure scumtell people would have figured that out a long time ago.
For me a vanity wagon doesn't have to be a one vote wagon. It's more if the person is ignoring a more viable wagon to be on one with low chances of going through.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
If you're talking to me, you're factually wrong. Axelrod and davesas (admittedly not the best company) were voting for dram before I did, and as far as I'm aware still are.↑ pistachi0n wrote:You're the only one voting him, nobody else is very interested.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
Still not sold one way or the other. I'll review her ISO.↑ Mirhawk wrote:Podo what do you think of skybird?
I really don't like the whole dropping his RVS vote 1000 posts into the game to start doing serious scumhunting, then the the first thing he does is ask Snarky (of all people) a question about something he said 1000 posts ago.
Too scummy to be scum is stupid, but I mean that's ridiculous.
Are you talking about dram's ISO? I did. I linked to a post from that ISO. I believe that dram acts like this as town, but I believe he also acts like this as scum, and if it's going to be like this all game eventually we have to make the decision whether or not we're willing to gamble on a player for whom we have no way of forming reads.
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:↑ podoboq wrote:Maybe I shouldn't be townreading Axelrod, but he's right about Dramonic, and using his opinion on Dram as a reason to scumread him is either:
"1. Finding reasons to scum read us that aren't legit
2. Not actually evaluating these reasons because you don't CARE how legit your read is as long as they make your case look good"
Look at this entire gourmet platter of a case that I give on Axelrod and you focus on the tiniest shrimp and say that it's rotten
Do you have anything to say about the actual reasons why Axelrod is scum?
-EP
OK, well if you actually read 1178, you'd see that I commented on everything in your wall that was discussing Axelrod, but whatever. I'll get to your new arguments later when it's not Survivor night, but judging by the way you completely misrepped me right there, I'm not entirely confident that it's going to warrant a full response.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
10 points to pistachi0n for a spot on read.↑ pistachi0n wrote:↑ Skybird wrote:
Why do you think it's scummy?
"I never said I was good at this game. I just enjoy playing it"seems like flippant scum defending being scumread.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
^^^^ SAY IT LOUDER FOR THE PEOPLE IN BACK ^^^^↑ Axelrod wrote:
I mean, are you agreeing that (without considering this person's specific "meta") that the way he's playing is scummy? That's the first question.
If you don't think it is, then, we're just not even in the same ballpark in terms of how to play this game.
If you agree that it's scummy, but just not forhim, becausehealways plays like this, my question to you is, what do you do about it? Because it sounds like you're just giving him a pass (because you think he's impossible to read?)
Whereas I think, if he gets voted, and he doesn't want to get lynched, it's going to make him play better and either show he's actually town, or, not.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
So I think Ranger is obvtown here, but even if she isn't, what does it honestly matter for today's lynch? We were probably going to lynch Mirhawk or FS anyway.
I suggest we proceed as normal. If today's lynch flips scum, what does that say about Ranger? If they flip town, we can reassess.
In case this is some super complicated bussing, I'd suggest FS as our lynch tonight since Ranger is voting Mirhawk. Plus, this way we can get beeboy on the wagon.
VOTE: FriendlessSeniors
If there's a flaw on this logic, someone please point it out to me.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
I wasn't given pause by beeboy, but this is making me reconsider. I still think the best course of action is to continue as normal for the day, and reevaluate during the next day. One of Mirhawk or FS is almost definitely scum, and scum!Ranger would probably deflect onto the townie, so why not move forward with the person who wasn't her target in case it's a ruse?↑ davesaz wrote:Ranger's replace-in as scum in Open 627 was similar to this one, though much shorter. I don't remember seeing her town replace-in so it's not enough info to make a definitive call by itself. However I find the Tammy read especially troubling, since her second post wan't until page 20. I would never give a read on a single RVS only post, much less a top of the list read, and can't think of a town motivation to do so. Now that I've seen Ranger's scum game this looks pretty suspicious. I also got some feeling that she wanted to enter the flow with her reads agreeing with the majority.
VOTE: Ranger- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
↑ Mirhawk wrote:↑ podoboq wrote:I think pistachion and Amihan are both town. Scum
knowsif pistachion and Amihan are both town.
When I see your response to the Miller garbage, I'm not saying that it looks to me like you know who the actual Miller is. I'm saying it looks like you know they're both town, and are stirring the pot making sure that one of the two of them comes out of it being scumread by town.
For reference:
Ah, that's fine actually.I thought this was more of that business where I knew it was a gambit because I'm scum.NOTE: Mirhawk's original post was not actually quoting mine, but I wanted to share the two in context with one another since it was in reply anyway.
I'll be honest, I started to townread Mirhawk after this. He saw a flaw in logic, was calling people on it, and then when I explained my logic, and he didn't see a flaw in it, he conceded that I had a fair argument. I don't see town bending like that.
I don't like his position on Ranger (or at least didn't like it), but I'm still holding out the possibility that he's town. FS, on the other hand, I'm basically sold on.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
Seniors and Mirhawk are town's highest scumreads, and frankly I think Seniors is obvscum. No longer sure about Mirhawk, but if I were to put odds on it, I think FS is 80%+ likely to be scum and Mirhawk is somewhere around 50/50.
The chances both coming up town with those odds are 1 in 10. I'm willing to take those odds. If my odds don't work for you, that's fine, but that's how I came to my conclusion.
Basically I'm saying that if Ranger is scum here, they aren't deflecting from our highest scum reads in order to get towncred (since she replaced into a suspicious slot). In that case, scum should choose the townie to kill if there is one. So we should lynch the other.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
Call it newbieness, but I townread the fuck out of her reads progression. It came off as stream of consciousness, with no barrier. It takes time to come up with lies that benefit scum, and frame your posts in ways that it's hard for town to pick at. Her post rate was too fast for her to fabricate everything, so I thought it was obvtown. Seeing so many people take problem with it, though, I've started to reconsider.
Reads list coming up. She's been knocked down a few pegs since the quoted post.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
beeboy wanted reads on a few people, so I just decided I'd post a read on the whole town,
On a scale of 1-7 where 1 is obvscum and 7 is obvtown. X is a person (or hydra) who I basically have no read on either because I haven't paid enough attention to their walls, or I'm just completely torn.
Of note, I scumread prolonged inactivity, especially when paired with useless posts and prod dodges. Sorry 'bout you, Snarky. Also, hydras have been hard for me to get a read on.
Amihan - 7
pistachi0n - 7
beeboy - 6
SirCakez - 5
Tammy - 5
Axelrod - 5
Sakura Hana - 5
tictac* - 5
davesaz - 5
Mirhawk - 4
Spiffeh - 4
Ranger - 4
Skybird - 3
True Ogre - 3
Friendless Seniors (hiplop/Errantparabola) - 2
SnarkySnowman - 2
dramonic* - 1
The Pied Piper (Plotinus/nachomamma8) - ??
Cerberus v666 - ??
THE WRONG LYNCH (Malakittens/goodmorning) - ??
This was super on the cuff, and obviously, all subject to change.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
On the upside, the prod pm has flavor in it.
↑ Spiffeh wrote:↑ podoboq wrote:So I think Ranger is obvtown here, but even if she isn't, what does it honestly matter for today's lynch? We were probably going to lynch Mirhawk or FS anyway.
I suggest we proceed as normal. If today's lynch flips scum, what does that say about Ranger? If they flip town, we can reassess.
In case this is some super complicated bussing, I'd suggest FS as our lynch tonight since Ranger is voting Mirhawk. Plus, this way we can get beeboy on the wagon.
VOTE: FriendlessSeniors
If there's a flaw on this logic, someone please point it out to me.
Oh my God I want to throw up
↑ Spiffeh wrote:↑ podoboq wrote:I wasn't given pause by beeboy, but this is making me reconsider. I still think the best course of action is to continue as normal for the day, and reevaluate during the next day. One of Mirhawk or FS is almost definitely scum, and scum!Ranger would probably deflect onto the townie, so why not move forward with the person who wasn't her target in case it's a ruse?
GUYS
DID ANYONE ELSE SEE THIS?
I REALLY DON'T THINK I CAN WRITE THIS OFF AS NOOBTOWN
IT'S SO BAD
Hey Spiffeh, I still see literally no problem with this logic, and you're not really pointing anything out to me.
As far as the Cakez things goes, I'm torn, because I was kinda town-reading Tammy, and obviously Cakez. I'm open to reassessing the Cakez thing, and if someone can make a (real) case on him, I'll consider voting their, but I still think FS has been the right lynch for a while now.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
Some players aren't actually following up on questions they ask, while as far as I can tell, Cakez is. However, you pointed out a good example where he didn't, in reference to his townreading dramonic based on meta reasons.↑ The Pied Piper wrote:Are you townreading everybody but dramonic and snarky then? Everyone else is more or less scumhunting.
The kicker is that in general, I agree with Cakez. So while Seniors for example is engaging with players, mentioning things he finds scummy, asking about them, then requiring people to justify their actions, I don't agree with their line of questioning as often as I do with Cakez's.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
OK, this is the kind of case I was asking for.↑ Axelrod wrote:
Well, looking back, you weren't doing it so much at the beginning of the game (which is when I was liking your posts). There were just a couple minor ones (#131, #149, #399) which didn't bother me at all. But seemed like starting around Dramonic, you started making reads on a lot of people based on their "metas." Dramonic (#733, #884, #1023, #1026, #1028), Sakura Hana (#1109), Swordsworth (#1112, #1328), Snarky (#1328, 1550), Ranger (#1364, #1412), and the last (little) one was Cerebrus (#1502).
That's what I'm talking about.
It's one thing to feel like you know how someone plays, but it's just lazy to write off someone's scummy behavior because they "always play like this", or to just assert that X play is their "Town" play. And it seems like your been doing that more as we've been going deeper, which is backwards from what it should be.
I think I'm OK with a Cakez lynch today, after that. If nothing else, a lot of information comes from a Cakez town-flip, while an FS town-flip wouldn't be as beneficial to town.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
I've agreed with scum before. Look at our newbie game, with Ness and I. We were in sync most of the game. It could be town with legitimately good opinions in line with my own, or scum with easy opinions to agree with.
I was using it as a reason to townread you, but it's not enough, and these last few days have displayed a lot of potential scum play on your part. Axelrod made a good case, and that put me over the line on you.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
For reference.
If you're going to point out a progression, you might want to start it where it actually begins.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
Those reads were fantastic, I'm not voting Cakez.
I'm gonna go ahead and make a list of people I'll lynch today, in descending order of preference. First person deserves it most.
dramonic
snarky
TrueOgre
Skybird
Seniors
I've liked Seniors' recent stuff (I'm as surprised as you are), but not quite enough to get me off the wagon. I'm trying to keep an open mind about Ranger. I might end up going with this.
Also, I'm aware that dramonic and snarky are better vig targets than lynch targets, but best case scenario, they're both dead at the beginning of day 2.- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- podoboq
-
podoboq Mafia Scum
- podoboq
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3021
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: Cincy
I've mostly been skimming, and frankly don't have a strong opinion on him. It hurts that he doesn't actually have a lot of content. I'll go ISO him.↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:podo, thoughts on tictacx - podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq
- podoboq