Make me.
-S
In post 17, tʃɹɪs wrote:oooh gimme VOTE: datisiIn post 15, Rhyme and Reason wrote:ALERT ALERT
SPECIAL OFFER AVAILABLE, GET IT WHILE STOCKS LAST
VOTE: DATISI
FREE TOWNCRED FOR ALL DATISI VOTERS
EXTRA 50% AVAILABLE FOR ANYONE ENSURING YEET BEFORE PAGE 5
Because you're a shining beacon of towniness, obviously.In post 41, Datisi wrote:why is everyone pocketing me smfh
yIn post 36, tʃɹɪs wrote:ok, now i'm having datisi town pings too,
ur saying ur not?
In post 25, Retti wrote:How funny would it be if I
In post 27, Datisi wrote:you pinky promised
pedit: thank you skitter i can now stop refreshing the game every 2 minutes
what about my reaction did you find townie?
why would he bother to lie about this fypov?In post 57, Datisi wrote:have you considered that he is... lying about having a potion that does nothing?
This isn't the towny response that I was hoping for, for the record.In post 52, T3 wrote:The flavor and potions of this game seem like something that could possibly be breakable if we al knew what each other was doing.
OH I read that as entirely being about them stealing the pagetop lolIn post 78, Datisi wrote:ye, bc they said they pinky swore i won't die on y-1 and then they threatened to hammer me
pedit: originally it felt like some sorta rolefish to me, that's why i voted him
when s_s gave his answer on why he thought pob was town, he outright assumed pob does have a null-potion so that's why i asked
do you wanna answer my 21?
I meanIn post 82, skitter30 wrote:it looks to me like those times when you were scum and did the same thing (panic room, defcon) ...
Otherwise idk what you're talking abt
I don't see the reason to do that. If they're scum who doesn't have a nothing-potion, then how would they know they even exist? It would look weird to be the only one claiming one of those.In post 57, Datisi wrote:have you considered that he is... lying about having a potion that does nothing?
I'm scum and worried you'll catch the Bad VibesIn post 113, Datisi wrote:mena, is there a reason you keep avoiding me?
it's okay, you can live in my pockets, they are big and comfy and there's space for many in themIn post 129, Retti wrote:Unfortunately for you I am too small and things fall out of me too easily
there's been something that's pinged me as towny and I like your take on poblong and retti that I kinda vibe with but it's mostly the default townread thingIn post 137, skitter30 wrote:This isnt like a real read on me right?
bc you're voting them and I wanted to get a wagon going, and bc the trjis read felt made upIn post 144, skitter30 wrote:why are you voting them?
Wrt bugs: dislike the initial dats vote, dislike they ignored the concerns abt the initial dats vote, dislike the tris read, and dislike the fact that that's ehat they chose to engage with
thanks, it's not awful it's just kind of abrupt from being in a p good mood a couple of hours ago or soIn post 148, skitter30 wrote:Also i missed this earlier but i hope things get better soonIn post 133, Rhyme and Reason wrote:now I'm feeling kinda sad but for non-game-related-reasons
In post 161, skitter30 wrote:I thought u meant like outside of urself
I meant generally (so myself included this time) but I would like to hear more about how I feel offIn post 162, skitter30 wrote:I'm also not sure i'd call you a scjmread, you more just feel kinda off
*shrug* where's the spice of life if not to be found in letting scum make dubious but potentially rewarding playsIn post 160, Datisi wrote:and my general rule of thumb is "don't let scum do pro-scum plays that they might even get away with tomorrow"In post 146, Rhyme and Reason wrote:thanks, it's just a thing, hopefully it'll pass
and I mean, I've seen hammers happen quick too, but my general rule of thumb there is "just lim the hammerer tomorrow"
sorry brain feels kind of melty so idk if this next point is gonna come out well but: yes, if I were scum, I'd be down to try and get a hammer on page 1 for the banter and because town don't policy lim lolhammers like they should. but just as much, I'm very okay with rapid L-1s when I'm town and part of that is pushing people even if it's in a jokey way. there was really no read beyond it was either you or skitter I was going to do that with and it seemed more fun with you because I have a different thing in mind re:skitt
I also don't think I've been tunnelling you at all really?
~Rhyme
it's not a "real" tunnel per se, it's the meme tunnel. like i get you (most likely) weren't trying to actually get me killed on pg1 but you were still constantly repeating that i need to die and refusing to engage me otherwise so i think it's fair to call it a tunnel
and like again, i'm kiiiinda concerned that you're pinged by my reaction of being concerned there when you know that i am vary of quick early yeets (i imagine that you know that at least) and you know exactly how concerned town!me gets with wagons/scumreads on me (considering my notes pt vents from c9++)
hmmIn post 165, skitter30 wrote:I feel like you're asking weird questions, your responses to a couple of things have been a little off, and i didnt like the scumclaiming bits
hmmmIn post 169, skitter30 wrote:I mean its weird but i'm not sure its enuf to call u scum over
the two pushing posts were both page 1 and the brush off was either page 2 or 3In post 170, Datisi wrote:i mean it was two posts + brush off but it was across multiple pages (i think idk my memory is not the best rn and i cbf to go back) so like. mini tunnel. let me have this one goddammit it was annoying.In post 166, Rhyme and Reason wrote:and like... even as a meme tunnel, it was uh... two posts? and then a brush off when asked why, but I think even in terms of memes that's hardly a tunnel
I'm less pinged now than I think I was by you wanting to know the reason for me pushing you in 21,like I think I quite like what you're saying at this point. I'd also uh, actually forgotten that you were wary of quick yeets bc it's been a while since we actually played together and if anything my hunger for swift yeetething has only strengthened in our time apart
i am interested in the bolded part
yep, that's the one! I'm glad u rememberIn post 178, Datisi wrote:ah yeah. that game where i wasn't focused on how i was being perceived. the same game where i got into multiple arguments with players in the ic slot over their read on me. yeah that one.In post 172, Rhyme and Reason wrote:but essentially the way you're engaging here is reminiscent of reading your posts in C9++ where I got the sense that you were much more focused on trying to sort than on how you were being perceived, which I think is +town for you although I admit to being kinda out of date