Death Curse
Forum rules
- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
It’s somewhat an annoying curse
When one is forced to speak in verse
Though this from Hectic I’d expect
It harms my power to detect
Yet this trifling impediment
Does not mean I’ll be negligent
The game begins with a full day
Easy to hide out of the way
I could just lurk and survive this
But I’d prefer to be LAMIST
‘I’m town’ I’ll cry from my rooftop
Not kill nor vote shall make me stop
Now all, convinced I’m innocent
And may I add, magnificent
Shall back me up as I scumhunt
Leading the town right from the front
The scroll will pass from hand to hand
And on the scum shall surely land
The mafia we won’t acquit
We’ll kill them all, it will be litThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
While at first glance this may seem goodIn post 37, Zdenek wrote:Hello! How I've missed you all!
Vote: Pooky
Since town gets to control at least two of the eliminated each day (the first scroll bearer and at least one of the next two), I think that we should use a points based voting system to rank who gets E'd from the game. I propose that we all pick our top three suspects each day, rank them, first choice gets 4 points, second gets 2, and third gets 1. (The exact number of points is up for debate, but hey ho this is what I settled on as a pretty straightforward one, which I think is better that 3,2,1 at reflecting people wanting to E their first choices). I think adding up the points will give pretty good guidance to the cursed where to pass the scroll and will hopefully be more accurate than treating the scroll as a vengeful shot.
For the first pick, I'm pretty happy sticking with the usual voting, but I'd also be curious to see if using the ranking system produces good elims generally.
I'd oppose this, don't think we should
I'd be concerned of the EVs
Counting charisma changes these
There's twenty of us, five are scum
And no nightkills from them will come
If one of five doth top our list
They shall continue to exist
If a single one appears town
Victory will not come around
Sure mafia can kill obvgood
Discussing picks in their dayhood
Best case is twelve dead by day four
One good read then would doom us, aw
Scum in top threeish is loss right
So point system may not delightThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
No, don't give the scroll to obvtown
That would just bring our win rate down
More, the list is easy to game
Follow too closely feels a shame
I'll rephrase the flaw if I may
Even if we kill one each day
That leaves us little wriggle room
To find the last or soon face doomThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
The renegade or loose cannonIn post 108, Toogeloo wrote:The plan seems fine on paper, but you have to also bear in mind that people who get scrolls know they are dead anyways, so they aren't going to be held accountable if they go rogue and want to be a hero and shoot an unpopular target.
Selects the target of their gun
Probably someone who's sent insults
But damn, they sure do get results
I'd call this a high effort flailIn post 166, Noraa wrote:Taylor - town for realizing that this isn't AI due to previous experience playing with me
Murder - null bc he didn't realize it wasn't AI even tho he has played with me before but the paranoia towards shelly is very town bc when playing with shelly, it is nerve-racking trying to determine if you're being absolutely fooled or if you are judging too much and she's actually town. I feel this paranoia all the way after one scum game with her where she told me about all her evil plans in the scum pt and after one town game where I was fooled by her big time. Something that town pings + something that scum pings cancel out and so I am null but prolly town lean still.
Pooky - town because I believe he believes in his SR on me and scum wouldn't bc scum knows who their scum buddies are.
Lexi - null. I still dislike the discord argument. Lexi's been more eager to push me than Pooky has which tbh is a bit strange considering normally the one that starts it is the biggest on pushing it :/
Isis - town because the tone is towny and I relate to some of those posts in that I would say something similar in her position
Bell - townie confusion. could be faked but I'm willing to believe it is real for now
Shelly - scum for misrepping people and also for throwing shade at pooky yet never voting pooky.
Vaultdweller - scum. can't quite put my finger on what's wrong here but I'm def getting scum pings.
Hopkirk - null but lean scum. dislike the jumping on all biggest wagons for no reason.
To win my trust your post did fail
This post you've made it feels because
The pressure getting to you was
The townreads do not feel deserved
Is how I'd sum what I've observedThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Hey Noraa please tell me
All of your thoughts on LLD
While I assume this is a jokeIn post 180, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Taylor swift 3rd scum thanks bell
I'll give advice, make it bespoke
There's no third parties in this game
A waste you say, yeah it's a shame
'How did you know?' You ask of Hop
'Your game knowledge I'll never top'
You all could know as much as me
If only you would read OPThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
?In post 237, Noraa wrote:
no you are tunneling. its clear as day. if anyone doesn't think its tunneling, I'd think they r weirdIn post 234, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Isn't that just kind of telling on yourself that you don't really have a ground to call this tunnelling
Hey pick a side and show some senseIn post 244, Adorable wrote:I don't understand why Noraa is getting defensive here in this type of setup. Noraa if you were the first to be given the scroll wouldn't you give it to your scum read?
Taylor asking do scum have a daytalk I couldn't tell if this was a joke or not.
We don't need you warming the fenceThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Nice try to post, but mod or notIn post 258, Hectic wrote:.
I'll try my best to steal pagetopThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Can you make that more specificIn post 264, Noraa wrote:I think pooky's point is valid and understandable considering I would likely agree if I weren't in my own position rn in which case I disagree that was a forced townslip because I had not read the OPs. That aside, LLD jumped on my wagon right off the bat which didn't surprise me bc I definitely understand that from a town pov, that prolly read bad and not willing to give me the benefit of the doubt is understandable. The problem is that LLD used an argument to back Pooky's case up that was misleading as I was not as she implied, super hyped up and ready to play since long ago. I was actually one of the last few people to /in so her saying that I was so hyped up that it's impossible I didn't read the OPs is just unreasonable not to mention using an argument like that against me is just mean considering its literally not even on ms.
I pointed this out immediately and she never responded until I poked at her again later.
she is overly confident and half of her reasons are just like "this post is bad"
Also can we point out that I am a noob compared to the majority of the people here? I do not understand why a lot of my posts are labelled as bad bc I am absolutely solving. My reads are weak and shit but really they are always going to "look scummy" if you first assume that I am scum and then look at my posts.
I see a lot of buddying in my wagon and tbh if I flip today, it'll be really interesting to see them immediately start doubting each other for pushing me this hard. I think a lot of people this game are over their heads and way too confident. I generally associate confidence with time and experience but regardless, a day 1, 10 pages in, lock scum!Noraa is just ridiculous especially from my pov.
The phrasing isn't terrific
You said you thought it would be fun
Did you say to everyone
That was because Hectic was mod
Or slightly on the setup laudThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
How obvious did you make itIn post 269, Noraa wrote:
what do you need more specific?In post 266, Hopkirk wrote:Can you make that more specific
The phrasing isn't terrific
You said you thought it would be fun
Did you say to everyone
That was because Hectic was mod
Or slightly on the setup laud
Reading setup you did omitThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
When you said the game 'would be fun'In post 271, Hopkirk wrote:
How obvious did you make itIn post 269, Noraa wrote:
what do you need more specific?In post 266, Hopkirk wrote:Can you make that more specific
The phrasing isn't terrific
You said you thought it would be fun
Did you say to everyone
That was because Hectic was mod
Or slightly on the setup laud
Reading setup you did omit
That's this question for you doneThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Did you specify ONLY moddingIn post 276, Noraa wrote:yeah I said the game would be fun in the discord server with LLD. I mean ... hectic's modding so it'd be weird if it wasn't interesting
And mention not another thingThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
I'm skimming 'cause thirty pages
Doing more would just takes ages
Plus I like the hyperposters
Much more than the no post coasters
I dislike this, it's fence-sittyIn post 291, Fidget wrote:I trust that Noraa received several votes for that? So I'll hold off for a moment.
UNVOTE:
I do not understand. Why did you feel the need to ask how many scum are in the setup rather than looking? If you thought this setup was closed, why would one of the designers/reviewers (Isis) play it?In post 104, Noraa wrote:Ok let's clarify something rq. I asked Cabd to bring me along to spectate the next game he was going to spectate. He said he was gonna spectate this game and that I was in it already. I was at the time, not even aware of this games existence. I checked out this game and saw it was modded by hectic and was like ooooo sounds fun! so then I directly inned. I don't read setup. Everyone says that I town slip as scum. So to be completely honest, a lot of the "townslips" aren't even town slips for me cuz I legitimately don't pay attention to the OPs. Pooky since you referenced Mafiasunny, I was a mafia goon that game and I legitimately asked my partners in the pt if there were town prs. Dumb question ig you could say and considering my partners were voyeur and Roleblocker, it should've been pretty obvious there were prs. I didn't read any of the setup in that game either and submitted actions in the pt when the mod directly said you had to pm him. I literally do not read OPs of games with setups I've never played in before(that was my first mini theme). I want to reference two different games as well but they're ongoing so I can't but regardless I only skim OPs and sometimes I dont even do that. In this case, I did not read anything believe it or not.
I am playing with the idea you're just easy elimbait, but what an odd question to ask.
The first sentence is a pitty
Whether nora flips bad or notIn post 357, Hectic wrote:
It feels like bussing we have got
Most likely scum on the wagon
Feels like Ador or UnowenThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
In post 504, shellyc wrote:
ok isis/bell/noraa/???/???In post 491, Isis wrote:Bell will you help me with this game? I think you're town. I guess you could be scum doing fancy soft defend anticatalyst stuff people said but you feel like town and I don't careWoah, one hundred percent my reads
I'd expect soon the scum concedes
Sadly due to lacking the time
Until tomorrow I'm a mimeThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
As the double replacement conditional post restricted townie, I'm conflicted about these changes. On the one hand, I can post properly. On the other hand, we're loosing Isis. On the other hand, we're getting Vax. On the other hand, I have more hands than I realized and that's pretty good tbh.
That role probably would have been better in a micro than a large tbh.
Vaguely aware there's some kind of wagon on me.
This is probably scum.In post 550, VaultDweller wrote:Ok, I see the so-called fake townslip. My first thought was that it was a joke post, but nowhere did they state that it was a joke post. At least from what I could read. So yeah, that makes it kind of scummy, especially with the link Pooky gave: (viewtopic.php?p=12236870#p12236870). I will abstain from voting for now though, with the wagon so close to being hammered and the day only 24 hours old.
Yeah, you don't seem like a particularly fun person to play with based on this. I saw you had 200 posts, so hopefully they're not just all flinging abuse.In post 601, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Your inability to read me is tilting me off the face of the earth.
I don't even know what meta bullshit game you are referencing to get this weird "tell" on me that wouldn;'t work even if I WAS SCUM (you moron)
but let me make this fucking really simple for you.
I'm going to die this game you fucking dummy. There's a 0 percent chance I live to endgame.
Fuck's sakes, like. How are you this dense?
Or is it this was a distraction or something?
IDFK
The lack of follow up here is scummy/too scummy to be scummy hm.In post 605, Lapsa wrote:Frankly speaking - this game's a garbage so far.
To an extent of people openly claiming scum and getting away with that.
Shelly/Denek/Mush/LLD/Pooky/Taylor fairly obvtown as of p27.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
A decent part of my Zdenek townread, looking to be one of my spicier reads atm, is that blatantly bad 'we should do this strategy' style posts come from newbtown from a good place (which I get in the tone of their follow ups to me in regard to it), not newbscum trying to fake content.
Numbers are something like this, I didn't check this so 1 might not add up right. If so just throw in a balancing β and we're fine.In post 685, Zdenek wrote:Made it to page 15.
Bell, I feel like I should be town reading you, after pages 7,8. Could you say something that will make be not be concerned by you?
I think Swift is probably town, and I think that Noraa-Swift scum buddies would be shocking.
What was your opinion of that game - it was one of the few that I looked at since signing up for this one. My own impression was that Noraa’s win really was quite lucky. Also, LLD, can you clarify what was said on the discord server? Preferrably in a way that town!Noraa would be bound to agree with.In post 265, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:You don't get to use this excuse after you won that other scumgame against very competent players.
Hopkirk, what were those numbers anyway?
My top three scum reads are Noraa, Owen and Bell.
0 = 15/20 * 14/19 * 13/18
1 = β or (15/20*14/19*5/18) + (5/20*14/18)+(15/20*4/19)
2 = 5/20 * 4/18
Nope.In post 688, Bell wrote:Are you for real with this and the flailing thing. I feel like you can’t be given the number of games you’ve played just from sheer blocks being knocked over after building them up.
Zdenek: I genuinely don’t know what you want me to say from that post. It just looks like you’re fence sitting.
In post 691, UNOwen wrote:
What's this all about?In post 685, Zdenek wrote: My top three scum reads are Noraa, Owen and Bell.
This is the slot that needs flak for the Noraa scumread. Trying to give an image they've had that read from the start when I don't see anything I like on the progression post rvs. Scum Uno here can't unvote at that point and is locked in, but I haven't seen a sincere pivot or deepening of the read.In post 708, UNOwen wrote:
I disagree my slot is content free. It has a juicy and filling Noraa scum read, I do not expect to vote elsewhere until she is cursed.In post 703, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:UNOwen is here! Quick, get 'em!
UNOwen, I would like your opinions. All of them (that are relevant to the game). I would like them soon, because right now your slot is /content free/. Zero calories. No fat, sugar, artificial flavors, natural flavors. 100% empty.
If there is something specific you'd like me to opine about, ask and I will provide.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
I'm catching up in between work btw, so don't expect this to be super quick until I finish.
In post 735, shellyc wrote:UNO i would like these names arranged in order of town -> scum
shellyc
Mushagana
isis
pooky
LLD
hopkirkIn post 738, shellyc wrote:im getting major gut townvibes from hopkirk btw, based on the resistance to leashing, the pushing on noraa and reasonable TRs
Isn't this the exact order you wanted to hear though? You picked 4 people you thought were obvtown, one slight town, and one suspicious (all reads you'd said) then Uno's order didn't conflict with that at all. What was your logic behind those specific 6 being the listing?In post 756, shellyc wrote:
The LLD read is a consensus read and not too out of place.In post 751, Bell wrote:Reeee why is this insightful.
The Mush read is well-reasoned and logical
The Pooky read is fine since pooky/isis s/s is possible
I would like you to elaborate on hopkirk tho
Ohno, hope you're feeling betty soonIn post 759, Bell wrote:They didn’t give a reason at the time of that post tho and no logic was provided.
Hopkirk I just have trouble reading through the rhymes because i’m not enjoying him like I usually would due to anhedonia.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
LLD is town, but I've noticed that essentially none of her posts can be reduced down to 'gr I'm angry' rather than any meaningful content.
UpsidesIn post 790, UNOwen wrote:
Right but if Noraa is correct that she did not mention setup in discord, does that make her more likely to be town?In post 768, shellyc wrote:hectic is a rather boring moddon't modkill me
an investigative mindset leans town though, it's not making something out of nothing, it's quite clearly a solving mindset
It doesn't seem like a useful line of inquiry, because I already presumed she had not mentioned setup.
IF Nora town - full picture of the situation reduces odds of misunderstanding
IF Nora scum - they can easily get caught out in a direct lie here
Either way - any interaction with Noraa helps inform our reads on the slot.
No downsides
I really don't understand how LL's mental image of Noraa would be 'Someone who'll do something they said earlier on, definitely not changing their mind or being annoyed with the game at all since then, definitely not chaotic or emotional as a player'.In post 878, Noraa wrote:
incorrect. I said there were two possibilities and I will not be forced to choose one. I will choose for myself. Don't worry stop screaming I think ur a town that's way over your head. I suggest you tone it down otherwise its gonna look really nasty tomorrow after a green flip on my end.In post 857, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I want to do Noraa because Noraa has CLAIMED SHE WILL HAND TO ADORABLE.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
I don't follow. Are you saying that as town you wouldn't read the OP, but as scum (you still wouldn't read the OP but) would know how many scum there were and not ask the question that town you always would?In post 900, Noraa wrote:I asked how many scums there are. If I was scum, I would literally just be like ok so with 4 scums here, blah blah blah. Do you really think that's not a more convincing town slip?
I don't get the logic unless you're saying you plan to use trust tells in a really dumb way that hurts your win rate more than it helps it.
Bad postIn post 940, Theta Alpine wrote:
then give noraa the chance to do it by taking the pressure off of her and starting a wagon on someone elseIn post 928, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Give me shit to work with so if you DO flip town, it's information for us.
if noraa is town this gives her the chance to contribute without feeling pressured to defend herself
if noraa is scum she is going to die today regardless
and it gives us the chance to get more interactions with a wagon on someone who is not already doomed
This is really bad phrasing. The last part feels like a lamist mediator talking words and ignoring why Noraa isn't working with us. Like if Noraa is town here in what world does she respond positiviely to 'work with us' and nothing else? In worlds of scum Noraa it doesn't matter sure, but if you care about the say 10% chance town Noraa (guessing your priors here) then this is a spaghetti weak appeal with only limpyness behind it.In post 986, MURDERCAT wrote:Sometimes, as town, you just have to eat a death. This includes a miselim. Even on D1. By fighting it so hard you make yourself look worse Noraa.
I'm 50/50 on whether you are purposefully doing it as scum because you want to avoid real conversations or if you are just playing to live instead of playing the optimal way to win as town.
But we have to eliminate you because there's too many SRs. So if are town please work with us now.
This doesn't happen because scum LL pushing town Noraa this far would give odds Noraa rage shoots LL much higher than any town benefits they'd get out of it imo.In post 1014, MURDERCAT wrote:The best timeline here is Noraa town passes to scum LLD and is lauded for the big brain play
My problem is that scum-you threatens to shoot a strong townread here in an attempt to try and get us to say 'let's hit Noraa with the third shot instead of first'. It's essentially light blackmail, and it's a bad look for you either way.In post 1024, Noraa wrote:My reasons:
Considering she can push this hard, she is 100% a threat to town. I did mess up some but I don't believe at all that she's willing to reconsider even for a second. She is way over herself and squashes all other opinions. I will bring her down with me to prevent town from having this absolute domineering player that is, as far as I'm concerned, pushing in 100% the WRONG places. She is not helping town and is so fucking frustrating to work with. I do not think town benefits from her reads and presence AT ALL. Perhaps this is hypocritical coming from me considering my playstyle also sucks ass but I mean in the end, its beneficial for town cuz we get basically two policy lims.
I think you're really overestimating LL's voice in the game btw. To me she's literally just sorted noise that I've chucked in the townbin and don't really care about. If you're town then how about literally not responding to, reading, or commenting on anything else LL says today, accepting she's probably town, and trying to find some more townreads. Imo, townblocking+POE is the best D1 strat. Good odds for the POE shoots beat out good scumreads unless there's a major skill disparity btw scum/town.
Atm I can't see any serious townreads from you or any attempt to look at your wagon. Sure, you could be 'legitimately annoyed', but can you also see why we'd all have a problem with that response since scum you really doesn't want to give out associative here, while town you has incentive to be trying to engage outside the black hole LL essentially is to you?There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
This has honestly got to be a really dedicated parody account lol.In post 1041, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
If you are town you played poorly and deserved to die. I'm fallible, I can make mistakes. But you look like scum and have played like scum.In post 1038, Noraa wrote:If I kill you while knowing you are town, maybe you should think twice before going ham on a newbie page 7 in a game.
rather than blaming everything on someone that has way less experience, consider that maybe you haven't done the best either.
But telling me to my face that because I got one read wrong, a read that would be easy to get wrong if indeed you are town given how you played.
And that I've somehow done something wrong.
You're delusional. I'd do this 100/100. It's not my fault you're deciding to game throw. Managing your emotional state is not my job, it's yours. You came here to play a game and you have a role to play if you are indeed town. Killing a townie is playing against your win condition and is against site rules.
Is this assuming she's ignored other scum in the PT telling her 'Noraa wtf' or that they just aren't commenting?In post 1056, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:yea she just realized the worst case scenario for her is to not get to shoot LLD for her scum team
Ok I give up, which one of these was supposed to be alignment indicative?In post 1070, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
Correct.In post 1068, MURDERCAT wrote:Oh no but his posts are so fun
I assume this is the "who I would have shot"
His posts are exactly the space of where I would be if I were scum this game.
Agreeing with most people.
Using a gimmick to hide themselves.
They townread me without a lot of good reasons and I didn't get great vibes.
They agreed with Isis and Bell being scum which was ???
I'm pretty sure they are in the "scum zone" and I want them dead.
There's a lot of people in the game who'll have seen me mention in other games I'm essentially V/LA tuesdays/thursdays because I'm bust playing mafia then. Wednesday was busy this week.In post 1074, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Like you have to remember.
the more pubilc and vocal you are, the more likely you are to die.
People like Mush and I are townie but marked for death. IF we're scum it's kind of over.
but Hopkirk is on no one's radar. No one is marking them as scum, no one marking them as hard town.
which means they will escape most lists and live a long time.
Which is what scum want to be here.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Noraa's like 35-40 town, 65-60% scum for me at this point, but I'd flip her today (third because I don't trust the rage kill) even if that was 60-40 the other way since we've got fifty pages of discussion on her, we get all the information from it, and scum never kills her at this point
I told Hectic I was going to do this before the game. It went something like this:In post 1075, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
I love the poems too, but my first thought when I saw them was "using a gimmick this game is a great scum cover to avoid lists and having to be dredged down in fights that kill you".In post 1072, Isis wrote:but Hopkirk writes poemz D:
Hopkirk spotted Hectic hiding in the bushes outside Pooky's house and strolled over to join him. 'I think I'll post exclusively in eight syllable rhyming couplets for Death Curse. You wouldn't modkill me if I commited hard to it then stopped would you?'
'Wow Hopkirk, what kind of mod do you think I am. That would be unethical.' Hectic gasped.
'Just like tax evasion' Hopkirk nodded.
They shared a finger gun.
'No but seriously though, Isis would literally chop my fingers off and feed them to my cat if I did.' Hectic sighed. 'What's the point in moderating if I can't just modkill whoever I want for stupid reasons.'
'What if you edit in a few rules into the OP then claim they were there the whole time?'
'I guess that might work. How'd you find me anyway?'
'You're always waiting outside Isis and Pooky's house at two or three in the morning. I checked with Isis but she wasn't home so I came right here.'
'Sometimes you're a real Flavour leaf.' Hectic chuckled. Hopkirk didn't ask him to explain what that meant, no matter how much Nero was wondering. It was fairly obvious what Hectic meant, and Hoppy knew how much his pal explaining his metaphors.
There conversation was interrupted as Pooky left his house to pick up his newspaper. Hectic leapt out of the bushes, stuffing Pooky under his arm and running off.
Hopkirk turned to Nero. 'I'm surprised you went along with this.' He began before trailing off as he noticed the look of horror that had crossed Nero's face.
'I... I never thought he'd go through with it.' Nero muttered. 'He always talked about it, but I assumed the cat was enough.'
'He needed someone else to hug.' Hopkirk shook his head. 'And we all know who's the cuddliest person on the site.'
'I guess.' Nero said. He seemed a little offended.
'You know what this means though? Now Death Curse doesn't have a mod.'
'No...' Nero said, pulling his trusty XL18 industrial strength flamethrower from its holster. 'But it's still got a goddamn co-mod. Hectic is my responsibility.'
Hopkirk tried to stop him, but Nero had already disappeared. He sighed in resignation, helped himself to Pooky's paper since he probably didn't need it anymore, then went off to do whatever he did on Thursday evenings.
------
I assume Nero/Hectic made up some time after that, but idk what happened there. Maybe Pooky saw and could tell us about what happened next?
Which ones? I think I only really commented on pretty obvtown slots?In post 1081, MURDERCAT wrote:Hopkirk iso looks null to me. I agree in principle with the logic for why that's scummy but I'm also not against hearing Hopkirk out for explanations for the reads.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
It's like, just 2-3 people, one of whom is pretty sus right now. Not sure why everyone's acting defeatist. Ovtown hyperposters being wrong isn't remotely a death sentence.In post 1114, Tayl0r Swift wrote:noraa is right. this game is dumb. everyone is letting lld play dictator and determine everything. thats not good. the people shes "working with" are just egging her on. this is not how town wins games.
Really interested where your murdercat SR is coming from since I'm SRing the slot if anything.In post 1125, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
DING DING DINGIn post 1121, MURDERCAT wrote:
I think by far the highest % play as town here is to let LLD work on D1 and use whether or not she lives and what the associations are to hunt afterwards.In post 1119, Tayl0r Swift wrote:its impossible to do much scumhunting while the thread is almost exclusively you dictating what everyone should think.
give me the scroll please. please please. let me kill lld. if we dont kill her now town loses 90%.
It's almost liek this has been the plan the whole day.
Can you post a summary of what I need to defend against? Not interested in this from anyone except murdercat, thanks.In post 1133, MURDERCAT wrote:
I would be too scared of you as scum to do what tayl0r is doing if you are right about NoraaIn post 1122, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:MurderCat, what's your take on Taylor here and them trying to shutdown the Hopkirk wagon?
I think Tayl0r often stands up for Noraa here as town and might genuinely feel like she (tayl0r) can't operate how she wants too. I don't think Hopkirk/Tayl0r/Noraa/?/? is the solve because Tayl0r probably just let's hopkirk come back and defend.
You say you're not sure, don't have any lean?In post 1155, Theta Alpine wrote:i step away for an hour and suddenly we are doing my plan
and yeah okay VOTE: tayl0r swift
we can sort hopkirk later and i am less sure about that
i still think adorable is prob scum but that is not going to be a thing we vote for i guess
Can your explain this post? Frist 2/3 only.In post 1163, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:hopkirk is not naturally scummy or LHF or disagree with LLD
try againThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
from MUGO - which part of that is scummy from day one of the game?Hopkirk has taken no stances of note, gets maddeningly turned around and stuck on mechanics, is using an obfuscatory posting style, and is dodging any attempt to corner them into producing content.
Like seriously 'dodging any attempt to corner them into producing content?' Going to want to get clarification on what you mean here.
In post 1176, Theta Alpine wrote:faking a post restriction would normally be rather scummy in my book but i am fairly sure in this game it is not alignment indicative
they did seem to attempt some discussion on game mechanics which i like
the blank vote on noraa is lean scum for me
i personally think scum would at least try to explain their vote though
they agreed with another players reads without much elaboration which does not sit right with me
but i feel like this early in the game it is excusable
Fence sitty in post one. Doesn't take a stance until directly called to at which point has a stance. Hmmmm.In post 1178, Theta Alpine wrote:yeah
i am willing to kill them at the moment but i strongly believe other slots are more likely to be scum
Going to what detail about which parts of that were AI in a meaningful way there and how much each one contributed since I thought that was a light town lean on me from your first post there.
why do i need towncred in this setup?In post 1179, Theta Alpine wrote:like seriously how do you expect to get towncred with a blank vote
that does not make sense to me
but maybe they expected town to look for bussers so idk
@Lady - since I'm back now it's fine for you to let everyone know you were just doing this as a reaction test for the more nullish slots. I'm assuming you've got similar leans like I have from it (bad on theta for example)There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Are you feeling ok? The kind of passive overreaction of this feels like it's come from a less good (irl, not game related) headspace.In post 1359, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Isis is gone so obviously I can't soul-read her and Hectic is the moderator so you're just trolling me at this point
Hey Vax I'm so sorry nobody else welcomed you very much. Welcome to our game, hope you enjoy it
In post 1381, shellyc wrote:
isn't the pro scum play here to just. bus Noraa and get LLD and misdirect LLDIn post 1377, Hopkirk wrote:This is probably scum.
If Noraa is town (say 30%, though I was closer to 60% when I made this post) then quickhammering is suicide and they lose nothing by dragging a Lady vsIn post 1382, shellyc wrote:I don't get scum motivation to sit on their hands on Noraa slot
they just bus Noraa with LLD impossible to marginalise now
isn't Lapsa a lurker as either align
Noraa fight out for ages. It bogs stuff down and creates mess. I'm getting a sense like a lot of scum just aren't posting here and wanted to let things play along.
If Noraa is scum, either they think they can change the wagon, or they don't want to look like obvious bussing. I think we were already looking for people bussing at that point. If we weren't 'look for bussing' is pretty strong site meta as far as I'm aware, so I can see this just being a newbscum who isn't sure of the best way to react to this but wants to post something. The tone reads as really 'don't want to get on anyone's bad side' at a glance.
I can't back it up with stats, but I have a strong feeling that this kind of 'propose a bad strategy that they vaguely believe in then drop it' comes from town trying to be helpful rather than scum, especially for new players. I don't think new scum ever really proposes a strategy that theyIn post 1385, shellyc wrote:
ehhhhIn post 1383, Hopkirk wrote:A decent part of my Zdenek townread, looking to be one of my spicier reads atm, is that blatantly bad 'we should do this strategy' style posts come from newbtown from a good place (which I get in the tone of their follow ups to me in regard to it), not newbscum trying to fake content.
but the easiest way of fake content is a mech oriented approach
also this feels like a game which I can solve through PoE
murder/mush/Taylor/fidget/hopkirk
these are town slotsknow is badbecause that's so attention grabbing and has no utility if there's even a couple of experienced players to discredit it afterwards.
Thinking back to all of the LONG (offsite) arguments I've had about 'yes we should lethal someone day one' and 'no we shouldn't list out all of our reads from most to least town multiple times a day', I gut townread the behavior.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
I felt there were things Noraa wasn't being 100% clear on and they both seemed like the kind of personalities to shout past each other in an argument so it was definitely plausible yeah.In post 1419, UNOwen wrote:
Did you feel there was a misunderstanding from either Noraa or LLD?In post 1403, Hopkirk wrote: Upsides
IF Nora town - full picture of the situation reduces odds of misunderstanding
IF Nora scum - they can easily get caught out in a direct lie here
Either way - any interaction with Noraa helps inform our reads on the slot.
No downsides
I'll take a look at you again yeah. I've got at least three townreads saying you're town and you do have the kind of posting style I frequently (wrongly) gut tunnel so I want to reread you soon.In post 1425, MURDERCAT wrote:
I thought it might work because I had a recent game where I baited an NK on N1 and the town PRs went on to play a big role in the win. But I have tried to interact with Noraa in many different places in many different ways.In post 1423, Hopkirk wrote:This is really bad phrasing. The last part feels like a lamist mediator talking words and ignoring why Noraa isn't working with us. Like if Noraa is town here in what world does she respond positiviely to 'work with us' and nothing else? In worlds of scum Noraa it doesn't matter sure, but if you care about the say 10% chance town Noraa (guessing your priors here) then this is a spaghetti weak appeal with only limpyness behind it.
100% sheeping a TR to pressure someone then? That's reasonable.In post 1434, MURDERCAT wrote:
lol at this entire post but..In post 1431, Hopkirk wrote:Which ones? I think I only really commented on pretty obvtown slots?
..I was responding pretty directly to this, as in, I want to give Hopkirk space to respond to you and not just do what we did to Noraa agin.In post 1070, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:
They townread me without a lot of good reasons and I didn't get great vibes.
Which of my games have you read?In post 1441, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
it means I think you're a good playerIn post 1436, Hopkirk wrote:Can your explain this post? Frist 2/3 only.
Zdenek was the mech stuff in a big part then his later posting felt like he wasn't just waiting around on Norra. 685 was a nice post.In post 1446, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
talk to me about denek and pooky?In post 1377, Hopkirk wrote:Shelly/Denek/Mush/LLD/Pooky/Taylor fairly obvtown as of p27.
Pooky I townread a lot of the casual/happy tone around the Noraa interactions. Idk about him anymore because there's some weird un-jovial stuff that feels off, so I'll get back to you on that.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
It was a pretty good one too since I think 3 people- notably Theta - jumped to agree with her. Pushing a low content slot for NAI stuff then seeing if people go along with you on something you don't agree with is a good way to catch out whether people are just agreeing with you.In post 1455, Vaxkiller wrote:I feel like its going to turn out that LLD's push on Hopkirk was just reaction testing like hopkirk said.
This post was why I thought that btw: https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12253586
The 'I am willing to kill them' really doesn't line up with what came before it or from this imo if it's literally 'they made a blank post' and you thought all of the other stuff was NAI? Are you using 'kill' in a really weak sense, or do you not really care who's first lethaled here? I really don't get your point of view here since as far as I can tell if you're town that's happy to vote me for how I interacted with the wagon then I'd expect to see you looking at the early wagon and potential bussing/avoidance a lot more and I really don't get that from you yet.In post 1457, Theta Alpine wrote:hopkirk
almost the entirety of my scum lean on you is that you made a blank vote on a popular wagon
with slight influences from faking a post restriction and the way you agreed with another players reads without elaboration
and honestly the more i thought about the blank vote the less i wanted to kill you because it simply did not make sense for scum to behave that way if noraa is scum
but i am also operating under the assumption that noraa could be town in which case that would be a valid scum lean
so let me just say that i do not think you and noraa are scum together
my scum lean on you is conditional on noraa being town
I dropped the act because two people replaced out so I wouldn't get modkilled for dropping it, and also because there were a lot of pages. I realized 'oh yeah, it's literally impossible to catch up on thirty pages of stuff and comment on it with this, I really should have saved this for a micro shouldn't I'. I could commit to it hard yeah, but then It's going to take me literally five times as long to format everything right and you can probably tell I don't want to spend my time like that.In post 1459, Bell wrote:@Hopkirk counter question to town cred question. Why are you trying to look town right now if you don't care about town cred by dropping the act?
Really not a fan of your POE here. Can I get some more thoughts on all of those slots?In post 1471, Bell wrote:
I'm not sure. There's kind of like, 4-6 people I want to vote RN.In post 1466, UNOwen wrote:
Who would be your next vote?In post 1432, Bell wrote: Behavioralism. She's scum reading whoever gives her a hard time and town reads whoever doesn't. Also, I voted her way before she voted me so I can't be omgusing her, when she's omgusing me, but she keeps forgetting that.
Lapsa, The guy that just replaced out. Hopkirk. Zdenek. pooky.
Maginally Theta
Pedit: I knew you'd say something like that.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
So can you expand on the Noraa/Hop being different teams a bit? That's a hot take and I'm interested in why.In post 1479, Theta Alpine wrote:
hopkirk read is 1176 and elaborated on in 1457In post 1458, Tayl0r Swift wrote:
why do you lean scum on hopkirk? why are teh other targets better? why a vote on adorable?In post 1450, Theta Alpine wrote:replying to hopkirk
i slightly lean scum on you
though i have several better targets
VOTE: adorable
i want to get a wagon on this
it is a conditional read so i guess that is technically fencesitting
but at this point i would not kill them today
i would want to see what noraa is first
adorable read is 832 and was elaborated on in 1191
tayl0r read is 1169
i do not want to read noraa at this pointUNOwen wrote:@Theta and Vaxkiller: 1426 is interested in what you think.
but strictly speaking
i want to believe noraa is town
but she does suspicious stuff that makes me doubt that is actually the case
Fortunately I'm self aware enough to recognize that I'd be actively making the game worse if I committed to actively harming my ability to talk properly. Unlike people who spend the entire game prod dodging until they get force replaced, or commit hard to other gimmicks that make them perma null I have the self awareness to realize that the gimmick had played out.In post 1480, Bell wrote:I don't agree that I was throwing shade at him. I was genuinely curious. I know that hopkirk generally knows what towncred is and how to get it and his switch in posting style is designed to get it.
....@Pooky confession: I don't think I can read taylor. But she seems to be try harding which is new and exciting to me.
More importantly, I can recognize when a joke's played out. If I kept going it isn't any funnier than it was initially, and I wouldn't want to do it until it was played out and actively annoying people since they couldn't read my slot because of it. Knowing there was some kind of wagon (because I was egoing myself by searching mentions of Hopkirk on the site. No, I'm not telling you why...) on me is a pretty good sign that keeping to the gimmick is going to piss people off/make the game less fun for them if they want to engage with me. Making it better is a lot more valuable in overall game enjoyment than keeping it going. Those kind of people who over commit to the bit when nobody cares anymore aren't entertaining.
Even more importantly, two people had been replace out at this point so I didn't have to keep going. Why would I have kept going out of choice? Try and phrase your answer to this as an eight line set of four two line eight syllable rhyming couplets. It's harder than you think. My fingers were literally hurting a bit after about thirty lines on D1. Imagine doing hundreds in a catch up.
Not sure why you think town-Hop would continue the gimmick, very interested in the why there.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
I thought the guy who replaced out meant Isis, so it's only 2/5 of these I don't like rather than 3/5 which is much more fine.In post 1495, Bell wrote:No, to me it seemed like a contradiction. I had a thought (he is lying), but like a good truth finder I decided to directly ask him rather than just go for one explanation out of many.
His explanation was 1) unexpected and 2) Makes sense. So I'm glad I asked.
@Hopkirk, why aren't you a fan? Besides zdenek and you? tho, your read on zdenek makes no sense to me.
Can you highlight which part of the read doesn't make sense? It's much easier to explain if you point out why it doesn't make sense first.
Shifting your vote doesn't clear you from a bad vote/position. I'm not accepting your offer to drop it.In post 1497, Theta Alpine wrote:
i mean i have shifted my vote to adorable twice now because their vote on noraa reads like either a bus or advancing an easy mislynchIn post 1491, Hopkirk wrote:In post 1455, Vaxkiller wrote:
The 'I am willing to kill them' really doesn't line up with what came before it or from this imo if it's literally 'they made a blank post' and you thought all of the other stuff was NAI? Are you using 'kill' in a really weak sense, or do you not really care who's first lethaled here? I really don't get your point of view here since as far as I can tell if you're town that's happy to vote me for how I interacted with the wagon then I'd expect to see you looking at the early wagon and potential bussing/avoidance a lot more and I really don't get that from you yet.In post 1457, Theta Alpine wrote:hopkirk
almost the entirety of my scum lean on you is that you made a blank vote on a popular wagon
with slight influences from faking a post restriction and the way you agreed with another players reads without elaboration
and honestly the more i thought about the blank vote the less i wanted to kill you because it simply did not make sense for scum to behave that way if noraa is scum
but i am also operating under the assumption that noraa could be town in which case that would be a valid scum lean
so let me just say that i do not think you and noraa are scum together
my scum lean on you is conditional on noraa being town
also
i specifically said that i would hammer you
it would take near majority of other players voting you for me to actually join in
i was willing to kill you because i believed you to have a better then random chance of being scum then town
but i tried to make it clear that i did not really want your wagon and that other people were much more likely to be scum in my opinion
So you're just going along with the majority is essentially what you're saying?
You still think I'm more likely to flip scum? Why's that.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Fair enough, I'll take another look in a bit. Fairly easy to misread some stuff when you've got a ton of stuff to read.In post 1499, MURDERCAT wrote:
I was pretty explicit about itIn post 1481, Hopkirk wrote:100% sheeping a TR to pressure someone then? That's reasonable.
So what's your read on me right now? From your posts at the end of the last page it seems like you're trying to throw shade at me in a 'I'm moving off, but watch your step kiddo' style move. I noted immediately that you didn't express a clear current read on me there and feel like that could be hedging because you want to go with the flow/wait to see if other people now TR and either move back to me or drop it based on whether you can blend with gameflow. This is largely based on what else you've posted giving me the 'go with the flow' impression, including what you just said about would hammer.In post 1500, Theta Alpine wrote:well that quote got messed up somehow
p-edit
i heavily believe scum would not bus with a blank vote the way you did
in my opinion it does not make sense to do that
there is a wifom argument there but i am going to ignore that for now since very little else you had done at that point was scummy in my opinionThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
So you've said Hop not scum if Noraa is scum. You've said it, I don't think you've explained it anywhere.In post 1502, Theta Alpine wrote:none of my votes so far have been on majority wagons
at the time i would have gone along with it because i do not have a good reason to contest lambdadelta a second time
as for your second question
i used past tense very specifically there
as i developed my read on you it turned into a conditional read for reasons i have already explained
You've also said if Noraa town > Hop scum. That's not been explained and it pretty much implies reasons to not like me outside what you've said.
Assume Noraa's flipped town. Why's Hop scum there?There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
So literally because I blank voted on the wagon? I'm going to want to know why you haven't given thoughts on a lot of questionable posting around that wagon from low activity posters. I'll give you a list if you can't work it out yourself, but I'd prefer to see what you come up with as part of the utility of this.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
What people assume scum would do really isn't close to what scum do in practice. Think about this, if everyone knew scum always do it then scum would stop doing it. Most of what I used to find scummy was just new townies I tunneled on. Personally I find scumslips to be more of a towntell than a scumtell tbh.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
In post 171, Toogeloo wrote:Vault dweller...scum?
That's pretty out there. What is it in their 4 posts that has you leaning scum?Looking back at the timings I don't like when this vote happened. Toogeloo didn't initially vote Noraa (or comment on it) after she made the posts that Toogeloo later comments she's 'caught scum' for making. The timing doesn't really gel unless he just fully skipped the posts (which is a possibility based on what else he's said I guess). Interested in hearing a bit more about when/why Noraa became definite scum for you Toogeloo, because I'm not convinced here that your were sincere voting since it's based on stuff that happens before your post 171. Side note, did you like VD here? They pinged me a little at this point.
Given you didn't push me or Zdenek around here, how much stock have you got in this?In post 102, Toogeloo wrote:When I first read my role pm, I thought it was a mod slip lol.
You put way too much faith in town. I think the opposite actually. Town are more likely to be complacent while scum are more likely to read rules so they can put IIoA into their posts and scheme without hunting.In post 60, shellyc wrote:i think town are much more likely to read the setup tbh
Vote: Pooky
Because it makes them happy. But I can get behind the Noora train. While I disagree with using the sign up thread or discord to scum hunt, it's still worth pushing.
In post 341, Toogeloo wrote:What exactly pinged your gut? It was only 4 posts at the time, I'm curious.
This feels like a weird thing to be your only interaction with Noraa on. Not sure how to explain it, but something about it feels like an odd angle to be engaging on.In post 338, Toogeloo wrote:I asked for expansion of reasoning for Vault dweller and never got it.
You made a lot of posts pushing for 'let's just finish this day and kill Noraa, it's inevitable and we should just do it', or words essentially to that effect. I'm having trouble understanding where this is coming from for you when you still want to catch up, people are saying do Noraa later etc. Also, you don't appear to really have reads at this point?In post 888, Toogeloo wrote:I think the best way to get LLD to do something different is to just be done with Noraa so we can move on with our lives.
I don't really get the mindset you're in when making this point? The second paragraph is tonally off.In post 897, Toogeloo wrote:No one's letting LLD do whatever the fuck she wants (though I personally don't care if she does whatever the fuck she wants).
You got caught saying something you probably should have not said. No one is going to let that go. It's a great place to start the game. There are no power roles in this game, so you aren't worth protecting by anyone, town or scum. Accept your fate, start working with us on who you'll pass the scroll to
and why, so that that person can start formulating a plan that works with town's will as well.
Can you specify which thing Noraa did that you didn't like? I'm fairly sure I know what you mean, but It's worth clarifying in case you're just saying it, since I don'tthinkyou've said it directly.
Again, this feels off when taken in the context of Toogeloo's limited engagement with the thread.In post 939, Toogeloo wrote:You're a detriment to town's win condition this game, Noraa. You're just too stubborn to realize it. There is 0% chance you live past flip 1. It's increasingly worse that talking to you is pointless because no one else exists outside of LLD to you.
Woah, you should be spending 'tomorrow' (now today) with your family instead of using your electronic devices. For shame *shakes fist*In post 1606, Toogeloo wrote:I'll see you all tomorrow.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Ok MURDERCAT can be town. The posts have a much more consistent POV and sincere/natural thought process on Noraa and the surrounding issues when I take the ISO as a whole instead of individual posts.
Did you ever do this or nah?In post 226, MURDERCAT wrote:
I mean, I am using the wagon to sort others as well. I think it will be very useful for that.In post 219, Tayl0r Swift wrote:ok lets sort those slots and loop back to noraa later on in the day. people are wayyyy too confident for page 10. this is not a good push.
In post 1244, MURDERCAT wrote:I know I've just been going with the flow, but here's some of my hot takes. I don't understand all the tip toeing, this isn't like a normal setup where town has to stop talking once we flip someone. There's still scenarios where Noraa flips town and I'd rather have time after that first Noraa "flip" and after we have more info to come to a decision about flips 2 and 3. Also this is like the most fun setup to get miselimed in so I don't really understand why town Noraa would be so upset, but whatever. I think odds of hitting 2 scum day 1 are higher if we flip Noraa scum and get LLD confirmed early than if we try to go backdoor, and I think if we flip 2 scum today we win outright. I don't think town Noraa venges LLD out of spite. If this is town Noraa I want to know sooner rather than later.In post 953, MURDERCAT wrote:Town Noraa probably does get this frustrated but I'm not convinced scum Noraa doesn't fake it and we 100% have to flip Noraa at this point regardless. So Noraa if you actually are town please take a step back from the game and come back ready to find scum instead of just yelling at LLD.In post 1584, MURDERCAT wrote:
I'm currently at about 70% chance of Noraa scum. The problem is that Noraa is an emotional player and did have a very strong emotional reaction. But I also respect her scum game enough to believe that she would use that in her favor and she recently said that she fakes townslips in all her scum games.In post 1582, Titus wrote:This sounds like Noraa is just an angry emotional player. I'd be run up half my games with this standard. Do you not believe the case?In post 134, MURDERCAT wrote:
I'm willing to roll with Bell and Noraa being lockscum based on this just for memesIn post 123, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Bell are you coaching Noraa in the scum PT you sly dog you? :3In post 283, MURDERCAT wrote:
Noraa not taking credit for a win looks bad to meIn post 268, Noraa wrote:Theres a thing called luck. Luck played in big time that game. My partner accidentally nokilled and that ultimately lead to our victory. Without that along with another player's lurking due to rl, you really think I could've won that game?In post 762, MURDERCAT wrote:
I'm town for immediately jumping on Noraa with no remorse when she flips scum, but also because memesIn post 353, shellyc wrote:why is murder town btw, entrance doesn't really ping either wayThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Atm I'm not even convinced It's Noraa scum since gamevibes feel more like 'scum coasting to not rock the boat and enjoying drama'. I'll keep y'all updated as thoughts progress.
Three of the more obv-obv townpicks is good. Not commenting on Noraa whatsoever in the entrance I kind of like tbh. I want more here but for in the five posts so far I'm not upset with this slot.In post 1703, Gloria Cleary wrote:I’ve now read over 50+ pages of this game but everytime, I believe I’m finally caught up, there’s at least 10 more. So what I think so far is Mush, LLD. Isis and Titus for town. I really don’t know who’s scum yet. I will probably be useless until D2 or 3, so I might just sheep Mush/Titus until I get some clarify.
In post 605, Lapsa wrote:Frankly speaking - this game's a garbage so far.
To an extent of people openly claiming scum and getting away with that.This slot is garbage so far. This is what I'd call a bad naked vote. Especially if Noraa flips town.
Next post I should probably catch up, then back to isos.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Feels like talking style, got any meta to show it isn't?In post 1542, Tayl0r Swift wrote:does anyone else feel like alpine's reads are pretty artificial?
for example he says "ever since this post i guess i scumread noraa"
a townie would say "ever since rereading i scumread noraa"
I liked the effortposting when she was going through all the game and giving her thoughts. It had a sincere tone, and I kind of liked her towards the end of my interactions with her yesterday.
Welcome Titus
Thanks for subbing in. It's an intimidating game with a lot of players and pages, short deadlines, and a massive amount of spectators. Kind of scary to play in a game with so many people watching and judging, especially when you think about who they are. I mean look at that spectator list:
PenguinPower- I can only imagine how much they're roasting us all right now. The spectator topic is probably full of stuff like 'The best way to resolve our problem with getting sign ups in the newbie queue is probably to let some of these guys sign up as newbies. What does Hopkirk even think he's doing lol.'
skitter30- Highly underappreciated player and spectator imo.
Andycyca- Too cunning to be caught signing up to spectate in the actual sign ups thread, but I still caught you. Don't feel too bad about it, I'm a highly skilled paranormal investigator
Gypyx- Incredibly cunning player. He knows how much Finland trusts me and is probably spectating the game purely for those codes. Naturally we manage to thwart those fiendish schemes of his every Saturday morning, but you've got to respect that level of dedication. In fact I'm willing to give you Sweden's as a reward for the persistence: 8765 5442 9499 1739
Cabd- What can I even say about this guy. I considered subbing out when I saw that spectate sign up. What a player. Just wow.
fferyllt- Cabd's sidekick and possible apprentice may seem non threatening at first, but don't be fooled. I feel like any day now she's going to show us all that she's taken everything Cabd's taught us as vastly improved on it. Then we'll all be sorry. We'll all see.
Syryana- I think we all remember this guy from his classic post back in the 'stop fakeclaim as town!: the case forlethalall liars'. Can you believe it's already been 1789 days 14 hours? Wow, time sure flies.
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... ct[]=20972
I can barely imagine how he'd feel about Noraa if he were in this game.
Ydrasse-
petapan- I'm going to be honest, I'm not sure who this is, and I'm fairly sure none of the other spectators are Hectic alts. Got a strong Hectic alt read on this slot.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
By trolling do you mean 'scum making posts' or actual trolling trolling?In post 1554, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:like how much more of this trolling are we allowing TS to do
I don't really get your problem with her in general, could you go over it a bit more?
I sure don't like Unowen's play around the Noraa wagon.In post 1558, UNOwen wrote:
Yes exactly. Noraa is not a fool, if she fears that she has been caught and is 100% going down then I believe her instinct would be to perform some sort of distancing with one of her partners. The highlighting of the Adorable post was pretty strong considering the context of Noraa getting swarmed that was going on. "Theres so many questions that I get when I see this post that I am definitely SRing you for it. I think I'd actually like to place my vote here bc I want to put some pressure on you." sounds like a very calculated statement, not naturally worded at all. Noraa later follows up with declaring she would give the scroll to Adorable too. However at no point does Noraa reach out to other players to support the Adorable vote, which I think she would if town and convinced she had identified a clearly scummy player hopping on the wagon. That she has this reaction to Adorable but is apparently not alarmed about the way I have lazily sat on her wagon (unlike both shelly and taylor) has further suggested to me that something is up.In post 1525, Theta Alpine wrote: 254 this feels like it was premeditated
i mean seriously it feels like this exchange between noraa and adorable was planned out ahead of time
why is a self-proclaimed newbie attacking adorable and effectively daring them to vote themselves
and not attacking hopkirk who had placed a blank vote
or unowen who had an rvs vote
On Adorable, she is busy and it is not clear that she has completely caught up so perhaps there will be better information later. But the vote was awkward as anything, independent of Noraa's alignment. Noraa is right that the whole "I don't understand why Noraa is defensive?" was a scummy question to ask. The implication is clear but instead of just stating a suspicion and acting on it there is a smoke screen of questioning to build up to the vote. Then immediately in 277 the facade drops, Adorable thinks Noraa is sus and declares she would give the scroll to Noraa. This looks like scum attempting to find their way onto a wagon.
In post 1623, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:This is Taylor being 95% Confident I'm Scum:
Spoiler:
After I offer her 1:1 in this post:
In post 1472, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:im actually thinking
Taylor - > Pooky -> Noraa would be a pretty damn good scroll pass
it's radio silence from Taylor. She knows T - > P -> N is a disaster for her scum team and she just disengages and starts poking at someone else.
if she was actually town and 95% confident she'd be all aboard
@Pooky - town Taylor would never accept this because she's getting the first lethal and you're getting the second. If she 90% scumreads you then it's a terrible trade for her to trade her own life and a strong townread (who scum you would scroll) as opposed to giving you first or third lethal. Town her would definitely never consider this over Pooky-Taylor-X and this feels kind of obvious? Like neither alignment Taylor would consider it a good offer, and I feel it's hard to miss that it's objectively a terrible offer from her POV, and also worse than the other virtually identical offer.In post 1632, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:There is a difference between town mindset this game and scum mindset.
Town WANT to trade 1:1 for scum and blow them up to kingdom come.
Scum WANT to survive and hide until endgame.
You trying to spin this as "suicidal stupidity" is downright ludicrious.
Nah, I don't accept your locktown read on me. You're going to have to try harder before I allow you to townread me.In post 1639, MUSHSHAGANA wrote:I'm not bothering to recap thoughts on the utter chaos that happened in my absence. If I'm skipping questions, get to me before 12AM CST.
I'll tell you my reads are mostly the same, except I'm willing to stuff Hopkirk into null. (I don't like the content, but the readable posts help. I'll need more time to determine my thoughts on what the content says for Hopkirk's alignment.)
I do like Titus. The aggression mixed into the curiosity is pinging me as town -- it reminds me of my high pressure pushes.
I'll also say that I think Pooky is super scummy and while I would love to save Tayl0r or doomed Noraa from the curse, Pooky is a great trade because they've been dodging deep inspection because of the town leader (who I think has been pocketed) running interference all game long. Noraa is doomed regardless, and Tayl0r's going to be hard to fit into everyone's townbloc and could create issues with town coalescence as a result, so we get game progression and easier reads for the folks who aren't getting what I'm getting from Tayl0r and Noraa.
Here's a funny little thing about Pooky: we've discussed the dangers of leashing scroll-passes, we decided that a Noraa leash was an acceptable compromise (well, not for me but I agree with the logic of the argument if I was scumreading Noraa), and then Pooky proposes a fully locked down chain of scroll-passing. I'm not sure if this is more likely to come from town who is not paying much attention to what they're doing, or more likely to be gambiting scum to retain their safe position, but I don't like it either way. (Another possibility is that it's scum playing a double layered gambit, presuming that Tayl0r has a spicier, townier target she'll take first if she does accept the scroll. See the Tayl0r vs LLD thing.)There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
@Fidget - are you a public alt? I'm wondering who you are since you said I've got a 'very good scumgame' and I haven't rolled scum in like two and a half years and 20-30 games at this point.
@Noraa - I'm online and going through stuff and want to interact with you a bit in real time. Idk if I'm starting to buy that 'hard effortposting Noraa' on the last five or so pages feels like town. Can you describe how you feel scum you would react in this scenario (basically to this whole game). literally just shoot me up with a post full of AOE? Also, please don't shoot Lady. I know you don't like their play this game, but it's a town slot and really doesn't have the influence you think.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Yeah, they're a scary crowd. Any of them you're specifically terrified by?In post 1729, Titus wrote:@Hopkirk - I hope the spectators like me.
VD is actually a very short iso and I like the later end of it from a town POV actually. This feels t.o.w.n https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12251872
Are you seeing Pooky vs Taylor as TvT or TvS Titus?There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
That wasn't in relation to anything specific. I just noticed you'd mentioned something that sounded like you weren't aware of it, and wanted to make sure you were. Obviously there's a big difference in flipping someone and knowing what they are then updating reads based on that vs 3 simultaneous flips where there's two chances for reads to update.
Got a read on Fidget?There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Hey MURDERCAT, Hectic knows how jealous I am of his adorable cat, no point trying to pretend I'm not, so I'm going to be blunt. If you want to sheep me from now on instead of Lady I've got a slot open.
After a reread my current read of Pooky is easier to express in a picture than words. Should be fairly self explanatory:
[hide][/hide]
You can get in another one of my pockets if you want buddy.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
To clarify my POE is closer to 10-12 than it is 5. Those are just the ones I was thinking of voting right now (less so Noraaright nowbut they're more the names I can see myself voting over the next two days)
It's largely that the tone feels under the radary/uncontroversial in general, but there's a couple of specific things that pinged me.
In post 39, Fidget wrote:
You have a pretty good understanding of the setup, up until the part where you question whether or not scum has a NK. What is your intention behind the last line?In post 14, Bell wrote:My understanding is that scum get one day vig you can’t shoot a scroll holder.
We get three flips at once.
That occur over a 7 day voting phase.
Then 2 baton passes for an additional 6 days of content.
3 flips repeat.
No scum NK?
So two things here. First, this kind of reads as someone waiting to see how much traction it gets before deciding to vote and/or bus.In post 291, Fidget wrote:I trust that Noraa received several votes for that? So I'll hold off for a moment.
UNVOTE:
I do not understand. Why did you feel the need to ask how many scum are in the setup rather than looking? If you thought this setup was closed, why would one of the designers/reviewers (Isis) play it?In post 104, Noraa wrote:Ok let's clarify something rq. I asked Cabd to bring me along to spectate the next game he was going to spectate. He said he was gonna spectate this game and that I was in it already. I was at the time, not even aware of this games existence. I checked out this game and saw it was modded by hectic and was like ooooo sounds fun! so then I directly inned. I don't read setup. Everyone says that I town slip as scum. So to be completely honest, a lot of the "townslips" aren't even town slips for me cuz I legitimately don't pay attention to the OPs. Pooky since you referenced Mafiasunny, I was a mafia goon that game and I legitimately asked my partners in the pt if there were town prs. Dumb question ig you could say and considering my partners were voyeur and Roleblocker, it should've been pretty obvious there were prs. I didn't read any of the setup in that game either and submitted actions in the pt when the mod directly said you had to pm him. I literally do not read OPs of games with setups I've never played in before(that was my first mini theme). I want to reference two different games as well but they're ongoing so I can't but regardless I only skim OPs and sometimes I dont even do that. In this case, I did not read anything believe it or not.
I am playing with the idea you're just easy elimbait, but what an odd question to ask.
Second, less Fidget based, but something Fidget picked up here is that Bell's kind of doing a fake townslip there too with the 'not knowing if scum have a nightkill' comment. Feels like that didn't really get a reaction. Hey Fidget, can you go a little more into where your solid Bell townread comes from because it feels like you handed it out quickly, and it feels a little (not completely but a little) at odds with your Noraa perspective.
I'm not sure how natural Fidget's progression reads since they had a problem with Noraa, but got a much bigger problem with her after it became clear pretty much everyone did.In post 300, Fidget wrote:I like Bell's tone, but pointing that out ruins the Noraa coaching/bussing joke so I'll shelve that for later.
YouIn post 166, Noraa wrote:Taylor - town for realizing that this isn't AI due to previous experience playing with me
Murder - null bc he didn't realize it wasn't AI even tho he has played with me before but the paranoia towards shelly is very town bc when playing with shelly, it is nerve-racking trying to determine if you're being absolutely fooled or if you are judging too much and she's actually town. I feel this paranoia all the way after one scum game with her where she told me about all her evil plans in the scum pt and after one town game where I was fooled by her big time. Something that town pings + something that scum pings cancel out and so I am null but prolly town lean still.
Pooky - town because I believe he believes in his SR on me and scum wouldn't bc scum knows who their scum buddies are.
Lexi - null. I still dislike the discord argument. Lexi's been more eager to push me than Pooky has which tbh is a bit strange considering normally the one that starts it is the biggest on pushing it :/
Isis - town because the tone is towny and I relate to some of those posts in that I would say something similar in her position
Bell - townie confusion. could be faked but I'm willing to believe it is real for now
Shelly - scum for misrepping people and also for throwing shade at pooky yet never voting pooky.
Vaultdweller - scum. can't quite put my finger on what's wrong here but I'm def getting scum pings.
Hopkirk - null but lean scum. dislike the jumping on all biggest wagons for no reason.reallydon't want to die, do you?
I don't like that you went offline just when I wanted to interact with you NoraaThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
My definition of 'vibing' is more 'would I give the person single point finger guns (both hands obviously) if this was irl mafia'.
Also, to clarify my position on Noraa- it's currently 'likely to flip scum at maybe 60% odds, but even if those were 30% odds I'd still be happy giving it the third lethal.' I'm just assuming we make her the final scrolled atm.
I'm at TvT for it now too after the Pooky reconsideration yeah.In post 1740, shellyc wrote:
wanna comment on this: I TR'd both pooky/taylor and am pretty sold on that being a town conflictIn post 1731, Hopkirk wrote:Are you seeing Pooky vs Taylor as TvT or TvS
pooky was one of the drivers of noraa wagon, pushed scum!bell with me
taylor is always town imo, no way they would WK a scum buddy in that position
pooky failing to engage with others and hyperfocusing on taylor reads pretty townie counterintuitively as scum is aiming to shade as many people as possible since they have no proper nightkill
You definitely don't get hit before Lady and a couple of other people it's probably best not to mention imo. I'm also very opposed to the idea of not sharing reads to avoid a NK. If we just solid townblock and do a POE today that's much better than the 'stay low until later in the game' when you're honestly more likely to eat a scroll since we'll have lost some of the bigger voices.In post 1746, MURDERCAT wrote:
Yes. I'm still in the "don't share too much" mode because I think I'm pretty widely town read and I'm likely a contender for a scroll when scum is hit. So as long as that's true and I've expressed who I want to flip and others agree (Noraa), I'm chilling.In post 1717, Hopkirk wrote:Did you ever do this or nah?
Given the scroll on Noraa is the better strat for dealing with the slot, we still need to pick an actual Lethal. I'd like as many second opinions as I can get on that, so any thoughts would be useful.
I'm assuming you hard townread me right now though right?There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
I'm happy with a Uno lethal right now, but I'm going to have to take a quick detour on Fidget.
I'm looking at this for the town/deepwolf block:
Hopkirk
Lady
Taylor
Vaxkiller
Mush
Zdenek
MURDERCAT
Shelly
PookyTheMagicalBear
Titus
Theta
If you're one of the other nine thenThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Pooky - Is that last comment about my spectator list a Mastina or a Hectic?
Hi Bell, I asked you to follow up and be more specific on which parts didn't make sense. Not sure if you were getting to this or missed it, but want to bring it up again.In post 1495, Bell wrote:No, to me it seemed like a contradiction. I had a thought (he is lying), but like a good truth finder I decided to directly ask him rather than just go for one explanation out of many.
His explanation was 1) unexpected and 2) Makes sense. So I'm glad I asked.
@Hopkirk, why aren't you a fan? Besides zdenek and you? tho, your read on zdenek makes no sense to me.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Can you give him an iso and post some thoughts?In post 1764, Bell wrote:Sorry, why is uno scum?
A little, it's just I like a lot of the more postery players. There's probably a deepwolf in those 10 somewhere.In post 1765, shellyc wrote:
seems fine but the other nine seems like the lurker block?In post 1762, Hopkirk wrote:Hopkirk
Lady
Taylor
Vaxkiller
Mush
Zdenek
MURDERCAT
Shelly
PookyTheMagicalBear
Titus
Theta
For reference: lurkers/unsortable are
Gloria Cleary
Flea The Magician
Lapsa
Adorable
Push block
Toogeloo
Unowen
Fidget
Bell
Noraa
1 deepwolf + 1 lurker + Noraa + 2 of (Toogeloo/Unowen/Bell/Fidget). Could be 2 deepwolves, 3 in push block, or 2 lurkers or something. I need a lot more for a solid solve, but this is where i'm vibing around.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
In post 1769, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
I don't know who Mastina isIn post 1766, Hopkirk wrote:Pooky - Is that last comment about my spectator list a Mastina or a Hectic?
The issue is thisIn post 1768, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
This depends on your game-state read of Noraa - is Noraa currently locked in as 3rd elim or not? Do we need some kind of pseudo vote to decide this?In post 1723, Hopkirk wrote:@Pooky - town Taylor would never accept this because she's getting the first lethal and you're getting the second. If she 90% scumreads you then it's a terrible trade for her to trade her own life and a strong townread (who scum you would scroll) as opposed to giving you first or third lethal. Town her would definitely never consider this over Pooky-Taylor-X and this feels kind of obvious? Like neither alignment Taylor would consider it a good offer, and I feel it's hard to miss that it's objectively a terrible offer from her POV, and also worse than the other virtually identical offer.
Also you fail to account for T-Swift's feelings about me - if she is 95% SR me and I'm a higher influence slot in that I'm driving a lot of the action - it absolutely makes sense for her to 1:1 trade me out if she has little to no traction on my slot. - Look at the feeling Isis had about LLD in early d1 - if you're a townie and you see someone who you consider almost certainly scum being townread all over the place and driving people out left and right - you want to trade your life for theirs early to avoid them doing more damage.
If Taylor is town and thinks you're scum then the actual order would be
Taylor-Pooky-One of Taylor's townreads
That's a shit bargain for Taylor. If she dies she absolutely wants to be in the middle.
Like nobody would EVER accept that because it's literally the worst possible outcome except for hitting 3 town since she dies and the mafia get the effective nightkill. It's far superior for her to kill someone she scumreads with the first slot. I especially don't get why you think Taylor as a player would like the deal based on the personality read I'm forming around her. What you SHOULD be asking her is whether she'd accept Pooky-Taylor-X since that's a deal town would consider taking. Choosing not to make that deal ensures she'll never take it as either alignment.
You're also definitely overestimating your game impact.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
@Bell - put your vote down somewhere, thanks.
So we're shooting X-Y-Noraa. Who do you want to be X (and Y if relevant). We need to decide on who's first shot, and as many trustable voices helping me sort is really useful.In post 1781, MURDERCAT wrote:
I'm in the town block already though, no? I do plan to share my opinions as they become relevant. The thing about Noraa is that there's enough there for me to think she flips town some of the time, I don't think town Noraa spite passes, and LLD could legitimately still be scum. My plan for LLD is "hope she dies early, if so she's town." If scum Noraa passes to town LLD I fully believe we go S>T>S on day 1 and if we go S>T>S on day 1 I believe we are in such a commanding position that we win outright regardless of one town read player being gone. So I don't really see why we are trying to milk this. Worse case scenario is town Noraa passes to town LLD who I think manages to hit scum for sure, so we still go T>T>S which is not that bad because we still deny scum a kill (though they would be happy with LLD being gone off course).In post 1756, Hopkirk wrote:You definitely don't get hit before Lady and a couple of other people it's probably best not to mention imo. I'm also very opposed to the idea of not sharing reads to avoid a NK. If we just solid townblock and do a POE today that's much better than the 'stay low until later in the game' when you're honestly more likely to eat a scroll since we'll have lost some of the bigger voices.
I mean he could just take the deepwolf slot right?In post 1783, shellyc wrote:i'd swap fidget -> zdenek in your solve but the rest of this seems quite solid
p-edit: why re you so confident in lld's ability to find scumThere's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Hey Bell, how come you didn't take me up on my offer for a Fidget wagon?In post 1690, Bell wrote:I never see posts like the one fidget just made come from town. Ever.
Why do I have so many scum reads this game.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
I think I see your issue.In post 1800, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
X is already fixed at NoraaIn post 1791, Hopkirk wrote:The issue is this
If Taylor is town and thinks you're scum then the actual order would be
Taylor-Pooky-One of Taylor's townreads
That's a shit bargain for Taylor. If she dies she absolutely wants to be in the middle.
Like nobody would EVER accept that because it's literally the worst possible outcome except for hitting 3 town since she dies and the mafia get the effective nightkill. It's far superior for her to kill someone she scumreads with the first slot. I especially don't get why you think Taylor as a player would like the deal based on the personality read I'm forming around her. What you SHOULD be asking her is whether she'd accept Pooky-Taylor-X since that's a deal town would consider taking. Choosing not to make that deal ensures she'll never take it as either alignment.
You're also definitely overestimating your game impact.
I might be over-estimating game impact sure.
Imagine town Taylor looking at the scenario. Let's say she 95% scumreads you and 95% TRs Lady.
If she gets the lethal
Taylor-Pooky-Lady (as scum you does NOT shoot Noraa)
If you get the lethal
Pooky-Taylor-Noraa
Why does she even take option 1?
Would you be happy with Pooky lethal, scroll to Taylor who insta passed to Lady? From town Taylor's perspective it's literally this and that's not a good trade.
Really want you to comment a yes/no on the above point.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened.- Hopkirk
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Hopkirk
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
In post 1804, Bell wrote:@hopkirk: just did.
My problem isn't that you're not sheeping me, it's that you expressed a bad read on the slot when I'm not happy with the interactions between the pair of you, then when given the opportunity to join a wagon there you didn't join in.In post 1806, Bell wrote:If you don’t specifically ask me to sheep you, I probably won’t sheep you,
You want to sheep now?
Third scroll is fixed on Noraa UNLESS 2nd scroll is scum since scum doesn't pass to Noraa no matter what alignment Noraa is.In post 1808, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:
is 3rd scroll fixed at Noraa or not? you seem to be one foot each world right now HopkirkIn post 1798, Hopkirk wrote:So we're shooting X-Y-Noraa. Who do you want to be X (and Y if relevant). We need to decide on who's first shot, and as many trustable voices helping me sort is really useful.
I think this is what you're missing in my posts about Taylor/you, since it's consistent with everything I'm saying.There's no reaching. I've become enlightened. - Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk
- Hopkirk