Xenogears Mafia (Game Over)
Forum rules
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
I wouldn't say that it's differing conviction. I feel strongly that Mala is scum. I have a few other things that I don't want to reveal because ~reasons~. Other than that, I'm feeling isolated and confused. I've been under attack for the entire duration of this game, and I've been trying to defend myself adequately while still pushing to find scum. The nick/bnb flips and some other stuff has made me come to realize that I need to recalibrate. I'm hoping to skim through the entire game again, or various chunks of it, to hopefully glean a better understanding of the gamestate.In post 3892, Aj The Epic wrote:Bro, this makes little sense. Your differing conviction from beginning to end makes very little sense especially when I know you want to hard scum read mala. Why does it come off as if you have no strong opinion on scum?- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
No.In post 3915, Malakittens wrote:Also someone said TD is conf-town, how is that?
Also, my game with Ghost-scum:
Here
He's a lot more waffley and a lot less abrasive in how he interacts with everyone.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
How does it make me look awful and Mala look townie?In post 3935, Aj The Epic wrote:Actually, I was going to before reading through the full day, but her approach seemed greatly altered. I was going to sit on it a while. The exchange between her and bro was interesting in the fact that it made bro look awful and mala look townie when put in a vacuum. I've been re-reading her and sitting for today just to make sure I'm not going confirmation bias on her with Rach.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
What about it is bad or misrep? Make unsubstantiated claims more pls.In post 3939, Aj The Epic wrote:This was particularly bad attempt to paraphrase or misrep as it bears very little to the actual content to said quoted mala post.
Town are often on scum-driven wagons; they have to be for a lynch to go through. Town-me could easily have been on wagons with other scum and not on wagons with town. Like, this is just basic counting.In post 3939, Aj The Epic wrote:w does this make sense in the context of the point your making? It makes it look like mastin's wagon was scum driven with you on it, and FTL's was town driven, lacking you. This almost works for Trust fund better because the delivery looks like you're mashing issues together and trying to force an answer that does not exist to this equation.
How is this bad? I assigned relative probabilities. I didn't say how those probabilities lined up with other probabilities.In post 3939, Aj The Epic wrote:This is incredibly bad. Period. There is nothing here that looks good.
This is just an outright lie. I have not flipped on my BnB read. I had "BnB or nick is scum, mutually exclusive. I think it's nick, so I'll vote there. Okay, turns out I was wrong, I'll have to push BnB tomorrow. Scum killed her and proved that I'm wrong." That is not me lying about anything. That is me having a thought process that attempts to recalibrate for new information because, *gasp*, I'm town and don't actually know who the scum are.In post 3939, Aj The Epic wrote:BnB goes town to being pressured today to town if nick is scum. But, you have BnB being scum because nick town, saying you would 'have to back off' yet this didn't happen. So what you've done is lied twice in two different ways, one about your bnb read and two about how you were playing this day. You certainly didn't back off to re-access your reads today, just pushed forward. That's the mistake I'm worried of right now. Especially seeing what you've done not making any adjustments.
And I didn't back off of Venmar or Mala at the start because the Mala read was independent of the nick read, as was the Venmar read. You completely neglected to mention the part, however, where I FUCKING PUT EVERYONE IN THE NULL RANGE BECAUSE OF MY LEVEL OF UNCERTAINTY THERE. However, stuff that's happened today that MALA HAS REACTED EXTREMELY POORLY TO implies that I can sort things out a bit better once I get a good chunk of time to reread a ton of shit with a few key points in mind.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Dat misrep.In post 3951, Aj The Epic wrote:Oh bugger off. I don't have a bad attitude, either, I think you're using that word wrong. I've got issues with Bro here, and the fact that he hasn't even stopped to consider makes me worried that, like yesterday, he's trying to pull me into a lynch I had already championed to get an easy mislynch and have me share blame with him so he could push me forward first. BnB had to tell him to back off before he actually stopped early D2 (I hadn't even signed in for D2 and he was acting as if I was going to support him all the way through and buddying up to me. I don't like that).
I stated that things that you said on day 1 were in line with what I was thinking about the gamestate. So you don't like that I cited stuff you brought up, basically.
Okay, guess agreeing with other people's points ever is buddying- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Let's go through these one by one, shall we?In post 3951, Aj The Epic wrote:Alright bro, since you brought up the post I have issues with, let's talk about it.
1. You've bitched about it too. So has Desp, so has muffin. I've mentioned it. So if you want to use this, you're out of your mind.
2. She calls two people town on her wagon, and tou take that to "Fence sitting". She had a definite opinion there, so calling it fence sitting is a lie.
3. I won't argue this.
4. Aren't you trying to make a claim that mala is scum and failing logic 101 but for one point that I brought up on d1? I'd call that fairly unsubstantiated.
5. Do you have a good idea of what fence sit means? She called Ghostlin a scum lean. Jesus, fence this, fence that and you wonder why I'm saying this is bad. Your whole vocabulary for this post was 'fence sit'.
6. Like you're discrediting her. If you look into it, she townreads mac, but disagrees. Now, she could state what she does, but she gives a clear opinion on it.
7. "Fence sitting" Please use this word in a sentence not including The Eagles hit "Desperado". I disagree with your usage in all but one place.
Mala concedes here "I don't like that people scumread me for doing something, so I'm just not going to do anything." That is clearly a very towny reaction to have, instead of scum trying to lurk away pressure and not leave anything behind. Clearly. It's especially awkward because she says that SHE THINKS PEOPLE ON HER WAGON ARE TOWN. IF SHE THINKS THAT, WHY DOESN'T SHE TRY TO DO ANYTHING WITH THEM AT ALL.I tried to do something during Day 1. I was getting scum read for catching up and interacting with players and posting my thoughts and chasing after my highest scum read.
These same said people who were voting me for being scum D1 are still alive and voting for me D2.
Although some of the people on my wagon currently I feel are town. So there's a chance this may be a town driven wagon (AJ, Mastin)
You already agree with me here. Moving on.Nick did a crazy flip flop on me from Day 1 and it looks survivalist at this point. Which in both ways can be a town tell or a scum tell, but I might be leaning on a scum tell at this point with one scum dead.
What I'm bringing up is the fact that Mala uses the NK to try to throw shade on me, despite the fact that SoS is a huge threat to anybody as scum. I was a viable wagon at that point; a lot of people were (and still are) scumreading me, including powerful players back then (bnb, Nacho, etc). It's a lazy way to try to appear like she's thinking, but her logic doesn't hold because it's not a point about why I am scum overBRO is probably scum due to the NK.the fast majority of players that would want ffery and GiF out early. I also don't actually get what you're contesting me about here because your semantics are vague as fuck. If you'd clarify what "but for one point that I brought up on d1? I'd call that fairly unsubstantiated." is supposed to mean?
I use "fence-sit" here because her language is slightly hedged in the first half. She's saying that he's a slight scum read, but the level of uncertainty and weakness she applies to the read in the first half of the sentence is worrysome.Ghostlin is fuck tunneling so I'm not sure, but due to him misrepping me I'm leaning scum.
There's a difference between discrediting and trying to argue against. I've been arguing against people all game. I've gone through points and tried to articulate, in great detail, why I feel the way I do. That's engagement. What Mala does here is discredit; she says "Oh Mac is town but he's just being wrong" with the implication that ignoring him for a while is fine. That is not a town way to approach things because it lessens the flow of information and invalidates opinions without trying to better understand where those opinions come from.Mac is just a confused townie.
The problem I have is that she's not decisive in how she says she's unsure in her read. If she'd said "I'm unsure of FTL," that would have sufficed. Why did she include the additional qualifiers?I'm "eh" on FTL at this point. Something in Day 2 that was posted is making me think town. No I won't point it out. so I'm having mixed feels right now.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
...why does it leave a bad taste in your mouth that I think that it's fucking dumb not to consider how your reads work together. Seriously, scum don't fucking exist in a vacuum. Why are you adverse to using that fact to scumhunt?In post 3959, Desperado wrote:I hate this argument. Scum reads are not required to work together. That you're using it to defend yourself leaves a really bad taste in my mouth.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
...Those emotions aren't fake.In post 3951, Aj The Epic wrote:He worries me, his attitude personally pisses me off to no end, and it's almost unbearable to read how emotionally caught up he tries to appear to be. The same could be said for a lot of players, so attitude wise I prefer to think I've taken the right approach in not using so much AtE you could serve it by the pound at a steak shop.
If you flip scum I'm actually fucking blacklisting you for trying to use my emotions to make a case against me. That's how offensive this is to me. If you're just town and being wrong, then you're just a fucking idiot, but not a huge dick.
And it's fucking sad that, despite the fact that you claim I've served "so much AtE you could serve it by the pound at a steak shop," I still have gone into far more detail about my thought processes than the vast majority of this game.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Maybe you should fucking play the goddamn game holy shit.In post 3964, notscience wrote:Mala should stop ATEing ;-;- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Oh yes, claiming a PR gives off a PR vibe, methinksIn post 3982, Faster Than Light wrote:Mac -> leaning town gives off the PR vibe- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Re the first paragraph:In post 4000, Desperado wrote:Because you are making a conditional statement (If Mala is scum, I am not) and then applying the statement in a way to make you appear to be town without satisfying the condition first. It's really underhanded.
And scum don't exist in a vacuum, but what constitutes scum-scum interaction and how associative tells actually work are just about the most subjective aspect of mafia in my opinion, and the argument that because you've been FOSing Mala since day one, you couldn't possibly be scum together, does not align with my perspective. Do you honestly believe that a Mala scum flip would clear you as town?
This is not a defense. This is me trying to gauge where other people stand (also, this wasn't addressed to you and you felt compelled to respond to it. Why?). That you paint this as me defending myself when, at best, it's an incredibly indirect defense, compared to the insane amount of actual defense I have done over the past two days is extremely scummy.In post 3936, BROseidon wrote:Also, muffin and mastin, you are scumreading both me and Mala. You would have to conclude that I've been hard-bussing the slot all game. Is this correct, and would you still push for me tomorrow if Mala flips scum?
Second, this entire game is subjective. I'm not saying, "OMG I SCUMREAD MALA EARLY THEREFORE CAN'T BE SCUM TOGETHER." What I'maskingis "does this look like S/S interaction to you."
A Mala scumflip only clears me as town if enough people think that it wasn't a S/S interaction. I'm not going to argue more than that.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Priorities:
1) Find scum
2) Don't get mislynched
I'm 2-2 in games where I've been mislynched/vigged. I'm 5-0 in games where I've been NK'd or survived. Clearly not getting mislynched is a good thing to do as town.
Ugh this reminds me that I need to update my wiki page with my 2 recently completed games >.>- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
This is mod-confirmed one-faction scum.In post 4063, Malakittens wrote:For all we know it could be an SK pretending to be a x-shot vig?- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Except I ISO'd Mutt to see if he left any indication of who he'd have targeted next. I found nothing. He spent all of day two with "I SHOT MY WHOLE LOAD ON SAKI LAWL."In post 4077, mastin2 wrote:Well, there's a minor logical jump involved. If wayne's slot was blocked, then they were blocked for a reason. If they were blocked for a reason, then it's typically because they had a reason to be blocked. One reason to block a claimed 1-shot vig who's taken a shot is that you fear scum will be hit and the vig was lying about being 1-shot.
So why would scum be afraid of him hitting again if 1) He'd claimed 1-shot and 2) There was no indication of who he'd target next if he were lying, and would thus be more likely to hit town than scum.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 4118, Desperado wrote:The tone of the bolded sentence is clearly meant to imply a defense
Feel free to read into stuff that isn't there more.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Apparently we have very different definitions of effort.In post 4119, Malakittens wrote:I'm giving effort, but this time it's not walls. Styles change, people change.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
I'm seeing what you're seeingIn post 4126, waynegg wrote:
So, youIn post 4120, Malakittens wrote:Why is AJ town?
I'm going with Thezmon's read on him which I think them playing offsite he would know how to read him better than the rest of it. Along with the fact AJ's been chasing down me along with others. I do think he's solidly townarescum...
Also, this feels parallel to how I sheeped Nacho's read of Rach in Xenoblade because "he knew how to read her better."- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Cabd, can you stop doing 1/2 assed reaction tests and actually play the game. I know you're a better player than this.In post 4149, Trust Fund wrote:Hey dopog, venmar claimed miller before he left. Confirm that it's true plz kthnx.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
No JK on SoSIn post 4164, Malakittens wrote:I'm Elhaym Van Houten, Battle Mage of the Nisan Alliance. I'm a Town JK.
Night 1 I JK'd AJ.
Night 2 I JK'd Mac
No JK on BnB
No JK on mastin
No JK on Muffin
This claim reeks.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In all fairness, scum have plenty of time to shoot NS.In post 4166, zMuffinMan wrote:(coz, you know, if i were a town JK, i'd be on the CLAIMED INNOCENT CHILD 24/7 if i wasn't trying to roleblock my scum reads, and mac and AJ don't match up with your supposed scum reads)
I wouldn't have jailed him were I a town JK. I'd have jailed SoS/BnB. You know, players who were solidly town and having impact.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Why are you answering for her and giving a different response from her?In post 4188, Andrius wrote:She chose to use it offensively instead of defensively.
So she chose to RB instead of Doc.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
I don't know how to gauge whether the lie is in the "why," the "Aj is town," or both.In post 4194, waynegg wrote:On AJ too?
pedit: You thought Aj would get killed over a hydra of two players who were both individually more active than Aj? Wat.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Okay, let me ask this in the clearest way possible:In post 4209, Malakittens wrote:I got 5 mins before work. Bro basically you are disagreein with AJ. This same arguement applies to anyone more active than AJ. I didn't think Fery was going to die N1.
Why did you think Aj would die over SoS, BnB, or any other similar player with a much higher profile than Aj?- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
This is, like 2/10 on detail.In post 4170, Malakittens wrote:I chose AJ because I really, really thought he was going to be NK'd. Why he was hunting and I really didn't see scum intent towards the end. Plus he pushed Rach hard.
I'm looking for a 9/10 or 10/10, which you have not given.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Technically, I robbed you of your kill last game...
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Why is it bothering me that I agree with this list sans me...
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Bad idea is bad. We should hold off a few more days before we claim.In post 4309, Mac wrote:part of me really wants us to have a mass claim today- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
But there aren't reasonsIn post 4369, Nachomamma8 wrote:There's also not an actual reason to lynch me.notto lynch you either, which given your normal MO is disconcerting for obvious reasons.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Oh yes, being one of the main suspects in days two and three and interacting with everyone in a bunch of ways during that time is clearly me "slipping by."In post 4377, Faster Than Light wrote:I feel like they've kinda slipped by until today despite doing some questionable things.
Clearly.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Except for the fact that scum have flipped 1 strong PR and 1 PR that may have been strong as well.
There could only be 2 masons. I haven't bothered looking for crumbs and don't really care to at this point.
IC is only somewhat powerful, and very hard to play optimally.
Both claimed investigative PRs are heavily gated (cop gets vanillaized if he doesn't catch scum, vanilla cop is weak already and then further gated by being non-consecutive).- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
You mean that awkward as reaction test Cabd pulled on me that literally did nothing?In post 4402, Andrius wrote:I don't like the bro tie to tf
Yeah, real "tie" there...- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Not opposed, but not sure it's optimal compared to Desp or Nacho.In post 4403, waynegg wrote:I think AJ is the correct vote today. Any opposed?- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Are you going to actually do anything, or just hope town implodes on itself so you can walk to an easy win?In post 4416, Nachomamma8 wrote:desperado/aj/bro, then.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
But the fact is that it could have come from scum, and the QT could have coached Anti through it. It'd be dumb to give the slot a free pass.In post 4423, zMuffinMan wrote:you're actually a moron if you think this is more likely to come from scum than town.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Why are Nacho and Desp not in this list?
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
I was asking about why my main scumreads weren't in there. You called it your list of suspicion, not the "not conftown group."In post 4439, waynegg wrote:But not Andy? Hmm. Nacho because I've never felt he was scum. My last list just consisted of the lynch pool of those people weren't saying was confirmed. Desp because I forgot. Think that's a slip right there BRO.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
There have been no tangible results to your reaction test. It didn't help shake any suspicion of me, nor did it make me more comfortable of your alignment in any way.In post 4451, Trust Fund wrote:First this:
And now the story changes to this?In post 2627, BROseidon wrote:
Can we link Varsoon to this game after it's done to demonstrate how to properly execute a reaction test?In post 2623, Trust Fund wrote:Also, I lied. So there's that~In post 4433, BROseidon wrote:
You mean that awkward as reaction test Cabd pulled on me that literally did nothing?In post 4402, Andrius wrote:I don't like the bro tie to tf
Yeah, real "tie" there...- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
In post 4492, Nachomamma8 wrote:DESPERADO/BRO, FULLCLAIM KIDS
Why the fuck would I ever claim before L-1 ever?- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
If I'm a super-strong PR that's a threat to scum, they'll know that I'm potentially a threat that needs to get shot. If I'm a weak PR/Vanilla/negative utility, scum know not to shoot me and push a lynch on me.In post 4519, Nachomamma8 wrote:You're a strong possibility for scum, several power roles have outted and will be shot over you because they are NOT scumspects, and one of you three clearing yourselves would tell me that something's gone and I could start reanalyzing now as opposed to later.
If you're so sure that the scumteam is all PRs, wouldn't it make sense to just have FTL investigate me?- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
VT result would exonerate me, PR claim would increase likelihood of me being scum if you act under the assumption of an all-PR scumteam, no?In post 4545, Nachomamma8 wrote:
what does this even mean...?In post 4544, BROseidon wrote:If you're so sure that the scumteam is all PRs, wouldn't it make sense to just have FTL investigate me?- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
How does the information from a vanilla result change if I claim vanilla beforehand?In post 4558, Nachomamma8 wrote:Yeah. Except if you claim vanilla townie beforehand, it's a cop investigation.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
Scum having all PRs with a Vanilla cop in play would be, like, shit-tier design, especially given how limited the town-power we have claimed at this point is.
Every town PR claim has been either not particularly implicitly super-powerful (IC), gated in some way (Anti's cop that goes away after 2 innocents, Wayne's 2-shot), or both (FTL's non-consecutive modifier, Mac's neighborizer, Mastin's whole role).
We also have 4 VT flips, and there are probably more VTs in play. No way scum is 5 PRs vs. that. That seems highly implausible.- BROseidon
-
BROseidon Expert Marxman
- BROseidon
- Expert Marxman
- Expert Marxman
- Posts: 8242
- Joined: April 18, 2013
A vanilla claim would further steer scum away from me.In post 4580, Nachomamma8 wrote:Why won't you claim PR/Not-PR? That takes away your previous concern, doesn't it?
The claiming this game has been aggressive as and I'm generally not a fan. I don't see why we've been giving scum so much information for free. - BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon
- BROseidon