A Musical Mafia! (Game over)
Forum rules
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
prod-dodge.
sorry. I'm right in the middle of something right now. I'm going to try to read some of this tonight, but I might not be able to until tomorrow.
I did read the first page the other night though and don't worry spiffeh a town-Tammy is here, also nacho you wound me by doubting the musical reference.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ beeboy wrote:Without reading it I guess you can interpret it that way.
That implies you think I should commit to RVS town reads. The idea behind early town reads is to make someone I like comfortable so they either play scummier or townier since they feel more safe going for there wincon. It also makes scum panic that people are establishing town pools before they get to look good which makes them play worse.
I expect scum to start playing weird and town to play more aggressive from that. Sakura votes me for the sketchiest reasons and ignores all other players. Turns out she skimmed the thread so it made sense she ignored other players which is why I didn't feel comfortable committing to that scum read. In terms of pressure I wouldn't drop the read if I didn't want to vote anyone but I have seniors so I had better things to vote. Also I think everyone has pushed someone because they think someone is playing badly not because they are scum so it is just something I acknowledged.
This is the first post of beeboy's I've liked. I was considering voting him when I caught up. Didn't really like the point on sakura. The point on seniors is weird too, but I'm reading that as mostly ego/reaction based so meh.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ beeboy wrote:Tic tac if you think I a exaggerating you don't understand seniors play at all.
Nothing they have done so far is towny. They also shouldn't have voted Snarky. They wouldn't mess up like that and do scummy things as town twice in a row then leave thread.
Neither one would be playing this safe and reserved as town. No one is this safe as town.
But then I don't like this post.
~~~
Agree that dave pointing out the hydra thing and calling it a backtrack when he explained his hydra thing is mehsville squared.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ beeboy wrote:Why Seniors is scum!
-They ignored my buddy offer.
-1 page later they replied.
What this is telling me is that they are scum and want to avoid looking awkward so they didn't immediately reply to me. They thought about a reply and wanted me to stop attracting attention and posted incredibly late.
I would be scum reading anyone for doing that.
How is an hour difference *incredibly* late.
You offered your buddy here:
An hour later they respond.
↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:beeboy I only buddy you when we're scum together
↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:I'm easy to sort when trying don't worry
I was starting to think you were just trying to get a reaction but this actually looks like you're trying to push it as a reason for voting them and exaggerating something that I can't fathom how you think it comes from scum.
Your snarky point is a bit better, but that didn't look like a strong push from them and just because someone is lynchbait doesn't mean that you can't suspect them or try to read them, so hopefully this gets better or stronger because right now I'm a big pile of eh.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:
True Ogre's entrance post is pretty balls.
Withholding vote is fine, ESPECIALLY not after beeboy tells him to vote us and then ogre does.
Look at how terrible withholding vote is there. Ogre OPENLY admits to being unsure of people that they want to sort, that they are considering to maybe be scum, and then just... doesn't vote. nope.
"I will entertain Sakura argument" is basically saying "I don't want to commit yet (which is fine) but i'm not gonna do anything about it (which isn't fine)"
"keeping an eye on axelrod" uh huh.
Can you put this into English though?
What's wrong with him not voting?I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
You're making a generalized statement about how no one behaves. It's part of why I can't take your read seriously and I've been expecting that it's just a reaction gathering/designed to look like you really believe strongly about something. You've made sweepings statements about how town/scum behave, not just about seniors but in your talk with sakura. Either you really haven't played that many games and you're trying sound knowledgeable or you're full of shit.
It's not about defending them; it's about pointing out that you're arguments aren't sound. You want to make it sound like you can read them, but then you make these types of statements that I know are not true by any objective stance. It weakens it, isn't constructive, and doesn't inspire trust in your ability to read the game or them.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ beeboy wrote:Unless you are aspiring to vote me what I am saying is only interacting with me for the first 200 paes of the game is pretty unconstructive.
If that is the case I find it weird you haven't voted me yet.
By discrediting my ability to read people and my seniors arguments you are defending them no matter how you try and spin it.
If by pointing out that your over generalizations are over generalized, not helpful, or convincing in any way, then sure I'm defending them. I look at it at looking past that and trying to figure out the actual read.
If your case is based on being able to read them really well then the overgeneralized stuff is not necessary and I need to cut through stuff I don't buy into to see something that makes sense.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ beeboy wrote:↑ Tammy wrote:If by pointing out that your over generalizations are over generalized, not helpful, or convincing in any way, then sure I'm defending them. I look at it at looking past that and trying to figure out the actual read.
If your case is based on being able to read them really well then the overgeneralized stuff is not necessary and I need to cut through stuff I don't buy into to see something that makes sense.
Yes 500 posts later I am still voting them because I don't like there RVS I don't see the problem with that.
I have no idea if you're serious here.
But even if so, you're completely missing my point. You're making overgeneralizations about play in general and then saying oh I can read them.
The play should be about them in particular. You're saying no town would make a naked vote after one hour. That's just objectively wrong, and if you're going to claim no town do things I've seen town do all the time and do myself, I'm not going to take you seriously.
If you're going to talk about why it's specific to them, talk about that. Otherwise you're just blowing hot air.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ The Pied Piper wrote:
What I think is scummy about Friendless Seniors, aside from the SnarkySnowman vote, is that they have made a bunch of posts over the span of an hour, but in those posts, they did virtually nothing. I do not think it is scummy that various people haven't posted yet, or that there are people with only 1-2 posts. But if someone has several posts spread out over some time, but there is nothing worth reading in those posts, that's scummy. Errant's wall is the first thing of substance from that slot, but I know that they're capable of writing walls as both alignments and I want to digest it when I'm less tired.
I don't have any problem at all if in the beginning of the game someone posts a bunch and doesn't do anything. (I have a habit of not taking anything seriously and goofing off for the first 5 or so pages if the mood strikes me.) I am interested in that wall though as the points were meh.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ beeboy wrote:↑ Tammy wrote:↑ beeboy wrote:↑ Tammy wrote:If by pointing out that your over generalizations are over generalized, not helpful, or convincing in any way, then sure I'm defending them. I look at it at looking past that and trying to figure out the actual read.
If your case is based on being able to read them really well then the overgeneralized stuff is not necessary and I need to cut through stuff I don't buy into to see something that makes sense.
Yes 500 posts later I am still voting them because I don't like there RVS I don't see the problem with that.
I have no idea if you're serious here.
But even if so, you're completely missing my point. You're making overgeneralizations about play in general and then saying oh I can read them.
The play should be about them in particular. You're saying no town would make a naked vote after one hour. That's just objectively wrong, and if you're going to claim no town do things I've seen town do all the time and do myself, I'm not going to take you seriously.
If you're going to talk about why it's specific to them, talk about that. Otherwise you're just blowing hot air.
No point in defending a push I made for a variety of reasons most of which have nothing to do with wanting Seniors lynched since my read has seriously evolved from where you are at right now.
I understand the point you are making but you are looking at what I am doing in a vacuum aren't looking at other players all that much and I still feel as though what you are doing this game underwhelming.
I feel as though what I did helped progress the game and if you don't think it is productive and you don't want to take me serious that is all on you but I am going to keep doing what I am doing.
OKAY!I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
I tried to find an appropriate gif which had someone sticking their tongue out and folding their arms in front of them in frustration at your silliness, but all I could find was weird tongue stuff.
So *tonguewag which sounds like a raspberry while I fold my arms and stomp my feet at you*I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:
"scumread on the people beeboy is pushing AND beeboy"
this guy is fencesitting, stirring the pot and trying to get momentum on our wagon for seriously shoddy reasons.
VOTE: sircakez
sorry ep, this is the guy who needs to die
Eh.
(And I don't even like sircakez that much.)I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ Friendless Seniors wrote:
These stances make no sense. Like, he is basically scumreading anyone making any sort of impact in the game. This is a super opportunistic position in the game and needs to be lynched.
I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ SirCakez wrote:↑ beeboy wrote:@cakes
What do you mean fence sitting? Fence sitting is when I don't take a stance on a popular wagon with lots of info. Sakura isnt a popular wagon nor is there any solid alignment indicative posts from her yet.
Yes a lot of my posts are about Seniors but that is a fallacy because of my post count
.
Since when is that fence sitting?
You're waffling everywhere on Sakura.
Why is waffling a problem?I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ pistachi0n wrote:I haven't seen millers immediately claim flavor in games I've played with them, so I'll follow suit. You'll know when it's relevant. Or when I'm dead, whatever comes first.
I agree with the request for a flavor claim.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
Bert in mafia with a quickness
VI can't remember his name in a cartoon themed game? My Little Pony some time back.
Two I know of off the top of my head.
Flavor claim would help if we have a flavor cop around. Miller claim won't help for cops, but could help for flavor cops.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ SirCakez wrote:↑ True Ogre wrote:My reservations were to do with his push on Sakura who I was not reading as scum. I did not expect him to back off so quickly but when he did I was more inclined to read him as town, as scum-beeboy had no reason to back off unless he was town and open to changing reads. Thus the sheep. Along with my own read on Seniors anyway.
That's not what I'm referring to.
I'm referring to how you said "I'm withholding my vote for now" then immediately voted in your next post.
Why is this problematic?
And can people stop acting like shit is scummy that isn't, you're making my head explode.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:
I can pretty much grab scum-nacho pretty well. last few games we played before our break I was able to spot him pretty early on, plus then there's tammy who can also spot him fairly easy tooo. I also can't read Ploti so!
~M
I already asked but why did you say you saw nothing out of the ordinary for nacho when sakura wanted to sort him early when what he posted early was absolutely alignment non-indicative for him?I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:↑ The Pied Piper wrote:
What do you mean about me? Do you mean that Sakura should be trying to sort us based on my posting or something else?↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:Alright, so far I haven't seen anything out of place for Nacho. So I'm unsure why you're focusing him for a sort so early on. Also then there's the fact Ploti is in that hydra too.
Doesn't it remind you kind of my early push on Persivul in our last game? Beeboy's point makes about as much sense to me as my points against Persivul made to myself in that game.
Mirhawk could be town. I like the kinds of questions they're asking. Feels like genuine scumhunting.
I kinda screwed up tags.
I think I need to go back and skim a quick Sakura game. I /may/ have forgotten how she plays. I just think it's odd that she's going to sort Nacho part of your hydra, but it doesn't seem like she has engaged him /yet/. It's also odd how she's not really going to sort you because she has two parts of the hydra to get an easier read on you both. It's just really odd and I'm not sure why it bothers me so much. I don't know why, but her playstyle is reminding me a mixture of three other players into one.
It kinda does. I already made a comment to GM about beeboy's posts have been bugging me, but she told me it's normal beeboy so I think I'm going to wait and see how this goes.
I also was early reading Mirhawk, but the last three pages erased that townread plus GM was saying that Mirhawk's posts weren't sitting with her right.
~M
I feel like I'm harping here, but I really want you to explain *why* it's odd she wants to sort nacho. Has there been something of nacho's he's posted so far that she should have interacted with him about? Why do you find it odd she might not be trying to sort plot?
(Also, she has addressed nacho, though iirc she mistook plot for nacho. I could be wrong in that, it's late)I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:↑ beeboy wrote:↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:
VOTE: Mirhawk
Going to vote and then talk to GM about it. If she feels differently we will certainly change our vote, but I am frankly starting to see not-town here.
I'm not sure how if she doesn't believe that Ami cc'd, but is willing to jump onto the building train that was happening that early page on.
I'm certainly a lot more sure of Mirhawk being scum than I was when I was reading early yesterday.
~M
I am revoking my town read on you.
go fur it. I don't care.
Just because my read doesn't agree with yours doesn't make me scum.
~M
I have a huge problem with you you saying you where scum reading him yesterday when that post above is the only thing that indicated you had a scum read on mirhawk. It is a blatant scum tell to pull stuff like that to justify your vote and it really bothers me which is why I have trouble seeing you flip town this game.
Nope, GM and I were discussing reads. I had a slight town read off pages 1-5 from Mirhawk, but I said I was holding off before saying it in thread and GM said she disagreed with me on it.
I think you're misrepping me pretty bad though. I am not fabricating my scum read on him. My read changed from early pages to his current posting so I'm failing to see how I'm justifying my read on him when it obviously changed from when I caught up after work and when I went to bed yesterday. I haven't had time to talk to GM today so I'm not sure if she's caught up or where she stands.
~M[/quote]
Where did the misreported occur?I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:Because obviously you voted after the CC when the wagon was growing.
Then shortly after you said you wanted her to CC, but was still voting. It felt as if you were leaving your options open which is a hugeeeeeee fencesit.
~M
I'm sorry for spamming people.
And Mala you are making me so unhappy right now.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
Fence sitting is ceremoniously removed from the language of everyone in this game. If it's used again in a stupid manner like it's been used from EVERY SINGLE PERSON WHO's USED IT TO THIS POINT I'll strike down upon you with great vengeance and furious anger. Test me.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ Swordsworth wrote:Sorry for any excessively delayed responses, I'm currently out of town.
Just reading over everything that's happened, I'd like Ami to clarify themself on what exactly they're trying to say pertaining to Pistachio's Miller claim. Is it a CC? A hinting at it? Just trying to see how people react?
My current scumreads at this time would probably be somewhere in the block of Hiplop, Cakez, and Beeboy. I have a question for you three: What if Pistachio is shot and flips town? What does this suggest about Ami, and would that warrant an instant vote?
@the late RVS matter, I can only be around early morning and laaate evening for this week. Sorry about that.
*TWITCH
TWITCH
TWITCHTIWITCHTQITCHTWITCHTWITCHTWITCH*I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:There's fact proving its wrong. I mean sure you can say it's useless to argue about, but if you did any back ground digging on me or even read the sign up thread I made a public announcement to both the playlist and the mod about how my posting will be and why.
~M
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
Hmmm I have some reads, but I'm going to hold on to a few until I'm both sober and awake.
(Bb it's cool. Though I do think it's funny that more people can't gauge who I'm actually gearing up to vote.)
Also going to hold my vote ooooh noooooo woooooo ahhhhhhhhhhI am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ SirCakez wrote:↑ Tammy wrote:↑ SirCakez wrote:↑ beeboy wrote:@cakes
What do you mean fence sitting? Fence sitting is when I don't take a stance on a popular wagon with lots of info. Sakura isnt a popular wagon nor is there any solid alignment indicative posts from her yet.
Yes a lot of my posts are about Seniors but that is a fallacy because of my post count
.
Since when is that fence sitting?
You're waffling everywhere on Sakura.
Why is waffling a problem?
It's an out for scum changing reads to fit the game state better. And it shows no conviction in reads which is another scum sign.
How many games have you played?I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ SirCakez wrote:↑ Tammy wrote:↑ SirCakez wrote:↑ True Ogre wrote:My reservations were to do with his push on Sakura who I was not reading as scum. I did not expect him to back off so quickly but when he did I was more inclined to read him as town, as scum-beeboy had no reason to back off unless he was town and open to changing reads. Thus the sheep. Along with my own read on Seniors anyway.
That's not what I'm referring to.
I'm referring to how you said "I'm withholding my vote for now" then immediately voted in your next post.
Why is this problematic?
And can people stop acting like shit is scummy that isn't, you're making my head explode.
It's backtracking. Why even say that in the first place if he was going to dump a vote two posts later?
You're positing his big scum plan was to say he wasn't putting a vote down and then 8 minutes later coming back to the thread and voting?
How is that even backtracking? Why does that make him scum?I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
Hi skybird! I'm pretty happy about it myselfI am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:
@Tammy: I can't address all of your questions because I'm not Mala, but here are the ones I can:
↑ Tammy wrote:↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:I think I need to go back and skim a quick Sakura game. I /may/ have forgotten how she plays. I just think it's odd that she's going to sort Nacho part of your hydra, but it doesn't seem like she has engaged him /yet/.
~M
I feel like I'm harping here, but I really want you to explain *why* it's odd she wants to sort nacho.
I think it was more meant, "It's weird that she says she wants to sort Nacho but hasn't really put action to word."
Well she got after her for the rvs post in which she said she wanted to sort nacho, that's the big one I want answered. She did ask him a question, but what kind of engagement was she supposed to do when he hadn't even really posted yet?
↑ Tammy wrote:↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:↑ beeboy wrote:I have a huge problem with you you saying you where scum reading him yesterday when that post above is the only thing that indicated you had a scum read on mirhawk. It is a blatant scum tell to pull stuff like that to justify your vote and it really bothers me which is why I have trouble seeing you flip town this game.
Nope, GM and I were discussing reads. I had a slight town read off pages 1-5 from Mirhawk, but I said I was holding off before saying it in thread and GM said she disagreed with me on it.
I think you're misrepping me pretty bad though. I am not fabricating my scum read on him. My read changed from early pages to his current posting so I'm failing to see how I'm justifying my read on him when it obviously changed from when I caught up after work and when I went to bed yesterday. I haven't had time to talk to GM today so I'm not sure if she's caught up or where she stands.
~M
Where did the misreported occur?
That quote was so broken.
It's the "you say you were scumreading him yesterday" from beeboy, when in actual fact, she said thatIwas scumreading him yesterday and that she was townreading him.
Surely that one was obvious?[/quote]
Nope it's not obvious at all. I still don't understand your explanation because that doesn't seem to be what was going on. And if that is the case, does that really warrant a "misrepping really bad" accusation?
So, yeah pretend I'm five and dumb and re explain it? Preferably Mala explain it?
--
I only have one! (well, 2 after this is posted) But OK![/quote]
Yeah, I meant that one.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ podoboq wrote:↑ Spiffeh wrote:↑ podoboq wrote:
Can you explain why? Is it just because of inactivity and↑ Swordsworth wrote:....What if Pistachio is shot and flips town? What does this suggest about Ami, and would that warrant an instant vote?
467 in general is just really awful
It has nothing to do with the activity
Do you feel differently?
I agree that it's pretty bad, and I think it warrants suspicion, but that alone isn't enough to for me to consider him my "ultimate lynch for today." It just seemed like a stretch, so I was wondering if you were seeing something I wasn't.
What do you think was bad about it?I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ SirCakez wrote:↑ Tammy wrote:↑ SirCakez wrote:↑ Tammy wrote:↑ SirCakez wrote:↑ True Ogre wrote:My reservations were to do with his push on Sakura who I was not reading as scum. I did not expect him to back off so quickly but when he did I was more inclined to read him as town, as scum-beeboy had no reason to back off unless he was town and open to changing reads. Thus the sheep. Along with my own read on Seniors anyway.
That's not what I'm referring to.
I'm referring to how you said "I'm withholding my vote for now" then immediately voted in your next post.
Why is this problematic?
And can people stop acting like shit is scummy that isn't, you're making my head explode.
It's backtracking. Why even say that in the first place if he was going to dump a vote two posts later?
You're positing his big scum plan was to say he wasn't putting a vote down and then 8 minutes later coming back to the thread and voting?
How is that even backtracking? Why does that make him scum?
No I'm saying it looks like trying to blend in after realizing his initial "not voting" thing sucked. And that I'd backtracking.
I've completed like 10 or so games onsite now? That's just a guess from memory. I've also played like 20 off site.
You think he, as scum, purposefully said he wasn't voting, didn't realize it at the time, posted then a few minutes later went shit I should blend in? You actually think that's a thought process someone has? I still don't get why it's backtracking. Why is no voting shitty in the first place and why can't he have simply changed his mind?
You have more than five games to your repertoire and you're actually trying to argue the waffling is a scum tell thing?I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:I don't know Tammy. I haven't played with Sakura in a very long time, but I don't ever remember her right in the beginning going 'I need to sort nacho out asap'. I remember other players doing that, but her? Never. It just seemed off to me.
I really don't see how you're not understanding where Beeboy misunderstood my post. I don't like beeboys overall switching to whoever doesn't agree with him must be scum mindset. He's done it with me and he's done it with others. I was town reading Mirhawk in the early start of the game, then after the whole miller thing his response, his fence sit was terrible so I started pushing it. That's where Beeboy said I was fabricating a read on Mirhawk, but I wasn't. How am I fabricating a read when my initial read on Mirhawk was town, but my ending read was scum. It's called the progression of the game, scum hunting is another word for it. So the fact he took to say I was fabricating a read when I wasn't is in fact a misstep.
~M
I have to agree with not liking FS last post though. /:
Sakura wanting to sort nacho first thing is pretty standard. Part of what I don't get is why you pointed out he hadn't done anything out of the ordinary yet when he hadn't even come close to posting anything alignment indicative yet. I also don't understand why you'd want to get in the middle of someone else's sorting process.
I agree that bee boy's tendency to do that is annoying. How come his question to you isn't him scum hunting? I just don't get why the response was an immediate "you're misrepping me!"I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:Is it me or am I failing to see why you're making such a big deal out of this Tammy. /:
Which one?I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:You already said it yourself that you're harping on the subject. So I fail to see how I'm exaggerating anything.
Like I already answeeeed it all, but not sure what you're expecting me to say that's different than the other few times I explained it.
As I said it felt out of place for Sakura, but I already admitted that I haven't played with her in a while? Idk sometime last summer if that?? Like it felt our of place for her to focus on nacho, but that's something I'd expect like Notty to do, or Mollie.
As for nacho I still fail to see why this is such a big deal. If he made a post that was alignment indicative I would have said it, but he didn't
I feel like I'm harping because it's a sticking point for me and I asked you twice about it. Trying to understand why on something is not making a really big deal out of it just like someone perhaps misinterpreting you is not a really big misrep.
Where were the few times you explained it? Pretty sure you answered and I responded. I haven't played much with Sakura either, but her wanting to sort nacho right away is standard. If you haven't played with someone I don't know why it would even spark your notice. Furthermore, you pointing out that nothing was out of the ordinary when he hadn't posted beyond a couple rvs posts feels off.
Right now my concern is that you are either scum with nacho and you did some early discrediting to stop someone from sorting him or you're scum trying to get on his good side.
You being exaggerative when people question you doesn't help that concern.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ Swordsworth wrote:Sorry for any excessively delayed responses, I'm currently out of town.
Just reading over everything that's happened, I'd like Ami to clarify themself on what exactly they're trying to say pertaining to Pistachio's Miller claim. Is it a CC? A hinting at it? Just trying to see how people react?
My current scumreads at this time would probably be somewhere in the block of Hiplop, Cakez, and Beeboy. I have a question for you three: What if Pistachio is shot and flips town? What does this suggest about Ami, and would that warrant an instant vote?
@the late RVS matter, I can only be around early morning and laaate evening for this week. Sorry about that.
What I didn't like about the post was explaining why he wasn't in rvs and apologizing for it.I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite!- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
- Tammy
-
Tammy Survivor
- Tammy
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 15361
- Joined: January 13, 2012
↑ THE WRONG WAGON wrote:
I have so many problems with this.
So many problems.
I don't really know if I can articulate them well, but they boil down to: 1. we are not omgusing by any stretch of the imagination and to use a phrase both inflammatory and inaccurate to describe our play is Not Good; 2. you are acting like you've never played with Mala before which is not even slightly the case.
I'm not going to pretend I have a very good handle on your play, because I don't, but it's problematic to me that you seem to be pressing your advantage like you're on the other side of the net.
How's this again? My response was a bit snarky sure, but considering you haven't omgus'd I wasn't describing your play up until that point but was a bit venting my frustration with mala's response and what felt like to me I'd get in response. I don't think that my questions to her were rude in any way. This is a mafia game after all, but what I do get from you guys, even here whoa with the exaggerations batman, is expressions that I should understand something that was not clear or I wouldn't have asked and a claim that I'm making a "really big deal" out of something I asked a couple questions about and was trying to understand.
Where am I acting like I haven't played with Mala again?
I don't play volleyball there sorry champ care to suggest a game I do play? Or slow it down on the sugar or caffeine or whatever is causing this hyperbole station?I am in the top 90% of scumhunters onsite! - Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy
- Tammy