Maybe? At this point I'm getting kinda worn down with this day. I think rereading Aaron the things I liked in his iso actually aren't as good as I thought they were whereas the things I liked in chemist are holding up better in my mindIn post 5272, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Your not willing to reconsider Chemist?
j/w but did you glance at the other Moriarty game I linked?In post 5275, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Chemist.
A neighbour ability JOAT.
And know what the funny part is?
That’s RIGHT! Good Boy!
The dead mafia member also happens to be EXACTLY that role.
I think Alisae made all their mafia members Neighborizing JOATs.
I agree that there could easily be a second scum joat but I don't think all 4 are scum, mostly because of my reads but also because I don't think Ali gambits on that never being testedIn post 5281, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:IDK TBH.
Honestly the only thing I’m positive in is lynching a Neighborizor JOAT today is the right call.
Because if Alisae really did make their entire mafia team Neighbourizing JOAT’s we pretty much auto win by lynching a Neighbour JOAT Claim today.
can you link me the content you're thinking of here?In post 5288, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:The recent content spews AF Town.
I mean maybe but in the last moriarty game there was 1 scum in a 3 man hood, 1 scum in 4 informed roles, and 1 goon against a neapolitan so uhhhIn post 5290, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:And they wanted to see if anyone would pick up on the mafia setup.
And guess who picked up in it.
That’s right!
THIS GUY!
wasn't that AFTER this game started though?In post 5297, gobbledygook wrote:he was caught day 1 and legit slipped he was scum in my modded game mini normal 2115
I've never played with town you I'm just looking back on previous gamesIn post 5316, AaronFrost wrote:Krazy have we played together prior to this game?
resistance on everything is because me, titus, and ank can't agree on who the day's lynch is yetIn post 5324, Espeonage wrote:Resistance on everything at the moment means I think someone being followed by people might be scum.
Espeonage, would you say there are a fair number of posts in aaron's iso that look ~more or less like this in terms of solving?AaronFrost wrote:I think this might be indicative of a dsj/clidd partnership. The first bit looks like he's trying to distance by speaking about his hesitance towards the Drew lynch but then goes on to follow clidd's wagon on Drew despite the weak reasoning.In post 175, dsjstr wrote:I agree with norwegian's 172, but I am worried about how convincing clidd is. When he shared his thoughts on the setup I saw that as NAI, any role could do that. The fact that I was already sussing Drew and then people started joining makes me
hesitant to join the wagon. If we did want to lynch Drew than I would want clidd to be the one to hammer. Right now I would have placed my vote on clidd if he wasn't already at L-2. I think part of my uneasy feeling is that you did vote for Drew rather
than me. What was the reasoning for that vote?
Not sure what this says about Drew's alignment unfortunately.
Hectic is now my strongest townread. I also realized that I have yet to play with scum!Hectic so I'm not entirely sure what his scumplay would look like
could you please link it then as I've asked 2-3 times now?In post 5334, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:What context.
The link you gave me doesn’t have the context with the Chemist and Alisae Interaction.
Chemist and Alisae had an interaction.
Dude I'm not saying I'm rightIn post 5342, Espeonage wrote:1. I'm not going to iso dive.
2. Your argument is flawed bc someone not doing what they usually do as town does not equate to scum, it equates to null. Which we went over yesterday. Same shit different day. You being correct in the end yesterday means nothing either. There were other things wrong with the slot in the end.
In post 3943, AaronFrost wrote:Leaf claimed it and then you and I both confirmed so I'm not sure why people are still doubting the claim. And if they doubt that I'm actually a mason, then they have to doubt you and Leaf are too.In post 3808, Hectic wrote:i mean we are masons don't get me wrong
but they don't know that Aaron
you might need to do something
Like yeah I had been playing under-the-radar scummy on purpose to hide this as long as possible. Most of the solving has taken place in the mason PT.
I feel pretty strongly about insomnia/TSE scum right now tho so that's where I'd like to lynch today.
like in rebuttal, you might say these are town indicative for Aaron?In post 3955, AaronFrost wrote:I don't remember you mentioning chemist's meta but I skimmed a lot so maybe I missed it.
Either way I strongly disagree and think he's town.
In post 5387, Espeonage wrote:So you are saying my failed action last night is scum indicative. Because I'm worried about claiming on a false positive.
it relies on the assumptions that:In post 5394, Reasonably Rational wrote:One shot alien, alright, that means that yes, said alien could be used on someone who did not claim ascetic, therefore making it a frame vs any night action. I don't see how Pine keeping people as ascetics is a positive effect because of that factor?
there are at present three claimed JOATs and some? number of additional neighborizersIn post 5396, Reasonably Rational wrote:What claimed night actions do we have that give feedback? And what are the sources of those actions?
Fuck being a shitty player who isn't keeping up with the game is really fucking hard, and it just makes you even shittier, compounding itself. ><
-Cerb
Yeah but I've never seen him try this hard?In post 5397, Hectic wrote:i think Somni!scum is very unlikely if Ank!town based on what she described from the neighbourhood
and Somni as town does tryhard more in recent games i've played with him in
I usually except joats to have at least one shot that gives feedback, although it's not certain since Hectic says he already used one such shotIn post 5411, Reasonably Rational wrote:Got it, and have those individuals all claimed things that give feedback? Or are we assuming that they'll get feedback?
I'm ignoring the problems with the assumption that scum didn't claim ascetic(though you should consider that if scum didn't claim ascetic, then they are probably in the group of people advocating for a pine lynch, as that's one very good way to keep themselves out of the PoE that follows from that line of reasoning, while not risking being caught).
-Cerb
that makes sense I'm a day 2 dayvigIn post 5417, OkaPoka wrote:hectic claimed to have checked you s_w and got a gunsmith guilty way back where
in this scenario I'm more thinking prevent your murderIn post 5438, Hectic wrote:oh i see to prevent a roleblock?
not sure if that's a valuable use of a watcher though
ultimately moving off leashes is a choice people can make, it's more to discourage scum from killing hectic/amrunIn post 5442, OkaPoka wrote:just dont leash shots and we lynch anybody who chooses to do an idiot check
I'm a claimed VT the IC doesn't like and I'm not assuming I survive to endgameIn post 5444, Hectic wrote:lul i doubt i'm getting murdered any time soon Sherlock
the IC doesn't like me very much
