Yes, let’s
Not that anyone will listen.
Yes, let’s
I’d be down to keep track of that if we do
Fuuuuck noIn post 15, Firebringer wrote:Everyone let us all begin by giving our Arthur reveal.
If you don’t know what I mean I am saying we all soft Merlin role and claim a person to be Arthur.
In case Merlin is night killed/lynched by accident we have our cleared townie.
Let me begin:
Varsoon is Arthur
My issue lies with the bolded: yeah we get a conftown, for one day: because the scumkill resolves before the claiming Arthur will die through this plan if he doesn’t claim the sword before Merlin dies.In post 15, Firebringer wrote:Everyone let us all begin by giving our Arthur reveal.
If you don’t know what I mean I am saying we all soft Merlin role and claim a person to be Arthur.
In case Merlin is night killed/lynched by accident we have our cleared townie.
Let me begin:
Varsoon is Arthur
?In post 27, Untrod Tripod wrote:holy quarterbacking, batman
This sounds reasonable, and no one that I’d want to promote this agenda for over LLD is around, so I’m in favor of this plan.In post 52, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:No, the correct method is for me to claim Excalibur, and then next day if I'm Arthur, to inform me.In post 47, Auro wrote:Town should probably vote for a consensus scumread to claim Excalibur, for maximum benefit. If they're scum they can't claim and we get a confirmation in the night. If they're not scum and claim we know they're IC -- they're gonna either contribute the next day and kill themselves, or Merlin confirms they're Arthur and we move on.In post 42, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Sure. Give me Excalibur.In post 39, Auro wrote:Throwing out a thought:
If scum claims Excalibur, they die immediately.
Town can vote on someone to claim Excalibur for the day. ONLY that person claims at night. If they're scum it remains unclaimed, lynch next day. If there's a claim treat them like an IC the next day.
Basically, me being unkillable and IC means people can't do the stupid paranoia thing about me. I get to give my reads without the whole "LLD is great at scum" argument.
I'm the optimal target.
On this: I think bussing in general is less effective at furthering scum’s goals than creating an association with a town player. In Children of Hurin, I let the association between Nero and me fester, and that caused the game winning mislynch to happen, though Town wasn’t winning towards the end anyway.In post 56, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Tone on both. It's what I expect from them.In post 54, Varsoon wrote:LL coming out hot with the reads.
What makes Nancy and UT town?
Why is mechanical talk scummy in an open setup?
If I was scum and you asked me to bus-gladiate, I'd do it in a heartbeat.
Kill resolves before claim. Yes, we'd effectively gate the scum kill but we'd also render the setup as 13-4 mountainous.In post 39, Auro wrote:Throwing out a thought:
If scum claims Excalibur, they die immediately.
Town can vote on someone to claim Excalibur for the day. ONLY that person claims at night. If they're scum it remains unclaimed, lynch next day. If there's a claim treat them like an IC the next day.
But I think you're right in that we could effectively use the sword claiming as a one-shot cop, but, again, that renders the bulletproof aspect of it kind of useless.
@MOD: If Merlin dies and flips, does Arthur's identity get revealed with the flip?
Can Merlin claim Excalibur?
It's not that we can't talk mechanics. Mechanics is NAI. It's that talking mechanics and using them to smother other interactions that generate reads + create "content" for scummy players is scumsided. Explained in a prior post, happy to explain again.
Crossbus Gladiates are inherently bad for scum due to the White Flag rule. If one scum remains, they concede. Bussing is far more likely to create a single scum surviving scenario, and eventually scum need to leave associatives, which means bussing is bad, especially day 1.
Yeah, you’re arguing with the person who got burned by that play, that’s not really doing anything cos they’re already onboardIn post 74, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I refuse to be RC and force people to lynch in a list order. Actively refuse.In post 73, DVa wrote:Also I don't really agree that having a single strong town leader dramatically helps us here, it nearly cost us Witches Ball. Scum knowing who the one IC is makes it too easy for them to play around that slot. Consistently pushing PoE wins more often.
Why would they want to? If they aren’t Arthur they die, and their influence dies with them.In post 110, Auro wrote:There's also a problem that she could just hold the sword and not vig anyone, destroying the point of the mechanic - and we wouldn't want to lynch her because she'd be an IC.In post 107, Gamma Emerald wrote:This sounds reasonable, and no one that I’d want to promote this agenda for over LLD is around, so I’m in favor of this plan.
Not feeling thisIn post 117, Kokichi Oma wrote:LLD flipped scum again it's looking like
Exactly. Does it seem smarter to gamble on the 1/12 chance you are Arthur (as there are 12 that receive Knight Errant PMs) with the cost of losing your ability to lead from then on, or to hold fast and remain an influence to town’s benefit?In post 122, Auro wrote:They die only if they vig.In post 120, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why would they want to? If they aren’t Arthur they die, and their influence dies with them.
This looks like a scum thought.
Which means a player with "influence" on getting the sword can just refuse to vig, and thus hold on to it stubbornly.
How would an IC work anti-town? The scummy part is you trying to suggest a play that hurts Town most of the time.In post 124, Auro wrote:Also interesting. My fears that a player might work anti-town as an IC is scummy?In post 122, Auro wrote:They die only if they vig.In post 120, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why would they want to? If they aren’t Arthur they die, and their influence dies with them.
This looks like a scum thought.
Which means a player with "influence" on getting the sword can just refuse to vig, and thus hold on to it stubbornly.
How is using the sword optimal play?In post 292, Auro wrote:"Behave" anti-town, by refusing to follow optimal play from a pre-decided strategy.In post 291, Gamma Emerald wrote:How would an IC work anti-town?
This is outdated anyway, currently I agree with Varsoon, what's your take on Varsoon's philosophy vs DVa's?
If they’re actively acting in town’s benefit they should holster. If they’re inactive or they’re performing poorly using it might be wiser.In post 128, Auro wrote:In the abscence of strategy, the latter.In post 126, Gamma Emerald wrote:Exactly. Does it seem smarter to gamble on the 1/12 chance you are Arthur (as there are 12 that receive Knight Errant PMs) with the cost of losing your ability to lead from then on, or to hold fast and remain an influence to town’s benefit?
If there's a town strategy otherwise, former.
Merlin, if alive, could confirm the person holding it is Arthur. No Merlin approval means the person is definitely not Arthur -- following prior discussed strategy, what should they do then? Suicide to give it up, or hold on to it?
I would say yes, but in LLD’s case I trust her to be effective at leading and not fooled by bad reasoning.In post 131, Auro wrote:Relatively new to the site, is there any individual who has reads much better than random?In post 126, Gamma Emerald wrote:with the cost of losing your ability to lead from then on, or to hold fast and remain an influence to town’s benefit?
Nancy, his post has nothing to do with Merlin holding the sword.
I agree with thisIn post 135, Auro wrote:Making proper use of the Excalibur mechanic, to my eyes, is *heavily* reliant on town working together. Individual players pushing their own reads through, as opposed to forming consensus, would be anti-town. Am I wrong?
Okay that makes sense. I might continue trying to refine strategy but I think you’re fine rn. Also I think your response to pressure was pretty towny, unless you’re a player who can flatly argue what you perceive as mechanically correct town play as scum, which I think takes development or a ton of confidence.In post 311, Auro wrote:Yep! My point was that a stubborn player who believes their reads are totally right (When they might not be) and keeping the sword to themselves, is anti-town in general - If we follow a strategy based on passing around the sword, which would rely on town cohesion.In post 310, Gamma Emerald wrote:I agree with thisIn post 135, Auro wrote:Making proper use of the Excalibur mechanic, to my eyes, is *heavily* reliant on town working together. Individual players pushing their own reads through, as opposed to forming consensus, would be anti-town. Am I wrong?
Is this what you were arguing?
Vig works like an extra lynch mechanically, although the truth of that depends on how it is used. So I think it should be pro-town overall, the variance is just how much.In post 312, Auro wrote:My pressing starting question right now is:
How stronger does a Vig ability provide, in addition to Bulletproof?
Is it *strong enough* to benefit town's winning chances greatly enough to actually adopt a strategy where we want Arthur ends up with the sword?
Why wouldn’t you want him engaging with you if it was the former?In post 164, Auro wrote:Either you're tone-reading or there's some scummy content in what I've posted that you disagree with.In post 161, Dunnstral wrote:This guy feels scummy to me as well
Which is it? If it's the latter, go ahead and engage me.
I *guess* Nevermind my last post...?In post 170, Auro wrote:In my imagination, someone REFUSING to gladiate is anti-town, and someone gladiates them for that.In post 166, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Yes but how do we force any player to duel? Why can’t scum just refuse? What’s stopping them from doing this? If there is no mechanic to force duels, then I don’t know how we ever get lynches.
@Dunnstral, yeah if it's "both" you can go ahead and engage with me on the content itself.
If you're scumreading me because I'm talking heavily about mechanics, sure. Can't help that.
Tone I'd say is playstyle, I feel like *every* game there's someone scumreading me off tone alone -- So I'd call that weak, but whatever suits you.
How?In post 171, Dunnstral wrote:And stuff like this that you're pushing seems anti-townIn post 153, Auro wrote: 3. (If Merlin's alive) Merlin confirms if Arthur the next day, says nothing if not, thus confirming to town that yesterday's winner isn't Arthur
Pretty sure this step 3 should never happen
I think a better read for determining the effect of yolodueling is Transformers Mafia, as that had a real duel mechanic rather than something akin to itIn post 189, DVa wrote:Not unless they want to be lynchedIn post 181, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Oh okay then. So anyone - other than Merlin - should do this, if they’re convinced they’ve found scum. Got it.
Yolodueling is precisely what made town lose in BoR
This reaction is in line with how I react to being accused of “not scumhunting” when I’m town.In post 197, Auro wrote:What do you count as scumhunting then? I did make a cursory townread on Nancy, is that too 'random' for you too? I prefer to 'scumhunt' through engagement and questions, not outright-accusations.In post 191, SirCakez wrote:I'm through pg 6 and auro has the most posts in the game by far but zero scumhunting, I don't count random questions. c'mon bro where's it at
certain other players (COUGH nancy COUGH) are guilty here too but not as badly
i don't think this is necessarily scummy but it's also not really helpful and honestly I think this massive setup discussion is gonna severely murder the motivation of the other 2/3 of the game playerlist because it's a ton of reading that is really hard to read unless you can really follow (and I couldn't, maybe I'm just an idiot tho)
that was up there for the most useless 7 pages I've ever read, at least to me. setup fiends will love it. i'm sure FG is loving it lol
i don't think i've ever read the words arthur, merlin or gladiate more before
I'll shut up with my attempts to figure a good strategy if town would rather just ignore it or not read it. If what you're saying is true, sure.
You see absolutely 0 utility in mechanics discussion? What if I tell you that through the process, we could come up with a consensus strategy reliant on town cohesion, and follow through to maximize town chances?
Was supposed to be the grind but became more break
Not really rn, I’m curious about the formation of the anti-LLD movement, I think it’s probably scum motivated based on how it looks rn. This thought process is based on a theory crafted in what I feel is the spiritual predecessor to this. LLD, Fire, and MariaR should be familiar with this off the top of my head. Don’t expect Fire or Maria to back me up here though.In post 403, Auro wrote:Townread on Gamma Emerald -- I can feel he's being honest WRT his treatment of my slot, the progression from the initial scumread to his understanding my position felt genuine.
Gamma, any scumreads?
I liked what I saw in those 3 posts, mkay? And almost everyone seemed on board with her claiming the sword at that point.In post 414, Kokichi Oma wrote:She made like 3 posts. How can you feel confident? And how was she designated? She just said she'd wanna take the swordIn post 411, Gamma Emerald wrote:I felt confident in LLD’s alignment, plus with LLD being designated as the claimant I saw no reason to concern about her.
Yeah I flip around between them at a whimIn post 418, Elsa Jay wrote:Like the new icon btw, Gamma. Guess I'll never be able to keep one towards you. Honestly, it makes me think I should have a different one once in awhile too... As Elsa still, of course.
Could’ve picked She but It felt more in line with my avatar characterIn post 421, DVa wrote:Gamma when did you change your pronoun to "It"? Should I stop referring to you as "He"?
Like the new avi btw
Why S_S
Lol that’s not Chain*, that’s Box!In post 439, DVa wrote:Yeah but do I actually call you "It" or not?In post 436, Gamma Emerald wrote:Could’ve picked She but It felt more in line with my avatar character
I waffle around on whether I want to use my preferred pronoun or play the “match the flavor” game
Is your avi not Link?
You dingus, that’s a memorial to LLD’s precious titleIn post 451, Kokichi Oma wrote:Lady, I think you should change your location to currently in a Rage
Okay I need to read back, like,In post 463, Dunnstral wrote:In post 398, Untrod Tripod wrote:It's not confirmable.In post 396, Auro wrote:@Varsoon: He said confirmed *in* LyLo, not claiming in LyLo, there's a difference, right?
You don't think Merlin/Swordholder works better as a hidden IC till the day before LyLo, as opposed to coming out in D2 where he becomes an obvious NK?
An example from 3p LYLO.
Player 1: I'm Merlin and have the sword
Player 2: No, I'm Merlin and have the sword
Player 3: Oh no! This plan had an obvious hole in it! Who could have ever predicted it!
I don't love us trying to "solve" the game like it's a fucking math problem. What I've seen in other games when this happened was scum got to hide in mechanics talk all game instead of having to actually engage with other players.
oh and no thanks on hurt tags. I say you gladiate your scum reads. I joined this game because the mechanics were different. Let's keep it different.Hold on a second, are you saying you think that something else is the optimal way to win the game but you don't like it and would rather play to have fun, or did I misinterpret this?In post 399, Untrod Tripod wrote:this is a fun game because it gives over half the game the chance to be BP vig. Who doesn't want that power? I'm claiming the sword every time I can and I'm going to try to vig shit. If I die I die. I'm more interested in having a unique experience than I am in trying to game the setup to be something it wasn't designed to be.
Wacky theory:In post 204, Dunnstral wrote:If one person grabs the sword and never tries to shoot it, then arthur never gets ahold of it in the first place thoughIn post 194, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Unless, you’re suggesting that anyone who has the sword must also attrmpt to vig? But since this is not a desperado role, that only results in dead townies, so having Merlin confirm Arthur after he already has the sword makes sense, doesn’t it?
If they don't vig they're confirmed town, yes, which is useful in it's own right (in fact, if arthur never grabs the sword then we have, potentially, an additional confirmed town to narrow things down), BUT it also means we have less power to try to put the sword on other people
Did I say it was youIn post 494, Dunnstral wrote:In post 491, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay I need to read back, like, yesterday, but I have a good idea of who might be scum from reading this now.
ok gamma
Ah fuckIn post 205, Auro wrote:I mean after Arthur's outed, they can only just claim to be Merlin. Premise being that scum wouldn't fakeclaim/counterclaim Merlin.In post 203, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:How does Merlin get confirmed without confirming Arthur?In post 196, Dunnstral wrote:Because arthur ALREADY HAS THE SWORD and all merlin confirming doing is telling him to shoot it - something that they are likely to do within 1-2 nights anyway, and even if they don't shoot it it's /just/ a vig, I think I'd rather have an additional confirmed town hidden awayIn post 194, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:If Merlin knows that Arthur has claimed the sword, why shouldn’t they confirm it?
This is town holy shitIn post 211, Auro wrote:I declared a townread on Nancy and DVa.In post 207, SirCakez wrote:i'd consider scumhunting to be declaring reads, pushing people, analysis of player posts, etc
I don't mind the setup talk and ofc I agree we need a good strategy, but I feel it's going in circles (i was skimming at certain points so this could be wrong) and rather spammy.
I'm "pushing" people to answer me through asking them questions.
There aren't enough posts to make a strong AI analysis on, anyway.
Scumlean on you for your weak shade of me not 'scumhunting', which is untrue even by your definitions.
It's not going in circles, I think it's useful, that it's spam is your opinion - which is prolly biased since you don't like mechanic discussions anyway.
This...actually feels viable? Let’s break this down:In post 216, Varsoon wrote:Ya'll are hard over-thinking this shit, which, imo, is what scum wants.
It's really fuckin' simple.
Everyone tries to claim sword N1.
Whoever gets it enjoys being BP and can claim if they need to confirm as IC if dueled.
If Merlin survives to D2, Merlin claims to become IC and, if he knows Arthur has the sword, he says so and Arthur keeps their mouth shut or
if he knows Arthur doesn't have the sword then he claims who Arthur is and boom
Town has 2 ICs on D2 and a secret BP IC or
Town has 1 IC on D2 and a secret BP Vig IC
If Non-confirmed-Arthur town gets the sword, they never attempt to vig with it because they are just going to shoot themselves in the foot 12 out of 14 times.
And that's it.
There's no more optimal play around it.
If you try to publicly gate who goes for the sword, you don't account for
1. Townies that disregard this shit
2. Scum having control of killing claimants/not
Basically playing around it as a public cop only works once and even then it's iffy.
Our goal should be to shut the fuck up and stop tilting who may or may not be Merlin and just scumhunt
There's no more point to discussing the Sword mechanics.
In post 539, VeridianCleric wrote:The issue Gamma is if everybody claims the Fallen don't have to bother, and therefore they never instant-die because of that
the Request for holly Excalibur is done via PM, so we don't know whom of the noble circle has requested to extract it from the rock, only that it has been claimed, and even than not by whom.
Fucking read further instead of knee-jerkingIn post 541, DVa wrote:There's 0% chance scum claim the sword Gamma don't shake my read on youIn post 533, Gamma Emerald wrote:there’s a 1/4 chance we get a dead mafia n1.
That’s not my weird theory for fucks sakeIn post 546, DVa wrote:Yeah it's just weird seeing Gamma spew out a weird theory only to immediately dismiss it tbhIn post 543, Auro wrote:He said in his next sentence, "Of course this crumbles if Maf don't go for it, which is the probable case"
This is some spicy shit but I don’t think it’s scum yetIn post 586, Elsa Jay wrote:I'd personally challenge thee wielder if they are shitty enough. You don't get to keep the sword if you hurt the game.
That was stream-of-consciousness writing, it’s a thing.In post 625, DVa wrote:was that paragraph sarcasm?In post 621, Gamma Emerald wrote:That’s not my weird theory for fucks sake
Bro NCS is some good stuffIn post 650, DVa wrote:Here you go Fire chanSpoiler:
Don't know if you're into this genre yet tho so let me know
Possibly? I’m just saying while it’s a hot take it’s nothing to grab a pitchfork over.In post 654, Dunnstral wrote:Are you going to think she's scum at a later date, then?In post 637, Gamma Emerald wrote:This is some spicy shit but I don’t think it’s scum yetIn post 586, Elsa Jay wrote:I'd personally challenge thee wielder if they are shitty enough. You don't get to keep the sword if you hurt the game.
Elsa I don't even disagree with you, I'm just telling you it's not going to happen, or if it does happen it will be a miracle
In post 663, VeridianCleric wrote:I think Gamma is good candidate to look into, quick to jump on strategies such as Varsoon without providing ideas of their own.
Firebringer trying to get everybody to reveal who they thought Arthur was, as the Fallen would know 4 of those guesses were bogus that would give 13 decent guesses to work with, any guesses on themselves would be ignored.
Further, claims and bosting of high success rates is rediculas
Lady's opening post is calling somebody as a fallen knight, dishonoured and unworthy to the rightfull claim of Excalibur, Further Lady is openly willing to take Excalibur
Also calls at Auro for discussin mechanics (Meta-Auro does this lots)
Also gives claim that Nancy and UT are town, without explaination as to why, Auro and I cought the foul laggards doing this in game that just ended.
Lady actually gives many reasons why not to follow along with any plan that has been laid out!
Untrod Tripod also jumps out, wants the sword, willing to run anybody through with it nightly and doesn't care the risk.
Varsoon i believe is hasn't fallen from the nobility of the round table, his suggestive play is the same as the one we just completed.
Dva same pro noble feel based on previous game, same push and drive.
Personally at this point I would see Firebringer and Lady enter the ring as they seem to be going after each other anyhow.
with Gamma, Untrod and varsoon going for the sword since two have said they don't care what the rest of the council say they are going for the sword.
I forgot about Frozen AngelIn post 682, Firebringer wrote:Frozen Angel is pretty good at both tooIn post 681, DVa wrote:so Maria?In post 674, Dunnstral wrote:Oro should I be scouting the playerlist for 'good at both town and scum, that is both hard to read and very strong to have as a town leader.' myself?
Full seriousness, this is a very incorrect analysis of my play. How much of the game have you read Ver Idian Cleric?In post 701, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 663, VeridianCleric wrote:I think Gamma is good candidate to look into, quick to jump on strategies such as Varsoon without providing ideas of their own.
Firebringer trying to get everybody to reveal who they thought Arthur was, as the Fallen would know 4 of those guesses were bogus that would give 13 decent guesses to work with, any guesses on themselves would be ignored.
Further, claims and bosting of high success rates is rediculas
Lady's opening post is calling somebody as a fallen knight, dishonoured and unworthy to the rightfull claim of Excalibur, Further Lady is openly willing to take Excalibur
Also calls at Auro for discussin mechanics (Meta-Auro does this lots)
Also gives claim that Nancy and UT are town, without explaination as to why, Auro and I cought the foul laggards doing this in game that just ended.
Lady actually gives many reasons why not to follow along with any plan that has been laid out!
Untrod Tripod also jumps out, wants the sword, willing to run anybody through with it nightly and doesn't care the risk.
Varsoon i believe is hasn't fallen from the nobility of the round table, his suggestive play is the same as the one we just completed.
Dva same pro noble feel based on previous game, same push and drive.
Personally at this point I would see Firebringer and Lady enter the ring as they seem to be going after each other anyhow.
with Gamma, Untrod and varsoon going for the sword since two have said they don't care what the rest of the council say they are going for the sword.Do you really want me to go after any special swords? ♪
That’s not what I askedIn post 741, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:They can’t. Once claimed, can never be unclaimed, unless the claimant dies, I think.In post 496, Gamma Emerald wrote:Wacky theory:In post 204, Dunnstral wrote:If one person grabs the sword and never tries to shoot it, then arthur never gets ahold of it in the first place thoughIn post 194, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:Unless, you’re suggesting that anyone who has the sword must also attrmpt to vig? But since this is not a desperado role, that only results in dead townies, so having Merlin confirm Arthur after he already has the sword makes sense, doesn’t it?
If they don't vig they're confirmed town, yes, which is useful in it's own right (in fact, if arthur never grabs the sword then we have, potentially, an additional confirmed town to narrow things down), BUT it also means we have less power to try to put the sword on other people
Kills happen before claiming right? So wouldn’t an attempted claim the same night a non-Arthur Town shoots get the sword? That could be a way to expedite the sword changing hands.
@FakeGod What happens if someone tries to claim when the sword is already claimed?
That’s what I’m thinking, but I want to verify itIn post 828, Untrod Tripod wrote:unless the vig resolves at a different time than the mafia kill, the sword would be unclaimed at the claiming phase if the holder died that night.
Erm what?In post 904, DVa wrote:Except this is literally something I have never saidIn post 902, Auro wrote:Except for her own admission that she finds it a lot harder as scum to be non-serious.
Mild town points for mirror tellIn post 909, Something_Smart wrote:You are right; if anyone takes the sword with intent to be BP, it disrupts the "use sword as a cop" plan. I think the only person who expressed interest in doing so is LLD, and she seems like she'd probably agree not to do it if it interfered with the plan.
I think this plan can be improved by letting everyone pick whether they go for the sword; probably not everyone will want to be BP and confirmable, if they're either likely to be townread or unlikely to be killed.
I also think it might be improved by introducing some more uncertainty into Merlin/Arthur. Obviously we need to strike a balance between making sure town knows what to do if Merlin dies versus not letting scum figure out who Merlin is too easily. I'm considering if it might be better to hypoclaim two potential Arthurs. That I think would fit better with a plan of using the sword as a cop, but it's still a possibility.
So?In post 999, Firebringer wrote:i think UT has by far the most hurts.
So here’s the counter plan Auro mentionedIn post 236, DVa wrote:How is there more value in having a pointless stealth IC than there is in townclearing the next day's lynch or mislynch?
And you are ignoring the possibility that the *next consensus scumread is scum* in which case we get a GUILTY and the sword is unclaimed and then we get to use the test again.
Do you not get that?
You guys are not playing toward best case scenario.
Best case scenario:
We force top two scumreads to gladiate
The winner is forced to claim sword
But they're scum so they don't and it remains unclaimed
Then we lynch them and rinse, repeat the next day
Like you all are thinking only of sword giving us an IC but it's *way more valuable* as having the potential to give us guilties
Effectively it gives us the chance to have a public daycop and a lynch each day phase
So no, "everyone claims the sword" is a shit plan
We’ll get to the “we got two scum” thing when we get there, as I see that as impeccably rare.In post 239, Varsoon wrote:Shortens the lynch pool, nothing wrong with it.
But I'm of the mind that more ICs early is better than not having them.
Regardless, Merlin has to claim if survived to D2 due to Arthur info not flipping on Merlin's death; so long as both are in setup killing Merlin before claim wipes 2 ICs off the map.
@DVa: If we consensus catch two scum on D1 in this game then scum have already fucking lost.
So despite being alright with her plan you go apeshit at DVa for that?In post 254, Varsoon wrote:@Dunn: Except it fuckin' confirms them as ICs what don't you understand about how IC works
@Auro: Setup Spec doesn't help us do very much here and just informs the scum kill, imo. I think Cakez is more likely town for wanting the game to move away from it. We've got like 10 pages of shit that should be obvious.
@DVa: Or more realistically understanding that it's fucking hard to reign in 13 other jackasses and not hinging an entire plan around it.
Stop shading me with that ish.
HURT: DVa