Newbie 2064 - (GG)
Forum rules
- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Hello I am JamesTheNames. I have replaced Salsa, fingers crossed this is a good game, and we can have fun, I will try my best to win though. I'm going to go over the game now, and there'll be 2 posts I follow this up with, one will be just a pure, gut-instinct read list/lean list, this is to be taken with a pinch of salt as it is just based off of gut-feel. I'll then reread it more closely, and I'll see what I can do from there.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
I'll take this a compliment. Thank you.In post 168, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
so weird from the get goIn post 167, JamesTheNames wrote:I will try my best to win though.
Take the following with a pinch of salt,gut-feels
Scummiest in no particular order:
JacksonVirgo, Fizz Raab, Orctin, Penguin_Alien
Meh in no particular order:
Dum, NinjaStore, Humaneatingmonkey (I like this name), Navigator
Towniest in no particular order:
Micc, Cabd
This was my first read over of all the messages, I'll read them again, try to link things/unlink things. Fingers crossed it goes well. There are many mehs because it is based off of vibe not anything particularly concrete, this will be fixed.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
My opinions on Fizz Raab
Spoiler:
My opinions on orctin
Spoiler:
My opinions on Dum
Spoiler:
My opinions on JacksonVirgo
Spoiler:
My opinions on humaneatingmonkey
Spoiler:
My opinions on Micc
Spoiler:
My opinions on NinjaTools
Spoiler:
My opinions on Navigatorv
Spoiler:
Individually, Fizz Raab, or orctin are the scummiest, but of course, there are 2 scum out there. JacksonVirgo and Dum as a scum duo makes sense to me, even though individually they aren't the most scummy, but when I consider them in conjunction, it makes sense to me.
This can easily change based on the response to this post, I don't want to be stubborn and cause issues.
UNVOTE: Micc
VOTE: Dum
This puts Dum at E-2.
By the way, if anybody really wants content just say so.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
All of the pressure from a vote with no sustanence or logic forces me to respond to it. You don't have to scum read someone to vote for them. You could just go down the route of "oh that seems suspicious", "oh that could apply some nice pressure", "I keep pushing very aggressively against somebody, and my push is focused on someone not wanting to be voted, maybe I should vote them and test the hypothesis."In post 187, JacksonVirgo wrote:Wait a fuckin' second. You are the salsa slot. Why are you refusing to acknowledge I am voting your slot
Mainly the last one.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Penguin_Alien posted once and disappeared, absolutely lurking.In post 190, JacksonVirgo wrote:
Explain these readsIn post 169, JamesTheNames wrote:
I'll take this a compliment. Thank you.In post 168, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
so weird from the get goIn post 167, JamesTheNames wrote:I will try my best to win though.
Take the following with a pinch of salt,gut-feels
Scummiest in no particular order:
JacksonVirgo, Fizz Raab, Orctin, Penguin_Alien
Meh in no particular order:
Dum, NinjaStore, Humaneatingmonkey (I like this name), Navigator
Towniest in no particular order:
Micc, Cabd
This was my first read over of all the messages, I'll read them again, try to link things/unlink things. Fingers crossed it goes well. There are many mehs because it is based off of vibe not anything particularly concrete, this will be fixed.
As for the rest: No.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
This was me being foolish and getting navigatorv and Dum mixed up in my head, I do apologise.In post 192, JacksonVirgo wrote:
I have no clue what you're saying. I have already said I scum-read your slot and Dums and I have made it obviously so, yet you're saying that you thought it was a pressure vote or something? That is the strangest thing I've heard so far.In post 189, JamesTheNames wrote:
All of the pressure from a vote with no sustanence or logic forces me to respond to it. You don't have to scum read someone to vote for them. You could just go down the route of "oh that seems suspicious", "oh that could apply some nice pressure", "I keep pushing very aggressively against somebody, and my push is focused on someone not wanting to be voted, maybe I should vote them and test the hypothesis."In post 187, JacksonVirgo wrote:Wait a fuckin' second. You are the salsa slot. Why are you refusing to acknowledge I am voting your slot
Mainly the last one.
You then appear in the thread, completely ignoring the fact that I am voting you, then you go and ask why I am not voting Dum when it's quite obvious if you read the game (which by your wording I am assuming you have) why I am not, as I've already said why. Then you say you have the strongest scum-read on myself, without explaining it at all and then in a later post you say how your read on me is not from me as an individual but as an associative read with me and dum. Correct me if I am wrong, but this is insane.
Your whole issue with Salsa was they apologised.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
You are very welcome, feel free to read the post I did before that, explaining it was a gut feel post, or to read the post following this which were actual reads.In post 193, JacksonVirgo wrote:
Thank you for strengthening my read on you.In post 191, JamesTheNames wrote:
Penguin_Alien posted once and disappeared, absolutely lurking.In post 190, JacksonVirgo wrote:
Explain these readsIn post 169, JamesTheNames wrote:
I'll take this a compliment. Thank you.In post 168, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
so weird from the get goIn post 167, JamesTheNames wrote:I will try my best to win though.
Take the following with a pinch of salt,gut-feels
Scummiest in no particular order:
JacksonVirgo, Fizz Raab, Orctin, Penguin_Alien
Meh in no particular order:
Dum, NinjaStore, Humaneatingmonkey (I like this name), Navigator
Towniest in no particular order:
Micc, Cabd
This was my first read over of all the messages, I'll read them again, try to link things/unlink things. Fingers crossed it goes well. There are many mehs because it is based off of vibe not anything particularly concrete, this will be fixed.
As for the rest: No.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Something which I forgot to mention with JacksonVirgo:
This post, where I got stuff mixed up in my head, my mistake, is referring to Navigatorv, Jackson's main issue with Navigatorv is the idea that Navigatorv is scared of being voted for, for some reason doesn't vote on this, and instead hovers an, at the time, AFK slot, due to them apologising.All of the pressure from a vote with no sustanence or logic forces me to respond to it. You don't have to scum read someone to vote for them. You could just go down the route of "oh that seems suspicious", "oh that could apply some nice pressure", "I keep pushing very aggressively against somebody, and my push is focused on someone not wanting to be voted, maybe I should vote them and test the hypothesis."
Mainly the last one.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
"I am voting Salsa since the read on Dum isn't super strong but they've been overly apologetic which I am thinking may be them doing so to "protect" themselves from any slips they make, which I also think is a subconscious act since they're new to the site."In post 200, JacksonVirgo wrote:You're still misrepresenting me dude
Voting because of apologising.
post 130: I would rather focus on Dum or Salsa
You have an actual case against Dum, why aren't you going for that?
You have a bit of a case against Navigatorv, why aren't you going for that?
UNVOTE: Dum
VOTE: JacksonVirgo- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
The end of 124In post 206, JacksonVirgo wrote:
I don't think I've said that eitherIn post 203, navigatorv wrote:Wait, I'm a bit confused, whe did Jackson think that I was scared of being voted? I remember HEM thought that but can't remember Jackson ever saying anything like that?- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
No, Dum and Jackson, there was only 1 post I got you and Dum confused in.In post 213, navigatorv wrote:Wait, duh, I just reread the previous posts and I think I understand what you were trying to say. You think that me and Jackson are the scum pair and that's why they didn't vote for me despite seeming to think I'm acting out of fear of backlash, is that right?- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Anyway, ignoring the mess, the point stands, it is really suspicious that they didn't vote Dum. The whole game they said they were suspicious of Dum, admittedly alongside me/Salsa, but they were suspicious of Dum all game. Dum starts to be in the spotlight, JacksonVirgo decides, you know what, I was suspicious of Dum all the game, there's a wagon forming on Dum, there's no point in voting someone I think is scummy. All of JacksonVirgo's repsonses in Post 130, would completely justify voting Dum.
"If I really wanted to spark fighting I would be aiding in the push of Orc or Micc not try and start a new wagon as that would put attention more on myself which would be counter-intuitive."
By post 130, a wagon was already forming on Dum, and they think Dum is scummy or warranting of suspicion.
"Also I disagree with Orc, they will not defend themselves properly and we won't get any pressure reads until they get pushed on. Again not voting but throwing intent is meaningless."
This is referring to the Dum wagon, once again, they find Dum to be suspicious or scummy, so why don't they vote.
I also present to you: Post 139
"Also if you haven't got much to work with, make them by voting other's you think is likely scum, communicate between other perspectives and get responses from those you are pushing. This will create the necessary content. We can't just sit around idle waiting for scum to out themselves."
How does pushing someone, essentially afk, "get responses from those you are pushing". How is not jumping on a wagon you find suspicious not "sit around idle waiting for scum to out themselves"?
I'm convinced completely, it is to feign suspicions of Dum, correct me if I'm mistaken, but Dum hasn't been a strong town read this game, and a fair few of us have been suspicious at at least one point, so why else would they pretend to be suspicious of Dum, if not because they are scum buddies, wanting to subtly distance themselves?
The slot I replaced into, barely posted, fair enough. They were never as big of a focus as Micc was. They say they don't want to start a wagon because they don't want attention. Why wouldn't they want attention? Town loves attention, they know they're Town, they don't have to worry about making mistakes like Scum do. They are trying to get everybody else to vote. They are trying to fly under the radar, to distance themselves from their scum duo (Dum).
@JacksonVirgo, what would it take for you to actually vote Dum? Do you need a cop to reveal Dum as scum? Do you want to wait until there is less attention on him? You're suspicious of him, other people are suspcious or wary of him, you have a prime time to apply pressure.
I apologisse for the lack of organisation and neatness in the last few posts.
I am 99% these are the duo, entirely based on JacksonVirgo.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
In post 0, Cabd wrote:Newbie 2064 - One vs. One Hundred
Moderator: Cabd
Backup Moderator and Dialogue Snark-Author: Penguin_Alien
Are you a bad enough dude(t) to take on the mob and win? Let's find out...
The flavor is purely for our (players+mods) collective enjoyment and has no effect whatsoever on the NewD3 newbie game setup and rules. This game will borrow imagery and flavor, as is my whimsy, from old television game shows, but will avoid spoilers for the results of those shows unless completely unavoidable.
Why would you waste time on a wagon gaining no ground. There's another person you're suspicious of. It is simple that you'd decide to turn attention to that person, from any pressure you would have applied, you could've determined a lot. I wouldn't call that insane. It isn't like I am saying to never vote me or my previous slot again. Before I joined this game you were pushing others to vote Dum, not my slot. I don't know why this is not obvious.In post 218, JacksonVirgo wrote:In post 216, JamesTheNames wrote:Anyway, ignoring the mess, the point stands, it is really suspicious that they didn't vote Dum. The whole game they said they were suspicious of Dum, admittedly alongside me/Salsa, but they were suspicious of Dum all game. Dum starts to be in the spotlight, JacksonVirgo decides, you know what, I was suspicious of Dum all the game, there's a wagon forming on Dum, there's no point in voting someone I think is scummy. All of JacksonVirgo's repsonses in Post 130, would completely justify voting Dum.
Why should I vote Dum, who I only scum-read mainly from gut over someone I have logic against. Why should I vote Dum, when I have a stronger read on someone else. You're assuming my read on Dum is stronger, when it's not. You keep assuming my logic on Salsa is "just them apologizing" when that's not the case at all. And I am the one that actually started throwing suspicion onto Dum before everybody else so your logic here is completely wrong. Your logic only stands if my only scum-read is Dum, which is completely not the case.
"If I really wanted to spark fighting I would be aiding in the push of Orc or Micc not try and start a new wagon as that would put attention more on myself which would be counter-intuitive."
By post 130, a wagon was already forming on Dum, and they think Dum is scummy or warranting of suspicion.
I started the fucking wagon dude, if I wanted to spark more fighting I wouldn't have done that as if I were scum, I would have no idea that it would take weight so fast.
"Also I disagree with Orc, they will not defend themselves properly and we won't get any pressure reads until they get pushed on. Again not voting but throwing intent is meaningless."
This is referring to the Dum wagon, once again, they find Dum to be suspicious or scummy, so why don't they vote.
This is starting to get hilariously insane. I keep saying I have more suspicion on your slot, so why would I vote elsewhere.
I also present to you: Post 139
"Also if you haven't got much to work with, make them by voting other's you think is likely scum, communicate between other perspectives and get responses from those you are pushing. This will create the necessary content. We can't just sit around idle waiting for scum to out themselves."
How does pushing someone, essentially afk, "get responses from those you are pushing". How is not jumping on a wagon you find suspicious not "sit around idle waiting for scum to out themselves"?
Check my last response. It's not hard dude
I'm convinced completely, it is to feign suspicions of Dum, correct me if I'm mistaken, but Dum hasn't been a strong town read this game, and a fair few of us have been suspicious at at least one point, so why else would they pretend to be suspicious of Dum, if not because they are scum buddies, wanting to subtly distance themselves?
What are you saying here? Null-read does not mean they're a scum-read what is your point.
The slot I replaced into, barely posted, fair enough. They were never as big of a focus as Micc was. They say they don't want to start a wagon because they don't want attention. Why wouldn't they want attention? Town loves attention, they know they're Town, they don't have to worry about making mistakes like Scum do. They are trying to get everybody else to vote. They are trying to fly under the radar, to distance themselves from their scum duo (Dum).
It does not matter how much they've posted. Their overall tone and the way they've been speaking is hugely filled with self-preservation. What the fuck are you even saying about attention, it is clear Salsa didn't want to be in the middle of it all and then you say Town loves attention, you're essentially saying that your slotisscum.
@JacksonVirgo, what would it take for you to actually vote Dum? Do you need a cop to reveal Dum as scum? Do you want to wait until there is less attention on him? You're suspicious of him, other people are suspcious or wary of him, you have a prime time to apply pressure.
When I feel the time is right, if you flip Town Dum is who I would next bet is scum it's not this hard to get in your head is it? Jesus.
I apologisse for the lack of organisation and neatness in the last few posts.
I am 99% these are the duo, entirely based on JacksonVirgo.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
why is this town? to be honest I'm reading navigator as scum here[/quote]In post 219, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
This is actually Town, I am fairly confident in this from this post. And to comment on this, that is indeed how I play. Just because an action may seem scummy or anti-town from the surface, does not mean that it comes from scum. Look deeper or you'll fall for false rabbit holesIn post 217, JacksonVirgo wrote:[quote="In post 211I think Jackson only votes for what they think are scum moves. Even if I was scared of backlash, that doesn't necessarily mean I'm scum
Jackson thinks it is town indicative because it supports them.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
I don't mind if someone posts 10 walls in a row, or 100 one liners in a row. You said you think short posts are scummy. I don't think it alone can be indicative of anything. Could HumanEatingMonkey contribute more? I guess? Is it scum indicative? No.In post 251, Fizz Raab wrote: And you are wrong if you think I'm scum when I've been way more helpful than HumanEatingMonkey has. Tell me what is alright with HumanEatingMonkey doing short posts without any information or real contribution to the game? Please explain your thoughts because I rather give out full details with my overexplaining things than having one post liners which is ridiclious to think that's fun when really, it does absolutely nothing to help with this game. Are you scum I wonder as well if your sticking up for someone being clear on likes and dislike posts and one liners. How is that not suspious to you?- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Comments are in purple inside the spoilers.
In post 258, navigatorv wrote:Sounds like everybody's been having a hell of a last few days, myself included.
I think I've got my emotions more under control though, so apologies for the emotional instability I showed to a few of you.
Since no one's really posted anything, I guess now's probably a decent time for me to post my reads from everyone. I'm re-reading everyone's posts as I write this, so this is probably gonna be long since I'll comment on everything that jumps out at me.
Now, from the top based on the order we were initially listed in:
orctinSpoiler:
Fizz RaabSpoiler:
Salsabil Faria and JamesTheNamesSpoiler:
DumSpoiler:
NinjaStoreSpoiler:
JacksonVirgoSpoiler:
MiccSpoiler:
humaneatingmonkeySpoiler:
Apologies for the length, there was just a lot of information to parse through. Hopefully, even if you don't necessarily agree with everything I say, this can help everyone look at things from new angles and maybe understand my thought process a bit.
Go for it.I have a proposition that I'd like to make. I understand if you don't want to risk potentially falling into a mafia trap, so I'll stay silent on it if you'd prefer not to hear it, but if you're willing to hear me out, I'd gladly share, even if the consensus turns out to be a "no".- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
I disagree.In post 277, humaneatingmonkey wrote:
I doubt newbscum openly buddies like that without much explanation.In post 103, Dum wrote:Town Reads:
1-navigatorv. As of right now, everything they have done looks extremely townie to me, especially with the reads they have been posting (Wich i mostly agree with).- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
First thing, this one is just entirely out of curiosity. What don't you like about early E-2s?In post 271, NinjaStore wrote:
I thought it was a dumb question so I didn't bother answering. I probably should have pointed that out at the time. The answer to James' second question should have been obvious. I had already made it pretty clear that I wasn't willing to put anyone at E-2 so early in day 1.Please post more. Why didn't you put Dum on E-2 in 165? Why didn't you vote for Micc after your 44?
I didn't cast a vote in 165 because I was waiting to see what Micc would have to say and hadn't decided who was scummier between Micc and Dum yet. Casting a vote for one of them at that time anyway would have probably been a good idea in retrospect. I should be more proactive with my voting rather than hanging back. I eventually did put a vote on Micc since he didn't answer.
Bothering to put in all this analysis work in the first place does earn you some town points. It doesn't exonerate you, but I'm switching votes to a higher priority scum read for now.
UNVOTE: navigatorv
VOTE: Micc
Second thing, can you point out between 241 and 271 what post or argument made you switch from Nav to Micc?- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
He claimed to agree with the majority of Nav's reads. Upon inspection, barely half agreed with. This is an attempted case at buddying.In post 285, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Why?- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
I'm not doing this.In post 297, navigatorv wrote:
So we have about 3 days until the deadline for voting. While it seems like things have been narrowed down, we still don't have a consensus on who to vote for. My proposition is this: if we can't narrow it down so that the majority of town agrees on one person by 12 hours before the deadline, everyone eliminates me. Even though you wouldn't be eliminating scum, you'd still have a higher chance of finding scum on later days which is still a net gain.In post 272, NinjaStore wrote:
I'm curious. Shoot.In post 258, navigatorv wrote:What I can do though is put my money where my mouth is. I have a proposition that I'd like to make. I understand if you don't want to risk potentially falling into a mafia trap, so I'll stay silent on it if you'd prefer not to hear it, but if you're willing to hear me out, I'd gladly share, even if the consensus turns out to be a "no".
Now obviously if I'm scum I could use this opportunity to try and convince everyone to vote for one of the three prime suspects, so if town agrees to this, I'll stop posting unless someone specifically requests a response from me.
Why are you so willing to get yourself killed?- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
22
Random Vote
27
Random enquiry as to whether someone has played on a different site
36
Votes Micc for what she believed to be stretching in the first 2 pages of the game.
37
Grammar Correction
53
Giving town cred to Navigatorv for a post she liked
82
Sarcastic comment, explains idleness, asking why agreeing beckons suspicion.
83
JacksonVirgo says why they sus Salsabil.
306I am not sussing you because you responded/town-read someone that has the same thoughts, I am just saying that's ALL you're responding to.
Dum does the same thing. It'll be interesting to see how JacksonVirgo explains how that is any different to what Salsabil did, considering Dum had a 151 post gap, with more than 4 days worth of content, compared to Salsabil with a 16 post gap, and less than 12 hours. We already know they won't answer this and will avoid it because they've been doing it all game and Dum is their scum buddy. We move on.
83
In terms of sarcasm or tone, 251, 89 and 248.That sarcasm doesn't help your case, in fact it makes me more confident.
Oof look at that edginess.In post 202, JacksonVirgo wrote:For fuck sake you can't be this dense. I am voting because of the intentions/tone behind their content not the content itself. Now stop fucking misrepresenting me I swear to fucking god
Salsabil's first post, not scummy it is just RVS. Salsabil's second post, not scummy, just a random enquiry. Salsabil's third post, voting for RVSing too hard, not scummy. Salsabil's fourth post, EBWOP. Salsabil's fifth post, agreeing with someone, also not scummy. Salsabil's sixth post, sarcasm and saying agreeing isn't scummy, this is also not scummy unless if you're JacksonVirgo, then it is very scummy.
Let's say the issue was agreeing with someone, 42. 271. 306
These are all with the idea of "town points".
You also have all of the instances of HumanEatingMonkey saying they agree with things or disagree with things. Dum also blindly said they agreed with Navigatorv.
So clearly saying you agree isn't an issue, unless JacksonVirgo is a hypocrite but I don't think they are.
The issue is that it is all they responded to then.
Between her 3rd/4th and 5th posts, 16 posts had been made.
She responded to 1 of them, a bunch of them were fluff such as 49.
I wonder how many JacksonVirgo responded to, considering they're being picky on how much Salsabil responded to.
It is 2 if you were wondering.
Their response to 51 is trivial.
Their response to 38 is same as what Salsabil did in 53, but disagreeing.
It is almost like what I said here:
is correct.In post 189, JamesTheNames wrote:All of the pressure from a vote with no sustanence or logic forces me to respond to it.
So NavigatorV considering:
How about you try and justify how a single instance of sarcasm, agreeing with somebody, and not replying much whilst being busy, would justify JacksonVirgo seeing Salsabil as a scum read instead of just a gut feel.In post 305, navigatorv wrote:Again, just because you will vote because you find someone suspicious doesn't mean others will do the same; it's pretty clear that Jackson only votes on who they think is scum, not just anyone they find suspicious.
Additionally, what would you do NavigatorV?
You have suspicions of 2 people, one of them is afk one of them isn't. You can get pressure from one of them, get content from one of them, further develop your reads on one of them, if you end up thinking this person is town, you can go back to the original person. Would you waste time voting on the busy not responding person, or the one you get content from?
Furthermore, if you were suspicious of 2 people, and you decided to stay on the one you got no content from, wasting time and pressure in a very effective manner, would you then try and convince other people to do the voting for you?
Let's say you did this ^. Why would you do this? Distancing? To stay off the wagon? To pretend like you're having an impact and to hide so you don't get spotlight on you?
Of course this is entirely hypothetical and nobody has done this this game.
I don't understand why I actually have to explain how a read off of tone, sarcasm, lack of responding due to life, and the act of agreeing with a single statement is a valid Scum read.
I look forward to your explanation NavigatorV.
If you can somehow explain how any of that makes sense, and isn't hypocritical, I'll admit I'm wrong, and I'll stop chasing after JacksonVirgo.
Until then.
My. Vote. Is. Not. Moving.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Town vibes.In post 321, NinjaStore wrote:I've caught up on reading the recent activity but still need to parse it a bit. As for questions directed at me:
In post 319, JohnnyFarrar wrote: What does SA stand for? I also played on a SA, wondering if it's the same one
A few years ago I played a few games on Something Awful. They were usually larger games with 24-48 hour days. I'm trying to adjust to much longer days, and figured we're best off playing out most of the time limit we have so enough discussion can happen to get reads on people. Putting someone at E-2 when barely any of that time has elapsed yet and we're still in a semi-joke phase seemed dangerous to me - it could have ended the day very early and denied us information. Seems like something scum would want to happen.In post 288, JamesTheNames wrote: First thing, this one is just entirely out of curiosity. What don't you like about early E-2s?
It was simply because Nav made an effortpost analyzing people in a lot of detail. We're supposed to be scumhunting, after all. Micc and Dum were already on my radar, and it was a tossup which one to put a vote on. I went with Micc since I still don't like his early E-2 vote.In post 288, JamesTheNames wrote: Second thing, can you point out between 241 and 271 what post or argument made you switch from Nav to Micc?
That was my initial joke vote with appropriately flimsy justification. I
washoping that having some people at two votes would get some discussion going. I wasn't expecting anyone to drop a third vote on Orctin so quickly, so it got my attention when Micc did that.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Sorry but botd?In post 325, JohnnyFarrar wrote:So like as I start my read of page 6, It should be known that in a regular game I would vote orc and keep my vote there. keep my vote there. That looked like you were trying to hammer. But newbie gets botd. Anyways.
P6:
I disagree with JV and Monkey about Dum looking fake.
Navy advocating for policy lims is yucky, as monkey points out.
Based on this page I'd rather vote Navy than Dum
P7:
Hooooo boy Rizz isn't gonna like me
Navy so polite
James is here, I like their initial reads
Navy thinking every post needs/ will have substance will lead to much frustration for them
P8:
We fighting
James has effort, which is nice. Prolly unwilling to vote James today unless something wild happens
Stopping again, sorry, family drama
Also don't apologise for that.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
I apologise now, for the lack of chronological order or general organisation in this post.
It doesn't assume people are equal. It applies even if suspicion levels aren't equal. If you have actual interest in town winning, you don't waste your time on something gaining no grounds, or which won't gain ground. You apply pressure onto the second most suspicious, then as I've said, from that your opinions can change, they can become stronger, they can become weaker. The pressure you apply can help others form their ideas and their reads. There is also once again, nothing stopping you from going back to your original vote. A town player's interest would be to therefore actually get stuff out of someone. JacksonVirgo opted not to do this.In post 313, navigatorv wrote: Now then, let's go into your hypothetical situation. Right off the bat there's a problem because it assumes that the suspicions on both people are equal. Jackson made it very clear that they found Salsa scummy while Dum was merely potentially suspicious. Going off of what I did do in a similar situation (100), I likely wouldn't have voted for any of them and waited to see (I should note that there is a difference in that Jackson only had to pick between two while I had three and my suspicion was much more even between them than Jackson's implied about theirs). In that case, am I just waiting for others to do the vote so I don't have to or distancing myself? Or am I just playing cautiously?
Maybe they were waiting to see if Salsa would post and wanted to see if their vote still left any pressure on her. Maybe Dum never crossed into full on scum territory for them for whatever reason. Maybe they just plain didn't even think to change their vote since they were focused on reading people. Any of these could be just as possible as them and Dum being scum buddies.
Also potentially suspicious? Pushing through a game saying you're going to vote Dum or Salsabil (or me), and saying you see them as most scummy, issuspicious?potentially
In post 313, navigatorv wrote:unreasonable hostility over a single vote, it's not hard to see why Jackson saw them as potential scum.
Only just realised this but this post makes their case against Salsabil even weaker, they are basically saying 74 and 83 aren't actually their reasons. Once again showing, not a valid vote on their part at all.In post 202, JacksonVirgo wrote:For fuck sake you can't be this dense. I am voting because of the intentions/tone behind their content not the content itself. Now stop fucking misrepresenting me I swear to fucking god
Unlike JacksonVirgo trying to hide under the radar by just focusing on myself, I'm trying to get content from other people, admittedly I've not done a great job at it.In post 313, navigatorv wrote:Can you explain why you suddenly switched to focusing on Fizz Raab out of nowhere then immediately switched back to Jackson? I assume you're trying to point out a place where Jackson could've tone-read someone as scum, but I can't really tell because you offered no explanation before or after.
Random contradictory thing I found while going through all of JacksonVirgo posts.In post 124, JacksonVirgo wrote:Firstly I already said it was mainly gut so I won't be pushing them, so you're misrepresenting my case here. There's also a large difference between why I think that read was NAI and why I think Dum's actions were scummy, which you seemed to ignore.
Have commented on how they normally play many a time already.In post 130, JacksonVirgo wrote:but I'm going to stop self-meta right now since I don't like doing so.
I was checking if JacksonVirgo had any other explanation as to why they have/had any actual case against Salsabil, 83 contradicts 202. They don't apart from just reiterations.
I checked, you just said you'd be fine with a Dum wagon, you didn't actually push for it before the wagon started. Unless if you classed NavigatorV questioning you on it as starting a wagon. It definitely does not. The Dum wagon only picked up after his "gambit". I read everything up to this point an extra time just for you.In post 218, JacksonVirgo wrote:I started the fucking wagon dude, if I wanted to spark more fighting I wouldn't have done that as if I were scum, I would have no idea that it would take weight so fast.
No? Posting a few times doesn't mean she doesn't want to be in the middle of it. Sarcastically going "Cause I'm scum (you caught me! )" doesn't seem like she doesn't want to be in the middle of it.In post 218, JacksonVirgo wrote:What the fuck are you even saying about attention, it is clear Salsa didn't want to be in the middle of it all
To be fair, I was trying more to highlight the tone of "You don't have anything else to post? That's useless." I should have made this clearerIn post 313, navigatorv wrote:
really isn't sarcastic like you seem to think.In post 74, JacksonVirgo wrote:You don't have anythign else to post about other than those which is "backing up" your own vote in a sense?
As if there is a world where this applies more to be than it does to JacksonVirgo.In post 313, navigatorv wrote:However, assuming you are, in fact, town, I'd definitely encourage you to try more flexible thinking. Never allowing yourself any doubt in your own theories is more than likely to lead you down the wrong trail eventually.
By the way, anybody can be free to answer this. Why has JacksonVirgo been particularly vulgar towards my slot? I don't think its particularly in the spirit of the game, plus I can't help but to see it as flaky since I'm the only one trying to get them Elimed? There's no need for it, and I wouldn't complain if it stopped. Thank you.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Ignore the context and try to insult me more go for it. You ignored the context, you say you hate self meta yet you do it yourself. Stop trying to be edgy and rude.In post 340, JacksonVirgo wrote:
I do this all the time. I am actually sick of you at this pointIn post 329, JamesTheNames wrote:Have commented on how they normally play many a time already.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Stop flaking. Swearing doesn't help your case.In post 343, JacksonVirgo wrote:Real fuckin' sick of them. I am sick of having to deal with people like them every. single. fucking. game- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Jackson, I know we haven't got a long much this game, but I just want to say you are still fun to play with even if some moments aren't the nicest.In post 368, JacksonVirgo wrote:I've had a small distance session from MS and this is off-topic so I'll keep this brief, and I've come to realize I'm ashamed of myself of how I've been acting on this site as of late. I'm gonna take a small break after this game, thanks for sticking with me until now fam.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
If you live in the United Kingdom there is a chance, I don't know any Aussies. Although I must say, Ten from NCT isn't Jackson.In post 370, JacksonVirgo wrote:
Yeah apologies.In post 369, JamesTheNames wrote:
Jackson, I know we haven't got a long much this game, but I just want to say you are still fun to play with even if some moments aren't the nicest.In post 368, JacksonVirgo wrote:I've had a small distance session from MS and this is off-topic so I'll keep this brief, and I've come to realize I'm ashamed of myself of how I've been acting on this site as of late. I'm gonna take a small break after this game, thanks for sticking with me until now fam.
Also quick question, are you the James I know? I assume not as you've been acting as you don't know me- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
I second this, but I'm not as certain on HumanEatingMonkeyIn post 375, JacksonVirgo wrote:If end up being the elim, monkey is almost definitely Town here as is Navi.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Admittedly I should stop being really stubborn I'm not helping the game and I don't want to ruin it for Jackson any more than I have.
Jackson and Dum are my priorities, I can't not see them as a duo, at least not right now, I'm also okay with going for a Fizz Raab Elim, but I'm not confident in this.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
It would yes. There'd still be suspicions on whichever stays, but my whole issue is I really can't see any other explanation for why you didn't vote Dum. For pressure reasons and such from earlier.In post 380, JacksonVirgo wrote:Also may I ask a question. If Dum/Myself get eliminated and flip Town, would that affect your read on the other considering you're reading us both as a pair.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
We still have 30 ish hours, no need to rush this we can still get responses. You did beat me to it though.
Also as cool as Daniel is and as much of a bop as 2U is, he isn't Jackson- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
You think so?In post 438, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Btw, if Fizz flips red, his partner definitely bussed.
If Jackson Hammers
Those who voted for Fizz Raab:
JacksonVirgo, humaneatingmonkey, navigatorv, JohnnyFarrar, orctin
Those who did not:
JamesTheNames, Dum, NinjaStore
If Fizz flips red I'm voting NinjaStore
397, 401, 404 and 405. Based off of these, and the fact at the time these were made Fizz Raab was at E-2. Surely NinjaStore would have voted here? NinjaStore made a claim in 397, which, I personally would consider as something to give scum vibes. 401 and 405 look like NinjaStore is trying to allow Fizz Raab to excuse themselves, then NinjaStore would try to defend them. This is only if Fizz Raab would flip red.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
It would have been nice to hear this earlier. I did explain that you can still temporarily throw sus on a slot then come back to it, so I'm still a bit ehh, but it would have been nice. I probably should have been listening to my own advice and stopped tunneling at least temporarily.In post 384, JacksonVirgo wrote:
Alright now that I have a clearer head and we're more civil I will try and explain this. From the very start of my read on Dum, the read was heavily in gut and I've learned to announce my gut reads but not tunnel them like I used to. Salsa/yourself was acting scummy in a sense that I could narrow down with actual logical thinking, salsa did not post/quote/respond to anything that was not directly backing up their own agenda, from memory their tone was also filled with self-preservation so that combined with not posting about anything that went against them made me think it's newb!scum pushing an agenda and trying not to stand out in the spotlight as best as possible. You then appeared with a similar agenda, focused mainly on scum-reading me which pinged me to the fact that 1. I was scum-reading you and it feels like OMGUS and 2. Your predecessor rejected everything that went against them. Both of which I feel are attempting to push the exact same agenda, self-preservation.In post 382, JamesTheNames wrote:
It would yes. There'd still be suspicions on whichever stays, but my whole issue is I really can't see any other explanation for why you didn't vote Dum. For pressure reasons and such from earlier.In post 380, JacksonVirgo wrote:Also may I ask a question. If Dum/Myself get eliminated and flip Town, would that affect your read on the other considering you're reading us both as a pair.
Now all I have on Dum is speculation based on their tone, which is stronger now that the game has progressed but not as strong as the read on your slot. Their tone seems overly apologetic and like they're trying to minimise backlash from their posts. That logic is much weaker than the one I had on you and thus I was never going to vote them over yourself, you then appeared essentially throwing an attack on me stating that I should have voted Dum if I were Town but that's entirely not the case at all, but either you're scum needing to throw a case at me or you're Town that's blind/biased to the fact that my logic on you was stronger to me, which other's also called out which I can only assume you didn't fully absorb because of your read.
--
I am also here to explain that associations read are kinda wack. Try, even for a second, removing that association read in your head (aka try to not think Dum and I are partners for a second) and think what your reads would be in that case, because you following this path by assuming we're both partners (which in a vacuum, chances are incredibly slim regardless) is making yourself tunnel-visioned. This is assuming that you're Town that's tunneling here and not scum.
I forgot to click post and went to sleep I apologise.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
I mean it in the lines of, somebody finds 2 people suspicious, 1 can be more suspicious than the other one, but if the game is pathing towards the least suspicious, or rather the one you aren't focusing, you'd start pressuring the other person, as its more efficient at the time. So if I were you, I would have switched to Dum, at least temporarily. When Dum and Salsabil were both in the game, Dum was much much more active, I would have pressured him, strengthened my read of him, then depending on how that goes, I could have gone back to Salsabil.In post 445, JacksonVirgo wrote:
Apologies again for getting heated earlier and not summarising it like this earlier. What do you mean by temporarily throw suspicion?In post 442, JamesTheNames wrote:It would have been nice to hear this earlier. I did explain that you can still temporarily throw sus on a slot then come back to it, so I'm still a bit ehh, but it would have been nice. I probably should have been listening to my own advice and stopped tunneling at least temporarily.
I forgot to click post and went to sleep I apologise.
Also may I ask you to reword or simplify your read on Dum and myself so I can see if I can it all straight. Also it'll be easier to understand/absorb it when we're not throwing each other's pinky toes in the corner of a coffee table.
My issue with Dum was he voted Micc, for being helpful. I don't buy the whole gambit nonsense.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
In post 439, JamesTheNames wrote:
You think so?In post 438, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Btw, if Fizz flips red, his partner definitely bussed.
If Jackson Hammers
Those who voted for Fizz Raab:
JacksonVirgo, humaneatingmonkey, navigatorv, JohnnyFarrar, orctin
Those who did not:
JamesTheNames, Dum, NinjaStore
If Fizz flips red I'm voting NinjaStore
397, 401, 404 and 405. Based off of these, and the fact at the time these were made Fizz Raab was at E-2. Surely NinjaStore would have voted here? NinjaStore made a claim in 397, which, I personally would consider as something to give scum vibes. 401 and 405 look like NinjaStore is trying to allow Fizz Raab to excuse themselves, then NinjaStore would try to defend them. This is only if Fizz Raab would flip red.
I take back what I said, I decided to read through orctin's posts. I find it strange or, too coincidental, the timings for him to join wagons.In post 444, NinjaStore wrote:
401 is why I hadn't voted him yet.In post 439, JamesTheNames wrote:
You think so?In post 438, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Btw, if Fizz flips red, his partner definitely bussed.
If Jackson Hammers
Those who voted for Fizz Raab:
JacksonVirgo, humaneatingmonkey, navigatorv, JohnnyFarrar, orctin
Those who did not:
JamesTheNames, Dum, NinjaStore
If Fizz flips red I'm voting NinjaStore
397, 401, 404 and 405. Based off of these, and the fact at the time these were made Fizz Raab was at E-2. Surely NinjaStore would have voted here? NinjaStore made a claim in 397, which, I personally would consider as something to give scum vibes. 401 and 405 look like NinjaStore is trying to allow Fizz Raab to excuse themselves, then NinjaStore would try to defend them. This is only if Fizz Raab would flip red.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
"I don't know how/what/who/when/why/where."In post 463, JacksonVirgo wrote:What's the point of a question mark, when the words Who, What, When, Where, Why and How all suggest it's a question anyway. That and a question generally has a different verbal tone than other sentences and thus having the punctuation to signal that it is a question at the end is very bad design.
This is literally a 3am thought from Jacko (well 3:30am)
"I have no doubt as to how/what/who/when/why/where."
"What implies a question"
Statements vs Questions as above.
In actual speak a change in tone depicts a question, you can't do this online, so instead you use a ?, the 3rd example is important as you don't know if it is a question, or a statement, without the punctuation at the end or the tone.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
No, the premise just strengthened it.In post 469, JacksonVirgo wrote:@James was your read on Dum only based on me being scum with them?- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Even anything brief would be phenomenalIn post 472, Dum wrote:Making this pos just to say im still alive (and keeping up with the thread) just not posting a whole lot because of IRL stuff. Will try to post more on the weekend- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
You have time to convince us otherwise.In post 477, navigatorv wrote:Here's hoping Fizz responds. Even if I think this is the best decision, I still don't like the idea of her getting eliminated without offering up something in her defense- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
I understood their meaning.In post 480, JacksonVirgo wrote:
You missed their meaning.In post 479, JamesTheNames wrote:
You have time to convince us otherwise.In post 477, navigatorv wrote:Here's hoping Fizz responds. Even if I think this is the best decision, I still don't like the idea of her getting eliminated without offering up something in her defense- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Apparently I can't read. This is what happens when you spend all night trying to code lagrange multipliers and eigenvectors...In post 483, navigatorv wrote:
You sure? Cause I still think she's scum and am keeping my vote, I just want to see at least an attempt at defense is allIn post 481, JamesTheNames wrote:
I understood their meaning.In post 480, JacksonVirgo wrote:
You missed their meaning.In post 479, JamesTheNames wrote:
You have time to convince us otherwise.In post 477, navigatorv wrote:Here's hoping Fizz responds. Even if I think this is the best decision, I still don't like the idea of her getting eliminated without offering up something in her defense- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Welcome to maths.In post 485, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Those are fake words- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
I know too many Maths with Philosophy minors to be willing to discuss this again I apologise.In post 488, navigatorv wrote:
Math is a social constructIn post 486, JamesTheNames wrote:
Welcome to maths.In post 485, JohnnyFarrar wrote:Those are fake words- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
The time for this for me, is roughly 1am tomorrow. In case nothing occurs over the next 6 hours,.intent to hammer at midnight- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
AsleepIn post 492, JacksonVirgo wrote:What do you think the reasons they're not here at the moment- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
Do you mean chronologically, or in sus rankings.In post 507, navigatorv wrote:On the one hand, I'm glad we didn't lose any power roles, but on the other I feel bad that both my first and last suspects were town lol- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
So somebody trying to out a Power Role would actually be worth focusing on? Not just somebody who say, didn't like Johnny>In post 512, humaneatingmonkey wrote:NK analysis is more WIFOM than you really need to read the game but it's information nevertheless. Assume scum priority is hunting PR.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
I personally think this is because I'm honestly not much of a threat, considering how badly my push on Jackson went.In post 519, NinjaStore wrote:I'm not sure how much we can read from the night kill, but I think James may be on to something with JV-Dum being a pair,and James was spared.- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
You only noticed this now? Even if I'm suspicious about Jackson I don't quite get this.In post 517, NinjaStore wrote:JV has already been discussed a lot, but here are some early posts that stand out.
227 228
JV's tone is interesting. They emphasize that they are making reads rather than talking about the people they are reading.
Then there's this post:
JV drops this subtle "I'm town" instead of just saying "I play this way as both town and scum."In post 232, JacksonVirgo wrote:
Sometimes I don't post and just read the thread for a small while in a tactical way. For example, if I feel like I am tunneling someone too hard I step back and just watch for a while to see what happens without my intervention etc. More reasons too but that's the way I feel is the best explanation.In post 231, humaneatingmonkey wrote:one last thing JV, your sig says you're a tactical lurker. what does it mean?so it's not anything to read me onI also do it as scum- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
This games me vibes. I don't feel great about the vibes given. Why does this post give me not-Town vibes?In post 507, navigatorv wrote:On the one hand, I'm glad we didn't lose any power roles, but on the other I feel bad that both my first and last suspects were town lol- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
In post 526, navigatorv wrote:
Are you referring to him saying we should assume Mafia is hunting PRs? If that's the case, I can see the potential, but it definitely needs a bit more than that to get me on the wagon since that just seems to be a decent assumption to make since they're the biggest threat to scum andIn post 523, JacksonVirgo wrote:Also I have small suspicion on HEM from the NK, and then instantly posting to back their own ass up since the top town didn't die.they don't have to worry about sussing out who's town like we do them.
Not to say the possibility isn't there, but it definitely doesn't say anything definitive imo
I'm curious how Ninja feels about what is highlighted in blue.In post 517, NinjaStore wrote:JV has already been discussed a lot, but here are some early posts that stand out.
227 228
JV's tone is interesting. They emphasize that they are making reads rather than talking about the people they are reading.
Then there's this post:
In post 232, JacksonVirgo wrote:
Sometimes I don't post and just read the thread for a small while in a tactical way. For example, if I feel like I am tunneling someone too hard I step back and just watch for a while to see what happens without my intervention etc. More reasons too but that's the way I feel is the best explanation.In post 231, humaneatingmonkey wrote:one last thing JV, your sig says you're a tactical lurker. what does it mean?so it's not anything to read me onI also do it as scumJV drops this subtle "I'm town" instead of just saying "I play this way as both town and scum."- JamesTheNames
-
JamesTheNames Goon
- JamesTheNames
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 705
- Joined: May 19, 2021
In post 534, NinjaStore wrote:In post 530, JamesTheNames wrote:In post 526, navigatorv wrote:
Are you referring to him saying we should assume Mafia is hunting PRs? If that's the case, I can see the potential, but it definitely needs a bit more than that to get me on the wagon since that just seems to be a decent assumption to make since they're the biggest threat to scum andIn post 523, JacksonVirgo wrote:Also I have small suspicion on HEM from the NK, and then instantly posting to back their own ass up since the top town didn't die.they don't have to worry about sussing out who's town like we do them.
Not to say the possibility isn't there, but it definitely doesn't say anything definitive imoIn post 517, NinjaStore wrote:JV has already been discussed a lot, but here are some early posts that stand out.
227 228
JV's tone is interesting. They emphasize that they are making reads rather than talking about the people they are reading.
Then there's this post:
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames
- JamesTheNames