Mini Normal 2115: Fin
Forum rules
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
But you are barbequing minorities, Colonel! War crime!In post 21, Alchemist21 wrote:
Traitor crumb?In post 20, Macabre wrote:Rejoice my comrades! I have found the traitor in our midst! Permanent record!
VOTE: JTheophrastus Bartholomew
VOTE: Macabre- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
You have more heads than tails, Hydra. Brains!In post 77, Looker wrote:Everyone looks exactly the same; how can you make heads or tails out of them?- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
Does this Colonel truly announce to his people that he is expediting this process from page 1? Is this the work of a good man, or a destructive force? Ponder!In post 78, Alchemist21 wrote:
I don’t think anything of it. I don’t really think anything of Macabre’s post either but I thought the vote might get us out of RVS.In post 76, Ame wrote:@Alchemist, what do you think of this post?
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
At what point does this sleepy boy believe this Colonel may have slipped up? Inquiry!In post 91, insomnia wrote:The TMI'd him part comes from Alchemist not reading his posts, which I get from him reaching the wrong conclusion. Not once was there a note about Wimpy responding easily to pressure.- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
Your mouth is too full, you cannot speak. Glutton! Sinner! You will destroy us all! Panic!
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
You are no flame alchemist, you are a wind alchemist. For you have knocked the wind out of me. Foul!In post 115, Alchemist21 wrote:
Does this mean you think Wimpy is bussing me?In post 113, Macabre wrote:It all falls into place if we believe this sleepy boy sleeps with the chimera! Revelation!
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
This crow certainly does believe that this sort of response could be the work of shady people. Therefore! Knowing in which way this sleepy boy views this pair is of great importance.In post 72, Wimpy wrote:
Oh no I amIn post 64, Alchemist21 wrote:
It tells me if he’s the type of player to respond poorly to pressure or not which is important to know if he is. His response tells me he’s not that type of player.In post 57, insomnia wrote:The question still doesn't help you figure him out though.- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
Do not allow yourselves to be misled from the work of this scarf boy, or how the burger has voted the crow for casting a ballot for the same person the burger had. Distraction!In post 103, Ame wrote:It struck me as odd to say since somni was using 'brother' in the singular sense toward Wimpy. It would have been weird for somni to say: "No high fives until I rest assured that you are a brother or a sister and not a traitor."
This isn't scummy, but it is a tad bit off, and gives me the impression that profii is anxious to establish rapport with somni.- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
Cast this crow to the flame! Cast this whole town to the flame! You will not tell the crow of your secrets! You will not tell the town of your secrets! Suspicious!In post 114, Wimpy wrote:
please speak normally and I will answer your question. I don't understand what you are asking and I am not really in the mood for fake altered speech.In post 112, Macabre wrote:Burger, please explain your reasoning to cast this Colonel to the fire! Urgency!- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
The mistake you had made was listening for vibrations when evidence has been given! Do not let your one-eye go lazy, and look for the testimonies of the Chimera's guilt! Diligence!In post 215, Chara wrote:it does make me wonder about what seems to be a consensus against profii, who as far as i can see hasn't done anything acutely scummy except for "bad vibes". not sure yet if it means an intuitive feeling on the part of some townies that she's scum, or scum seeing some remarks against a player and deciding they work.
In post 82, insomnia wrote:For Ame, I had an initial scum read on profii, nothing too strong, just a gut feeling upon seeing his first vote. I never decided to chase that read but now that Chara voted I thought they had the same idea of scum reading Profii so I decided to vote as well.In post 103, Ame wrote:This isn't scummy, but it is a tad bit off, and gives me the impression that profii is anxious to establish rapport with somni.
This was also off:
...
...
It's fairly obvious from your #64 that you hadn't played with Wimpy, so this added no value and comes off to me as pseudoengagement.
That was the reasoning at the time of my post, but while we're on the subject, this also gives me the same vibes:
...In post 105, Alchemist21 wrote:It was short and lacked an RVS vote.
As for the Profii vote, that makes sense. Profii’s actually giving me weird vibes too because they’ll say something about either Insomnia or myself that looks like they’re trying to understand both of our viewpoints but then they seem to doubtcast their own conclusions and I can’t tell if they’re actually confused or trying to play both sides of the discussion without having to commit to a stance on either of us.- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
It is troubling that the Colonel wished to go from one game state to another, and wanted honors as a result! However! Later evidence has become indeterminate, not invalid! Equally likely to be in favor of his guilt or innocence. Sad!
In post 201, Alchemist21 wrote:Macabre thinks I made some kind of Freudian slip with me and Wimpy when I’m trying to understand his posts and am obviously confused by them and I don’t know why and I’m expecting myself to be confused again when he starts talking about more people. Also, the term “sleeps with,” which is what confused me initially, is apparently an accusation of you two being scum together but I never got a clear answer on that from Macabre, and if there are more euphemisms like that in store I’ll probably be confused by them too.- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
Does this sleepy boy still believe the Colonel outed the Burger as an innocent? What did the exchange between these two really accomplish? Layers!In post 246, insomnia wrote:I don't think they're scum together if that's what you are referring to.- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
This Chimera put undue weight upon the Burger without involving themselves into the conflict! Opposite of the Colonel, impossible to be informed of! Heart of darkness!In post 254, Ame wrote:
Which post are you referring to?In post 239, Macabre wrote:The Chimera is only suspicious for getting involved in a conversation of another, which they had no strong commitment in! It is so!- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
A bad One-eye has no reason to think critically of the words of the scarf boy if they are aware of their nature. Additionally! This crow suggests that the One-eye has seen the opportunity to blend in with the innocents! Mimicry!In post 281, Chara wrote:
defense of profii? i scumread profii.In post 279, Macabre wrote:Furthermore, One-eye has stolen a term from the scarf boy to make a case in defense of the Chimera! Yet, this One-eye does not combat scarf boy directly. It acts without conviction. Careful!
as for stealing a term, i'm not sure which you mean, but it is highly possible i read something Ame said and repeated it. it's a fun fact of language that humans (or nonhumans) will tend to parrot terminology recently used by others. it's how we learn the rules of our discourse.- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
The Knight having past experience with a good natured Chimera is unconvincing! New record!In post 282, Chara wrote:
i object. all behaviour of the chimera is valid evidence!In post 277, Macabre wrote:This crow will not recognize the greeting of the chimera, its initial vote, or past behavior of the Chimera as valid evidence. Inadmissible!- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
This One-eye has taken all evidence against the Chimera and labelled it as a bad vibration, yet this is a term used by the scarf boy when they delivered valid charges against the Chimera. Kokomo!In post 340, Egix96 wrote:
I'm confused, where has Chara done that?In post 272, Macabre wrote:Other parts of the case brought against the Chimera are not valid! However!One-eye's reduction of the events that have transpired is suspicious!Doom!
VOTE: Chara- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
This crow will not take the words of the One-eye when the One-eye has taken the words from another. The evidence is as clear as many cut outs of various newspapers and cereal boxes: a letter gifted to us all as proof of the guilt of this One-eye. Scary!
In post 215, Chara wrote:it does make me wonder about what seems to be a consensus against profii, who as far as i can see hasn't done anything acutely scummy except for "bad vibes". not sure yet if it means an intuitive feeling on the part of some townies that she's scum, or scum seeing some remarks against a player and deciding they work.- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
We must look beyond simple statements and question the nature of our peers if we hope to be victorious! Marvel!In post 288, AaronFrost wrote:
Dearest crow, if I may interject, this bug-slayer is actually condoning the acts of they one-eyed one. I believe they and most others in this village have condemned the chimera for his actions.In post 279, Macabre wrote:Furthermore, One-eye has stolen a term from the scarf boy to make a case in defense of the Chimera! Yet, this One-eye does not combat scarf boy directly. It acts without conviction. Careful!- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
Scarf boy has a warm aura. A well researched scholar. Winters respite!In post 319, Looker wrote:@Macabre / AaronFrost / profii / Alchemist21:- Do you find this interaction suspicious?
- Do you feel that either of these players is town?
The Knight has not proven himself yet, though has appeared to care much of the inconsistencies of the Colonel. Defection!- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
To further this thought: could this scarf boy had corrected this knight in secret, and hoped to give them a way out of their own mess? Could this knight, so worried about the inconsistencies of the Colonel, truly forget his own if he were an evil doer? It seems to this crow that this knight would worry more about his own misadventures in this case! Doubt!- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
The Ghost echoed the Knight's argument against the Chimera. Is this Ghost so easily aligned with the Chimera?In post 413, Ame wrote:aa-pr or aa-al. But pr cleared from being scum with al.
In post 184, AaronFrost wrote:I kind of agree with you on profii. Last game I played with him he felt pretty obviously town. Granted I was scum in that game so I didn't exactly have to read him too much but I could never push him either. Not quite getting the same vibes from him here as he's been mostly under the radar.- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
This scarf boy lassos the post believed to explain the death of One-eye. Could this solve the mystery so easily? Wonder!In post 689, Ame wrote:Caw! Caw?- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
This crow believes that if the guilty among us had seen this as well and acted upon it, they would not feel enthused to continue such a bold challenge to the bloc voting for the Ghost! Now, this scarf boy saw it, and so did the wolf. Both of these actors later voted for the Ghost! Hammer time!In post 636, gobbledygook wrote:- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
While it says very little about the scarf boy, it seems to this crow that the hydra is an innocent should one of the scarf boy or the wolf be a criminal. Justice!
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
When guts are spilled, I hunger for more. Infinite loop!In post 798, insomnia wrote:Macabre, can you go into some solo analysis, as in, analysis that's not based on interactions between people?- Macabre
-
Macabre
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
It is nice to see the divine one again. It has been awhile. Hail!In post 683, ObviousScum wrote:SUPCUNTSI'MTHE
M A F I A G O O N
ANDI'MHERETOTROLLTHEFUCKOUTOFTHISGAME- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
It is this contribution from the Knight that makes the case that they care much about the dichotomy of saying/doing which this crow had chastised the One-eye for later in that day! Yet, this Knight made the same mistake himself, as pointed out by this scarf boy. Could it be, a Knight with a true heart, which cares little for himself? Ponder!In post 234, Luca Blight wrote:
I’m feeling ambivalent about Alchemist so far. I like this perspective on Profii, but I’m left wondering why there’s no vote/push from Alchemist? It seems like he’s playing it cautiously himself.In post 105, Alchemist21 wrote:
It was short and lacked an RVS vote.In post 103, Ame wrote:What didn't you like about it?
As for the Profii vote, that makes sense. Profii’s actually giving me weird vibes too because they’ll say something about either Insomnia or myself that looks like they’re trying to understand both of our viewpoints but then they seem to doubtcast their own conclusions and I can’t tell if they’re actually confused or trying to play both sides of the discussion without having to commit to a stance on either of us.- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
This crow was not aware that both the wolf and scarf boy had voted the Ghost previous to the One-eye. Lost record!In post 807, Ame wrote:
It's worrying that you came to the wrong conclusion here. It shouldn't be "both these actors later voted for the Ghost!" but "both these actors switched from the Ghost!" Meaning if the guilty would not feel enthused to continue a bold challenge, why would these actors bring challenge to it then, especially since the Ghost had been confirmed scum at that point.In post 793, Macabre wrote: This crow believes that if the guilty among us had seen this as well and acted upon it, they would not feel enthused to continue such a bold challenge to the bloc voting for the Ghost! Now, this scarf boy saw it, and so did the wolf.Both of these actors later voted for the Ghost!Hammer time!- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
The sleepy boy seemed to come to the wrong conclusion upon the Colonel Burger relationship early in the previous day! What did it truly accomplish? Think beyond the immediate and pull back the layers! Not as innocent as this sleepy boy seemed to think. Restful!In post 807, Ame wrote:Also @Mac why did you need insomnia's view of wimpy and Alch's relation to determine your read on the situation?- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
This testimony by the burger is most interesting! Indeed I had been present at this time, yet the One-eye had died. Thonk?!In post 809, Wimpy wrote:Last visited:Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:30 pm
he sort of messed up though. he should have at least logged off and back on so it appears it was a new log in- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
Does this scarf boy still believe the hydra to be scum with the wolf given the record they submitted on the previous day of the wolf voting for the One-eye? Bizarre!In post 744, Ame wrote:
Looker actually is a viable option. I'll change my back up to her. She can only be scum with you or Egix though, so the best play is all to lynch you vig Egix.In post 717, ObviousScum wrote:Why are Looker and ELA cleared?- Macabre
-
Macabre Goon
- Macabre
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 539
- Joined: July 15, 2017
This sleepy boy may claim victory here, but should they not care about their methods, defeat may find them in time. Worry!In post 816, insomnia wrote:
I said they're not scum partners and I was right.In post 812, Macabre wrote:
The sleepy boy seemed to come to the wrong conclusion upon the Colonel Burger relationship early in the previous day! What did it truly accomplish? Think beyond the immediate and pull back the layers! Not as innocent as this sleepy boy seemed to think. Restful!In post 807, Ame wrote:Also @Mac why did you need insomnia's view of wimpy and Alch's relation to determine your read on the situation? - Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre
- Macabre