Mini Normal 2159 | Cinder Block Mafia | Game Over!
Forum rules
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
So, this was the 14th post after mine soVOTE: not mafiaIn post 28, Not_Mafia wrote:
Be the change you want to see in the worldIn post 26, ItalianoVD wrote:
Do it someone. Sheep him.In post 20, Not_Mafia wrote:SUPCLODPOLES,I'MTHEJESTERANDI'MHERETOTROLLTHEFECALMATTEROUTOFTHISGAME!
VOTE: Not_Mafia
Someone asked about expereince/strengths. I've been playing a long time, but I am not very good. I am bad at finding scum, but I also end up not voting for townies much either. And I hate day 1s.
Think I've only played with not mafia before though- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
I only did that to generate a random number for my first vote. Its the way I do itIn post 32, SJReaver wrote:I don't even remember signing-up for this game. Sorry if you think my post is bad, but given people are still posting things like 'this is the fourteenth post,' there isn't exactly a high bar to reach.
Thank you for the info though, Walter.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
Nope. By the end of day 1 no one will have caught scum. Never happened before, it isnt going to change here
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
We lynched a townie day 1In post 101, Not_Mafia wrote:
We just played together in a game where I caught scum day 1In post 96, geraintm wrote:Nope. By the end of day 1 no one will have caught scum. Never happened before, it isnt going to change here
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
I am so very confused.In post 140, RCEnigma wrote:Geraintm is an honest guy, I like that. But I'm scumreading him for not getting the 42nd post.
Reaver I am finding unhelpful- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
I am 100% sure I can go through every single game on this site and find someone on day 1 claiming they have caught scum that by the end of the game will be true. but they don't get lynched....
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
so, Not MAfia had posted 5 times when the vote was counted?In post 159, RCEnigma wrote:Number by names is post count as of the vote count.
that seems...odd info to count- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
I don't get why it is odd?In post 162, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:That post by frog seems really weird considering the fact that it was his second post all game. Something to keep an eye on.
N_m do you have any thoughts on the playerbase other than you are proud of the fact you caught scum D1.
I don't get the vote. froma read where you say it is either A or B, you pretty hard veer into BIn post 165, Raya36 wrote:The interaction between Reaver and Walter at 31 felt weird or awkward maybe. Almost felt like maybe Walter was going for a push but then backed off when Reaver responded. I got the same feeling from 67.
callforjudgement's huge post 50 was a lot. I don't townread it but don't necessarily scum read it either. I just think it's something scum could do to try to take the credit of getting us out of rvs which is what seemed to be happening (55). After reading more it feels like he's either town tryharding or scum trying way too hard to be 'obvtown'. Time will tell.
I kinda like Banana for town. Just as an early gut read.
VOTE: callforjudgement
and that is a really obvious sucking up to Banana
but then this from Walter, sucking up to Raya sucking up to Banana....well lets just say I have noticed thisIn post 168, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:hmm
I see where you come from on that.
I think he is a town lean for me because of his more recent posts like 142 and 147.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
I find day 1s fairly useless, way too much noise and people being too clever. no one has got any info to go on and day one is just random....excepting scum never get lynched.In post 195, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Wdym by “no one will have caught scum”In post 96, geraintm wrote:Nope. By the end of day 1 no one will have caught scum. Never happened before, it isnt going to change here
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
@ call for judgement - lets agree that I see Day 1s differently to most and leave it there, otherwise we are going to spend a long time getting nowhere with each other and it will be a distraction.
@ Raya - I find it odd that you don't like me saying I thinking you are trying to generate karma with someone by saying you read them town for no good reason, but then agree when I say the same about someone doing it to you...
like....they are the same. you don't get to just say "i'm special" and brush it off- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
everyone is probably town, it isn't a very wild take at all...In post 256, RCEnigma wrote:Frog is probably town. That's a wild wild take.
I have sat here and pointed out a few things that I have noted as potentially as interesting. that is as much as you'll get from me and a vote isn't going to make it any differentIn post 263, SJReaver wrote:Not_Mafia is not a sheep but a cow. I find sheeping accusations underwhelming. If every townie does their own thing, we don't tend to get very far.
VOTE: geraintm
You spend more time talking about how you dislike day one than you do scumhunting. You may have a pulse but it's a weak one.
what's happening? what's happening?In post 290, Frogsterking wrote:
VOTE: Nosferatu VOTE: NosferatuIn post 289, Nosferatu wrote:am i getting punk'd lmao?
u accused me of active lurking on like my 2nd or 3rd post lmao?
did prodging become AI while i was away im starting to get lost in the sauce rn- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
?In post 323, RCEnigma wrote:But I only know one person that has voted scum for sure.
I see not mafia is being their normal day 1 self too- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
which bit didn't you like?In post 327, callforjudgement wrote:those actions.
I think Frogster's initial case on Nosferatu is weak (but seems to be sincere), but Nosferatu's reaction to it has been pretty telling in its own right.
this I amfine with for example.In post 306, Nosferatu wrote:i dont like unvoting; i dont see a pressing reason to switch off, etc
note that you are buddying up with frogster and using their logic/wagon to justify your own vote- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
I can't work out if this is genuine frustration or an pro town fake or a scum fake.In post 334, Nosferatu wrote:
im so over this bullshit read my town pm and weepcallforjudgement wrote:
I do it to make it possible to distinguish between players who play in an anti-town way out of ignorance and players who play in an anti-town way out of choice. It isn't intended to read me, so much as to read other players.In post 308, SJReaver wrote:callforjudgement continues their focus on optimal play. I suspect their desire to lecture people over how they ought to play is a NAI personality trait.
On that note, VOTE: Nosferatu. I was hoping to sort Nosferatu by seeing where their vote moved after I pointed out that it wasn't doing anything useful, but Nosferatu seems happy to be intentionally hard to read and to make it hard for it to scumhunt other players, even after I explained the consequences of those actions.
I think Frogster's initial case on Nosferatu is weak (but seems to be sincere), but Nosferatu's reaction to it has been pretty telling in its own right.
VOTE: nosferatu
if ur on this wagon you suck at this game
like, if any game you are in is causing you this must anger then just leave, it isn't good for your mental health.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
oh, i'm this guy. I constantly have to check every claim made in a game because I don't know what it is. sometimes I don't ask because I feel stupid. like.....scum has multitasking. I take it that means they can do more than one thing each night, but I just assumed they could do that already so why is mod spelling it out?In post 341, Gamma Emerald wrote: I find it very unfair to expect everyone who plays Normals to be 100% up to speed on what is and isn’t allowed in them. I had a game where I thought I knew my stuff but I made a fatal error that lost the game for town. No one’s perfect.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
hmmm, I just came out of a game where scum had to claim on day 1 to get out of pressure and give themselves a few more days before their lynch. this feels...similar?In post 344, Nosferatu wrote: that is what im saying, im not hinting at a pr tho i think its optimal play as town unless you have a negative utility role which i don't
well, im glad you like it. I am not deliberately stalling so much as I know day 1 I will find it very, very hard to get any strong reads on anyone.In post 353, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:
I kinda like this statement by gerain because it does not show a willingness to appease and shows he wants to put some thought into it.Though he could just be stalling but IdkIn post 318, geraintm wrote:you might want more....but I am notgoing to fake a bunch of reads just to please you.
hey you said that our last game and you were town then too! you really do make this game easy
?In post 361, Nosferatu wrote: no neutral means 3p
I still don't get this. raya has voted for not mafia, callforjudgement and walter. are you saying you are 100% sure scum is within those 3? as you follow with a vote for callforjudgement, I assume this is what you meant.In post 364, RCEnigma wrote:
It's Raya, literally the only person to vote scum for sure this game.In post 326, geraintm wrote:
?In post 323, RCEnigma wrote:But I only know one person that has voted scum for sure.
I see not mafia is being their normal day 1 self too
VOTE: CFJ
my god you are making it easy for a wagon to form on youIn post 368, Nosferatu wrote:you know what i dont think someone with an avatar such as urself would engage in this kind of pro-town behavior
VOTE: cfg
@ reaver - your vote for CFJ …. I don't like it. you seem happy to jump on wagons
@ italiano - I can understand your reads. by far the most memorable thing in this game to me is nosferatu and when reading through a night's worth of posts they are the one that keeps sticking out. i confess that i can't see scum doing it though, raising their head above the parapet so early in the game when they could have kep a lower profile. but i don't know why town would do it either??
note that Sordos is MIA, they need to a) return b) post better when they do
other thoughts on low posting players
:
Frog - their post history seems entirely aimed at nosferatu, no one else.
not mafia - yep they are going to do nothing day 1 again. like, i have previous at saying i dislike day 1s, but i have reasons. i wish they were just more involved- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
I assume so, I see no reason for them to lie. I'm just waiting for mod to turn upIn post 416, ItalianoVD wrote:In post 398, geraintm wrote:@RCenigma - you have call for judgement as scum, but you have just killed Gamma??
Sorry, no clue what this means. What is dayvig? Gamma is killed?In post 399, RCEnigma wrote:Cfj is the easier to elim, so yes.
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
I assumed it was real because I checked the wiki
Normal Guidelines
Vigilantes are considered Normal on mafiascum.net if their kill flavour is indistinguishable from other factions'. As of 9 November 2015, they must also be town aligned.
And i read that and went "oh..." but every game I play there seems to be a new role I've never played with before.
I wish people wouldn't liefake claims just confuwe me. I'm a simple man and just want things kept all easy
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
What thing?In post 460, Gamma Emerald wrote:ItalianoVD
callforjudgement
Gamma Emerald
BananaCucho
SJReaver
Not_Mafia
geraintm
Raya36
Frogsterking
Nosferatu
RCEnigma
sordros
WaltertheDunce10
also
VOTE: geraintm
it's not strong but the thing I called out earlier is the first thing in a while that's actively pinged me
Just a quick post before I'm done for the night, but like a bit more from you please- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
In post 450, Raya36 wrote:
I thought dayvig was a thing in normals :/In post 446, Gamma Emerald wrote:okay does no one know how the role rules work rn
Oh, is this what you meant?In post 439, Gamma Emerald wrote:what's up Nosf?
Also that last post by geraint is kinda sketchy
tbh I kinda thought they were a newb but I was thinking about how that would impact this thought, checked, and they have been active in normal games recently, so the idea of the lost townie who might be just taking things at face value doesn't really apply
Do not underestimate my inabiity to understand what is going on in a game. I quoted in a different post why I thought it was genuine- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
Cryptic post is cryptic...In post 490, ItalianoVD wrote:
For reasons I can’t reveal based on the rules, I’m taking Frogsterking out of my scumreads.In post 471, Frogsterking wrote:Charmander just shot up to FoS #2 for his terrible defense of Nosferatu. Arguably it makes him even scummier than Nosferatu.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
You know way more about the game than I do then...In post 487, Frogsterking wrote:At the moment I'm feeling like this is a four-scum setup.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
In post 490, ItalianoVD wrote:
For reasons I can’t reveal based on the rules, I’m taking Frogsterking out of my scumreads.In post 471, Frogsterking wrote:Charmander just shot up to FoS #2 for his terrible defense of Nosferatu. Arguably it makes him even scummier than Nosferatu.In post 487, Frogsterking wrote:At the moment I'm feeling like this is a four-scum setup.
I have so few reads on anyone day 1, my posts will just be on those who stand out. It isn’t intentional. I do usually try at some point to go through everyone, but I have today off and then it is a bank holiday weekend so my mafia time is less than normal.In post 480, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I am on now, kinda swamped with work today/tomorrow.
the frustration could be genuine like banana but I disagree that it would be towny neccesarily.
But the frustration still seems to be evident and still there, which to me seems slightly townier.
I looked through Gerain's posts and I find it telling that his post on his reads seem to target only a few people.
I don't like the response in 392 where he says he does not have strong reads D1.
I disagree with banana on 452, call it out like it is or make it more subtle, plus it did garner a reaction before it was debunked.
I would like to hear 471 by frog be expanded upon.
Frog seems to have this obssesion with nos now.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
I think you underestimate how puzzled I can be by other players. I had had a conversation with them about how they knew someone had voted for scum, worked out they meant one exact vote on one exact player, and then they just went and vigged someone else. I wanted to know why. They explained and from then I was waiting for the mod to come along and flip the kill and then I would either shout at them for a terrible shot or congratulate them on their amazing aim (as I firmly believe if they had shot scum it was blind luck).In post 477, callforjudgement wrote:
Vigilante and Day Vigilante are normally considered different roles (you can also see a dayvig as Vigilante plus the Day modifier, but Day is abNormal).In post 467, geraintm wrote:I assumed it was real because I checked the wiki
Normal Guidelines
Vigilantes are considered Normal on mafiascum.net if their kill flavour is indistinguishable from other factions'. As of 9 November 2015, they must also be town aligned.
And i read that and went "oh..." but every game I play there seems to be a new role I've never played with before.
I wish people wouldn't liefake claims just confuwe me. I'm a simple man and just want things kept all easy
Anyway, what's bothering me about this is: if you assumed that a dayvig is legal in Normals on the basis that it's a type of Vigilante, and that the dayvig shot were real, but were aware that Vigilantes were always town, surely you should have assumed that RCEnigma was confirmed town as a result?
There doesn't seem to be much reason to ask about the motivation of a "confirmed townie", unless you want their help sorting a slot (and in the hypothetical world where Gamma is "about to flip", there is absolutely no reason to try to scumhunt the slot, you just wait for the mod to get online). So in retrospect, this post looks more like you were trying to figure out how a townie would react to the dayvig, than actually reacting to the dayvig.In post 398, geraintm wrote:@RCenigma - you have call for judgement as scum, but you have just killed Gamma??
That is my honest explanation of what was going through my head at the time _ someone in very QuickTime trying to work out what exactly what going on, checking the wiki and all. I am not sure what you mean by scumhunting the slot (the person shot?) or trying to concoct a reaction to a day vig.
Have I explained myself well enough.
Your next post though confuses me, where you attack Walter for only interacting with me. You think you have found two scum in me and Walter?- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
Quicknpop in, but i assume 3 always unless something really, really squiffy happens. Like killing 3 scum and the game nit being overIn post 530, Nosferatu wrote:also 4 scum is kind of insane for 13 players?- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
What do you mean, voting block? Is that when a bunch of people declare themselves as town and start throwing their votes around?In post 533, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:
I was noting the mixed reactions by people.In post 523, RCEnigma wrote:
What does this even mean?In post 511, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Weird though we get a scum then a fan post and before that Nm with a vote on a person who just replaced in
The main thing that stuck out to me was italiano's meme and scum post.
It is really weird to have a take based on last slot so quickly in my opinion.
The one thing that has me worried though is the lack of a voting block.
You'd think there would be a second wagon, instead it is cfj and everyone else.
Kinda has me suspicious but if this keeps up this reminds of something, but site rules.
The 4 scum being explained is good.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
I wish people would stop being so cryptic. If you have an opinion then say, don't save them for later when they can be tailored to the game state. That is just potentially scummy...In post 528, Frogsterking wrote:By the way guys at this point in time I have three serious scum reads and I'll disclose them another time. I also have one other very weak town read I'll ISO now.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
how is that different to what I just described?In post 539, Gamma Emerald wrote:I think it's specifically referring to when a set of players votes together and moves their votes together- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
oh I am.strobgly anti claim. You can go back through my old games and see that. I am aboutb90% sure that even a town role shouldn't claim except in direct circumstances, because it just doesn't lead to a good outcome. If late enough in the day you get a panicked lynch, just so many reason to not claim.In post 506, callforjudgement wrote:
I guess it's natural to want to know why someone does something weird. But information that doesn't help in figuring out anyone's alignment isIn post 497, geraintm wrote:I think you underestimate how puzzled I can be by other players. I had had a conversation with them about how they knew someone had voted for scum, worked out they meant one exact vote on one exact player, and then they just went and vigged someone else. I wanted to know why.dangerousto know as town, especially if publicly posted in the thread – the scum will learn it too, and they can make better use of it than a townie can. This is why, for example, it's hugely anti-town to push someone to claim (except if you have a guilty on them, or during a generally agreed-upon massclaim). So as town, you have to train yourself into not asking questions when you can't make use of the answers for scumhunting/townhunting purposes.
They're reads that work independently (although obviously, they fit together with each other quite neatly). On day 1, reading players based on their interactions necessarily has to take a lot of possibilities into account; without flips, there's rarely enough information to be able to make use of associative tells. (It's still worth recording them, though, so that when people look back over the thread after a few players have flipped they have the information to understand what they mean.)In post 497, geraintm wrote:Your next post though confuses me, where you attack Walter for only interacting with me. You think you have found two scum in me and Walter?- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
But it can be enough to vote for them, especially in a tiebreak situation. I hate people being actively anti town. Lying about your role. Fakkng a guilty verdict on someone!In post 522, Gamma Emerald wrote:
scummy (or to better express what self-voting actually is, anti-town) doesn't mean scumIn post 521, Tayl0r Swift wrote:whoops did not mean to hit submit there. sometimes im a bit premature.
407 (nos) uh calling you scum is scummy? by self voting as town arent you necessarily playing against wincon?
413 (gamma) in what world is a self-vote not scummy?
436 (banana) hmm odd timing depending on flips this could be an attempt at a counterwagon?
VOTE: cfj- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
I like the potted history of geraintm day 1.
It does miss the reasoning for it all though.
Indidnt realise that my way of placing a random vote wasn't 100% kosher. But I think it is a fun way to place a eandom vote so I'm going to carry on.
But you missed why I don't move my day 1 votes much. It just takes a lot for me to place a vote, i rarely see actions on day1 that makes me think scum (have to be things like someone self votjng).
I've said in past games I think town would be better off not lynching day 1, as scum never die day 1.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
Why?In post 563, Not_Mafia wrote:My Taylor vote was a joke but now it’s serious
I dislike you jusybdo this.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
you've made 12 posts this vame.In post 567, Not_Mafia wrote:When I do what?
You vite Taylor swift with no explanation. And then say you have an explanation in your next post...but don't give it. I've been in another game with you and I find you on day 1 just...hard.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
You have no explanation, but the vote is serious?In post 563, Not_Mafia wrote:My Taylor vote was a joke but now it’s serious
This is why you are so infuriating- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
In post 592, ItalianoVD wrote:
What does it mean?In post 590, Gamma Emerald wrote:Do you not have the ability to read one post up?
In post 573, Nosferatu wrote:this games getting kinda boring can someone fake a guilty?- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
Vague, no meaning, meant to inspire confidence in your vague scum whispering abilities?In post 605, Not_Mafia wrote:You can take my last 2 votes as some indication of my thoughts- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
I saw your join date and then had to go check how many games you have actually played, but this isn't like your first or second game...In post 626, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I guess maybe. I think i see it now.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
huh?
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
this feels bollocksIn post 653, shellyc wrote:
The unvote didn't alert me. The uptight entrance of "reading" did. The tone to me was almost like reading the thread was a burden to them.In post 652, geraintm wrote:huh?
nope, going to call you out too. nothing about looker's post was oddIn post 659, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Strange entrance by looker but that is one post.
I love reading.
655, is just really weird in that it sorta shows like cfj said a lack of reading/ disengagement.
frog's post 662 - I don't get this. feels a load of hot air, no real substance
Nosferatu - your posts stink.
you tag raya as scummy - twive, and don't go anywhere with that thought.
random vote on the banana slot
random vote on shelly
how bored are you? are you just randomly interacting with this game? I see no content from you at all. be better
at italiano - I don't get why you single out Not mafia as being ok>
has ayone played with call for judgement before? are their very earnest posts typical? do they normally post like this as town/hide when scum?
don't like posts like this. caling out a third of the game and saying there is likely to be a scum in there...well duh. it feels like a post they can circle back later to to say "look, I always thought they were scum"In post 679, Tayl0r Swift wrote: oof yeah i really wanna lynch in cfj, shelly, enigma, or walter. like really really. they cant all be scum but this is some serious opportunism, id be surprised if there arent at least 2 scum in there maybe even all three if walter is scum.
nope you don't get to do this. you don't get to say "we aren't allowed to talk about my very cryptic post". why are so many people in this game being like this??In post 690, Tayl0r Swift wrote:i still feel like cfj will be easy to evaluate after some flips, but is a bit messy today. i am suspicious, but dont want to lynch there today. that said, VOTE: shelly
i dont think its in town's best interest to discuss my vote movement at this time, but im happy to discuss the merits of a vote on shelly or the merits of a vote on walter. im guessing raya will understand what i mean based on past mind-melding at the very least.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
Yep, I know i have double standards and should post better content, but that isn't going to stop me going ? When I see people make posts with little or jo logic behind them.
My problem will be paralysis, I find it very hard to get a strong enough read on someone to vote for them being scum. But when I do I will say exactly why. None of this "I'm voting x but you can't ask me why" reasons some people are giving- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
@ nosferatu - thanks for providing some explanation of your votes. will be useful later
@ call for judgement - this feels like a well meaning post. can you see yourself not voting for Italiano today>
i'll note here that most wagons are mostly town. just the way it worksIn post 714, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:I do tend to be a person who is miselimed cfj. I call bullshit on this statement, I think that all 3 wagons you, Italiano and I are somewhat town.
I should point out that 650 was not enough of a scum read and a vote. I did not think of that number to be associated with the actual percentage, just one that you have a higher chance of flipping town.
you do like leaving reasons hanging in the air. you did it in 690 too when you said we shouldn't discuss your vote, and you again have hinted at something you know but don't want to share with us.In post 715, Tayl0r Swift wrote: this is a good post. i think there is a third possible explanation though, which is why i moved my vote away from walter. i dont think im going to vote for walter or italiano today, but will expect more from them on subsequent days.
we have very different views on how helpful this type of post is then. I understand I am not going to change people's minds but it is something I do take note ofIn post 716, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
i think having a PoE of 3-4 people at this stage is pretty good actually. and im not saying i think theres one scum in this group. im saying i think this is where we find most if not all of the scum and flipping here will solve the game.In post 694, geraintm wrote:
don't like posts like this. caling out a third of the game and saying there is likely to be a scum in there...well duh. it feels like a post they can circle back later to to say "look, I always thought they were scum"In post 679, Tayl0r Swift wrote: oof yeah i really wanna lynch in cfj, shelly, enigma, or walter. like really really. they cant all be scum but this is some serious opportunism, id be surprised if there arent at least 2 scum in there maybe even all three if walter is scum.
@ Italiano when you said "two partners are in that group" - what was the group you meant?
I aim to start going through everyone and give my thoughts on them soon.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
I don't understand what you mean. vig kill italiano?In post 736, Not_Mafia wrote:Can flashwagon Walter please, italiano is a vig kill not a lynch
I cant get a read on nosferatu at all. their posts are just...whiny- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
thoughts on frogster
had a strong red on nosferatu earyl game, loads of long posts.
then switched and said gamma and banana were...but not the associated long posts with evidence.
back to long log posts on rc enimgma
528 - vague post hinting at scum but not disclosing any actual reads
weird read on CFJ about them being scum, but not wanting to lynch. instead focussing on nosferatu and banana
662 - raya is now scum
734 - wants to look at walter in case they are scum (and later asks permission from not mafia to join that wagon)
overall, they are throwing a lot of scum reads around. sticks with them but quickly moves onto the next shiny thing. not impressed
(tryng to go trough these in order of number of posts)- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
thoughts on taylor swift
their entrance seems fine,i find their method of reading not townie or scummy just fine. except they manage to get two scum votes as they go through
679 - already said I dislike this when they group so many together as potential scum
690 - said already dislike them saying we aren't allowed to discuss their votes
by 730 have hard turned away from walter
thoughts - it was a good entrance, but posts have dialled back and now just seems in an style disagreement with nosferatu and I don't like the way they entered in hard against walter and now they aren't in their top 3.
I realise I already finding it easy to find bad things to say about everyone and not looking for good things.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
@ frogster
This is blatantly a post where you are trying to get someone else to make the case for you to join their wagon. you might not like the way I phrased it "asking for permission" but is the type of post people use where they want to move their vote to another wagon, cant justify it themselves so want to get someone else to write something so they can go "oh yeah, good point, I didn't see it that way, I will join you"In post 745, Frogsterking wrote:
I'd be more likely to consider joining your wagon if I understood why you scum read him.In post 736, Not_Mafia wrote:Can flashwagon Walter please, italiano is a vig kill not a lynch
you say I have said you throw a lot of scum reads around but you deny this
In post 288, Frogsterking wrote:
There was one post from sordoros I thought could be a scum tell because of its potential to be gloating:In post 471, Frogsterking wrote:Charmander just shot up to FoS #2 for his terrible defense of Nosferatu. Arguably it makes him even scummier than Nosferatu.In post 488, Frogsterking wrote:
It's difficult to imagine, I would start with Banana and Gamma for the strange townreads.In post 482, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Frog, if nos is town, what are your scumreads?In post 528, Frogsterking wrote:By the way guys at this point in time I have three serious scum reads and I'll disclose them another time. I also have one other very weak town read I'll ISO now.In post 619, Frogsterking wrote:I'm down for a Nosferatu or Banana lynch. I also scumread the CFJ slot because of his early interactionsIn post 662, Frogsterking wrote:There are three things I wanted to say this afternoon.
#1I realized I have a feeling that Raya is scum
b]#3[/b] In the same spirit of being proactive and risk averse I'll point out a reason why I believe CFJ is scum
^^ to me looks like wants to see Walter as potential scum and shelly is scumIn post 734, Frogsterking wrote:I don't have much new to add except that I'm tempted to do an ISO on the Walter slot because his alignment seems to be a point of contention.
Looker replaced into a slot I had a slight town read on and shelly replaced into a slot I was scum reading and on first glance neither has done anything yet that looks alignment indicative to me.
and you now vote for me.
for you to deny that you throw a lot of scum reads around and are constantly moving onto new targets is laughable.
but go ahead, explain how I haven't understood your posts...- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
is this a random vote because they've played with them in the past?In post 642, shellyc wrote:Hey Italiano, how's it going? Wagons are great and time to bring fresh energy here.
VOTE: ItalianoVD
bashed this over the head a lot, but I hate this post and their response
gets into a weird back and forth with raya
that's it....
considering they have said they have read the game, this is just weird and disappointing.- geraintm
-
geraintm Mafia Scum
- geraintm
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4587
- Joined: March 9, 2006
- Location: Wales
not mafia
I confess, I find them infuriating. their posts are a bunch of non sequiturs. all votes, then saying they weren't serious and then of course they were. it is impossible to get a read on them and no amount of prodding will get them to change.
if anyone else can get a read on them then i'd love to hear why you think they are town or mafia - geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm
- geraintm